Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on the Digital Nomad with VOSviewer

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the bibliometric characteristics of studies on digital nomadism published in the Scopus database to guide those who want to conduct research on digital nomadism. Studies on digital nomadism published in the Scopus database were systematically analysed under the headings of authors, citations, sources, countries, institutions, and keywords. The data obtained were examined and mapped in terms of bibliometric indicators using VOSviewer. In addition, in the literature review, studies on digital nomadism were examined in terms of variables such as the findings and analyses used. Using the keyword “digital nomad” in the Scopus database, 1,080 results were obtained by selecting the “all fields” tab. According to the results of the analysis, while most publications on digital nomadism are published in the journal “Proceedings of the Acm on Human-Computer Interaction,” the most cited journal is “Sociology.” In terms of the number of citations, it was found that the study “Mobility and Proximity” dated (2002) was the most cited study. It was also concluded that the author who published the most publications was Daniel Schlagwein. The most cited institution was Unk “Syracuse University.” It was determined that the most publishing country was the USA and the most used keywords in terms of keywords were “digital nomads,” “Covid-19,” “remote working,” “digital nomadism” and “mobility.” This study found that interest in digital nomadism has increased rapidly in recent years, mainly because of the acceleration of the transition to remote working due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the increase in the opportunity to work remotely with technological developments, and the opportunity to work while travelling. On the other hand, although digital nomadism is generally associated with freedom and flexibility, difficulties in managing work-life balance, the difficulties of constant travel, and the lack of stability and regular income encourage researchers to conduct more studies in this field. In this context, the data obtained can guide future studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital nomad
• Remote Work
• Mobility
• Digital Work

Kaynakça

1. Aroles, J., de Vaujany, F. X., & Dale, K. (Eds.). (2021). Experiencing the new world of work. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
2. Belot, M. (2004). Why is Employment Protection Stricter in Europe than in the Us?. European Public Law: EU eJournal. https://doi.org/10. 2139/ssrn.621983. google scholar
3. Bonneau, C., & Aroles, J. (2021). Digital nomads: A new form of leisure class?. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
4. Chang, Y. N., & Chiu, C. Y. (2022). The Future of Work after COVID-19 from the Office to the Edge: Using the IT Industry as an Example. google scholar
5. Chen, H., Tsang, Y. P., & Wu, C. H. (2023). When text mining meets science mapping in the bibliometric analysis: A review and future opportunities. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 15, 18479790231222349. google scholar
6. Chevtaeva, E., & Denizci-Guillet, B. (2021). Digital nomads’ lifestyles and coworkation. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 21, 100633. google scholar
7. Cook, D. (2020). The freedom trap: digital nomads and the use of disciplining practices to manage work/leisure boundaries. Information Technology & Tourism, 22(3), 355-390. google scholar
8. Cook, D. (2023). What is a digital nomad? Definition and taxonomy in the era of mainstream remote work. World Leisure Journal, 65(2), 256-275. google scholar

