Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The ILO at Centenary: Political Preferences and Tendencies in Changing Conditions

Yıl 2019, , 59 - 96, 31.12.2019

Özlem Özgür Büyükdere

https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015

Öz

The paper presents the International Labour Organization (ILO), which has addressed economic, social, and political changes, through its policies and activities and has examined emerging problems and expectations for working life. The current research is based on a literature review. The establishment of the ILO is first discussed from the World War perspective, that is, based on seeking universal peace for social justice. Then, the ILO’s policies, which were adopted during the welfare state period and globalization age and shaped under the leadership of neoliberal policies, are examined. Lastly, the ILO’s new road map, which aims to accomplish its mission to improve global working and living conditions, is emphasized and policy suggestions are presented for future studies. Results show that the ILO established its policies by considering social structures and changes and international conjunctures for a century. Continuing this approach in the 21st century, the ILO pursues proactive policies with the aim of setting standards for working life in the structuring period of globalization. These developments demonstrate that the ILO’s current importance and effectiveness for working life and international economic relations will increase in the future.

Anahtar Kelimeler

International Labour Organization Social Justice Decent Work Globalization Future of Work

Kaynakça

  • Morse, D. A. (1969). The Origin and Evolution of the I.L.O. and Its Role in the World Community. New York: Ithaca.
  • OECD. (1996). Trade, Employment and Labour Standards: A Study of Core Workers’ Rights and International Trade. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • O’Grady, J. (June 1994). Case2: Province of Ontario, Canada: Removing the Obstacles to Negotiated Adjustments. Sengenberger W., Campbell, D. (Ed.), Creating economic opportunities: The Role of Labour Standards in Industrial Restructuring (ss. 255-278). Geneva: ILO.
  • Onida, F. (July 2008). Labour Standards and ILO’s Effectiveness in the Governance of Globalization (CESPRI Working Paper No. 218). Milano: CESPRI.
  • Perez, J. B. (2013). The International Labour Organization (ILO) as an Actor of Global Governance: Sufficiently Involved to Help Overcome the Latest Financial and Economic Crisis?, Yearbook on Humanitarian Action and Human Rights, Universidad de Deusto. ISSN: 1885 - 298X, 11/2013, Bilbao. 109-139.
  • Plata-Stenger V. (9 March 2016), Europe, the ILO and the Wider World (1919-1954), Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, http://ieg-ego.eu/en/threads/transnational-movementsand-organisations/international-organisations-and-congresses/veronique-platastenger-europe-the-ilo-and-the-wider-world-1919-1954.
  • Rodgers, G., Lee, E., Swepston, L., Van Daele, J. (2009). The International Labour Organization and the Quest for Social Justice, 1919-2009. Geneva: ILO.
  • Telljohann, V., da Costa, I., Müller, T., Rehfeldt, U. (June 2009). European and International Framework Agreements: Practical Experiences and Strategic Approaches (European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions EF/08/102). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • The Global Voice of Business. (May 2015). Paper on International Labour Standards in the Contemporary Global Economy. London: The International Bar Association Global Employment Institute. Thompson, E. P. (1966). The making of the English working class. New York: Vintage Books.
  • United Nations. (6-12 March 1995). Report of the world summit for social development. New York: UN.
  • United Nations. (8 September 2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/52/2, Fifty-fifth Session, Agenda Item 60 (b). New York: UN.
  • United Nations (16 September 2005) 2005 World Summit Outcome, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/60/1, Sixtieth Session, Agenda Items 46 and 120. New York: UN.
  • United Nations. (24 October 2005). 2005 World Summit Outcome, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, Sixtieth Session, A/RES/60/1. New York: UN.
  • United Nations. (2006). Report of the Secretary-General on the Work of Organization, Sixty-first Session, Supplement No.1, A/61/1. New York: UN.
  • United Nations, (15 January 2008), Official List of Millennium Development Goals Indicators, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://unstats.un.org/unsd/mdg/Host. aspx?Content=Indicators/OfficialList.htm.
