Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A Geographical Perspective on Transhumance Cultures in the World

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 45, 195 - 213, 30.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2022-1171902

Öz

This study focuses on transhumance as shaped by pastoral farming, rural cultural, rural economic, and geographic conditions. The main issue of this study is transhumance culture, which is at risk of transforming due to global pressures and threats. In this context, the first aim of the study is to determine which subjects are involved in transhumance culture’s transformation in the world, the second is to reveal the factors that initiate this process, the third is to introduce efforts to protect transhumance, and the fourth and final is to give examples from around the world. The study has been prepared as a thematic and descriptive compilation and is supported with spatial examples in order to add a geographical dimension. Transhumance currently faces many threats, such as aging and urbanization in rural areas, failure in rural development, migration to and from mountains, climate change, and over tourism. In addition, green, circular, and digital technologies as well as economic and political decisions have an opportunistic value for transhumance. International and national institutions have made many decisions and supported transhumance in order to protect it. As a result, this study can be expected to contribute to this with some valuable implications for Turkey by looking at the transformation of transhumance and the measures taken from a global perspective. Common global problems such as climate change, migrations from mountains, the aging population, and abandonment of the shepherd profession indicate that transhumance in Turkey, which has been in great decline, should benefit from the world agenda.

Kaynakça

  • Ahmad, Z., Postigo, J. C., Rahman, F. ve Dittman, A. (2021). Mountain pastoralism in the Eastern Hindu Kush: The case of Lotkuh Valley, Pakistan, Mountain Research and Development, 41(4), 16-28. google scholar
  • Alagöz, C. A. (1993). Türkiye’de yaylacılık araştırmaları, Türkiye Coğrafyası Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Dergisi, 2, 1-51. google scholar
  • Albayrak, L. (2020). Ardahan’da yaylacılık kültürü ve yaylacılık faaliyetlerinde yaşanan sorunlar, Ardahan Değerlemeleri-2: Değerler, Potansiyeller ve Yaklaşımlar (Ed. İhsan Kurtbaş), 159189, 1. Basım, Ankara: Nobel Akademi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Aryal, S., Maraseni, T.N. ve Cockfield, G. (2014). Sustainability of transhumance grazing systems under socio-economic threats in Langtang Nepal, Journal of Mountain Science, 11(4), 1023-1034. https://doi:10.1007/s11629-013-2684-7. google scholar
  • ASPIR. (2015). Petit manuel du berger d’Alpage. Association de Soutien aux Projets d’Interprétation et de Recherches sur les Activités Pastorales (ASPIR), Collection Hors les Drailles, Première Édition. google scholar
  • Atout France. (2015). La Réhabilitation de l’immobilier de loisir dans les stations de montagne. Editions Atout France 58, Paris. google scholar
  • Bakırcı, M. (2019). Gerger ilçesinde (Adıyaman) yaylacılığın mekânsal ve sosyo-ekonomik değişimi, Uluslararası Yaylacılık ve Yayla Kültürü Sempozyumu, 26-28 Eylül 2019, Giresun, 479-498. google scholar
  • Baykal, F. (2021). Dağların geleceğini tehdit eden iki zıt olgu: Nüfus kaybı ve kentleşme, Coğrafi Perspektifle Dağ ve Dağlık Alanlar II (Sürdürülebilirlik-Yönetim-Örnek Alan İncelemeleri), (Ed. S. Birinci, Ç. K.Kaymaz, Y. Kızılkan), 1-26, İstanbul: Kriter Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Baykal, F. (2022). Kültürel Coğrafya 2021-2022 Öğretim Yılı Ders Notları, Ege Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi Coğrafya Bölümü, İzmir. google scholar
  • Belliggiano, A., Bindi, L. ve Ievoli, C. (2021). Walking along the Sheeptrack: Rural tourism, ecomuseums, and bio-cultural heritage, Sustainability, 13(16), 8870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168870 google scholar
  • Bhasin, V. (2017). Status of women in transhumant societies, Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2(1), 1-22. https://doi:10.1080/ 09766634.2011.1188554 google scholar
  • Bonnet, O., Teppaz, C. ve Vilmant, J. (2020). Bergers des Alpes, une vaste enquête sur le métier, les profils et les attentes des bergères, bergers et vachers salariés des Alpes, CERPAM, SEA 73 et FAI. google scholar
  • Bourbouze, A. (2018). Les grandes transformations du pastoralisme Méditerranéen et l’émergence de nouveaux modes de production, CIHEAM Watch Letter, 39, 2-7. google scholar
  • Boz, İ. (2019). Sis Dağı yaylacılık geleneğinde kültürel değişim, Uluslararası Yaylacılık ve Yayla Kültürü Sempozyumu, 26-28 Eylül 2019, Giresun, 415-425. google scholar
  • Cambi, F., Citter, C., Cristoferi, D., De Silva, M., Guarducci, A., Macchi, G., Pizziolo, G., Sarti, L., Vanni, E., Volante, N. ve Zagli, A. (2015). A cross-disciplinary approach to the study of transhumance as territorial identity factor in a long term perspective: The TraTTo project - Southern Tuscany paths and pasturages from prehistory to the modern age, Review of Historical Geography and Toponomastics, X(19-20), 85-98. google scholar
