The Changing Appearence of Employers’ Associations: A Review of Selected Countries

Yıl 2023, , 59 - 75, 19.07.2023

M. Seyyid Yelek

https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2023.84.1221130

Öz

Employers’ associations are formed by capital owners to protect and develop their common economic rights and interests in industrial relations. Employers’ associations were founded based on the change in interclass relations after the Industrial Revolution and have played an important role in the process of making rules regarding industrial relations for a long time, having achieved great success in protecting the class interests of their members. However, the weakening in the reasons that led to the formation of employers’ associations in the following period caused these institutions to lose their members and power to a significant extent. As a result, employers’ associations have taken various measures to prevent membership losses and to maintain their power. This article discusses England, Germany, and the United States of America as examples of countries where employers’ associations developed early. Employers’ associations are observed to have undergone a significant transformation as a result of their struggles and activities related to maintaining their existence, and they started undertaking the activities of other employers’ organizations in this context and in line with their capabilities. Based on these changes, this study concludes that employers’ associations have gone beyond being pure industrial relations organizations to gradually having become hybrid organizations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Employers’ Associations, Industrial Relations

İşveren Sendikalarının Değişen Görünümü: Seçilmiş Ülkeler Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Öz

İşveren sendikaları, sermaye sahiplerinin endüstri ilişkilerindeki ortak ekonomik hak ve çıkarlarını korumak ve geliştirmek için oluşturdukları örgütlerdir. Sanayi devriminden sonra sınıflar arası ilişkilerde görülen değişim üzerine kurulan işveren sendikaları uzun bir dönem boyunca endüstri ilişkilerindeki kural koyma sürecinde önemli görevler üstlenmişler ve üyelerinin sınıfsal çıkarlarını korumada büyük ölçüde başarıya ulaşmışlardır. Ancak ilerleyen süreçte, işveren sendikalarının ortaya çıkmalarına sebep olan olgularda görülen zayıflama, bu kurumların üye kaybı yaşamalarına ve güçlerini önemli ölçüde yitirmelerine sebep olmuştur. Bu durum karşısında işveren sendikaları üye kayıplarını azaltmak ve güçlerini muhafaza etmek amacıyla çeşitli önlemler almışlardır. Çalışmada işveren sendikacılığının erken gelişme gösterdiği ülke örneklerinden İngiltere, Almanya ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ele alınmıştır. İşveren sendikalarının varlıklarını devam ettirmek kaygısıyla giriştikleri mücadeleler ve izledikleri faaliyetler neticesinde önemli bir dönüşüm geçirdikleri, işveren dernekleri ve odalar gibi diğer işveren örgütlerinin yürüttükleri faaliyetleri de imkânları doğrultusunda üstlendikleri görülmüştür. İşveren sendikalarının böylelikle saf endüstri ilişkileri örgütleri olmanın ötesine geçerek giderek karma örgütler haline gelmeye başladıkları sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İşveren Sendikaları, İşveren Örgütleri, Endüstri İlişkileri