  • Vaughan-Whitehead, D., Vazquze-Alvarez, R. (2018). Curbing Inequalities in Europe: The Impact of Industrial Relations and Labour Policies. Vaughan-Whitehead, D. (Ed.), Reducing Inequalities in Europe: How Industrial Relations and Labour Policies Can Close the Gap (ss. 1-67). Geneva, Switzerland: ILO, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Viilup, E., Przetacznik, J. (January 2016). Briefing The International Labour Organisation and International Trade, European Parliament, Directorate-General for External Policies Policy Department, DG EXPO/B/PolDep/Note/2016_33. Brussels: European Parliament.
  • World Bank. (1990). World Development Report. Washington DC: World Bank. World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization. (February 2004). A fair globalization: Creating opportunities for all. Geneva: ILO.
  • World Trade Organization. (18 December 1996). Singapore WTO Ministerial 1996: Ministerial Declaration, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.wto.org/ english/thewto_e/minist_e/min96_e/wtodec_e.htm. World Trade Organization, World Trade Report 2013: Factors Shaping the Future of the World Trade. Geneva: WTO.
  • ILO. (2019c). World Employment Social Outlook: Trends 2019. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (21 June 2019). ILO Centenary Declaration For The Future of Work, Adopted by International Labour Conference at its One Hunderd Eighth Session. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO, World Health Organization. (November 2009). Social Protection Floor Initiative: The Sixth Initiative of the CEB on the Global Financial and Economic Crisis and Its Impact on the Work of the UN System, Manual and Strategic Framework for Joint UN Country Operations. Geneva: ILO,
  • WHO. International Monetary and Financial Committee. (October 14, 2017). IMFC Statement by Guy Ryder Director General International Labour Organization,Thirty-Sixth Meeting. Washington D.C.: IMF. International Trade Union Confederation. Constitution, Adopted at the Founding Congress, Vienne, November 2006, Amended by the Third Congress, Berlin, May 2014. Brussels: ITUC CSI IGB.
  • Jakovleski, V., Jerbi, S., Biersteker, T. (19 June 2019). The ILO’s Role in Global Governance: Limits and Potential.
  • Gironde, C., Garbonier, G. (Ed.), The ILO@100: Adressing the Past and Future of Work and Social Protection (ss. 82-108). Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff Publishing.
  • Jansen, M., Lee, E. (2007). Trade and Employment: Challenges for Policy Research, A Joint Study of the Intrenational Labour Office and the Secretariat of the World Trade Organization. Geneva: World Trade Organization Secretariat.
  • Kaufman, B. E. (2010). The theoretical foundation of ındustrial relations and its ımplications for labour economics and human resource management. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64(1), 74-108.
  • Kott, S. (19 June 2019). ILO: Social Justice in a Global World? A History in Tension.
  • Gironde, C., Garbonier, G. (Ed.), The ILO@100: Adressing the Past and Future of Work and Social Protection (ss. 21-39). Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff Publishing.
  • Kunanayakam, T. (2013). The Declaration on the Right to Development in the Context of United Nations Standard Setting. United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (Ed.), Realizing the Right to Development: Essays in Commemoration of 25 Years of the United Nations Declaration on the Right to Development (ss. 17-48). New York and Geneva: United Nations Publications.
  • Langille, B. A. (2003-2004). Re-reading of the Preamble of the 1919 ILO Constitution in Light of Recent Data on FDI and Worker Rights. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 42(1), 87-99.
  • Lee, E. (1998). The Asian Financial Crisis: The Challenge for Social Policy. Geneva: ILO.
  • Marshall S., Fenwick C. (2016). Labour Law and Development: Characteristics and Challenges. Marshall S., Fenwick C. (Ed.), Labour Regulation and Development: Socio-Legal Perspectives (ss. 1-32). Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA, ILO, Geneva, Switzerland: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • ILO. (01 December 1999). ILO Calls For New Multilateral Initiative to Address Social Implications of Globalization, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.ilo.org/ global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_007962/lang--en/index.htm.