  • Clout, H. (2005) La transhumance: Passé, présent, avenir? Modern&Contemporary France, 13(2), 225-228. https://doi:10.1080/09639480500133727 google scholar
  • Corbier, M. (2016). Interrogations actuelles sur la transhumance, Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome, Antiquité, 128(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.4000/mefra.3762 google scholar
  • Costello, E. ve Svensson, E. (2018). Transhumant pastoralism in historic landscapes: Beginning a European perspective. Historical archaeologies of transhumance across Europe (Eds. E. Costello and E. Svensson), 1-55, The European Association of Archaeologists (EAA), Routledge. google scholar
  • Djohy, G. (2017). Pastoralism and socio-technological transformations in Northern Benin, Göttingen Series in Social and Cultural Anthropology, Göttingen University Press. google scholar
  • Doğanay, S. (2010). İşlevsel değişim sürecinde Çakırgöl çevresinde yaylalar ve yaylacılık, Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 611-639. google scholar
  • Doğanay, H. ve Coşkun, O. (2013). Türkiye yaylacılığındaki değişme eğilimleri ve başlıca sonuçları, Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, (30), 1-28. google scholar
  • Dorji, N. (2020). Transhumant pastoralism in a changing world: Challenges and opportunities to sustainable yak farming in Bhutan, PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.18174/525664 google scholar
  • Drexler, C., Braun, V., Christie, D., Claramunt, B., Dax, T., Jelen, I., Kanka, R., Katsoulakos, N., Le Roux, G., Price, M., Scheurer, T. ve Weingartner, R. (2016). Mountains for Europe‘s future-a strategic research agenda, MRI, Bern. google scholar
  • Easdalea, M.H. ve Aguiarb, M.R. (2018). From traditional knowledge to novel adaptations of transhumant pastoralists the in face of new challenges in North Patagonia, Journal of Rural Studies, 63, 65-73. google scholar
  • Ertaş, N. (2020). Yayla ve mera yasaklarının küçükbaş hayvancılıkfaaliyetleri üzerindeki etkisi: Van örneği, Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 44, 183-200. google scholar
  • Euromontana. (2011). Background paper on sustainable mountain tourism. Conference: Sustainable Active Tourism-Mountain Communities Leading Europe in Finding Innovative Solutions, 2728 September, 2011, Inverness, Scotland. google scholar
  • Euromontana. (2019). La transhumance bientôt au patrimoine culturel immatériel de l’UNESCO? google scholar
  • Euromontana. (2020). La transhumance est désormais officiellement inscrite au patrimoine culturel immatériel de l’UNESCO. google scholar
  • European Commission-CINEA-D2. (2021). LIFE OREKA Mendian on LIFE public database, conservation and management of Basque mountain grasslands. Reference: LIFE15 NAT/ES/000805. google scholar
  • European Environment Agency. (2017). Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016. An indicator-based report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. google scholar
  • FAO. (2013). Pourquoi investir dans le développement durable des montagnes? Rome: Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’Alimentation et l’Agriculture, Chef de la Sous-Division des Politiques et de L’appui en Matière de Publications. google scholar
  • FAO. (2022). Journée Internationale de la Montagne 2022. google scholar
  • Fernandez-Giménez, M. E. ve Ritten, J. (2020). An economic analysis of transhumance in the Central Spanish Pyrenees, Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice, 10(10), 1-13. google scholar
  • Fernandez-Giménez, M. E., El Aich, A., El Aouni, O., Adrane, I. ve El Aayadi, S. (2021). Ilemchane transhumant pastoralists’ traditional ecological knowledge and adaptive strategies: Continuity and change in Morocco’s High Atlas Mountains, Mountain Research and Development, 41(4), R61-R73. google scholar
  • Filak, M. ve Gorisek’s, Z. (2022). The coexistence of transhumance shepherding practices and tourism on Bjelasnica Mountain in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Grazing Communities: Pastoralism on the Move and Biocultural Heritage Frictions, Chapter 13, pp.280299. Publisher: Berghahn Books. google scholar
  • Ghirardello, L., Walder, M., de Rachewiltz, M. ve Erschbamer, G. (2022). Cultural sustainability from the local perspective: The example of transhumance in South Tyrol, Sustainability, 14, 9052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159052 google scholar
  • Gurung, D. B. (2019). Stumbling transhumance pastoralism in the shadow of globalization and the state, Contemporary Social Sciences, 28(3), 109-118. google scholar
  • Herzog, F., Bunce, R. G. H., Pérez-Soba, M., Jongman, R. H. G., Sal, A. google scholar
  • G. ve Austad, I. (2005). Policy options to support transhumance and biodiversity in european mountains, A Report on the Transhumount Stakeholder Workshop, Landquart, Zurich, 26-28 May 2004, Mountain Research and Development, 25(1), 82-84. google scholar