Kaynakça

• Adams, R.J. (1980). industrial Relations Systems in Europe and North America, Canada: Mcmaster University: Research and Working Paper Series No: 173 google scholar
• Adams, R.J. (1981). A Theory of Employer Attitudes and Behaviour Towards Trade Unions in Western Europe and North America, Canada: McMaster University Faculty of Business, Research and Working Paper Series No. 175. google scholar
• Alpaslan, I. (2003). İş Hukuku, (5.bs). Ankara: İmaj Kitabevi. google scholar
• Armstrong, E.G.A.. (1984). Employers Associations in Great Britain. In J.P. Windmuller & A. Gladstone (Eds.), Employers Associations and industrial Relations: A Comparative Study (pp. 44-78). Oxford: Clarendon Press. google scholar
• Aydoğanoğlu, E. (2007). Sınıf Mücadelesinde Sendikalar. İstanbul: Evrensel Basım Yayın. google scholar
• Barry, M. & Wilkinson, A. (2011). Reconceptualising Employer Associations Under Evolving Employment Relations: Countervailing Power Revisited. Work, Employment and Society, 25(1), 149-162. google scholar
• Barry, M. (2011) Concerted Capital: Understanding Employer Interests and the Role of Employer Coordination in Contemporary Employment Relations. In K. Townsend & A. Wilkinson (Eds.), Research Handbook on the Future ofWork and Employment Relations (pp. 111-129). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. google scholar
• Berndt, K.K. (2004). Employment Relations in Germany. In G.J. Bamber, R.D. Lansbury, & N. Wailes (Eds.), International and Comparative Employment Relations: Globalisation And The Developed Market Economies (4th Ed) (pp. 211-253). Australia: Allen Unwin google scholar
• Bieler, A.& Roland, E. (2017). Ulusötesi Dayanışma mı? Avro Bölgesi Krizinde Avrupa İşçi Sınıfı. Tuncel Ö. (Çev.), Social Register 2015: Sınıflar Dönüşürken kitabı içinde (s. 157-174), İstanbul: Yordam Kitap. google scholar
• Bonnett, C.E. (1922). Employers’ Associations in the United States: A Study ofTypical Associations. New York: The Macmillan Company. google scholar
• Bulfone, F. & Afonso, A. (2020). Business Against Markets: Employer Resistance to Collective Bargaining Liberalization During the Eurozone Crisis. Comparative Political Studies, 53 (5), 809-846. google scholar
• Bunn, R.F. (1984). Employers Associations in the Federal Republic Germany. In J.P. Windmuller & A. Gladstone (Eds.), Employers Associations and industrial Relations: A Comparative Study (pp. 169-201). Oxford: Clarendon Press. google scholar
• Clegg, H.A. (1954). Employers. In A. Flanders & H.A. Clegg (Eds.), The System of industrial Relations in Great Britain: Its History, Law and Institutions (pp. 197-251). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. google scholar
• Delican, M. (1998). British Industrial Relations in Transition 1960-1990. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 0(41-42), 105-114. google scholar
• Derber, M. (1984). Employers Associations in the United States. In J.P. Windmuller & A. Gladstone (Eds.), Employers Associations and industrial Relations: A Comparative Study (pp. 79-114), Oxford: Clarendon Press. google scholar
• Engels, F. (2016). [Fransa’da Sınıf Mücadeleleri 1848-1850’nin 1895 tarihli Almanca baskısına] Giriş. Fransız Üçlemesi (pp. 15-35), (E. Özalp, Çev.). İstanbul: Yordam Kitap. google scholar
• Erçel, K. (2020). ABD’ye Özgü Kavramlar Sözlüğü - “Çalışma Hakkı Eyaleti (Right-to-Work State). Birikim Dergisi. Erişim adresi: http://www.birikimdergisi.com/haftalik/8884/abd-ye-ozgu-kavramlar-sozlugu-calisma-hakki-eyaleti-right-to-work-state.XEhcGMb7mu4. google scholar
• Esin, P. (1974). Türkiye’de İşveren Sendikacılığı. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları No.373. google scholar
• Eurofound. (2022). Living and Working in Finland. Erişim adresi: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/country/finland. google scholar
• Fahlbeck, R. (1994). The Demise of Collective Bargaining in the USA: Reflections on the UN-American Character of American Labor Law. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 15(2), 307-334. google scholar
• Flanders, A.D. (1974). The Tradition of Voluntarism. British Journal of industrial Relations, 12(3), 352-370. google scholar
• Foner, E. (1984). Why is There No Socialism in the United States. Oxford Journals, History Workshop, 17, 57-80. google scholar
• Gable, R.W. (1959). Birth of an Employers’ Association. Business History Review, 33(4), 535-545. google scholar