  • ILO. (March 2000). Report of the Working Party on the Social Dimensions of the Liberalization of International Trade, ILO Governing Body, 277th Session, GB.277/16. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (November 2000). Framework for studies on integrated policies to achieve a wider sharing of the benefits of globalization, ILO Governing Body, 279th Session, GB.279/ WP/SDG/3. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (November 2001). Enhancing the action of the Working Party on the Social Dimension of Globalization: Next steps, ILO Governing Body, 282nd Session, GB.282/ WP/SDG/1. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (2002). Decent Work and the Informal Economy, Report No VI, International Labour Conference 90th Session. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (12 February 2008), The ILO at a Glance, Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (10 June 2008). ILO Declaration on Social Justice For A Fair Globalization, Adopted by International Labour Conference at its Ninety-seventh Session. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (2009). The Financial and Economic Crisis: A Decent Work Response. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (19 June 2009). Recovering from the Crisis: A Global Jobs Pact, Adopted by the International Labour Conference at its 98th Session. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (2010). Review of the follow-up to the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, International Labour Conference 99th Session Seventh Item on the Agenda Report VII. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (2012). Fundamental principles and rights at work: From commitment to action International Labour Conference 101st Session Sixth Item on Agenda Report VI. Geneva:ILO.
  • ILO. (2013). Report of the Director-General: Towards the ILO Centenary: Realities, renewal and tripartite commitment (Report 1(A), International Labour Conference, 102nd Session). Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (2015). Report of the Director-General: The Future of Work Centenary Initiative (Report 1, International Labour Conference, 104th Session). Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (2017). A Reflection on the Future of Work and Society. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (29-30 September 2017). The ILO Global Commission for the Future of Work: Paper Presented at the G7 Labour and Employment Ministerial Meeting. Turin, Italy: ILO.
  • ILO. (2019a). Global Commission on the Future of Work: Work for a Brighter Future. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (2019b). Conventions and Recommendations, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.ilo.org/global/standards/introduction-to-international-labour-standards/ conventions-and-recommendations/lang--en/index.htm.
  • Charnovitz, S. (2000). The International Labour Organization in its Second Century. Von Bogdandy, A., Wolfrum, R. (Ed.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (ss. 147-184). Heidelberg: Max Planc Institute.
  • Coxson, C. R. (1999). The 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work: Promoting Labor Law Reforms Through the ILO as an Alternative to Imposing Coercive Trade Sanctions. Penn State International Law Review, 17(3), 469-504.
  • Delican, M. (2017). Uluslararasılaşma ve küreselleşme bağlamında karşılaştırmalı endüstri ilişkileri: gelişmeler ve teorik yaklaşımlar. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 72, 1-33.
  • Ebert, F. C., & Posthuma, A. (2011). Labour Provisions in trade arrangements: current trends and perspectives. (International Labour Organization International Institute for Labour Studies Disscussion Paper Series No. 205) Geneva: ILO.
  • Global Deal. (2018). Building Trust in a Changing World of Work: The Global Deal for Decent Work and Inclusive Growth Flagship Report 2018. Geneva: ILO, Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Gravel, E., Kohiyama T., & Tsotroudi K. (2014) A legal perspective on the role of ınternational labour standards in rebalancing globalization. Revue Interventions économiques, Papers in Political Economy, 49, 1-20. Hansenne, M. (1994). Promoting Social Justice in the new global economy. Monthly Labor Review, 3-4.
  • Igwe, I. O. C. (April 2018). History of the ınternational economy: the bretton woods system and its ımpact on the economic development of developing countries. Athens Journal of Law, 4(2), 105-126.
  • ILO. (1919), Constitution of the International Labour Organization, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:62:0::NO:62:P62_LIST_ ENTRIE_ID:2453907:NO
  • ILO. (10 May 1944), Declaration Concerning the Aims and Purposes of the International Labour Organization (Declaration of Philadelphia). Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (1995). World Employment 1995: An ILO Report. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (1996). World Employment Report 1996/97: National Policies in a Global Context. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (June 1999). Report of the Director-General: Decent Work, International Labour Office 87th Session. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (18 June 1998). ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and Its Follow-Up: Adopted by the International Labour Conference at its Eighty-sixth Session. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (22 March 1999). Statement by Mr. Juan Somavia Director General of the International Labour Office Upon Taking his Oath of Office, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/dgo/speeches/somavia/1999/oath.htm.

