Koşmak Değil Kazanmak Önemlidir: İran ve Türkiye’de Geleneksel-Dindar Müslüman Kadınların Eylemliliği

Öz

Orta Doğu’da kadınların eylemliliği ile ilgili olarak, genelde eylemlilik kavramının kadınlar için uygun olmadığını ve bu kadınları tanımlamak için genellikle boyun eğme ve itaat kavramlarının kullanıldığını gösteren yaygın varsayımlara rağmen, bu çalışma, batı dışında muhafazakâr bölgelerde, özellikle de Orta Doğu’da yaşayan kadınlar için kadınların eylemliliğinin anlamları hakkında yeterli bilgi olmadığını gösterebilmiştir. Ankara ve Tahran’daki 50 alt-orta sınıf geleneksel-dindar Müslüman kadından veri topladık. Nitel bir yöntem, tematik analiz, bilişsel ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmelerden yararlandık. Sonuçlar, sessiz ihlal teorisini vurgular bir şekilde, dindar kadınların gündelik hayatlarındaki ihlallerinin sessiz, gizli ve yavaş olabileceğini göstermektedir. Yine de bu kadınlar düşük düzeydeki eğitim ve ekonomik koşullarına rağmen eylemliliklerini gösterebilmektedirler. Geleneksel dindarlık kalıplarına ya da sosyal, kültürel ve dini beklentilere göre hareket etmemekte ve düşünmemektedirler. Eylem özgürlükleri için ortamlar ve kaynaklar yaratmakta ve isteklerini dışarıda gerçekleştirmektedirler. Kadınlar, güvenli alanlarından çıktıktan ve değişimin keyfini yaşadıktan sonra karar alma sürecinde aktif aktörler olarak karar vermektedirler.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eylemlilik
• Müslüman Kadınlar
• Orta Doğu
• İran
• Türkiye

It is not to Run but to Win: Traditional-Religious Muslim Women’s Agency in Iran and Türkiye

Öz

Despite widespread assumptions about women’s agency in the Middle East that show the concept of agency as not typically useful to them and submission and obedience as characteristics typically used to describe these women, this study was able to show there is insufficient knowledge about the meanings of women’s agency for women living in conservative non-western regions, especially the Middle East. We gathered data from 50 lower-middle-class traditional-religious Muslim women in Ankaras and Tehran. We used a qualitative method, thematic analysis, and cognitive and semi-structured interviews. By emphasizing the quiet encroachment theory, the result shows that the encroachment of religious women in their everyday lives may be silent, hidden, and slow. Still, these women have been able to demonstrate their agency despite low education and economy. They don't act and think according to the traditional patterns of religiosity or social, cultural, and religious expectations. They create environments and resources for their freedom of action and fulfill their wishes outside. Women make decisions as active agents in the decision-making process after exiting their safe space and experiencing the joys of change.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Agency
• Muslim women
• The Middle East
• Iran
• Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. Abu-Lughod, L. (1993). Writing women’s words. Berkeley: Univ of California Press. google scholar
2. Abu-Lughod, L. (2000). Veiled sentiments. Berkeley: Univ of California Press. google scholar
3. Abu-Lughod, L. (2002). Do Müslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others. American Anthropologist, 104(3), 783-790. google scholar
4. Arat, Y. (1990). Islamic Fundamentalism and Women in Türkiye. The Muslim World, 80(1), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.1990. tb03479.x google scholar
5. Bartkowski, J. P., & Read, J. N. G. (2003). Veiled submission: Gender, power, and identity among evangelical and Muslim women in the United States. Qualitative sociology, 26(1), 71-92. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1021456004419 google scholar
6. BaYat, A. (2010). Life as Politics: How ordinary people change the Middle East. F. Sadeghi, Trans. Amsterdam University. google scholar
7. Bilge, S. (2010). Beyond subordination vs. resistance: An intersectional approach to the agency of veiled Muslim women. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 31(1), 9-28 https://doi.org/10.1080/07256860903477662 google scholar
8. Boddy, J. (1989). Wombs and alien spirits: Men and women in the Zar cult in North Africa. Madison. Univ of Wisconsin Press. google scholar