  • Huntsinger, L., Forero, L. C. ve Sulak, A. (2010). Transhumance and pastoralist resilience in the Western United States, Pastoralism, 1(1), 1-36. google scholar
  • IDEASS. (-). Transhumance is recognized as intangible cultural heritage in Spain. Innovation for Development and South-South Cooperation. google scholar
  • Kaban, E. (2019). Yaylacılık kültüründe dönüşüm: Sultanmurat ve Eğrisu yaylaları örneği, Uluslararası Yaylacılık ve Yayla Kültürü Sempozyumu, 26-28 Eylül 2019, Giresun, 260-272. google scholar Kaya, F. (2008). Aladağ’da yaylalar ve yaylacılık, Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 13(19), 123-148. google scholar
  • Kılıç, T. (2014). Güvencesiz yaşamlar: Göçebeler (Göçerler), Yayla Kültürü ve Yaylacılık Sempozyumu (Ed. H. Tunçel), 47-46, 6-7 Kasım 2014, Bilecik. google scholar
  • Maison de la Transhumance. (2022). LA ROUTO, Itinéraire agritouristique sur les pas de la transhumance. google scholar
  • Manzano, P. ve Casas, R. (2010). Past, present and future of trashumancia in Spain: Nomadism in a developed country, Pastoralism, 1(1), 7290. https://doi:10.3362/2041-7136.2010.005 google scholar
  • McGahey, D., Davies, J., Hagelberg, N., ve Ouedraogo, R. (2017). Pastoralisme et economie verte-un lien naturel? Etat des lieux, défis et ımplications en matière de politique. UICN et PNUE. google scholar
  • Meini, M., Di Felice, G. ve Petrella, M. (2018). Geotourism perspectives for transhumance routes. Analysis, requalification and virtual tools for the geoconservation management of the drove roads in Southern Italy, Geosciences 8(368), 1-32. https://doi:10.3390/geosciences8100368 google scholar
  • Millar, J. ve Tenzing, K. (2021). Transforming degraded rangelands and pastoralists’ livelihoods in Eastern Bhutan, Mountain Research and Development, 41(4), D1-D7. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-21-00025.1 google scholar
  • Mounet, C. ve Turquin, O. (2014). Espaces et acteurs pastoraux: Entre pastoralisme(s) etpastoralité(s), Revue de Géographie Alpine [Online], 102-2. https://doi.org/10.4000/rga.2462 google scholar
  • Nepal, S. K. (2002). Mountain ecotourism and sustainable development: Ecology, economics, and ethics, Mountain Research and Development, 22(2), 104-109. google scholar
  • Ntassiou, K., Doukas, I. D. ve Papadopoulos, I. (2016). On the study, modernisation, support and promotion of transhumance, through a dedicated Web-GIS, Int. J. Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 2(2/3/4), 193-205. google scholar
  • Ocak, S. (2016). Transhumance in Central Anatolia: A resilient ınterdependence between biological and cultural diversity, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29, 439-453. https:// doi:10.1007/s10806-016-9613-z google scholar
  • OCDE. (2013). L’innovation verte dans les services touristiques, Études de l’OCDE sur le Tourisme, Editions OCDE, Paris. google scholar
  • OREE. (2019). Économie circulaire & alimentation: Des ınitiatives franciliennes pour tous les goûts. Comité Francilien de l’Economie Circulaire, Paris. google scholar
  • Oreka Mendian ve Euromontana. (2021). Aperçu des pratiques durables pour la gestion des prairies de montagne en Europe. LIFE15 NAT/ ES/000805, Bruxelles. google scholar
  • Özalp, M. ve Sütlü, E. (2011). Fırtına Havzası’nın yukarı bölümlerinde yürütülen yaylacılık faaliyetlerinin zamansal değişiminin irdelenmesi ve bazı çevresel sorunların tespiti, Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi,12(2),148-160. google scholar
  • Palladino, P. (2018). Transhumance revisited: On mobility and process between ethnography and history, Journal of Historical Sociology, 31, 119-133. https://doi:10.1111/johs.12161 google scholar
  • PCI. (2020). Les pratiques et savoir-faire de la transhumance en France. Fiche d’Inventaire du Patrimoine Culturel Immatériel. google scholar
  • Philip, L. ve Williams, F. (2019). Healthy ageing in smart villages? Observations from the field, European Countryside, 11(4), 616-633. google scholar
  • Rayamajhi, N. ve Manandhar, B. (2020). Impact of climate change and adaptation measures on transhumance herding system in Gatlang, Rasuwa, Air, Soil and Water Research, 13, 1-10. google scholar
  • Rode, C. (2019). Améliorer l’attractivité du métier de berger et sa reconnaissance. République Française, Ministère de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation, Bureau du Changement Climatique et de la Biodiversité, Paris. google scholar
  • Schmidt, F. (2013). Benchmarking de l’agritourisme en Autriche, Allemagne, France et Suisse. Travail de Bachelor. Haute Ecole de Gestion et Tourisme, Sierre, Suisse. google scholar
  • SEE-HNV. South-east Europe HNV farming network. google scholar
  • Shepherd Net. Positions, Mission, European Shepherds Network. google scholar
  • Shirasaka, S., Watanabe, T., Song, F., Liu, J. ve Miyahara, I. (2013). Transhumance in the Kyrgyz Pamir, Central Asia, Geographical Studies, 88(2), 80-101. google scholar
