MARGINALIZED MIGRATION, TRENDS AND POLICIES

Öz

Migration is a social phenomenon which was observed throughout history with changing characteristics over time, and which will continue to exist in the future. When the history and sustainability of this social fact are taken into consideration, it is obvious that migration is inherent in human nature. The continuous quests of human beings for better living conditions together with the desire to escape from political and social conflicts constitute the elements that trigger migration. Even though migration was constant throughout history, today it is one of the most important items on the international agenda. Therefore, the attempts to solve this social issue have never been so intense before. National states or international organizations try to solve the migration problem through regulations and restrictions that are put into effect within the framework of their sovereignty and policies. On the other hand, the person who intends to migrate opts to achieve his goal through informal channels, which will lead migration to marginalize. As a response to this, governments try to be more effective in the face of this problem. For these reasons, migration phenomenon continues to take the priority on the agendas. In this study, the transformation of migration which has become more complicated from formal to informal structure, its development, and migration policies will be examined within a general framework; and the reasons of this transformation will be investigated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Migration,Illegal Migration,Regulation,Globalization,Marginal Migration

MARGINALIZED MIGRATION, TRENDS AND POLICIES

Öz

Göç olgusu zaman içinde deùLüen karakteristik yap×V×na karü×n tarihin tüm zamanlar×nda görülen ve gelecekte de sürmesinin kaç×Q×lmaz görüldüùü sosyal bir olayd×r. Bu sosyal olay×n zaman derinliùi ve sürekliliùi göz önüne al×nd×ù×nda ise onun adeta insan×n varolmas× ile bütünleümiü bir niteliùe sahip olduùu görülmektedir. únsan×n hep daha iyiyi elde etme beklentisinin yaratt×ù× bencillik ile toplumsal yaüamdaki siyasal ve sosyal çat×ümalar×n önlenmesindeki baüar×V×zl×k karü×V×nda bireyin bu ortamdan uzaklaüma isteùi, göç hareketlerinin sürmesindeki ve beslenmesindeki unsurlar× oluüturmaktad×r. Göçün tarihsel sürekliliùine raùmen, günümüzde daha önce olmad×ù× kadar bu sosyal sorunun çözümüne yönelik politika ve gündem oluüturma özelliùine de sahip olduùu görülmektedir. Göçün sorun olarak gündem oluüturmadaki öncüllüùü, daha çok ulusal devletlerin veya uluslararas× organizasyonlar×n egemenlik ve politika belirlemeye yönelik hassasiyetleri kapsam×nda göçe yönelik getirdikleri engellemeler ve N×V×tlamalar karü×V×nda, göç karar×Q× gerçekleütirme arzusunda olan göçmenin bunu informal yollardan oluüturma yolundaki karü×tl×k, hem göçün giderek marjinalleümesine ve hem de hükümetlerin bu olay karü×V×nda etkin olabilme isteùinin çat×ümas×ndan kaynaklanmaktad×r. Bu çal×ümada da daha kompleks bir hal alan göçün formal yap×dan informal yap×ya dönüüümü, geliüimi ve oluüturulan politikalar genel bir çerçeve içinde ele al×narak, bu dönüüüme yol açan geliümelere cevap verilmeye çal×ü×lmaktad×r. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Göç, Yasa Dışı Göç, Düzenleme, Küreselleşme, Marjinal Göç

Kaynakça

1. Apap, J. (2002): “Shaping Europe’s Migration Policy New Regimes fort he Employment of Third Country Nationals: A Comparison of Strategies in Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK”, European Journal of Migration and Law, No: 4: 309-328.
2. Bhagwati, J. (2003): “Borders Beyond Control”, Foreign Affairs, Jan/Feb, 82 (1): 98- 104. (HTML version from EBSCO digital data base).
3. Boswell, C. and Straubhaar T. (2004): “The Illegal Employment of Foreign Workers: an Overview”, Intereconomics Review of European Economic Policy, 39 (1): 4-7.
4. Boutang, Y. M. and Garson, J. P. (1984): “Major Obstacles to Control of Irregular Migrations: Prerequisites to Policy”, International Migration Review, 18 (3): 579-592.
5. Dauvergne, C. (2003): Challenges to Sovereignty: Migration Laws for the 21st Century, www.sisr.net/apo/Challengesfinal.doc.(21.03.2005).
6. de Tapia, S. (2003): New Patterns of Irregular Migration in Europe, Seminar Report 12 and 13 November 2002 Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
7. Entorf, H. (2002): “Rational Migration Policy Should Tolerate Non-zero Illegal Migration Flows: Lessons from Modelling the Market for Illegal Migration”, International Migration, 40 (1): 27-43.
8. Entorf, H., and J. Moebert. (2004): “The Demand for Illegal Migration and Market Outcomes”, Intereconomics, 39 (1): 7-10.

