Sınırlar Ötesinde Yuva Düşlemek: Sandra Cisneros’un “Çığırtkan Kadınlar” Öyküsündeki Bireyselleşme Yolculuğu

Öz

1980’lerden itibaren Latin Amerika kökenli Amerikalı kadın yazarların ortaya koyduğu

kuramsal ve yazınsal metinler geleneksel feminist okumalara alternatif bir bakış açısı

sağlamıştır. Bu bağlamda Sandra Cisneros, “Sınır Edebiyatı” ve “Sınır Çalışmaları”

alanlarında belki de en önemli ve öncül isimlerden birisi olarak kabul görür. Bu makale,

ilk olarak “Sınır Çalışmaları” alanında öne çıkan isimleri ve alanın kuramsal çerçevesini

ana hatlarıyla ortaya koyduktan sonra Cisneros’un “Woman Hollering Creek” başlıklı

kısa öyküsünün yakın bir okumasını yapar. Öykü, alışılagelmiş “Birinci Dünya ve Üçüncü

Dünya” çerçevesinde, ikili karşıtlığı üzerinden yapılan okumalara yapıbozucu bir yöntem

ile yaklaşarak, alışılagelmiş tematik ve biçemsel birçok sınıra da meydan okur. Ayrıca

bu öykü, Meksika popüler kültüründe yaygın olan fotoroman ve pembe-dizi türlerinin

başarılı bir parodisini yaparak, öykünün başkarakteri olan Cleafílas isimli Meksikalı

göçmen bir kadının Amerika’daki kimlik ve ses arayışını ataerkil düzenin dayattığı

kısıtlı bir cinsiyetçi söylemden kurtararak yeni bir bireysellik formülünü okuyucuya

sunmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, makale, öyküde kullanılan anlatı stratejilerinin analizini

yaparken, öykünün birbirleriyle etkileşim halinde olan tematik içeriği ve biçemsel

özelliklerini ayrıntılarıyla inceler.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sandra Cisneros,“Woman Hollering Creek”,sınır çalışmaları,fotoroman,pembe-dizi

(Re)Imagining Home Across Borders: The Construction of Selfhood in Sandra Cisneros’s “Women Hollering Creek”

Öz

Since the 1980s, the literary and theoretical output of American women writers of

Latin-American heritage has offered an alternative reading of feminist literary tradition.

Sandra Cisneros is probably one of the foremost figures within the American context

of “Border Literature” and “Borders Studies” proper. This article firstly outlines the

parameters, theorems and prominent figures of Border Studies, and then examines

Cisneros’ short story “Woman Hollering Creek” which deconstructs the dualistic

mode of thinking in terms of first world vs. third world dichotomy, and defies various

thematic and structural borders. The story is also a parody of the Mexican popular

genres of telenovella (soap opera) and fotonovella (photo novel), and offers a new

form of identity formation through the female protagonist’s quest for finding her own

voice and subjectivity outside the prescribed gender roles attuned to the patriarchal

discourse proposed in the aforementioned popular genres. Hence, this article offers a

close reading of the story’s narrative strategies on a linguistic and semantic level as they

inform its thematic concerns.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sandra Cisneros,“Woman Hollering Creek”,border studies,telenovella,fotonovella

Kaynakça

1. Alarcón, N. (1989). Traddutora, traditora: A paradigmatic figure of Chicana feminism. Cultural Critique, 13, 57-87.
2. Alarcón, N. (1990). The theoretical subject(s) of this bridge called my back and Anglo-American feminism. In G. Anzaldúa (Ed.), Making face, making soul / Haciendo Caras: Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color (pp. 356-69). San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
3. Anzaldúa, G. (2002). Speaking in tongues: A letter to third world women writers. In C. Moraga & G. Anzaldúa (Eds.), This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (pp. 183-94). Berkeley: Third Woman. (Original work published 1981).
4. Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Press.
5. Anzaldúa, G. (1990). Haciendo caras, una entrada: An introduction. In G. Anzaldúa (Ed.), Making face, making soul / Haciendo Caras: Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color (pp. xv-xxviii). San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
6. Bhabha, H. (1992). The world and the home. Social Text, 31/32, 141-153.
7. Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.
8. Candelaria, C. (1986). Chicano poetry: A critical introduction. Westport: Greenwood.