9. Burke, C. K. (2012). Women’s Agency in Gender - Traditional Religions: A Review of Four Approaches, sociology of compass, 6(2), 122-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00439.x google scholar
10. Chapman, M. (2015). Feminist dilemmas and the agency of veiled Muslim women: Analysing identities and social representations. European Journal of Women's StuDies, 1-14. https://doi.org/l0.1177/l350506815605346 google scholar
11. Coulson Noel, J. (1994). A History of Islamic Law. Edinburgh. Univ Press. google scholar
12. Davidman, L. (1991). Tradition in a rootless world: Women turn to Orthodox Judaism. Berkeley: Univ of California Press. google scholar
13. Deeb, L. (2006). An enchanted modern: Gender and public piety in Shi’i leba-non. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ Press. google scholar
14. Ezazi, Sh. (2006). Women all Over the World Want to Change the Situation (an opportunity to exchange experiences of women in Iran, Morocco, Türkiye, and Belgium). Sarmaye newspaper. 333, 8. google scholar
15. Fazil Miqdad, M. (1994). Kanzol Erfan fi fiqh Ahkam al-Qur'an, Tehran: Mortazavi. google scholar
16. Friedan, B. (2015). The Feminine MYstique. Trans: Sadeghi, F. Tehran, Iran: Nashr-e Negah. google scholar
17. Gallagher, S. (2007). Agency, resources, and identity: Lower-income women's experiences in Damascus. Gender and Society, 21(2), 227-249, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27640960 google scholar
18. Ghabel, A. (2013). Jurisprudence, functions, and capabilities. Virtual Space: Shariat Aghlani. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-S3_7 vGsXDVUWpUdDdiUWhGbUU /edit. google scholar
19. Groult, B. (2000). Cette mâle assurance. Trans: PoYandeh, MJ. Tehran, Iran: Jami. google scholar
20. Hee J.K. & Madhu S.A. & Ho Y.Y. (2018). Women’s agencY freedom through empowerment against domestic violence: Evidence from Nepal. International Social Work Journal, 62(3), 1088-1103. Article first published online: April 18, 2018; Issue published: MaY 1, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872818767255 google scholar
21. Joseph, S. (2005). Learning desire: Relational pedagogies and the desiring female subject in Lebanon. Journal of Middle East Women's Studies, 1(1), 79-109, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40326850. google scholar
22. Jurjani, A. (2009). Darj al-Dorar fi Tafseer Ahkam al-Qur'an (Researcher: T. Farhat). Jordan: Dâralfikr. google scholar
23. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agencY, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30, 435-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125 google scholar
24. Kabeer, N. (2001). Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment in discussing women's empowerment: Theory and practice. Sida Studies. No 3 (Novum Grafiska AB: Stockholm). google scholar
25. Kabeer, N. (2017). Economic pathwaYs to women’s empowerment and active citizenship: What does the evidence from Bangladesh tell us? The Journal of Development Studies, 53(5), 649-663. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1205730 google scholar
26. Kagotho, N. & Vaughn, G.M. (2016). Women’s agency in household economic decision making in Kenya. International Social Work, 61(6), 767-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872816663291 google scholar
27. Kandiyoti, D. (1996). Contemporary feminist scholarship and Middle East studies, chapter 1, Gendering the Middle East emerging perspective, edited by Deniz KandiYoti, SYracuse Univ Press. google scholar
28. Lazreg, M. (2013). Poststructuralist theorY and women in the Middle East: going in circles? Contemporary Arab Affairs, 6(1), 74-81. https:// doi.org/10.1080/17550912.2012.757884 google scholar
29. Mahmood, S. (2001). Feminist theorY, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the EgYptian Islamic Revival. Cultural Anthropology, 16(2), 202-236, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/656537. google scholar
30. Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton, New JerseY: Princeton Univ Press. google scholar
31. Malhotra, A. & Schuler, S. R. & Boender, C. (2005). Women’s empowerment as an variable in international development, measuring empowerment: cross-disciplinary perspectives. ed: D. NaraYan (Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2005), pp. 71-88. google scholar
32. Massad, J.A. (2002). Re-orienting desire: The gaY international and the Arab World. Public Culture, 14(2), 361-385, from https://www.muse. jhu.edu/article/26284. google scholar
