The Career Adaptability of Psychology Students: The roles of Demographic Variables, Personality, and Positive Psychological Capital

Öz

The growing number of psychology undergraduate programs and increased quotas for existing programs mean increased competition among psychology students for post-graduation career opportunities. Career adaptability becomes an important factor for a person’s employability, career success, and satisfaction under competitive conditions. This study tests a research model formed based on career construction theory with the participation of 355 psychology undergraduates from Istanbul. This model examines participants’ demographic variables regarding their family’s socioeconomic status, childhood environment, personality traits, and positive psychological capital (PsyCap) as antecedents of career adaptability as well as PsyCap’s mediating role in these associations. The results show that, regarding demographic variables, the administrative size of the place where participants spent most of their life positively predicts career adaptability at a low level. Father’s education level was found to have a small negative effect on career adaptability. Openness to experience, conscientiousness, extroversion, and agreeableness are the personality traits that positively predict career adaptability, while neuroticism negatively does. PsyCap acts as a mediator between the five personality traits and career adaptability. Among all the variables, the strongest predictor of career adaptability is PsyCap. As such, making investments in developing university students’ positive psychological resources using university career centers would be a better strategy for preparing young adults for work life. Future studies are recommended to include demographic variables related to middle and high school education and family-related variables such as parents’ personalities, family’s career orientations, and values attributed to children in order to better understand the roles demographic and family-related variables have on career construction. In addition to the theoretical model, data pertaining to the participants’ career objectives were also analyzed. The analysis results reveal 97.2% of the participants to be planning to apply for a master’s degree and 54.6% to have declared pursuing a career in clinical psychology. Considering the scarcity of postgraduate quotas compared to undergraduate quotas, this finding indicates that a significant portion of the participants should be more flexible in managing their post-graduate careers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Career adaptability
• big five personality traits
• demographic variables
• positive psychological capital
• career objectives

Psikoloji Öğrencilerinin Kariyer Uyum Yetenekleri: Demografik Faktörler, Kişilik ve Pozitif Psikolojik Sermayenin Rolü

Öz

Psikoloji lisans programlarının sayısında ve mevcut programların kontenjanlarındaki artış psikoloji öğrencileri için mezuniyet sonrası kariyer fırsatları açısından rekabetin artması anlamına gelmektedir. Rekabetin arttığı koşullarda kişinin iş bulabilmesi, kariyer başarısı ve memnuniyeti gibi faktörler açısından sahip olduğu kariyer uyum yeteneği önem arz etmektedir. Bu araştırma kapsamında, İstanbul’da eğitimlerine devam eden 355 psikoloji lisans öğrencisinin katılımıyla, kariyer yapılandırma kuramının varsayımlarından yola çıkılarak oluşturulan araştırma modeli test edilmiştir. Bu model çerçevesinde katılımcıların ailelerinin sosyoekonomik statüleri ve yetiştikleri ortam ile ilişkili bazı demografik değişkenlerin, kişilik özelliklerinin ve pozitif psikolojik sermayenin kariyer uyum yeteneği üzerindeki yordayıcılığı ve bu ilişkilerde pozitif psikolojik sermayenin aracılık rolü incelenmiştir. Yapılan analizlerde demografik değişkenlerden katılımcının yaşamının çoğunu geçirdiği yerin idari büyüklüğünün kariyer uyum yeteneğini düşük ancak pozitif yönde, babanın eğitim düzeyinin de yine düşük ancak negatif yönde yordadığı gözlenmiştir. Kişilik özelliklerinden deneyime açıklığın, özdisiplinin, dışa dönüklüğün ve uyumluluğun kariyer uyum yeteneğini pozitif yönde, nevrotikliğin ise negatif yönde yordadığı; ayrıca pozitif psikolojik sermayenin beş kişilik faktörü ve kariyer uyum yeteneği arasındaki ilişkilerde aracı değişken olduğu bulunmuştur. Bütün değişkenler dikkate alındığında kariyer uyum yeteneği üzerinde açıklayıcılığı en yüksek olan değişken pozitif psikolojik sermayedir. Bu nedenle üniversite eğitimi sürecinde kariyer merkezleri tarafından öğrencilerin pozitif psikolojik kaynaklarının geliştirilmesine yönelik yatırımlar yapılması gençlerin çalışma hayatına hazırlanması açısından iyi bir strateji olabilir. Kariyer yapılandırma sürecinde demografik faktörlerin etkisini anlayabilmek için katılımcıların orta ve lise eğitimine ilişkin değişkenlerin; ailenin etkisini anlayabilmek için de ebeveynlerin kişilik özellikleri, ailenin kariyere verdiği önem ve çocuklara atfedilen değer gibi değişkenlerin yapılacak araştırmalara dâhil edilmesi önerilir. Test edilen kuramsal modele ilaveten, katılımcıların kariyer hedeflerine ilişkin betimsel veriler de incelenmiş ve katılımcıların %97.2’sinin yüksek lisans yapmayı planladığı, %54.6’sının klinik psikoloji alanında uzmanlaşmayı istediği gözlenmiştir. Lisans kontenjanlarına kıyasla yüksek lisans kontenjanlarının azlığı dikkate alındığında bu bulgu, katılımcıların önemli bir kısmının mezuniyet sonrası kariyerlerini yönetirken daha esnek davranması gerektiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kariyer uyum yeteneği