  • Sidiropoulou, A., Karatassiou, M., Galidaki, G. ve Sklavou, P. (2015). Landscape pattern changes in response to transhumance abandonment on Mountain Vermio (North Greece), Sustainability, 7, 15652-15673. https://doi:10.3390/su71115652 google scholar
  • Somuncu, M., Akpınar, N., Kurum, E., Çabuk Kaya, N. ve Özelçi Eceral, T. (2010). Gümüşhane ili yaylalarındaki arazi kullanımı ve işlev değişiminin değerlendirilmesi: Kazıkbeli ve Alistire yaylaları örneği, Ankara Üniversitesi Çevrebilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 107-127. google scholar
  • Sözer, A. N. (1990). Kozak yaylacılığı üzerine bazı gözlemler ve notlar, Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 5(1), 1-9. google scholar
  • Stolton, S., Dudley, N. ve Zogib, L. (2019). Mobile pastoralism and World Heritage. A Divers Earth Publication. google scholar
  • SWAC-OECD. (2007). Promoting and supporting change in transhumant pastoralism in the Sahel and West Africa. Policy Note: 3. google scholar
  • SWAC-OECD-ECOWAS. (2008). Livestock and regional market in the Sahel and West Africa, Potentials and challenges. ECOWAS Commission and SWAC-OECD. google scholar
  • Thomsin, L. (2001). Un concept pour le décrire: L’espace rural rurbanisé, Ruralia, 9, 1-15. google scholar
  • Trifu, A. ve Terec-Vlad, L. (2015). Understanding the transhumance and migration as phase in the humanity cycles, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 63, 91-94. https://doi:10.18052/ www.scipress.com/ILSHS.63.91 google scholar
  • Tunçel, H., Gürgen, G., Çiçek, İ. ve Doğu, A. F. (2004). Doğu Karadeniz dağlarında yaylacılık, Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(2), 49-66. google scholar
  • Tümertekin, E. ve Özgüç, N. (2016). Ekonomik coğrafya, küreselleşme ve kalkınma (On Beşinci Basım), İstanbul: Çantay Yayınları. google scholar
  • UICN ve UNEP. (2014). Le pastoralisme et l’economie verte-un lien naturel? International Union for Conservation of Nature (UICN) and UN Environment Programme (UNEP). google scholar
  • UNCCD. (2007). Women pastoralists, preserving traditional knowledge, facing modern challenges. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Bonn. google scholar
  • UNEP ve UNWTO. (2012). Tourism in the green economy-background report. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), Madrid. google scholar
  • UNESCO. (2019). Convention pour la sauvegarde du patrimoine culturel immatériel. Pour Inscription en 2019 sur la Liste Représentative du Patrimoine Culturel Immatériel de l’Humanité, Quatorzième Session 9-14 Décembre 2019, Bogotá. google scholar
  • UNESCO. (2022). Intangible culturel heritage, 2019, transhumance, the seasonal droving of livestock along migratory routes in the mediterranean and in the Alps, Austria, Greece and Italy. google scholar
  • United Nations. (2020). Preventing, mitigating & resolving transhumance-related conflicts in UN peacekeeping settings, a survey of practice. (Eds. N. Hyman, T. Mpyisi-White, M. Donati), United Nations Departments of Peace Operations Policy, Evaluation and Training Division, Policy and Best Practices Service. google scholar
  • UNWTO. (2021). Recommendations for the transition to a green travel and tourism economy. World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), Madrid. https://doi:10.18111/9789284422814 google scholar
  • Vidal-González, P. ve Fernández-Piqueras, R. (2021). Connected solitude: Mobile phone use by Spanish transhumant livestock farmers, Mobile Media&Communication, 9(2), 377-396. https:// doi:10.1177/2050157920966005 google scholar
  • Wymann von Dach, S. ve Ruiz Peyré, F. (Eds.) (2020). Vibrant mountain communities. Regional development in mountains: Realizing potentials, tackling disparities. Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of Bern, Bern Open Publishing (BOP). google scholar
  • Yiğit, A. (2014). Türkiye’de yaylacılık faaliyetlerinin gerilemesi ile karın yerde kalma süresi arasındaki ilişkiler, Yayla Kültürü ve Yaylacılık Sempozyumu (Ed. H. Tunçel), 6-7 Kasım 2014, Bilecik. google scholar
  • Zogib, L. (2014). On the move-for 10’000 years: Biodiversity conservation through transhumance and nomadic pastoralism in the Mediterranean. The Mediterranean Consortium for Nature and Culture. google scholar

Dünyada Yaylacılık Kültürüne Coğrafi Bir Bakış

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 45, 195 - 213, 30.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2022-1171902

Öz