9. Carillo, L. & Lyson, T. (1983). The fotonovela as a cultural bridge for Hispanic women in the United States. Journal of Popular Culture, 17(3), 59-63.
10. Castillo, A. (1995). Massacre of the dreamers: Essays on xicanisma. New York: Plume.
11. Cisneros, S. (1991). The house on Mango Street. New York: Vintage.
12. Cisneros, S. (2004). Woman hollering creek and other stories (pp. 43-56). London: Bloomsbury, Cisneros, S. (1996). Guadalupe the sex goddess. In A. Castillo (Ed.), Goddess of the Americas: Writings on the Virgin of Guadalupe (pp. 46-51). New York: Riverhead.
13. Del Castillo, R. G. (1990). The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo: A legacy of conflict. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
14. Erlick, J. C. (2000) Why Latin@s? A note from the editor. DRCLAS News, Spring Issue, 4.
15. Flora, C. B. (1980). Fotonovelas: Message creation and reception. Journal of Popular Culture, 14(3), 524-534.
16. Flores, J. & Yúdice, G. (1990). Living borders/buscando America: Languages of Latino self-formation. Social Text, 8(2), 57-84.
17. Fuentes, C. (1985). The old gringo. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux Inc.
18. Fuentes, C. Interview with Bill Moyers. In B. S. Flowers (Ed.), A world of ideas: Conversations with thoughtful men and women about American Life Today and the ideas shaping our future (pp. 506-513). New York: Doubleday, 1989.
19. Hicks, Emily. (1991). Border writing: The multidimensional text. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20. Jameson, F. (1990). Modernism and imperialism. In Nationalism, colonialism, and literature (pp. 43-68). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
21. JanMohamed, A. R. & Lloyd, D. (1987). Introduction: Minority discourse – What is to be done? Cultural Critique 7, 5-17.
22. Lafaye, J. (1976). Quetzalcóatl and Guadalupe: The formation of Mexican national consciousness, 1531-1813. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
23. Lugones, M. (1987). Playfulness, ‘world’-travelling, and loving perception. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 2(2), 3-19.
24. McCracken, E. (2000). Postmodern ethnicity in Sandra Cisneros’ Caramelo. Journal of American Studies Turkey (JAST), 12, 3-12.
25. Mohanty, S. (1993). The epistemic status of cultural identity: On beloved and the postcolonial condition. Cultural Critique, 24, 41-80.
26. Paz, O. (1985). The labyrinth of solitude and other writings. (L. Kemp, Y. Milos & R. P. Belash, Trans.). New York: Grove Press. (Original work published in 1950).
27. Perez, D. R. (2008). There was a woman: La Llorona from folklore to popular culture. Austin: University of Texas Press.
28. Pérez, E. (1999). The decolonial imaginary: Writing Chicanas into history. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
29. Said, E. (1988). Representing the colonized: Anthropology’s interlocutors. Critical Inquiry, 15(2), 205-225.
30. Saldaña-Portillo, J. (2001). Who’s the Indian in Aztlán? Re-writing Mestizaje, Indianism, and Chicanismo from the Lacandón. In I. Rodríguez (Ed.), The Latin American subaltern studies reader (pp. 402-423). Durham: Duke University Press.
31. Saldívar, R. (1990). Chicano narrative: The dialectics of difference. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
32. Saldívar-Hull, S. (1999). Woman hollering transfronteriza feminisms. Cultural Studies, 13(2), 251-262.
33. Sandoval, C. (1991). U.S. third world feminism: The theory and method of oppositional consciousness in the postmodern world. Genders, 10, 1-24.
34. Spivak, G. (1987). Subaltern studies: Deconstructing historiography. In Other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. New York: Methuen, 197-221.
35. Stevens, E. (1973). Marianismo: The other Face of machismo. In A. Pescatello (Ed.), Female and male in Latin America (pp. 90-101). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
36. Viramontes, H. M. (1989). Nopalitos: The making of fiction. In A. H. Delgado, E. Ortega, N. M. Scott & N. S. Sternbach (Eds.), Breaking boundaries: Latina writing and critical readings (pp. 33-38). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
37. Wolf, E. (1958). The Virgin of Guadalupe: A Mexican national symbol. The Journal of American Folklore 71(279), 34-39.