• beş faktör kişilik modeli
• demografik değişkenler
• pozitif psikolojik sermaye
• kariyer hedefleri

Kaynakça

1. Alkan, N. (2007). Beş Faktör Kişilik Ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. [Yayımlanmamış Araştırma]. Ankara. google scholar
2. Arcan, K. (2018). Bir çekim alanı olarak psikoloji bilgisi ve eğitimi (Psikolojinin popülaritesi). T.C. Maltepe Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 6-35. google scholar
3. Arık, E. (2015, 23-25, Kasım). 2023 Hedeflerinin Psikoloji Bölümlerine Etkileri [Sözlü Sunum]. 14. Ulusal Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi, Ankara, Türkiye. google scholar
4. Avey, J. B. (2014). The left side of psychological capital: New evidence on the antecedents of PsyCap. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(2), 141-149. https://doi. org/10.1177/1548051813515516 google scholar
5. Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Smith, R. M., ve Palmer, N. F. (2010a). Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1), 17. https:// doi.org/10.1037/a0016998 google scholar
6. Avey, J. B., Luthans, F. ve Youssef, C. M. (2010b). The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(2), 430-452. https://doi. org/10.1177/0149206308329961 google scholar
7. Bandura, A. (1982). Self efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122 google scholar
8. Baranczuk, U. (2021). The Five-Factor Model of personality and generalized self efficacy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Individual Differences, 42(4), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/ a000345 google scholar

9. Barrick, M. R. ve Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991. tb00688.x google scholar
10. Bimrose, J. ve Hearne, L. (2012). Resilience and career adaptability: Qualitative studies of adult career counseling. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(3), 338-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jvb.2012.08.002 google scholar
11. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Psikoloji Bölümü (2022). Undergraduate Program. http://www.boun.edu.tr/trTR/ Content/Akademik/Lisans_Katalogu/FenEdebiyat_Fakultesi/Psikoloji_Bolumu adresinden 11 Şubat 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
12. Bozgeyikli, H. (2017). Big Five Personality Traits as the predictor of teachers’ organizational psychological capital. Journal ofEducation and Practice, 8(18), 125-135. google scholar
13. Bozionelos, N. (2004). The relationship between disposition and career success: A British study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(3), 403-420. https://doi. org/10.1348/0963179041752682 google scholar
14. Brooks, L., Cornelius, A., Greenfield, E. ve Joseph, R. (1995). The relation of career-related work or internship experiences to the career development of college seniors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46(3), 332-349. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1995.1024 google scholar
15. Campbell, J. B. (2008). Modern personality theories: What have we gained, what have we lost? G. Boyle, G. Matthews, ve D. Saklofske (Ed.) SAGE Handbook of personality theory and assessment. Personality theories and models içinde (C. 1, s. 190-212). Sage Publishers. google scholar
16. Chen, E. ve Paterson, L. Q. (2006). Neighborhood, family, and subjective socioeconomic status: How do they relate to adolescent health?. Health Psychology, 25(6), 704-714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.25.6.704 google scholar
17. Coetzee, M. ve Stoltz, E. (2015). Employees’ satisfaction with retention factors: Exploring the role of career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jvb.2015.04.012 google scholar
18. Conard, M. A. (2006). Aptitude is not enough: How personality and behavior predict academic performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(3), 339-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jrp.2004.10.003 google scholar
19. Çetin, F. ve Basım, H. N. (2012). Örgütsel psikolojik sermaye: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 45(1), 121-137. google scholar
20. Çizel, R. B. (2018). Gender and emotional intelligence as predictors of tourism faculty students’ career adaptability. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR) An International Journal of Akdeniz University Tourism Faculty, 6(2), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.30519/ahtr.431014 google scholar
21. De Vries, R. E., Pronk, J., Olthof, T. ve Goossens, F. A. (2020). Getting along and/or getting ahead: Differential HEXACO personality correlates of likeability and popularity among adolescents. European Journal of Personality, 34(2), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2243 google scholar
22. Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., Van Rooy, D. L. ve Viswesvaran, C. (2006). Big five factors of personality. J. H. Greenhaus ve G. A. Callanan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of career development içinde (s. 36-42) . Sage. google scholar
23. Fawehinmi, O., Yahya, K. K., Yusliza, M. Y. ve Muhammad, Z. (2020). Dataset on the antecedents of career adaptability among undergraduate students in Malaysia. Data in Brief, 32, 106211. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106211 google scholar
24. Feng, H. Y. (2012). The relationship of Taiwanese university students’personality traits, motivations on overseas internship and their achievements. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 1(2), 176. google scholar
25. Fiori, M., Bollmann, G. ve Rossier, J. (2015). Exploring the path through which career adaptability increases job satisfaction and lowers job stress: The role of affect. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91, 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.08.010 google scholar
26. Fletcher, J. M. ve Schurer, S. (2017). Origins of adulthood personality: The role of adverse childhood experiences. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/ bejeap-2015-0212 google scholar
27. Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. P. Devine ve A. Plant (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology içinde. (C. 47, s. 1-53). Academic Press. google scholar
28. Garcia, P. R. J. M., Restubog, S. L. D., Ocampo, A. C., Wang, L. ve Tang, R. L. (2019). Role modeling as a socialization mechanism in the transmission of career adaptability across generations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 111, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.12.002 google scholar
29. Gelissen, J. ve de Graaf, P. M. (2006). Personality, social background, and occupational career success. Social Science Research, 35(3), 702-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.06.005 google scholar
30. Gong, Z., Gilal, F. G., Gilal, N. G., Van Swol, L. M. ve Gilal, R. G. (2022). A person-centered perspective in assessing career adaptability: Potential profiles, outcomes, and antecedents. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.03.009 google scholar
31. Guan, Y., Wang, F., Liu, H., Ji, Y., Jia, X., Fang, Z., Li, Y., Hua, H. ve Li, C. (2015). Career-specific parental behaviors, career exploration and career adaptability: A three-wave investigation among Chinese undergraduates. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jvb.2014.10.007 google scholar
32. Gunthert, K. C., Cohen, L. H. ve Armeli, S. (1999). The role of neuroticism in daily stress and coping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1087. google scholar
33. Han, J., Chu, X., Song, H. ve Li, Y. (2015). Social capital, socioeconomic status and self-efficacy. Applied Economics and Finance, 2(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/aef.v2i1.607 google scholar
34. Hayes Process Macro Org. (2021). Erişim adresi https://www.processmacro.org/version-history.html adresinden 15 Temmuz 2021 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
35. Hazrati-Viari, A., Rad, A. T. ve Torabi, S. S. (2012). The effect of personality traits on academic performance: The mediating role of academic motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 367-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.055 google scholar
36. Hirschi, A. (2009). Career adaptability development in adolescence: Multiple predictors and effect on sense of power and life satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(2), 145-155. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.01.002 google scholar
37. Holland, J. L. (1997) Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. (3. Baskı), Psychological Assessment Resources. google scholar
38. IAAP (2022). Divisions. Erişim adresi https://iaapsy.org/ adresinden 20 Şubat 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır google scholar
39. İstanbul Üniversitesi Psikoloji Bölümü (2022). Akademik Kadro. https://psikoloji-edebiyat.istanbul. edu.tr/tr/akademikkadro adresinden 11 Şubat 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
40. John, O., Donahue, E. ve Kentle, R. (1991). The “Big Five” Inventory—Versions 4a and 54. Technical report, institute of personality assessment and research. University of California, Berkeley. google scholar
41. Johnston, C. S. (2018). A systematic review of the career adaptability literature and future outlook. Journal of Career Assessment, 26(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716679921 google scholar
42. Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Boudreau, J. W. ve Bretz Jr, R. D. (1995). An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Personnel Psychology, 48(3), 485-519. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01767.x google scholar
43. Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J. ve Barrick, M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00174.x google scholar
44. Kanten, S. (2012). Kariyer Uyum Yetenekleri Ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2 (16), 191-205. google scholar