100.Yılında Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü: Değişen Koşullarda Politika Tercihleri ve Yönelimler

Yıl 2019, , 59 - 96, 31.12.2019

Özlem Özgür Büyükdere

https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015

Öz

Makalede Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü’nün (UÇÖ), kuruluşundan bu yana dünyayı derinden etkileyen ekonomik, sosyal ve siyasal değişimlere, ortaya çıkan problemler ile çalışma hayatına yönelik beklentilere hangi politika ve faaliyetlerle karşılık verdiği incelenmiştir. Araştırmada literatür taraması ile elde edilen veriler kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada ilk olarak evrensel barış için sosyal adalet arayışına dayanan UÇÖ’nün kuruluş süreci dünya savaşları penceresinden ele alınmıştır. Ardından refah devleti dönemi ve sonrasında neoliberal politikaların önderliğinde şekillenen küreselleşme sürecinde UÇÖ’nün izlediği politikalar incelenmiştir. Son olarak, milenyum ile birlikte yeniden yapılanma sürecine giren UÇÖ’nün, dünya ölçeğinde çalışma ve yaşam koşullarının iyileştirilmesi misyonunu gerçekleştirmek için belirlediği yeni yol haritası üzerinde durulmuş ve yakın gelecekte izlenmesi gereken politikalar konusundaki önerilere yer verilmiştir. Çalışmada elde edilen sonuçlar UÇÖ’nün, bir asırdır toplumsal yapılar ve değişmeler ile uluslararası konjonktürleri dikkate alarak politikalar oluşturduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu tutumunu 21. yüzyılda da devam ettiren UÇÖ, küreselleşmenin yapılandırılması sürecinde çalışma hayatı ile ilgili standart oluşturma amacıyla proaktif politikalar takip etmektedir. Bu gelişmeler günümüzde olduğu gibi gelecekte de UÇÖ’nün çalışma hayatı ve uluslararası ekonomik ilişkilerdeki önem ve etkinliğinin artacağını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü Sosyal adalet Uygun iş Küreselleşme İşin geleceği