33. Mehra, R. (1997). Women, empowerment, and economic development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554, 136-149, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1049571. google scholar
34. Mir-Hosseini, Z. (2003). The construction of gender in Islamic legal thought and strategies for reform. Haw-wa: Journal of Women in the Middle East and the Islamic World, 1 (1), 1-28, from https://www.zibamirhosseini.com/publications/articles. google scholar
35. Mishra, N., & Tripathi, T. (2011). Conceptualizing women's agencY, autonomY and empowerment. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(11), 58-65, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41151972. google scholar
36. Moghadam, V. (2010). Women, structure, and agencY in the Middle East: Introduction and overview to feminist formations' special issue on women in the Middle East. Feminist Formations, 22(3), 1-9 https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/408748 google scholar
37. Muhanna, A. (2020). Agency and gender in Gaza: Masculinity, femininity and family during the second Intifada. New Yourk: Routledge; 1 edition. google scholar
38. Najafi, M. (1983). Jawahir al-Kalam fi Sharh Shara'i' al-lslam. Editör: Ghuchani, A. BaYrüt, Lebanon: Dar IhYa' al-Turath al-'Arabi. google scholar
39. Qutteina, Y. &; James-Hawkins, L. & Al-Khelaifi, B. & Yount, K.M. (2019). Meanings of women’s agencY: A case studY from Qatar on improving measurement in context. Journal of Arabian Studies Arabia, the Gulf, and the Red Sea, 9(1), 33-51. https://doi.org/10. 1080/21534764.2019.1649828 google scholar
40. Rassam, A. (1980). Women and domestic power in Morocco. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 12(2), 171-179. http://www.jstor. org/stable/162890. google scholar
41. Rinaldo, R. (2014). Pious and critical: Müslim women activists and the question of agency. Gender & Society, 28 (6), 824-846. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0891243214549352 google scholar
42. Sadiqi, F. (2018). Female perceptions of Islam in today’s Morocco. Journal of Feminist Scholarship, 11, 48-60, from https://digitalcommons. uri.edu/jfs/vol11/iss11/6. google scholar
43. Saktanber , A. (2009). Women and the IconographY of Fear: Islamization in Post-Islamist. TürkiYe. Trans: Rahimi Nadoushan, M & Alizade, R. Journal of Ettelaat Hekmat Va Marefat. 3, 65-68. google scholar
44. Sarookhani, B & Rafat Jah, M. (2004). Sociological effective factors on the redefinition of women's google scholar
45. Sayis, M. (2002). Tafsir âYât al-Ahkam. Beirut, Lebanon: Almaktaba Alasriea. google scholar Scott, J. (2002). Every day resistance in cultural resistance reader by duncombe. London: Verso. google scholar
46. Sehlikoglu, S. (2018). Revisited: Muslim women’s agencY and feminist anthropology of the Middle East. Contemporary Islam, 12, 73-92. Published online: 23 ,2017. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11562-017-0404-8 google scholar
47. Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford Univ Press. google scholar
48. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press. google scholar
49. ShalinskY, A. (1986). Reason, desire, and sexualitY: The meaning of gender in Northern Afghanistan. Ethos, 14(4), 323-343, from http:// www.jstor.org/stable/640408. google scholar
50. Shively, K. (2014). Entangled ethics: Piety and agency in Türkiye. Anthropological Theory, 14(4), 462-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499614539072 google scholar
51. Spreitzer, G. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483-504, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/256789. google scholar
52. Tabarani, S. Nd. Al-Mu'jam Al-Kabir. Cairo, EgYpt: Ibn Tamimah. google scholar
53. Thompson, E. (2003). Public and private in middle eastern women's history. Journal of Women's History, 15(1), 52-69. https://muse.jhu. edu/article/43100. google scholar
54. Vintges, K. (2012). Muslim women in the western media: Foucault, agency, governmentality and ethics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 19(3), 283-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506812443476 google scholar
55. Werbner, P. (2018). Between Islamic piety, agency and ethical leadership: paradoxes of self-transformation, Contemporary Levant, 3(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/20581831.2018.1449934 google scholar
56. Yount, K.M., VanderEnde, K.E., Dodell, S. et al. (2016). Measurement of women’s agency in EgYpt: A national validation study. Social Indicators Research Journal, 128, 1171-1192. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11205-015-1074-7 google scholar