45. Knouse, S. B. ve Fontenot, G. (2008). Benefits of the business college internship: A research review. Journal of Employment Counseling, 45(2), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1920.2008. tb00045.x google scholar
46. Kocjan, G. Z., Kavcic, T. ve Avsec, A. (2021). Resilience matters: Explaining the association between personality and psychological functioning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 21(1), 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.08.002 google scholar
47. Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64(4), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015309 google scholar
48. Le Pine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A. ve Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 563-593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00214.x google scholar
49. Li, Y., Guan, Y., Wang, F., Zhou, X., Guo, K., Jiang, P., Mo, Z. Li, Y. ve Fang, Z. (2015). Big-five personality and BIS/BAS traits as predictors of career exploration: The mediation role of career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.04.006 google scholar
50. Lounsbury, J. W., Park, S. H., Sundstrom, E., Williamson, J. M. ve Pemberton, A. E. (2004). Personality, career satisfaction, and life satisfaction: Test of a directional model. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(4), 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072704266658 google scholar
51. Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J. ve Peterson, S. J. (2010). The development and resulting performance impact of positive psychological capital. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(1), 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20034 google scholar
52. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B. ve Norman, S. M. (2007a). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x google scholar
53. Luthans, F., Avey, J. B. ve Patera, J. L. (2008). Experimental analysis of a web-based training intervention to develop positive psychological capital. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2008.32712618 google scholar
54. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O. ve Li, W. (2005). The psychological capital of Chinese workers: Exploring the relationship with performance. Management and Organization Review, 1(2), 249-271. https://doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2005.00011.x google scholar
55. Luthans, F., Luthans, K.W. ve Luthans, B.C. (2004). Positive psychological capital: Beyond human and social capital. Business Horizons, 47 (1), 45-50. https://doi 10.1016/j.bushor.2003.11.007 google scholar
56. Luthans, F., Youssef, C.M. ve Avolio, B.J. (2007b). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press. google scholar
57. Lü, W., Wang, Z., Liu, Y. ve Zhang, H. (2014). Resilience as a mediator between extraversion, neuroticism and happiness, PA and NA. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 128-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.015 google scholar
58. McCrae, R. R. ve Costa, P. T. (1985). Updating Norman’s” adequacy taxonomy”: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 710-721. google scholar
59. McCrae, R. R. ve Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 google scholar
60. McCrae, R. R. ve Costa Jr, P. T. (1991). Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 227-232. https://doi. org/10.1177/014616729101700217 google scholar
61. Mercan, N. (2016). Psychological capital research for relations with career adaptability. PressAcademia Procedia, 2(1), 434-442. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016118663 google scholar
62. Negru-Subtirica, O., Pop, E. I. ve Crocetti, E. (2015). Developmental trajectories and reciprocal associations between career adaptability and vocational identity: A three-wave longitudinal study with adolescents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jvb.2015.03.004 google scholar
63. Ng, T. W. ve Feldman, D. C. (2010). Human capital and objective indicators of career success: The mediating effects of cognitive ability and conscientiousness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 207-235. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X414584 google scholar
64. Nilforooshan, P. ve Salimi, S. (2016). Career adaptability as a mediator between personality and career engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.02.010 google scholar
65. O’Connell, D. J., McNeely, E. ve Hall, D. T. (2008). Unpacking personal adaptibility to work. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 14, 248-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071791907311005 google scholar
66. Ohme, M. ve Zacher, H. (2015). Job performance ratings: The relative importance of mental ability, conscientiousness, and career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 87, 161-170. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.01.003 google scholar
67. Ö’Sûilleabhâin, P. S., Howard, S. ve Hughes, B. M. (2018). Openness to experience and adapting to change: Cardiovascular stress habituation to change in acute stress exposure. Psychophysiology, 55(5), e13023. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13023 google scholar