• Gennard, J. & Judge. (2002). G. Employee Relations (3rd Ed). Wiltshire: Chartered Institute of Personel and Development. google scholar
• Gooberman, L., Hauptmeier, M. & Heery, E. (2018). Contemporary Employer Interest Representation in the United Kingdom. Work, Employmend and Society, 32(1), 114-132. google scholar
• Gooberman, L., Hauptmeier, M. & Heery, E. (2019). The Decline of Employers’ Associations in the UK, 1976-2014. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(1), 11-32. google scholar
• Gooberman, L., Hauptmeier, M. & Heery, E. (2020). A typology of employers' organisations in the United Kingdom. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 41 (1), 229-248. google scholar
• Greenwood, J. & Traxler, F. (2007). United Kingdom. In F. Traxler & G. Huemer (Eds.), Handbook of Business Interest Associations, Firm Size and Governance: A Comparative Analytical Approach (pp. 315-347). New York: Routledge. google scholar
• Harman, C. (2013). Halkların Dünya Tarihi: Taş Devri’nden Yeni Binyıla (3.bs), (U. Kocabaşoğlu Çev.), İstanbul: Yordam Kitap. google scholar
• Hilbert, F.W. (1905). Employers’ Associations in the United States. In H.H. Jacob & G.E. Barnett (Eds.), Studies in American Trade Unionism (pp. 183-218), New York: Henry Holt and Company. google scholar
• Hornung-Draus, R. (2002). Between e-economy, Euro and Enlargement. Where are Employer Organisations in Europe Heading? Industrielle Beziehungen, 9(2), 209-221. google scholar
• Hornung-Draus, R. (2004). The Role of National and European Employer Organisations in the 21st Century. Warwick Papers in Industrial Relations: Number 73. Coventry. google scholar
• Kağnıcıoğlu, D. (2014). Toplu Pazarlık: Teori ve Uygulama, Ankara, Nobel Yayınları. google scholar
• Katz, H.C. & Hoyt N.W. (2004). Employment Relations in the United States of America. In G. Bamber, R.D. Lansbury & N. Wailes (Eds.), International and Comparative Employment Relations: Globalisation and the DevelopedMarket Economies (pp.67-90), Australia: Allen&Unwin. google scholar
• Kessler, S. & Bayliss, F. (1998). Contemporary British Industrial Relations (3rd Ed). London: Macmillan Business. google scholar
• Koray, M. (2007). Sosyal Politikanın Anlamı ve İşlevini Tartışmak. Çalışma ve Toplum, 2007/4 (15), 19-56. google scholar
• Kulak, Ö. (19 Ağustos 2018). Führer’in Rüyası: Gleichschaltung. Erişim adresi: https://www.birgun.net/haber/fuhrer-in-ruyasi-gleichschaltung-227562. google scholar
• Lawrence, A.G. (2004). Employer and Worker Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Lewis, E. (2015). Multi-Employer Bargaining in the UK-Does it Have a Future? In G.V. Gyes & T. Schulten (Eds.), Wage Bargaining Under the new European Economic Governance: Alternative Strategies for Inclusive Growth (pp. 221-258). Brussels: Etui. google scholar
• Lipset, S.M. (1983). Radicalism or Reformism: The Sources of Working Class Politics. The American Political Science Review, 77(1), 1-18. google scholar
• Malson, P. (2014). Çalışarak Yaşamak ya da Savaşarak Ölmek: Küresel İşçi Sınıfı Nasıl Oluştu? (2. bs), (G. Orhan & M. Ertan, Çev.). İstanbul: Yordam Kitap. google scholar
• Markezich, M. (2017). Why is Collective Bargaining so Difficult in the United States Compared to its International Peers?, Washington Center for Equitable Growth. Erişim adresi: https://equitablegrowth.org/why-is-collective-bargaining-so-difficult-in-the-united-states-compared-to-its-international-peers/, 20 Ekim 2020. google scholar
• Martin, C.J. & Swank D. (2012). The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• McIvor, A.J. (1984). Employers’ Organisation and Strikebreaking in Britain, 1880-1914. International Review of Social History, 29(1), 1-33. google scholar
• Mcnese, T. (2008). The Labor Movement: Unionizing America. New York: Chelsea House. google scholar
• Mitchell, T. (2013). Citizens’ Committees and Alliances. In M. Dubofsky (Eds.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of American Business, Labor and Economic History (pp. 118-119), Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Mohanty, P.K. (1992). The Changing Pattern of Collective Bargaining: The Case of British Steel. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 28(2), 179-194. google scholar
• Nickell, S., Nunziata, L., Ochel, W., & Quintini, G. (2002). The Beverdige Curve, Unemployment and Wages in the OECD from the 1960s to 1990s, Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Papers. google scholar
