Application of swat hydrological model to assess the impacts of land use change on sediment loads

Rouhollah Nasirzadehdizaji; Dilek Eren Akyüz

doi:10.31015/jaefs.2022.1.15

EN

Application of swat hydrological model to assess the impacts of land use change on sediment loads

Abstract

Controlling and reducing the watershed's erosion and sedimentation is essential to ensure the continuity of projects implemented to develop land and water resources and improve sustainability, performance, and longevity. Sediment control is also critical in managing the river basin in limiting the transport of solids, improving water quality, sustaining aquatic life, and preventing damage to downstream aquatic environments and ecosystems. Estimating the potential effects of land-use changes on surface runoff and soil erosion requires distributed hydrological modeling methods. In addition to naturally occurring sediments, changes in land-use types for different applications can be a primary cause for the increase in sediment rates in the watershed. This study used the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), a rainfall-runoff model, to evaluate land use/cover changes (i.e., deforestation) and their impact on sediment load under different scenarios. For the baseline (no changes) scenario, the watershed is calibrated using the flow and sediment data measured from the rain gauge station during the time step to estimate the post-deforestation changes at the sub-catchment scale of the study area. The study results indicated that the total surface runoff and sediment yield for the selected sub-catchment in the deforestation scenario with the highest spatial distribution, due to the high erosivity (24% increase) of excessive surface runoff after deforestation, sediment yield increased 3.5-fold. In contrast, due to the removal of trees and vegetation's canopy, the evapotranspiration, leaf area index, and dissolved oxygen transported into reach showed the inverse ratios, and the values decreased by 5%, 24, and 17%, respectively, in compared with the baseline scenario. In terms of watershed management, therefore, the application of hydrological models such as SWAT rainfall-runoff and erosion models can be a helpful method for decision-makers to apply for the protection of forests from intensive impacts such as deforestation and limiting their socio-environmental effects.

Keywords

Land use/cover change, Deforestation, SWAT model, Erosion, Sediment yield, Watershed management.

Supporting Institution

Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa,

Project Number

FDK-2018-29656.

Thanks

The study was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Project number FDK-2018-29656. The authors would like to thank the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa for their support. This study is part of the first author's Ph.D. thesis.

References

Abbaspour, K. C., Vejdani, M, and Haghighat, S. (2000). SWAT-CUP Calibration and Uncertainty Programs for SWAT. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 43(5), 1596–1602. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.3000
Abbaspour, K. C., Yang, J., Maximov, I., Siber, R., Bogner, K., Mieleitner, J., Zobrist, J., and Srinivasan, R. (2007). Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology, 333(2–4), 413–430. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.014
Aber, J. D. (1992). Nitrogen cycling and nitrogen saturation in temperate forest ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7(7), 220–224. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(92)90048-G
Aksoy, E., Panagos, P., Montanarella, L., and Jones, A. (2010). Integration of the Soil Database of Turkey. In Earth. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2788/77892
Aliye, A., Modibbo, N., Medugu, N., and Ayo, O. (2014). Impacts of Deforestation on Socio-Economic Development of Akwanga Nasarawa State. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 3(2), 403–416. Retrieved from www.ijset.net
Amundson, R., Berhe, A., Hopmans, J., Olson, C., Sztein, A. E., and Sparks, D. (2015). Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science, 348(6235). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261071
Arnold, J., Allen, P., and Bernhardt, G. (1993). A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology, 142(1–4), 47–69. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90004-S
Arnold, J. G., Moriasi, D. N., Gassman, P. W., Abbaspour, K. C., White, M. J., Srinivasan, R., Santhi, C., Harmel, R. D., and Griensven, A. Van. (2012). Swat: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation. 55(4), 1491–1508. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.42256
Atalay, I. (1986). Vegetation formations of Turkey. Travaux - Institut de Geographie de Reims, 65–66, 17–30. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3406/tigr.1986.1183
Avwunudiogba, A., and Hudson, P. F. (2014). A Review of Soil Erosion Models with Special Reference to the needs of Humid Tropical Mountainous Environments. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(4), 299–310. Doi: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2014.v3n4p299

