The Promising Momentum and Collective Practices of the Recently Expanding Network of Consumer-Led Ecological Food Initiatives in Turkey

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 40 Sayı: 1, 129 - 162, 23.07.2020

İrem Soysal Al

Öz

The main objective of this paper is to contribute to the discussions on the collective ecological food initiatives in Turkey that the academic literature has to a large extent ignored. This study provides a current and detailed analysis of these initiatives in Turkey, whose momentum has expanded considerably in recent years, especially in Istanbul. The study investigates food communities and consumer food cooperatives as two significant forms of consumer-led collective ecological food initiatives, comparing these in terms of their motivations, organization models, and functions. A comprehensive picture of almost 20 consumer-led ecological food initiatives is presented, and 11 prominent examples of these possessing transformative ambitions in Istanbul are discussed in detail. The fieldwork is based on my participant observation of the Kadıköy Cooperative, of which I have been a member for one year, and close interactions with the members of other ecological food initiatives for two years, as well as 20 in-depth interviews with the members of these initiatives. This paper examines the commonalities in these initiatives that differentiate them from other alternative food channels, as well as the connections, relationships, and collaborations among these recently emerging collective ecological initiatives. The paper discusses concrete examples of the alternative relations in food production, distribution, and consumption that these urban ecological food initiatives try to offer in practice and that indicate the potential power these initiatives have for transforming current food relations and for contributing to the emerging food sovereignty struggle in Turkey. The study also illustrates how the consumers and producers in this network of initiatives have conceptualized their practices and ambitions within the food sovereignty movement.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Consumer food cooperatives, Food communities, Collective and Ecological Alternative Food Initiatives, Food sovereignty, Small ecological farming

Kaynakça

• Akçay, E., & Kocagöz, U. (2018). Bir siyaset rasyonalitesi olarak müşterekleştirme. Felsefelogos, 68, 31–41.
• Aydın, Z. (2010). Neo-liberal transformation of Turkish agriculture. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(2), 149–187.
• Aysu, A. (2015). Gıda krizi: Tarım, ekoloji ve egemenlik. Metis Yayınları.
• Aysu, A. (2019). Kooperatifler. Yeni İnsan Yayınevi. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste [La Distinction] (R. Nice, Trans.). Routledge.
• Buck, D., Getz, C., & Guthman, J. (1997). From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of Northern California. Sociologia Ruralis, 37(1), 3–20.
• Buğday Association (December 2019). Ecological Farmers’ Markets. http://ekolojikpazarlar.org/
• Buttel, F. H. (1997). Some observations on agro-food change and the future of agricultural sustainability movements. In D. Goodman & M. Watts (Eds.), Globalising food: Agrarian questions and global restructuring (pp. 344–365). Routledge.
• Ekoharita. (December 2019). Ecological map. https://www.ekoharita.org/ekoloji-haritasi/
• European Coordination Via Campesina (2018). A guide to food sovereignty. https://viacampesina. org/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/Food-Sovereignty-A-guide-Low-Res-Vresion.pdf
• European Central Bank (2019, December 10). Turkish Lira to Euro exchange rate. http://sdw.ecb.europa. eu/quickview do;jsessionid=782FBE71E90C841856120CF8468E08DE?SERIES_KEY=120. EXR.D.TRY.EUR.SP00.A
• Food and Agriculture Organization (1999). Recommended international code of practice: General principles of food hygiene. http://www.fao.org/3/y1579e/y1579e02.htm
• Goodman, D., & Goodman, M. (2007). Localism, livelihoods and the ‘post-organic’: changing perspectives on alternative food networks in the United States. In D. Maye, L. Holloway, & M. Kneafsey (Eds.) Alternative food geographies (pp. 23–39). Elsevier.
• Jones, O., Kirwan, J. Dunn, H., Hopkins, A., Whittington, F., Buller, H., & Morris, C. (2010). On the alternativeness of alternative food networks: sustainability and the co-production of social and ecological wealth. In D. Fuller, A. Jonas, & R. Lee (Eds.), Interrogating alterity (pp. 95–110). Routledge.
• Kadirbeyoğlu, Z. (2016). Alternative food initiatives for environmental justice: Marginal or transformative? Paper presented at the IRSA: XIV World Congress of Rural Sociology. https:// orgprints.org/30010/25/IRSA_World%20Congress%20Presentations_Jan17.pdf
• Kadirbeyoğlu, Z., & Konya, N. (2017). Alternative food initiatives in Turkey. In F. Adaman, B. Akbulut, & M. Arsel (Eds.) Neoliberal Turkey and its discontents: Economic policy and the environment under Erdogan (pp. 39–41). Taurus.
• Karakaya, E. (2016). Agro food system transitions? Exploring alternative agro food initiatives in İzmir, Turkey (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). https://openaccess.iyte.edu.tr/ handle/11147/4874?locale-attribute=tr
• Keyder, Ç., & Yenal, Z. (2013). Bildiğimiz tarımın sonu: Küresel iktidar ve köylülük. İletişim Yayınları.
• Kocagöz, U., & Doğançayır, C. M. (2017, April 24). Operationalizing food sovereignty: A critical approach from an ongoing experiment in Turkey. Paper presented at the International Colloquium on the Future of Food and Challenges for Agriculture in the 21st Century. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
• https://www.academia.edu/37488790/Operationalizing_Food_Sovereignty_a_critical_approach_ from_an_ongoing_experiment_in_Turkey
• Marx, K. (2015). Kapital (Cilt 1, M. Selik, çev.). Yordam. McMichael, P. (2009). A food regime geneology. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 139–169.
• McMichael, P. (2013). Food regimes and agrarian questions. Fernwood Publishing.
• McMichael, P. (2016). Commentary: Food regime for thought. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(3), 648–670.
• Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2018). Statistics on organic agriculture 2002-2018. https:// www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/Bitkisel-Uretim/Organik-Tarim/Istatistikler
• Ministry of Food, Agriculture, and Livestock (2018). Budget presentation, November 2017. https:// www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Belgeler/ButceSunumlari/ButceSunumu_2018.pdf
• Öngel, F. S., & Yıldırım, U. D. (Eds.) (2019). Krize karşı kooperatifler: deneyimler, tartışmalar, alternatifler. Notabene Yayınları.
• Research Institute of Organic Culture & the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements. (2016). Organic in Europe: Statistics and emerging trends 2016.
• Research Institute of Organic Culture & the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements. (2019). The world of organic agriculture: Statistics and emerging trends 2019. https://ciaorganico.net/documypublic/486_2020-organic-world-2019.pdf
• Soysal A., I., & Küçük, B. (2019). In-between anxiety and hope: Trusting an alternative among ‘alternatives’ in the (post) organic food market in Turkey. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 25(2), 173–190.
• Şık, B. (2017, March 28). Glifosat kalıntısı GDO’lu ekmek kadar önemli bir halk sağlığı sorunu. https://bianet.org/bianet/tarim/184902-glifosat-kalintisi-gdo-lu-ekmek-kadar-onemli-bir-halksagligi-sorunu