68. Özler, D. E., Mercan, N. ve Yeni, Z. (2016). Y kuşağının beş faktör kişilik özelliklerinin kariyer uyum yetenekleri üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. İş Güç, Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 18(4), 145-162. google scholar
69. Pappas, S. (2022). The rise of psychologists: Psychological expertise is in demand everywhere. https:// www.apa.org/monitor/2022/01/special-rise-psychologists adresinden 1 Ocak 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
70. Parola, A. ve Marcionetti, J. (2021). Career decision-making difficulties and life satisfaction: The role of career-related parental behaviors and career adaptability. Journal of Career Development, 0894845321995571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845321995571 google scholar
71. Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322-338. google scholar
72. Ramos, K. ve Lopez, F. G. (2018). Attachment security and career adaptability as predictors of subjective well-being among career transitioners. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 104, 72-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.10.004 google scholar
73. Rossier, J., Zecca, G., Stauffer, S. D., Maggiori, C. ve Dauwalder, J. P. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale in a French-speaking Swiss sample: Psychometric properties and relationships to personality and work engagement. Journal of Vocational behavior, 80(3), 734-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jvb.2012.01.004 google scholar
74. Rudolph, C. W., Lavigne, K. N. ve Zacher, H. (2017). Career adaptability: A meta-analysis of relationships with measures of adaptivity, adapting responses, and adaptation results. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.09.002 google scholar
75. Rusu, A., Mairean, C., Hojbota, A. M., Gherasim, L. R. ve Gavriloaiei, S. I. (2015). Relationships of career adaptabilities with explicit and implicit self-concepts. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 92-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.05.003 google scholar
76. Safavi, H. P. ve Bouzari, M. (2019). The association of psychological capital, career adaptability and career competency among hotel frontline employees. Tourism Management Perspectives, 30, 6574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.02.001 google scholar
77. Sartık, H., ve Koca-Ballı, A. İ. K. (2020). Kişilik özelliklerinin kariyer uyum yeteneğine etkisi: üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 68-86. google scholar
78. Savickas, M. L. (2011). Constructing careers: Actor, agent, and author. Journal of Employment Counseling, 48(4), 179-181. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1920.2011.tb01109.x google scholar
79. Savickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. R. W. Lent ve S. D. Brown (Ed.) Career development and counselling: Putting theory and research into works içinde (s. 147-183). John Willey & Sons Inc. google scholar
80. Savickas, M. L. ve Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011 google scholar
81. Savickas, M. L., Porfeli, E. J., Hilton, T. L. ve Savickas, S. (2018). The student career construction inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 138-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.01.009 google scholar
82. Schelleman-Offermans, K. ve Massar, K. (2020). Explaining socioeconomic inequalities in self-reported health outcomes: The mediating role of perceived life stress, financial self-reliance, psychological capital, and time perspective orientations. PLoS One, 15(12), e0243730. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0243730 google scholar
83. Schmitt, N. (2007). The interaction of neuroticism and gender and its impact on self-efficacy and performance. Human Performance, 21(1), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280701522197 google scholar
84. Scioli, A., Chamberlin, C. M., Samor, C. M., Lapointe, A. B., Campbell, T. L., Macleod, A. R. ve McLenon, J. (1997). A prospective study of hope, optimism, and health. Psychological Reports, 81(3), 723-733. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1997.81.3.723 google scholar
85. Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). Öğrenilmiş iyimserlik. (S. K. Akbaş, Çev.). HYB Basım Yayın. (Orijinal yayın tarihi 1990). google scholar
86. Sevinç, A. ve Siyez, D. M. (2018). Öğrenci Kariyer Yapılandırma Envanteri’nin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 5(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.18394/ iid.349410 google scholar
87. Sheffield, D., Dobbie, D. ve Carroll, D. (1994). Stress, social support, and psychological and physical wellbeing in secondary school teachers. Work & Stress, 8(3), 235-243. https://doi. org/10.1080/02678379408259995 google scholar
88. Shiah, Y. J., Huang, Y., Chang, F., Chang, C. F. ve Yeh, L. C. (2013). School-based extracurricular activities, personality, self-concept, and college career development skills in Chinese society. Educational Psychology, 33(2), 135-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2012.747240 google scholar