Bu çalışma, pastoral hayvancılık, kırsal kültür, kırsal ekonomi ve doğal coğrafi koşullarla şekillenen “yaylacılık” faaliyetini işlemektedir. Çalışmanın temel problemi, yaylacılık kültürünün küresel baskılar ve tehditler karşısında dönüşüme uğrama riskini taşımasıdır. Bu kapsamda çalışmanın amacı, dünyada yaylacılık kültürünün hangi konularda dönüşüm içinde olduğunu ve bu süreci başlatan faktörlerin neler olduğunu ortaya koymak, yaylacılığı koruma çabalarını tanıtmak, onlardan örnekler vermektir. Çalışma, tematik ve betimsel derleme türünde hazırlanmış, her bölüme mekânsal örnekler eklenerek coğrafi boyut kazandırılmıştır. Yaylacılık, günümüzde birçok tehdit faktörü ile karşı karşıyadır: Kırlarda nüfusun yaşlanması, kırsal kentleşme, kırsal kalkınmada başarısızlık, dağlara göçler ve dağlardan dışarıya göçler, iklim değişikliği, aşırı turizm vd. Ayrıca yeşil ekonomi, döngüsel ekonomi, dijital teknoloji, ekonomik ve politik kararlar, yaylacılık için birer fırsat değeri taşımaktadır. Uluslararası ve ulusal kurumlar yaylacılığı korumak üzere birçok kararlar almakta, destekler vermektedir. Sonuç olarak yaylacılığın dönüşümüne ve alınan tedbirlere küresel pencereden bakan bu çalışmanın Türkiye için bazı çıkarımlarda bulunmaya katkı verebileceği düşünülebilir. Özellikle iklim değişikliği, dağlardan dışarıya göç, nüfusun yaşlanması ve çobanlık mesleğinin terk edilmesi gibi küresel ortak sorunlar, büyük bir gerileme içindeki ülkemiz yaylacılığının dünya gündeminden yararlanması gerektiğine işaret etmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Ahmad, Z., Postigo, J. C., Rahman, F. ve Dittman, A. (2021). Mountain pastoralism in the Eastern Hindu Kush: The case of Lotkuh Valley, Pakistan, Mountain Research and Development, 41(4), 16-28. google scholar
  • Alagöz, C. A. (1993). Türkiye’de yaylacılık araştırmaları, Türkiye Coğrafyası Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Dergisi, 2, 1-51. google scholar
  • Albayrak, L. (2020). Ardahan’da yaylacılık kültürü ve yaylacılık faaliyetlerinde yaşanan sorunlar, Ardahan Değerlemeleri-2: Değerler, Potansiyeller ve Yaklaşımlar (Ed. İhsan Kurtbaş), 159189, 1. Basım, Ankara: Nobel Akademi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Aryal, S., Maraseni, T.N. ve Cockfield, G. (2014). Sustainability of transhumance grazing systems under socio-economic threats in Langtang Nepal, Journal of Mountain Science, 11(4), 1023-1034. https://doi:10.1007/s11629-013-2684-7. google scholar
  • ASPIR. (2015). Petit manuel du berger d’Alpage. Association de Soutien aux Projets d’Interprétation et de Recherches sur les Activités Pastorales (ASPIR), Collection Hors les Drailles, Première Édition. google scholar
  • Atout France. (2015). La Réhabilitation de l’immobilier de loisir dans les stations de montagne. Editions Atout France 58, Paris. google scholar
  • Bakırcı, M. (2019). Gerger ilçesinde (Adıyaman) yaylacılığın mekânsal ve sosyo-ekonomik değişimi, Uluslararası Yaylacılık ve Yayla Kültürü Sempozyumu, 26-28 Eylül 2019, Giresun, 479-498. google scholar
  • Baykal, F. (2021). Dağların geleceğini tehdit eden iki zıt olgu: Nüfus kaybı ve kentleşme, Coğrafi Perspektifle Dağ ve Dağlık Alanlar II (Sürdürülebilirlik-Yönetim-Örnek Alan İncelemeleri), (Ed. S. Birinci, Ç. K.Kaymaz, Y. Kızılkan), 1-26, İstanbul: Kriter Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Baykal, F. (2022). Kültürel Coğrafya 2021-2022 Öğretim Yılı Ders Notları, Ege Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi Coğrafya Bölümü, İzmir. google scholar
  • Belliggiano, A., Bindi, L. ve Ievoli, C. (2021). Walking along the Sheeptrack: Rural tourism, ecomuseums, and bio-cultural heritage, Sustainability, 13(16), 8870. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168870 google scholar
  • Bhasin, V. (2017). Status of women in transhumant societies, Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2(1), 1-22. https://doi:10.1080/ 09766634.2011.1188554 google scholar
  • Bonnet, O., Teppaz, C. ve Vilmant, J. (2020). Bergers des Alpes, une vaste enquête sur le métier, les profils et les attentes des bergères, bergers et vachers salariés des Alpes, CERPAM, SEA 73 et FAI. google scholar
  • Bourbouze, A. (2018). Les grandes transformations du pastoralisme Méditerranéen et l’émergence de nouveaux modes de production, CIHEAM Watch Letter, 39, 2-7. google scholar
  • Boz, İ. (2019). Sis Dağı yaylacılık geleneğinde kültürel değişim, Uluslararası Yaylacılık ve Yayla Kültürü Sempozyumu, 26-28 Eylül 2019, Giresun, 415-425. google scholar
  • Cambi, F., Citter, C., Cristoferi, D., De Silva, M., Guarducci, A., Macchi, G., Pizziolo, G., Sarti, L., Vanni, E., Volante, N. ve Zagli, A. (2015). A cross-disciplinary approach to the study of transhumance as territorial identity factor in a long term perspective: The TraTTo project - Southern Tuscany paths and pasturages from prehistory to the modern age, Review of Historical Geography and Toponomastics, X(19-20), 85-98. google scholar
  • Clout, H. (2005) La transhumance: Passé, présent, avenir? Modern&Contemporary France, 13(2), 225-228. https://doi:10.1080/09639480500133727 google scholar
  • Corbier, M. (2016). Interrogations actuelles sur la transhumance, Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome, Antiquité, 128(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.4000/mefra.3762 google scholar
  • Costello, E. ve Svensson, E. (2018). Transhumant pastoralism in historic landscapes: Beginning a European perspective. Historical archaeologies of transhumance across Europe (Eds. E. Costello and E. Svensson), 1-55, The European Association of Archaeologists (EAA), Routledge. google scholar
