The Delian Problem, its Two Pre-Euclidean Solutions and Plutarch’s Assessment

Öz

The Delian Problem—doubling a cube's volume—was a significant challenge in preEuclidean mathematics, necessitating the geometric construction of the cube root of 2. This paper analyzes two pivotal solutions: Archytas's method using intersecting 3D solids and Menaechmus's use of conic sections. Plutarch later claimed Plato condemned these solutions as "mechanical," arguing they undermined pure mathematical inquiry. This study reevaluates Plutarch's assertion by examining Plato's dialogues, including the Republic, Sophist, and Timaeus. It argues for a more nuanced interpretation of Plato's stance, suggesting that while he valued mathematical purity, he likely recognized the utility of diagrams and geometric constructions as tools for accessing Ideal Forms. The solutions by Archytas and Menaechmus, though potentially imperfect by Platonic standards, could thus have been seen as valuable intellectual advancements. The paper posits that Plutarch’s account may not fully capture Plato’s intricate and possibly evolving perspective on these innovative mathematical methods. Instead of outright rejection, Plato might have viewed these solutions as important, albeit incomplete, steps in the ongoing pursuit of mathematical understanding, reflecting both his philosophical ideals and his appreciation for ingenuity in geometry.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Delios
• Plato
• Archytas
• Menaechmus
• Plutarch

Delos Sorunu’nun Öklid Öncesi Döneme Ait İki Çözümü ve Plutarkhos’un Değerlendirmesi

Öz

Delos sorunu, yani bir küpün hacminin iki katına çıkarılması, Öklid öncesi dönemin önemli bir matematik problemidir ve 2 sayısının küp kökünün geometrik inşasını gerektirir. Bu çalışma, Arkhutas’ın üç boyutlu cisimlerin kesişimini kullanan ve Menaihmos’un konik kesitlere başvuran çözümlerini inceler. Bu çözümlerin soyut yapısına karşın, Plutarkhos, Platon’un bu yöntemleri “mekanik” bularak eleştirdiğini iddia etmiştir. Bu çalışma, Plutarkhos’un bu iddiasının güvenilirliğini, Platon’un Devlet, Sofist ve Timaios gibi temel diyalogları çerçevesinde yeniden değerlendirmektedir. Platon’un matematiksel bilginin ideal saflığını ön planda tutarken, geometrik inşaların ve diyagramların Platonik İdealara ulaşmada araçsal bir rol oynayabileceğini kabul etmiş olabileceği savunulmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, Arkhutas ve Menaihmos’un çözümleri, Platon için mutlak mükemmellikte olmasalar da entelektüel ilerleme yolunda değerli adımlar olarak görülebilir. Sonuç olarak, Plutarkhos’un aktarımlarının, Platon’un bu yenilikçi geometrik yöntemlere dair karmaşık ve muhtemelen zamanla değişen bakış açısını tam olarak yansıtmadığı; Platon'un bu çözümleri toptan reddetmek yerine, onları matematiksel anlayışın gelişiminde önemli, ancak ideal hedefe ulaşmada belki de ara basamaklar olarak değerlendirmiş olabileceği ileri sürülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Delos
• Platon
• Arkhutas
• Menaihmos
• Plutarkhos

Kaynakça

1. Adam, James. The Republic of Plato II. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
2. Burnyeat, M. F. “Platonism and Mathematics, a Prelude to Discussion.’’ Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle, Derleyen: Andreas Graeser, Swirzerland: Paul Haupt Berne, 1987. google scholar
3. Euclid. The Thirteen Books of The Elements Vol 2. Çeviren Sir Thomas L. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1908. google scholar
4. Euclid. The Thirteen Books of The Elements Vol 3. Çeviren Sir Thomas L. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1908. google scholar
5. Heath, Thomas. A History of Greek Mathematics Vol 1. UK: Oxford, 1921. google scholar
6. Huffman, Carl A. Arkhutas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King. UK: Cambridge, 2005. google scholar
7. Robins, Ian. Mathematics and the Conversion of the Mind. Ancient Philosophy 15, 2, (1995). google scholar
8. Knorr, W. Richard. The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems. New York: Dover Publications, 1993. google scholar

9. Knorr, Wilbur. Textual Studies in Ancient and Medieval Geometry. Birkhauser: Boston, 1999. google scholar
10. Kouremenos, Theokritos. ‘’The Tradition of the Delian problem and its origins in the Platonic corpus’’ Trends in Classics, vol. 3.2. 2011. google scholar
11. Kouremenos, Theokrıtos. "Solıd Geometry, Astronomy And Constructıons In Plato's Republıc" Philologus 148, No. 1 (2004): 34-49. google scholar
12. Lunsford, Matt D. “The Delian problem, platonic solids and Finite Fields.’’ Mathematics Magazine. (2019). google scholar
13. Little, John B. “A Mathematician Reads Plutarch: Plato's Criticism of Geometers of His Time.” Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 7, 2 (2017). google scholar
14. Masia, Ramon. “A new reading of Arkhutas’ doubling of the cube and its implications.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 70 (2) (2016). google scholar
15. Netz, Reviel. The Works of Archimedes Volume 1: The Two Books on the Sphere and the Cylinder. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004. google scholar
16. Netz, Reviel. A New History of Greek Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2022 google scholar
17. Reviel Netz. The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics, A Study in Cognitive History. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999. google scholar
18. Plato. “Republic.’’ Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vols. 6 içinde. Çeviren Paul Shorey. London: Harvard University Press, 1969. google scholar
19. Plato, “Euthydemus.’’ Plato in Twelves Volumes, Vol 3 içinde. Çeviren W. R. M. Lamb, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967. google scholar
20. Plato. “Philebus.” Plato in Twelves Volumes, Vol 9 içinde, Çeviren. Harold N. Fowler, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1921. google scholar
21. Plato. “Sophist.’’ Plato in Twelves Volumes. Vol 12 içinde. Çeviren. Harold N. Fowler. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1921. google scholar
22. Plato. “Timaeus.’’ Plato in Twelves Volumes. Vol 9 içinde. Çeviren. W. R. M. Lamb. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1925. google scholar
23. Plutarch. Plutarch’s Moralia in Fifteen Volumes Vol. 7. Çeviren Lacy and Einarson. London: Harvard University Press, 1959. google scholar
24. Plutarch, Plutarch’s Morals Vol 3. Düzenleyen. William W. Goodwin. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1878). google scholar
25. Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives Vol 5. Çeviren Bernadotte Perrin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1961. google scholar
26. Riginos, A. S. Platonica: the anecdotes concerning the life and writings of Plato. Leiden: Brill. 1976. google scholar
27. Waerden, B. L. Van Der. Science Awakening I. Çeviren Arnold Dresden. Kluwer Academic Pub, 1975. google scholar
28. Theon of Smyrna. Mathematics Useful for Understanding Plato. Çeviren Robert and Deborah Lawlor. San Diago: Wizards Bookshelf, 1979. google scholar
29. Zhmud, Leonid. “Plato as ‘Architect of Science’.” Phronesis 43, 3 (1998). google scholar