Kaynakça

  • Morse, D. A. (1969). The Origin and Evolution of the I.L.O. and Its Role in the World Community. New York: Ithaca.
  • OECD. (1996). Trade, Employment and Labour Standards: A Study of Core Workers’ Rights and International Trade. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • O’Grady, J. (June 1994). Case2: Province of Ontario, Canada: Removing the Obstacles to Negotiated Adjustments. Sengenberger W., Campbell, D. (Ed.), Creating economic opportunities: The Role of Labour Standards in Industrial Restructuring (ss. 255-278). Geneva: ILO.
  • Onida, F. (July 2008). Labour Standards and ILO’s Effectiveness in the Governance of Globalization (CESPRI Working Paper No. 218). Milano: CESPRI.
  • Perez, J. B. (2013). The International Labour Organization (ILO) as an Actor of Global Governance: Sufficiently Involved to Help Overcome the Latest Financial and Economic Crisis?, Yearbook on Humanitarian Action and Human Rights, Universidad de Deusto. ISSN: 1885 - 298X, 11/2013, Bilbao. 109-139.
  • Plata-Stenger V. (9 March 2016), Europe, the ILO and the Wider World (1919-1954), Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, http://ieg-ego.eu/en/threads/transnational-movementsand-organisations/international-organisations-and-congresses/veronique-platastenger-europe-the-ilo-and-the-wider-world-1919-1954.
  • Rodgers, G., Lee, E., Swepston, L., Van Daele, J. (2009). The International Labour Organization and the Quest for Social Justice, 1919-2009. Geneva: ILO.
  • Telljohann, V., da Costa, I., Müller, T., Rehfeldt, U. (June 2009). European and International Framework Agreements: Practical Experiences and Strategic Approaches (European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions EF/08/102). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • The Global Voice of Business. (May 2015). Paper on International Labour Standards in the Contemporary Global Economy. London: The International Bar Association Global Employment Institute. Thompson, E. P. (1966). The making of the English working class. New York: Vintage Books.
  • United Nations. (6-12 March 1995). Report of the world summit for social development. New York: UN.
  • United Nations. (8 September 2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/52/2, Fifty-fifth Session, Agenda Item 60 (b). New York: UN.
  • United Nations (16 September 2005) 2005 World Summit Outcome, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/60/1, Sixtieth Session, Agenda Items 46 and 120. New York: UN.
  • United Nations. (24 October 2005). 2005 World Summit Outcome, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, Sixtieth Session, A/RES/60/1. New York: UN.
  • United Nations. (2006). Report of the Secretary-General on the Work of Organization, Sixty-first Session, Supplement No.1, A/61/1. New York: UN.
  • United Nations, (15 January 2008), Official List of Millennium Development Goals Indicators, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://unstats.un.org/unsd/mdg/Host. aspx?Content=Indicators/OfficialList.htm.
  • Vaughan-Whitehead, D., Vazquze-Alvarez, R. (2018). Curbing Inequalities in Europe: The Impact of Industrial Relations and Labour Policies. Vaughan-Whitehead, D. (Ed.), Reducing Inequalities in Europe: How Industrial Relations and Labour Policies Can Close the Gap (ss. 1-67). Geneva, Switzerland: ILO, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Viilup, E., Przetacznik, J. (January 2016). Briefing The International Labour Organisation and International Trade, European Parliament, Directorate-General for External Policies Policy Department, DG EXPO/B/PolDep/Note/2016_33. Brussels: European Parliament.
  • World Bank. (1990). World Development Report. Washington DC: World Bank. World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization. (February 2004). A fair globalization: Creating opportunities for all. Geneva: ILO.
  • World Trade Organization. (18 December 1996). Singapore WTO Ministerial 1996: Ministerial Declaration, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.wto.org/ english/thewto_e/minist_e/min96_e/wtodec_e.htm. World Trade Organization, World Trade Report 2013: Factors Shaping the Future of the World Trade. Geneva: WTO.
  • ILO. (2019c). World Employment Social Outlook: Trends 2019. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (21 June 2019). ILO Centenary Declaration For The Future of Work, Adopted by International Labour Conference at its One Hunderd Eighth Session. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO, World Health Organization. (November 2009). Social Protection Floor Initiative: The Sixth Initiative of the CEB on the Global Financial and Economic Crisis and Its Impact on the Work of the UN System, Manual and Strategic Framework for Joint UN Country Operations. Geneva: ILO,
  • WHO. International Monetary and Financial Committee. (October 14, 2017). IMFC Statement by Guy Ryder Director General International Labour Organization,Thirty-Sixth Meeting. Washington D.C.: IMF. International Trade Union Confederation. Constitution, Adopted at the Founding Congress, Vienne, November 2006, Amended by the Third Congress, Berlin, May 2014. Brussels: ITUC CSI IGB.
  • Jakovleski, V., Jerbi, S., Biersteker, T. (19 June 2019). The ILO’s Role in Global Governance: Limits and Potential.
  • Gironde, C., Garbonier, G. (Ed.), The ILO@100: Adressing the Past and Future of Work and Social Protection (ss. 82-108). Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff Publishing.
  • Jansen, M., Lee, E. (2007). Trade and Employment: Challenges for Policy Research, A Joint Study of the Intrenational Labour Office and the Secretariat of the World Trade Organization. Geneva: World Trade Organization Secretariat.
  • Kaufman, B. E. (2010). The theoretical foundation of ındustrial relations and its ımplications for labour economics and human resource management. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64(1), 74-108.
  • Kott, S. (19 June 2019). ILO: Social Justice in a Global World? A History in Tension.
  • Gironde, C., Garbonier, G. (Ed.), The ILO@100: Adressing the Past and Future of Work and Social Protection (ss. 21-39). Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff Publishing.
  • Kunanayakam, T. (2013). The Declaration on the Right to Development in the Context of United Nations Standard Setting. United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (Ed.), Realizing the Right to Development: Essays in Commemoration of 25 Years of the United Nations Declaration on the Right to Development (ss. 17-48). New York and Geneva: United Nations Publications.