  • Djohy, G. (2017). Pastoralism and socio-technological transformations in Northern Benin, Göttingen Series in Social and Cultural Anthropology, Göttingen University Press. google scholar
  • Doğanay, S. (2010). İşlevsel değişim sürecinde Çakırgöl çevresinde yaylalar ve yaylacılık, Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 611-639. google scholar
  • Doğanay, H. ve Coşkun, O. (2013). Türkiye yaylacılığındaki değişme eğilimleri ve başlıca sonuçları, Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, (30), 1-28. google scholar
  • Dorji, N. (2020). Transhumant pastoralism in a changing world: Challenges and opportunities to sustainable yak farming in Bhutan, PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.18174/525664 google scholar
  • Drexler, C., Braun, V., Christie, D., Claramunt, B., Dax, T., Jelen, I., Kanka, R., Katsoulakos, N., Le Roux, G., Price, M., Scheurer, T. ve Weingartner, R. (2016). Mountains for Europe‘s future-a strategic research agenda, MRI, Bern. google scholar
  • Easdalea, M.H. ve Aguiarb, M.R. (2018). From traditional knowledge to novel adaptations of transhumant pastoralists the in face of new challenges in North Patagonia, Journal of Rural Studies, 63, 65-73. google scholar
  • Ertaş, N. (2020). Yayla ve mera yasaklarının küçükbaş hayvancılıkfaaliyetleri üzerindeki etkisi: Van örneği, Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 44, 183-200. google scholar
  • Euromontana. (2011). Background paper on sustainable mountain tourism. Conference: Sustainable Active Tourism-Mountain Communities Leading Europe in Finding Innovative Solutions, 2728 September, 2011, Inverness, Scotland. google scholar
  • Euromontana. (2019). La transhumance bientôt au patrimoine culturel immatériel de l’UNESCO? google scholar
  • Euromontana. (2020). La transhumance est désormais officiellement inscrite au patrimoine culturel immatériel de l’UNESCO. google scholar
  • European Commission-CINEA-D2. (2021). LIFE OREKA Mendian on LIFE public database, conservation and management of Basque mountain grasslands. Reference: LIFE15 NAT/ES/000805. google scholar
  • European Environment Agency. (2017). Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016. An indicator-based report, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. google scholar
  • FAO. (2013). Pourquoi investir dans le développement durable des montagnes? Rome: Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’Alimentation et l’Agriculture, Chef de la Sous-Division des Politiques et de L’appui en Matière de Publications. google scholar
  • FAO. (2022). Journée Internationale de la Montagne 2022. google scholar
  • Fernandez-Giménez, M. E. ve Ritten, J. (2020). An economic analysis of transhumance in the Central Spanish Pyrenees, Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice, 10(10), 1-13. google scholar
  • Fernandez-Giménez, M. E., El Aich, A., El Aouni, O., Adrane, I. ve El Aayadi, S. (2021). Ilemchane transhumant pastoralists’ traditional ecological knowledge and adaptive strategies: Continuity and change in Morocco’s High Atlas Mountains, Mountain Research and Development, 41(4), R61-R73. google scholar
  • Filak, M. ve Gorisek’s, Z. (2022). The coexistence of transhumance shepherding practices and tourism on Bjelasnica Mountain in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Grazing Communities: Pastoralism on the Move and Biocultural Heritage Frictions, Chapter 13, pp.280299. Publisher: Berghahn Books. google scholar
  • Ghirardello, L., Walder, M., de Rachewiltz, M. ve Erschbamer, G. (2022). Cultural sustainability from the local perspective: The example of transhumance in South Tyrol, Sustainability, 14, 9052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159052 google scholar
  • Gurung, D. B. (2019). Stumbling transhumance pastoralism in the shadow of globalization and the state, Contemporary Social Sciences, 28(3), 109-118. google scholar
  • Herzog, F., Bunce, R. G. H., Pérez-Soba, M., Jongman, R. H. G., Sal, A. google scholar
  • G. ve Austad, I. (2005). Policy options to support transhumance and biodiversity in european mountains, A Report on the Transhumount Stakeholder Workshop, Landquart, Zurich, 26-28 May 2004, Mountain Research and Development, 25(1), 82-84. google scholar
  • Huntsinger, L., Forero, L. C. ve Sulak, A. (2010). Transhumance and pastoralist resilience in the Western United States, Pastoralism, 1(1), 1-36. google scholar
  • IDEASS. (-). Transhumance is recognized as intangible cultural heritage in Spain. Innovation for Development and South-South Cooperation. google scholar
  • Kaban, E. (2019). Yaylacılık kültüründe dönüşüm: Sultanmurat ve Eğrisu yaylaları örneği, Uluslararası Yaylacılık ve Yayla Kültürü Sempozyumu, 26-28 Eylül 2019, Giresun, 260-272. google scholar Kaya, F. (2008). Aladağ’da yaylalar ve yaylacılık, Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 13(19), 123-148. google scholar
  • Kılıç, T. (2014). Güvencesiz yaşamlar: Göçebeler (Göçerler), Yayla Kültürü ve Yaylacılık Sempozyumu (Ed. H. Tunçel), 47-46, 6-7 Kasım 2014, Bilecik. google scholar