9. Gençler, A. (2002): “Yabanc× Kaçak úüçilik Gerçeùi ve Türkiye Örneùi”, TÜHúS úü Hukuku ve úktisat Dergisi, 17 (3): 28-46.
10. Gençler, A. (2004): “Büyüyen Yasad×ü× Göç Sorunu ve Türkiye”, Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3 (1): 174-180.
11. Guiraudon, V. (2001): “De-nationalizing control”, Controlling a New Migration World, Ed. V. Guiraudon and C. Joppke, Florence.
12. Iguchi, Y. (2000): “Illegal Migration, Overstay and Illegal Working in Japan Development of Policies and their Evaluation”, Combating the Illegal Employment of Foreign Workers, OECD: 157-165.
13. IOM. (2003): World Migration 2003 Managing Migration Challenges and Responses for People on the Move. Vol.2 – IOM World Migration Report Series, Geneva.
14. Içduygu, A., et al. (2001): “Socio-economic Development and International Migration: A Turkish Study”, International Migration, 39 ( 4): 39-61.
15. Jandal, M. (2004): “The Estimation of Illegal Migration in Europe”. Migration Studies, 12 (153): 141-155.
16. Kiriüçi, K. (2004): “Reconciling refugee protection with efforts to combat irregular migration: the case of Turkey and the European Union”, Global Migration Perspectives No: 11 October, Global Commission on International Migration, www.gcim.org.
17. Marie, C.V. (2004): Preventing Illegal Immigration: Juggling Economic Imperatives, Political Risks And Individual Rights, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg.
18. Martin, P. and T. Straubhaar (2002): “Best Practices to Reduce Migration Pressures”, International Migration, 40 (3): 5-23.
19. Martin, P. and E. Midgley (2003): “Immigration: Shaping and Reshaping America”, Population Bulletin, 58 (2).
20. Migration and Development: How to make migration work for poverty reduction. House of Commons International Development Committee Sixth Report of Session 2003-04: 1, London.
21. Miller, J.M. (1995): Employer Sanctions in France: From the Campaign Against Illegal Alien Employment to the Campaign Against Illegal Work, U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform, Research Paper University of Delaware.
22. OECD (2000): Some Lessons from Recent Regularization Programmes, Combating the Illegal Employment of Foreign Workers, OECD: 53-69.
23. OECD, SOPEMI (2003): Trends in International Migration, OECD Annual Report 2002 Edition, Paris.
24. Pecoud, A. and P. de Guchteneire (2005): “Migration without borders: an investigation into the free movement of people”, Global Migration Perspectives No: 27 April, Global Commission on International Migration. www.gcim.org.
25. Salvator, D. (1998): International Economics, Sixth Edition, New Jersey.
26. Schatzer, P. (2005): Illegal migration needs firm but compassionate solution, www.population 2005.org/Illegal%20migration.doc.(30.03.2005).
27. Shafagatov, R. and A. Mirzayeva (2005): Immigration Policy as a Challenging Issue in The EU Policy – Making Process: A Study of Immigrant Integration Policy, Linköpings Universitet, Master Thesis (Digital sample), Linköping.
28. Skeldon, R., (2002): “Migration and Poverty”, Asia-Pasific Journal, 17 (4): 67-82.
29. Stalker, P., (2000): Workers Without Frontiers The Impact of Globalization on International Migration, Geneva: ILO.
30. Tapinos, G. (2000): “Irregular Migration: Economic and Political Issues”, Combating the Illegal Employment of Foreign Workers, OECD: 13-43