  • Langille, B. A. (2003-2004). Re-reading of the Preamble of the 1919 ILO Constitution in Light of Recent Data on FDI and Worker Rights. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 42(1), 87-99.
  • Lee, E. (1998). The Asian Financial Crisis: The Challenge for Social Policy. Geneva: ILO.
  • Marshall S., Fenwick C. (2016). Labour Law and Development: Characteristics and Challenges. Marshall S., Fenwick C. (Ed.), Labour Regulation and Development: Socio-Legal Perspectives (ss. 1-32). Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA, ILO, Geneva, Switzerland: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • ILO. (01 December 1999). ILO Calls For New Multilateral Initiative to Address Social Implications of Globalization, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.ilo.org/ global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_007962/lang--en/index.htm.
  • ILO. (March 2000). Report of the Working Party on the Social Dimensions of the Liberalization of International Trade, ILO Governing Body, 277th Session, GB.277/16. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (November 2000). Framework for studies on integrated policies to achieve a wider sharing of the benefits of globalization, ILO Governing Body, 279th Session, GB.279/ WP/SDG/3. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (November 2001). Enhancing the action of the Working Party on the Social Dimension of Globalization: Next steps, ILO Governing Body, 282nd Session, GB.282/ WP/SDG/1. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (2002). Decent Work and the Informal Economy, Report No VI, International Labour Conference 90th Session. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (12 February 2008), The ILO at a Glance, Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (10 June 2008). ILO Declaration on Social Justice For A Fair Globalization, Adopted by International Labour Conference at its Ninety-seventh Session. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (2009). The Financial and Economic Crisis: A Decent Work Response. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (19 June 2009). Recovering from the Crisis: A Global Jobs Pact, Adopted by the International Labour Conference at its 98th Session. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (2010). Review of the follow-up to the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, International Labour Conference 99th Session Seventh Item on the Agenda Report VII. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (2012). Fundamental principles and rights at work: From commitment to action International Labour Conference 101st Session Sixth Item on Agenda Report VI. Geneva:ILO.
  • ILO. (2013). Report of the Director-General: Towards the ILO Centenary: Realities, renewal and tripartite commitment (Report 1(A), International Labour Conference, 102nd Session). Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (2015). Report of the Director-General: The Future of Work Centenary Initiative (Report 1, International Labour Conference, 104th Session). Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (2017). A Reflection on the Future of Work and Society. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (29-30 September 2017). The ILO Global Commission for the Future of Work: Paper Presented at the G7 Labour and Employment Ministerial Meeting. Turin, Italy: ILO.
  • ILO. (2019a). Global Commission on the Future of Work: Work for a Brighter Future. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (2019b). Conventions and Recommendations, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.ilo.org/global/standards/introduction-to-international-labour-standards/ conventions-and-recommendations/lang--en/index.htm.
  • Charnovitz, S. (2000). The International Labour Organization in its Second Century. Von Bogdandy, A., Wolfrum, R. (Ed.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (ss. 147-184). Heidelberg: Max Planc Institute.
  • Coxson, C. R. (1999). The 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work: Promoting Labor Law Reforms Through the ILO as an Alternative to Imposing Coercive Trade Sanctions. Penn State International Law Review, 17(3), 469-504.
  • Delican, M. (2017). Uluslararasılaşma ve küreselleşme bağlamında karşılaştırmalı endüstri ilişkileri: gelişmeler ve teorik yaklaşımlar. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 72, 1-33.
  • Ebert, F. C., & Posthuma, A. (2011). Labour Provisions in trade arrangements: current trends and perspectives. (International Labour Organization International Institute for Labour Studies Disscussion Paper Series No. 205) Geneva: ILO.
  • Global Deal. (2018). Building Trust in a Changing World of Work: The Global Deal for Decent Work and Inclusive Growth Flagship Report 2018. Geneva: ILO, Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Gravel, E., Kohiyama T., & Tsotroudi K. (2014) A legal perspective on the role of ınternational labour standards in rebalancing globalization. Revue Interventions économiques, Papers in Political Economy, 49, 1-20. Hansenne, M. (1994). Promoting Social Justice in the new global economy. Monthly Labor Review, 3-4.
  • Igwe, I. O. C. (April 2018). History of the ınternational economy: the bretton woods system and its ımpact on the economic development of developing countries. Athens Journal of Law, 4(2), 105-126.
  • ILO. (1919), Constitution of the International Labour Organization, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=1000:62:0::NO:62:P62_LIST_ ENTRIE_ID:2453907:NO
  • ILO. (10 May 1944), Declaration Concerning the Aims and Purposes of the International Labour Organization (Declaration of Philadelphia). Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (1995). World Employment 1995: An ILO Report. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (1996). World Employment Report 1996/97: National Policies in a Global Context. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (June 1999). Report of the Director-General: Decent Work, International Labour Office 87th Session. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (18 June 1998). ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and Its Follow-Up: Adopted by the International Labour Conference at its Eighty-sixth Session. Geneva: ILO.
  • ILO. (22 March 1999). Statement by Mr. Juan Somavia Director General of the International Labour Office Upon Taking his Oath of Office, Erişim Tarihi: 15 Ekim 2019, https://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/dgo/speeches/somavia/1999/oath.htm.
Toplam 64 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Siyaset Bilimi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Özlem Özgür Büyükdere Bu kişi benim 0000-0003-2600-1274