• OECD. (1994). Collective Bargaining: Levels and Coverage. Employment Outlook 1994 (pp. 167-208). google scholar
• Paoletti, F., Sheldon, P. & Nacamulli, R.C.D. (2011). Membership, Identity and Internal Organization in an Employers’ Association. Paper submitted to 27th EGOS Colloquium. Gothenburg-Sweden. google scholar
• Pearson, C. (2018). Employers Associations and Open Shops in the United States. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History. Erişim Adresi: https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-459#acrefore-9780199329175-e-459-div1-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.013.459. google scholar
• SAK (The Central Organisation of Finnish Trade Unions). (2017). Employers Confederation Terminates All National Level Labour Market Agreements. Erişim adresi:
• https://www.sak.fi/en/whats-new/news/employers-confederation-terminates-all-national-level-labour-market-agreements. google scholar
• Sanford C. (1975). Labor in the United States, Columbus: Merill Books. google scholar
• Sarıoğlu, H. İ. (2000). Sanayileşmiş Ülkelerde Toplu Pazarlık Düzeyi ve Kapsam Üzerine. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 0(43-44), 95-104. google scholar
• Schmitter, P.C. & Streeck, W. (1999). The Organizations of Business Interests: Studying the Associative Action of Business in Advanced Industrial Societies, Max-Planck-Institut für
• Gesellschaftsforschung Discussion Paper 99/1. Köln. google scholar
• Schnabel, C. (1999). Collective Bargaining under Stress: Decentralisation and Opening Clauses in Germany. Paper prepared for the Workshop Controlled Decentralisation of Wage Bargaining- The German Experience with the Exit Clause. Rome. google scholar
• Silvia, S.J. (2013). Holding The Shop Together: German Industrial Relations in the Postwar Era. New York: Cornell University Press. google scholar
• Stephen, J.S. & Wolfgang, S. (2007). Why Are German Employers Associations Declining?: Arguments and Evidence. Comparative Political Studies, 40(12), 1433-1459. google scholar
• Talas, C. (1959). Taft-Harley Kanunu ve “Çalışma Hakkı. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 1-20. google scholar
• Talas, C. (1981). Toplumsal Politikaya Giriş. Ankara: S Yayınları. google scholar
• Thorsten, S.& Reinhard, B. (2018). Varieties of Decentralisation in German Collective Bargaining. Multi-Employer Bargaining Under Pressure: Decentralisation Trends in Five European
• Countries (pp. 105-149). Brussels: European Trade Union Institute. google scholar
• Tokol, A. (2001). Çokuluslu Şirketler ve Endüstri İlişkilerine Etkileri, İş, Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 3(2), Erişim adresi: http://www.isguc.org/? p=article&id=63&cilt=3&sayi=2&yil=2001. google scholar
• Traxler, F. (2000). Employers and Employer Organisations in Europe: Membership Strenght, Density and Representativeness. Industrial Relations Journal, 31(4), 308-316. google scholar
• Traxler, F. (2003). Economic Change and its Impact on Employer Association: A Crossnational Comparison. Paper for IIRA. 13th World Congress. google scholar
• Traxler, F. (2008). Employer Organizations. In P. Blyton, N. Bacon, J. Fiorito & E. Heery (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Industrial Relations (pp. 225-240). London: Sage Publication. google scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor, Erişim adresi: https://www.dol.gov/olms/regs/compliance/cba/. google scholar
• Uwe, J. (2021). Membership in Employers’ Associations and Collective Bargaining Coverage in Germany. GLO Discussion Paper: No. 954, 1-45. google scholar
• Weir, R.E. (2004). Knights of Labor. Workers in America: A Historical Encyclopedia Vol: 1. California: ABC-CLIO, LLC. google scholar
• Wigham, E. (1973). The Power to Manage: A History of The Engineering Employers’ Federation, London: Mcmillan. google scholar
• Windmuller, J.P. (1960). Amerikan Sendikalarının Siyasi Faaliyetleri, (S. Zaim, Çev.). Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 0(9-10-11), 18-29. google scholar
• Yarmie, A.H. (1980). Employers’ Organizations in Mid-Victorian England. International Review ofSocial History, 25(2), 210-211. google scholar
• Yorgun, S. (2007). Dirilişin Eşiğinde Sendikalar: Yeni Eğilimler Yeni Stratejiler, Bursa: Ekin Basım Yayın Dağıtım. google scholar