89. Siu, O. L., Bakker, A. B. ve Jiang, X. (2014). Psychological capital among university students: Relationships with study engagement and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(4), 979-994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9459-2 google scholar
90. Snyder, C. R, Irving L, Anderson J. (1991). Hope and health: Measuring the will and the ways. C. R. Snyder ve D. R. Forsyth (Ed.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology içinde. (s. 285-305). Pergamon. google scholar
91. Soresi, S., Nota, L. ve Ferrari, L. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale-Italian Form: Psychometric properties and relationships to breadth of interests, quality of life, and perceived barriers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 705-711. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.020 google scholar
92. Soye, A. ve O’Sûilleabhain, P S. (2019). Facets of openness to experience are associated with cardiovascular reactivity and adaptation across both active and passive stress exposures. International Journal ofPsychophysiology, 140, 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.03.016 google scholar
93. Stewart, C., Wall, A. ve Marciniec, S. (2016). Mixed signals: Do college graduates have the soft skills that employers want? Competition Forum, 14 (2), 276-281. google scholar
94. Sullivan, S. E. ve Baruch, Y. (2009). Advances in career theory and research: A critical review and agenda for future exploration. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1542-1571. https://doi. org/10.1177/0149206309350082 google scholar
95. Şahin, I. ve Kırdök, O. (2018). Investigation of relationship between high school students’ career adaptability, subjective well-being and perceived social support. International Education Studies, 11(8), 127-135. google scholar
96. Tan, C. S., Low, S. K. ve Viapude, G. N. (2018). Extraversion and happiness: The mediating role of social support and hope. PsyCh Journal, 7(3), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.220 google scholar
97. Taylor, S. E. ve Seeman, T. E. (1999). Psychosocial resources and the SES-health relationship. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 896(1), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999. tb08117.x google scholar
98. Teixeira, M. A. P., Bardagi, M. P., Lassance, M. C. P, de Oliveira Magalhâes, M. ve Duarte, M. E. (2012). Career adapt-abilities scale—Brazilian form: Psychometric properties and relationships to personality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jvb.2012.01.007 google scholar
99. Tr.freelancer (2022). Psikoloji Jobs for April. https://www.tr.freelancer.com/jobs/psychology/ adresinden 15 Nisan 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
100. Türk Psikologlar Derneği. (2021). Sıkça sorulan sorular. https://www.psikolog.org.tr/tr/kurumsal/ sikca-sorulan-sorular-x716 adresinden 15 Eylül 2021 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
101. Ünsal, P. (2014). Kariyer gelişim kuramları ve kariyer danışmanlığı. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. google scholar
102. Van Gestel, S. ve Van Broeckhoven, C. (2003). Genetics of personality: Are we making progress?. Molecular Psychiatry, 8(10), 840-852. google scholar
103. Van Vianen, A. E., Klehe, U. C., Koen, J. ve Dries, N. (2012). Career adapt-abilities scale—Netherlands form: Psychometric properties and relationships to ability, personality, and regulatory focus. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 716-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.002 google scholar
104. Winstone, N., Balloo, K., Gravett, K., Jacobs, D. ve Keen, H. (2020). Who stands to benefit? Wellbeing, belonging and challenges to equity in engagement in extra-curricular activities at university. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1469787420908209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787420908209 google scholar
105. Yang, Y., Xu, X., Liu, W. ve Pang, W. (2020). Hope and creative self-efficacy as sequential mediators in the relationship between family socioeconomic status and creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 438. https://doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00438. google scholar
106. Yökatlas. (2022). Psikoloji programı bulunan üniversiteler. https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/lisans-bolum. php?b=10169 adresinden 31 Mayıs 2022 tarihinde alınmıştır. google scholar
107. Zaccardi, M. C., Howard, C. M. ve Schnusenberg, O. (2012). Student preparation and personality traits in the job market. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 16, 35-53. google scholar
108. Zacher, H. (2014a). Career adaptability predicts subjective career success above and beyond personality traits and core self-evaluations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(1), 21-30. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.10.002 google scholar
109. Zacher, H. (2014b). Individual difference predictors of change in career adaptability over time. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84, 188-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.01.001 google scholar