  • Maison de la Transhumance. (2022). LA ROUTO, Itinéraire agritouristique sur les pas de la transhumance. google scholar
  • Manzano, P. ve Casas, R. (2010). Past, present and future of trashumancia in Spain: Nomadism in a developed country, Pastoralism, 1(1), 7290. https://doi:10.3362/2041-7136.2010.005 google scholar
  • McGahey, D., Davies, J., Hagelberg, N., ve Ouedraogo, R. (2017). Pastoralisme et economie verte-un lien naturel? Etat des lieux, défis et ımplications en matière de politique. UICN et PNUE. google scholar
  • Meini, M., Di Felice, G. ve Petrella, M. (2018). Geotourism perspectives for transhumance routes. Analysis, requalification and virtual tools for the geoconservation management of the drove roads in Southern Italy, Geosciences 8(368), 1-32. https://doi:10.3390/geosciences8100368 google scholar
  • Millar, J. ve Tenzing, K. (2021). Transforming degraded rangelands and pastoralists’ livelihoods in Eastern Bhutan, Mountain Research and Development, 41(4), D1-D7. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-21-00025.1 google scholar
  • Mounet, C. ve Turquin, O. (2014). Espaces et acteurs pastoraux: Entre pastoralisme(s) etpastoralité(s), Revue de Géographie Alpine [Online], 102-2. https://doi.org/10.4000/rga.2462 google scholar
  • Nepal, S. K. (2002). Mountain ecotourism and sustainable development: Ecology, economics, and ethics, Mountain Research and Development, 22(2), 104-109. google scholar
  • Ntassiou, K., Doukas, I. D. ve Papadopoulos, I. (2016). On the study, modernisation, support and promotion of transhumance, through a dedicated Web-GIS, Int. J. Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 2(2/3/4), 193-205. google scholar
  • Ocak, S. (2016). Transhumance in Central Anatolia: A resilient ınterdependence between biological and cultural diversity, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29, 439-453. https:// doi:10.1007/s10806-016-9613-z google scholar
  • OCDE. (2013). L’innovation verte dans les services touristiques, Études de l’OCDE sur le Tourisme, Editions OCDE, Paris. google scholar
  • OREE. (2019). Économie circulaire & alimentation: Des ınitiatives franciliennes pour tous les goûts. Comité Francilien de l’Economie Circulaire, Paris. google scholar
  • Oreka Mendian ve Euromontana. (2021). Aperçu des pratiques durables pour la gestion des prairies de montagne en Europe. LIFE15 NAT/ ES/000805, Bruxelles. google scholar
  • Özalp, M. ve Sütlü, E. (2011). Fırtına Havzası’nın yukarı bölümlerinde yürütülen yaylacılık faaliyetlerinin zamansal değişiminin irdelenmesi ve bazı çevresel sorunların tespiti, Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi,12(2),148-160. google scholar
  • Palladino, P. (2018). Transhumance revisited: On mobility and process between ethnography and history, Journal of Historical Sociology, 31, 119-133. https://doi:10.1111/johs.12161 google scholar
  • PCI. (2020). Les pratiques et savoir-faire de la transhumance en France. Fiche d’Inventaire du Patrimoine Culturel Immatériel. google scholar
  • Philip, L. ve Williams, F. (2019). Healthy ageing in smart villages? Observations from the field, European Countryside, 11(4), 616-633. google scholar
  • Rayamajhi, N. ve Manandhar, B. (2020). Impact of climate change and adaptation measures on transhumance herding system in Gatlang, Rasuwa, Air, Soil and Water Research, 13, 1-10. google scholar
  • Rode, C. (2019). Améliorer l’attractivité du métier de berger et sa reconnaissance. République Française, Ministère de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation, Bureau du Changement Climatique et de la Biodiversité, Paris. google scholar
  • Schmidt, F. (2013). Benchmarking de l’agritourisme en Autriche, Allemagne, France et Suisse. Travail de Bachelor. Haute Ecole de Gestion et Tourisme, Sierre, Suisse. google scholar
  • SEE-HNV. South-east Europe HNV farming network. google scholar
  • Shepherd Net. Positions, Mission, European Shepherds Network. google scholar
  • Shirasaka, S., Watanabe, T., Song, F., Liu, J. ve Miyahara, I. (2013). Transhumance in the Kyrgyz Pamir, Central Asia, Geographical Studies, 88(2), 80-101. google scholar
  • Sidiropoulou, A., Karatassiou, M., Galidaki, G. ve Sklavou, P. (2015). Landscape pattern changes in response to transhumance abandonment on Mountain Vermio (North Greece), Sustainability, 7, 15652-15673. https://doi:10.3390/su71115652 google scholar
  • Somuncu, M., Akpınar, N., Kurum, E., Çabuk Kaya, N. ve Özelçi Eceral, T. (2010). Gümüşhane ili yaylalarındaki arazi kullanımı ve işlev değişiminin değerlendirilmesi: Kazıkbeli ve Alistire yaylaları örneği, Ankara Üniversitesi Çevrebilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 107-127. google scholar
  • Sözer, A. N. (1990). Kozak yaylacılığı üzerine bazı gözlemler ve notlar, Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 5(1), 1-9. google scholar
  • Stolton, S., Dudley, N. ve Zogib, L. (2019). Mobile pastoralism and World Heritage. A Divers Earth Publication. google scholar
  • SWAC-OECD. (2007). Promoting and supporting change in transhumant pastoralism in the Sahel and West Africa. Policy Note: 3. google scholar