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 15 Ekim 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019

Kaynak Göster

APA Özgür Büyükdere, Ö. (2019). 100.Yılında Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü: Değişen Koşullarda Politika Tercihleri ve Yönelimler. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi(77), 59-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015
AMA Özgür Büyükdere Ö. 100.Yılında Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü: Değişen Koşullarda Politika Tercihleri ve Yönelimler. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi. Aralık 2019;(77):59-96. doi:10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015
Chicago Özgür Büyükdere, Özlem. “100.Yılında Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü: Değişen Koşullarda Politika Tercihleri Ve Yönelimler”. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, sy. 77 (Aralık 2019): 59-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015.
EndNote Özgür Büyükdere Ö (01 Aralık 2019) 100.Yılında Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü: Değişen Koşullarda Politika Tercihleri ve Yönelimler. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi 77 59–96.
IEEE Ö. Özgür Büyükdere, “100.Yılında Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü: Değişen Koşullarda Politika Tercihleri ve Yönelimler”, Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, sy. 77, ss. 59–96, Aralık 2019, doi: 10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015.
ISNAD Özgür Büyükdere, Özlem. “100.Yılında Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü: Değişen Koşullarda Politika Tercihleri Ve Yönelimler”. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi 77 (Aralık 2019), 59-96. https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015.
JAMA Özgür Büyükdere Ö. 100.Yılında Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü: Değişen Koşullarda Politika Tercihleri ve Yönelimler. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi. 2019;:59–96.
MLA Özgür Büyükdere, Özlem. “100.Yılında Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü: Değişen Koşullarda Politika Tercihleri Ve Yönelimler”. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, sy. 77, 2019, ss. 59-96, doi:10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0015.
Vancouver Özgür Büyükdere Ö. 100.Yılında Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü: Değişen Koşullarda Politika Tercihleri ve Yönelimler. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi. 2019(77):59-96.