9. De Oliveira, O. J., da Silva, F. F., Juliani, F., Barbosa, L. C. F. M., & Nunhes, T. V. (2019). Bibliometric method for mapping the state-of-the-art and identifying research gaps and trends in literature: An essential instrument to support the development of scientific projects. In Scientometrics recent advances. IntechOpen. google scholar
10. Devcic, K., & Prazic, I. T. (2022). The Digital Nomad Motivation in the Republic of Croatia. Limen, 87. google scholar
11. Do Rosario Mira, M., Moura, A., & Araujo, N. L. S. (2023). Trends and interconnections between Digital Nomads and Tourism: A bibliometric analysis. Revista Rosa dos Ventos-Turismo e Hospitalidade, 15(4). google scholar
12. Emerson, M. (1988). Regulation or deregulation of the labour market: Policy regimes for the recruitment and dismissal of employees in the industrialised countries. European Economic Review, 32, 775-817. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(88)90047-5. google scholar
13. Gellert, G. A., Montgomery, S., Bridge, O., & Gellert, T. E. (2022). No retrenchment from employee empowerment: employer wellness imperatives and opportunities emerging from the covid-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 918784. google scholar
14. Green, P. (2020). Disruptions of self, place and mobility: Digital nomads in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Mobilities, 15(3), 431-445. google scholar
15. Hannonen, O. (2020). In search of a digital nomad: defining the phenomenon. Information Technology & Tourism, 22, 335-353. google scholar
16. Hassan-Montero, Y., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & De-Moya-Anegon, F. (2014). Graphical interface of the Scimago Journal and Country Rank: an interactive approach to accessing bibliometric information. Elprofesional de la informacion, 23(3). google scholar
17. Iliescu, A. N. (2021). Knowledge mapping of the knowmad concept-a text mining analysis. In Strategıca-International Academic Conference, 958-968. google scholar
18. Izak, M., Reissner, S., & Shortt, H. (2023). Flexible lives: spatial, temporal, and behavioural boundaries in a fluid world of work and home. Culture and Organization, 29(5), 375-379. google scholar
19. İli, B., & Büyükbaykal, G. N. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Digital Nomad Studies, Hacı Bektaşı Veli University, Journal of SBE. google scholar
20. Kugler, A. (2007). The Effects of Employment Protection in Europe and the USA. European Economics: Labor & Social Conditions eJournal. google scholar
21. Lamovsek, A., & Cerne, M. (2023). Past, present and future: A systematic multitechnique bibliometric review of the field of distributed work. Information and Organization, 33(2), 100446. google scholar
22. Liegl, M. (2014). Nomadicity and the care of place—on the aesthetic and affective organization of space in freelance creative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 23, 163-183. google scholar
23. Makimoto, T., & Manners, D. (1997). Digital nomad. John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
24. Mancinelli, F. (2020). Digital nomads: freedom, responsibility and the neoliberal lorder. Information Technology & Tourism, 22(3), 417-437. google scholar
25. Marshakova-Shaikevich, I. (2018). Bibliometric Maps of Science: The Visualization of Scientific Research. In Information Visualization Techniques in the Social Sciences and Humanities. IGI Global. google scholar
26. Müller, A. (2016). The digital nomad: Buzzword or research category?. Transnational Social Review, 6(3), 344-348. google scholar
27. Nash, C., Jarrahi, M. H., Sutherland, W., & Phillips, G. (2018). Digital nomads beyond the buzzword: Defining digital nomadic work and use of digital technologies. In International conference on information (pp. 207-217). Cham: Springer International Publishing. google scholar
28. Orel, M. (2019). Coworking environments and digital nomadism: Balancing work and leisure whilst on the move. World Leisure Journal, 61(3), 215-227. google scholar
29. Özyürek, H., Babacoğlu, S., Polat, M., & Turen, U. (2024). Mapping the field of digital nomadism: A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer and R. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (EPSTEM), 24, 263-280. google scholar
30. Pandey, N., & Pal, A. (2020). Impact of digital surge during Covid-19 pandemic: A viewpoint on research and practice. International Journal of İnformation Management, 55, 102171. google scholar
31. Qiu, J. P., Dong, K., & Yu, H. Q. (2014). Comparative study on structure and correlation among author co-occurrence networks in bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 101, 1345-1360. google scholar
32. Reichenberger, I. (2018). Digital nomads-a quest for holistic freedom in work and leisure. Annals ofLeisure Research, 21(3), 364-380. google scholar
33. Sanul, G. (2022). Digital nomadism and global mobility: Challenges and suggestions for international migration policies. International Migration, 60(6), 272-275. google scholar
34. Scherbakova, N. G., & Bredikhin, S. V. (2021, November). Co-authorship network structure analysis. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2099, No. 1, p. 012055). IOP Publishing. google scholar
35. Shawkat, S., Abd Rozan, M. Z., Salim, N. B., & Shehzad, H. M. F. (2021, October). Digitalnomads: A systematic literature review. In 2021 7th International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. google scholar
36. Simova, T. (2023). A research framework for digital nomadism: a bibliometric study. World Leisure Journal, 65(2), 175-191. google scholar
37. Soliman, M., Cardoso, L., de Almeida, G. F., Araujo, A., & Vila, N. (2021). Mapping smart experiences in tourism: A bibliometric approach. European Journal of Tourism Research, 28. google scholar
38. Spurk, D., & Straub, C. (2020). Flexible employment relationships and careers in times of the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of vocational behavior, 119, 103435. google scholar
39. Sulintang, A., Saragih, T., Pramasanti, A., Mahaganti, F., Fitriani, K., Augustin, E., ... & Kara, S. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of Indonesia’s labor dynamics: Future works, digital transformations, and contemporary employment landscape shifts. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(2), 679-688. google scholar
40. Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 328-341. google scholar
41. Thompson, B. Y. (2019). The digital nomad lifestyle:(remote) work/leisure balance, privilege, and constructed community. International journal of the sociology of leisure, 2(1), 27-42. google scholar
42. Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & Van Den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405-2416. google scholar
43. Wang, B., Schlagwein, D., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Cahalane, M. C. (2018). Digital work and high-tech wanderers: Three theoretical framings and a research agenda for digital nomadism. http://www.acis2018.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ACIS2018_paper_127.pdf google scholar
44. Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472. google scholar