  • SWAC-OECD-ECOWAS. (2008). Livestock and regional market in the Sahel and West Africa, Potentials and challenges. ECOWAS Commission and SWAC-OECD. google scholar
  • Thomsin, L. (2001). Un concept pour le décrire: L’espace rural rurbanisé, Ruralia, 9, 1-15. google scholar
  • Trifu, A. ve Terec-Vlad, L. (2015). Understanding the transhumance and migration as phase in the humanity cycles, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 63, 91-94. https://doi:10.18052/ www.scipress.com/ILSHS.63.91 google scholar
  • Tunçel, H., Gürgen, G., Çiçek, İ. ve Doğu, A. F. (2004). Doğu Karadeniz dağlarında yaylacılık, Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(2), 49-66. google scholar
  • Tümertekin, E. ve Özgüç, N. (2016). Ekonomik coğrafya, küreselleşme ve kalkınma (On Beşinci Basım), İstanbul: Çantay Yayınları. google scholar
  • UICN ve UNEP. (2014). Le pastoralisme et l’economie verte-un lien naturel? International Union for Conservation of Nature (UICN) and UN Environment Programme (UNEP). google scholar
  • UNCCD. (2007). Women pastoralists, preserving traditional knowledge, facing modern challenges. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Bonn. google scholar
  • UNEP ve UNWTO. (2012). Tourism in the green economy-background report. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), Madrid. google scholar
  • UNESCO. (2019). Convention pour la sauvegarde du patrimoine culturel immatériel. Pour Inscription en 2019 sur la Liste Représentative du Patrimoine Culturel Immatériel de l’Humanité, Quatorzième Session 9-14 Décembre 2019, Bogotá. google scholar
  • UNESCO. (2022). Intangible culturel heritage, 2019, transhumance, the seasonal droving of livestock along migratory routes in the mediterranean and in the Alps, Austria, Greece and Italy. google scholar
  • United Nations. (2020). Preventing, mitigating & resolving transhumance-related conflicts in UN peacekeeping settings, a survey of practice. (Eds. N. Hyman, T. Mpyisi-White, M. Donati), United Nations Departments of Peace Operations Policy, Evaluation and Training Division, Policy and Best Practices Service. google scholar
  • UNWTO. (2021). Recommendations for the transition to a green travel and tourism economy. World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), Madrid. https://doi:10.18111/9789284422814 google scholar
  • Vidal-González, P. ve Fernández-Piqueras, R. (2021). Connected solitude: Mobile phone use by Spanish transhumant livestock farmers, Mobile Media&Communication, 9(2), 377-396. https:// doi:10.1177/2050157920966005 google scholar
  • Wymann von Dach, S. ve Ruiz Peyré, F. (Eds.) (2020). Vibrant mountain communities. Regional development in mountains: Realizing potentials, tackling disparities. Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of Bern, Bern Open Publishing (BOP). google scholar
  • Yiğit, A. (2014). Türkiye’de yaylacılık faaliyetlerinin gerilemesi ile karın yerde kalma süresi arasındaki ilişkiler, Yayla Kültürü ve Yaylacılık Sempozyumu (Ed. H. Tunçel), 6-7 Kasım 2014, Bilecik. google scholar
  • Zogib, L. (2014). On the move-for 10’000 years: Biodiversity conservation through transhumance and nomadic pastoralism in the Mediterranean. The Mediterranean Consortium for Nature and Culture. google scholar
Toplam 86 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Ferdi Akbaş 0000-0003-1899-1458

Füsun Baykal Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-4599-4235

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Aralık 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 7 Eylül 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Sayı: 45

Kaynak Göster

APA Akbaş, F., & Baykal, F. (2022). Dünyada Yaylacılık Kültürüne Coğrafi Bir Bakış. Journal of Geography(45), 195-213. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2022-1171902
AMA Akbaş F, Baykal F. Dünyada Yaylacılık Kültürüne Coğrafi Bir Bakış. Journal of Geography. Aralık 2022;(45):195-213. doi:10.26650/JGEOG2022-1171902
Chicago Akbaş, Ferdi, ve Füsun Baykal. “Dünyada Yaylacılık Kültürüne Coğrafi Bir Bakış”. Journal of Geography, sy. 45 (Aralık 2022): 195-213. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2022-1171902.
EndNote Akbaş F, Baykal F (01 Aralık 2022) Dünyada Yaylacılık Kültürüne Coğrafi Bir Bakış. Journal of Geography 45 195–213.
IEEE F. Akbaş ve F. Baykal, “Dünyada Yaylacılık Kültürüne Coğrafi Bir Bakış”, Journal of Geography, sy. 45, ss. 195–213, Aralık 2022, doi: 10.26650/JGEOG2022-1171902.
ISNAD Akbaş, Ferdi - Baykal, Füsun. “Dünyada Yaylacılık Kültürüne Coğrafi Bir Bakış”. Journal of Geography 45 (Aralık 2022), 195-213. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2022-1171902.
JAMA Akbaş F, Baykal F. Dünyada Yaylacılık Kültürüne Coğrafi Bir Bakış. Journal of Geography. 2022;:195–213.
MLA Akbaş, Ferdi ve Füsun Baykal. “Dünyada Yaylacılık Kültürüne Coğrafi Bir Bakış”. Journal of Geography, sy. 45, 2022, ss. 195-13, doi:10.26650/JGEOG2022-1171902.
Vancouver Akbaş F, Baykal F. Dünyada Yaylacılık Kültürüne Coğrafi Bir Bakış. Journal of Geography. 2022(45):195-213.