Reverse-Engineering the Sylph: Reclaiming Female Ballet Bodies in Florentina Holzinger’s TANZ

Öz

Florentina Holzinger’s 2019 TANZ critically relates to ballet history’s disciplinary treatment of female bodies. Based on the case study of TANZ, this article identifies choreographic and performative strategies through which contemporary dance work reclaims the agency of female dancing bodies; and contributes to a practice-based macro-history of ballet, in which contemporary works become springboards for re-writing historical narratives. The article approaches dance in a methodological framework influenced by gender studies, cultural studies and critical theory. It uses macro-historiographic concepts to analyze interviews with cast members, observations of rehearsals and the resulting performance. It argues that Holzinger’s work reclaims female ballet bodies through five interconnected strategies: the diversification of the homogeneous ballet body; the de-essentialization of romantic femininity; the reversal of the male gaze by an all-female group of performers; the development of trans-human, techno-ecological alliances; and the détournement (subversive repurposing) of bourgeois-driven romantic spectacle. It further argues that through such strategies TANZ points to under-acknowledged aspects of a ballet history that subverts its very own norms. It thus presents contemporary feminist dancemaking in a common framework with the under-acknowledged struggles of historical female dancers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Florentina Holzinger
• Romantic Ballet
• Feminist Ballet History
• Macro-Historiography in Dance

Kaynakça

1. Acton, K. & Eales, L. (2018). Ballet for All Bodies? Tensions in Teaching Ballet Technique within an Integrated Dance Context. In P. Markula & M. I. Clark (Eds.), The Evolving Feminine Ballet Body (151-170). Edmonton: The University of Alberta Press.
2. Adair, C. (1992). Women and Dance. Sylphs and Sirens. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press. Akinleye, A. (Ed.). (2021). (Re:) Claiming Ballet. Bristol: Intellect.
3. Atelier d’histoire culturelle de la danse. (undated). Histoire Culturelle de la Danse – A propos/About.
4. Retrieved (30/03/2023) from https://ahcdanse.hypotheses.org/a-propos.
5. Bal, M. (1999). Quoting Caravaggio. Contemporary Art, Preposterous History. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
6. Banes, S. & Carroll, N. (1997). Marriage and the Inhuman: La Sylphide’s Narratives of Domesticity and Community. In L. Garafola (Ed.), Rethinking the Sylph: New Perspectives on the Romantic Ballet (pp. 91-106). Hanover / London: Wesleyan University Press / University Press of New England.
7. Bournonville, A. (1999 [1860]). Letters on Dance and Choreography. London: Dance Books. Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Burt, R. (2004). Undoing Postmodern Dance History. Retrieved (30/03/2023) from http://sarma. be/docs/767.

9. Butler, J. (2006 [1990]). Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
10. Deans, J. A. (2021). Arabesque en Noire: The Persistent Presence of Black Dancers in the American Ballet World. In A. Akinleye (Ed.), (Re:) Claiming Ballet (48-67). Bristol: Intellect.
11. Débord, G. & Wolman, G. J. (1956). A User’s Guide to Détournement. Retrieved (30/03/2023) from http://www.bopsecrets.org/SI/detourn.htm.
12. Duran, L. (2022). Interview with the author, online, 5 June.
13. Foster, H. (1996). The Return of the Real. The Avant-Garde at the End of the Century. Cambridge/ London: MIT Press.
14. Foster, S. L. (1996). Choreography and Narrative. Ballet’s Staging of Story and Desire. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
15. Foster, S. L. (2005 [1996]). The Ballerina’s Phallic Pointe. In S. L. Foster (Ed.), Corporealities.
16. Dancing Knowledge, Culture and Power (pp. 1-26). London: Routledge.
17. Foster, S. L. (2011). Choreographing Empathy. Kinesthesia in Performance. Oxon/New York: Routledge.
18. Foucault, M. (1997 [1984]). The Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984, Vol. 1: Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth (pp. 281-301). New York: The New Press.
19. Franko, M. (Ed.). (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Dance and Reenactment. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Garafola, L. (2022). La Nijinska. Choreographer of the Modern. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Garafola, L. (2007). Russian Ballet in the Age of Petipa. In M. Kant (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ballet (pp. 151-163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Garafola, L. (Ed.). (1997). Rethinking the Sylph: New Perspectives on the Romantic Ballet. Hanover/ London: Wesleyan University Press / University Press of New England.
23. Garafola, L. (1986). The Travesty Dancer in Nineteenth-Century Ballet. Dance Research Journal, 18(1), 35-40.
24. Gutsche-Miller, S. (2021). Madame Mariquita, Greek Dance, and French Ballet Modernism. Dance Research Journal, 53, 46-68. DOI:10.1017/S014976772100036X
25. Gutsche-Miller, S. (2015). Parisian Music-Hall Ballet, 1871-1913. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
26. Haitzinger, N. (2009). Vergessene Traktate – Archive der Erinnerung. Zu Wirkungskonzepten im Tanz von der Renaissance bis zum Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts. Munich: Epodium.
27. Hartman, S. (2019). Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments. Intimate Histories of Social Upheaval. New York/London: Norton.
28. Jarrasse, B. (2018). Les Deux Corps de la danse. Imaginaires et représentations à l’âge romantique. Pantin: CND.
29. Jowitt, D. (2010 [1998]). In pursuit of the sylph: ballet in the Romantic period. In A. Carter & J. O’Shea (Eds.), The Routledge Dance Studies Reader Second Edition (209-219). Oxon: Routledge.
30. Kant, M. (2007). The soul of the shoe. In M. Kant (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ballet (pp.184-198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Kelly, D. (2012). Ballerina. Sex, Scandal, and Suffering Behind the Symbol of Perfection. Vancouver: Graystone Books.
32. Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
33. Leon, A. (2022). Expanded Choreographies – Choreographic Histories. Transhistorical Perspectives Beyond Dance and Human Bodies in Motion. Bielefeld: Transcript.
34. Lorde, A. (2018 [1984]). The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House. London: Penguin.
35. Marquié, H. (2015). Enquête en cours sur Madame Stichel (1856 - ap. 1933) - Quelques pistes de réflexion. Recherches en Danse, 3, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.4000/danse.974
36. McCarren, F. (2020). One Dead at the Paris Opera Ballet. La Source 1866-2014. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Morris, G. (2017). Giselle and the Gothic: Issues and Methodologies. In L. Nicholas & G. Morris (Eds.), Rethinking Dance History (pp. 235-247). London: Routledge.
38. Olivesi, V. (2017). Entre Plaisir et censure, Marie Taglioni chorégraphe du Second Empire. Danser. Clio. Femmes, Genre, Histoire, 46, 43-64. DOI: 10.4000/clio.13699
39. Pouillaude, F. (2017 [2009]). Unworking Choreography. The Notion of the Work in Dance. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Preciado, B. (P.) (2003). Multitudes queer. Notes pour une politique des ‘anormaux’. Multitudes, 12, 17-25. DOI: 10.3917/mult.012.0017
41. Sabee, O. (2022). The Rat de l’Opéra and the Social Imaginary of Labour: Dance in July Monarchy Popular Culture. French Studies, I.XXVI/4, 554-575. https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/knac180
42. Schwartz, S.W. (2021). The Ever After of Ballet. In A. Akinleye (Ed.), (Re:) Claiming Ballet (189- 208). Bristol: Intellect.
43. Stoneley, P. (2007). A Queer History of the Ballet. Oxon: Routledge.
44. Thomas, H. (2003). The Body, Dance and Cultural Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Tusk, L. (2022). Interview with the author, online, 6 June.