Bettess, R., Fisher, K., Hardwick, M., Holmes, N., Mant, J., Sayers, P., Sear, D., and Thorne, C. (2011). Key Recommendations for Channel management (Issue Phase 2). Environment Agency, Bristol, UK. Retrieved from www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Bonan, G. B. (1999). Frost Followed the Plow: Impacts of Deforestation on the Climate of the United States. Ecological Applications, 9(4), 1305. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2641398
Bredemeier, M. (2010). Forest, climate and water issues in Europe. Ecohydrology, 130(February), 126–130. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/eco
Brevik, E. C. (2006). Soil health and productivity. Soils, Plant Growth Crop Prod. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), I. Retrieved from https://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c10/E1-05A-04-00.pdf
Chrisphine, O., Maryanne, O., and Boitt, K. M. (2015). Assessment of Hydrological Impacts of Mau Forest, Kenya. Journal of Waste Water Treatment & Analysis, 07(01), 1–7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7587.1000223
Citiroglu, H., Barut, I., and Zuran, A. (2011). Groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Loussi polje area, N Peloponessus: the PRESK method. In Advances in the Research of Aquatic Environment. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24076-8_39
CLC. (2018). European Union, Copernicus Land Monitoring Service 2018, European Environment Agency (EEA), 1, 129. Retrieved from https://land.copernicus.eu/
Collins, A. L., and McGonigle, D. F. (2008). Monitoring and modelling diffuse pollution from agriculture for policy support: UK and European experience. Environmental Science and Policy, 11(2), 97–101. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2008.01.001
Cullu, M. A., Gunal, H., Akca, E., and Kapur, S. (2018). Soil Geography. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Change (pp. 105–109). The Soils of Turkey. World Soils Book Series. Springer, Cham. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247501.n3605
De Vente, J., Poesen, J., Verstraeten, G., Govers, G., Vanmaercke, M., Van Rompaey, A., Arabkhedri, M., and Boix-Fayos, C. (2013). Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at regional scales: Where do we stand? Earth-Science Reviews, 127, 16–29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.08.014
Farley, K., Jobbágy, E., and Jackson, R. (2005). Effects of afforestation on water yield: A global synthesis with implications for policy. Global Change Biology, 11(10), 1565–1576. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01011.x
Gellis, A., Fitzpatrick, F., and Schubauer-Berigan, J. (2016). A Manual to Identify Sources of Fluvial Sediment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R1(September), 106. Retrieved from https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P100QVM1.PDF?Dockey=P100QVM1.PDF
Hargreaves, G. H., and Samani, Z. A. (1985). Reference Crop Evapotranspiration From Ambient Air Temperature. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 1(2): 96-99. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.26773
Hassan, M. A., Roberge, L., Church, M., More, M., Donner, S. D., Leach, J., and Ali, K. F. (2017). What are the contemporary sources of sediment in the Mississippi River? Geophysical Research Letters, 44(17), 8919–8924. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074046
Hughes, R., Kauffman, J., and Jarmaillo, V. (2000). Ecosystem-Scale Impacts of Deforestation and Land Use in a Humid Tropical Region of Mexico. Ecological Applications, 10(2), 515. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2641111
Iwata, T., Nakano, S., and Inoue, M. (2003). Impacts of past riparian deforestation on stream communities in a tropical rain forest in Borneo. Ecological Applications, 13(2), 461–473. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0461:IOPRDO]2.0.CO;2
Izquierdo, A. E., and Grau, H. R. (2009). Agriculture adjustment, land-use transition and protected areas in Northwestern Argentina. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2), 858–865. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.013
Jenkins, A. P., Jupiter, S. D., Qauqau, I., and Atherton, J. (2007). The importance of ecosystem-based management for conserving aquatic migratory pathways on tropical high islands: a case study from Fiji. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 656(October 2006), 636–656. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc
Juárez-Orozco, S., Siebe, C., and Fernández, D. (2017). Causes and Effects of Forest Fires in Tropical Rainforests: A Bibliometric Approach. Tropical Conservation Science, 10. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082917737207
Kük, M., and Burgess, P. (2010). The Pressures on, and the Responses to, the State of Soil and Water Resources of Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Çevrebilimleri Dergisi, March, 199–211. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1501/csaum_0000000036
Langdale, G. W., West, L. T., Bruce, R. R., Miller, W. P., & Thomas, A. W. (1992). Restoration of eroded soil with conservation tillage. Soil Technology, 5(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0933-3630(92)90009-P
Li, Y., Zhao, M., Mildrexler, D. J., Motesharrei, S., Mu, Q., Kalnay, E., Zhao, F., Li, S., and Wang, K. (2016). Potential and actual impacts of deforestation and afforestation on land surface temperature. Journal of Geophysical Research, 121(24), 14372–14386. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024969
Maxwell, S. L., Fuller, R. A., Brooks, T. M., and Watson, J. E. M. (2016). Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature, 536(7615), 143–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/536143a
Monteith, J. L. (1965). Evaporation and Environment. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology., 19, 205–234. Retrieved from https://repository.rothamsted.ac.uk/item/8v5v7
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., M. W. Van Liew, R. L. Bingner, Harmel, R. D., and T. L. Veith. (2007). Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 50(3), 885–900. Retrieved from https://swat.tamu.edu/media/1312/moriasimodeleval.pdf
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10(3), 282–290. Doi: https://doi.org/https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/1970JHyd...10..282N/doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
Neitsch, S., Arnold, J., Kiniry, J., and Williams, J. (2011). Soil & Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute, 1–647. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.063
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., and Williams., J. R. (2005). Soil and Water Assessment Tool User’s Manual Version 2005. Diffuse Pollution Conference Dublin, 494. Retrieved from http://swat.tamu.edu/media /1292/swat2005theory.pdf
Owens, P. N., Batalla, R. J., Collins, A. J., Gomez, B., Hicks, D. M., Horowitz, A. J., Kondolf, G. M., Marden, M., Page, M. J., Peacock, D. H., Petticrew, E. L., Salomons, W., & Trustrum, N. A. (2005). Fine-grained sediment in river systems: Environmental significance and management issues. River Research and Applications, 21(7), 693–717. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.878
Pattanayak, S. K., and Wendland, K. J. (2007). Nature’s care: Diarrhea, watershed protection, and biodiversity conservation in Flores, Indonesia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16(10), 2801–2819. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9215-1
Pimentel, D., and Burgess, M. (2013). Soil erosion threatens food production. Agriculture (Switzerland), 3(3), 443–463. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture3030443
Pimentel, D., Harvey, C., Resosudarmo, P., Sinclair, K., Kurz, D., McNair, M., Crist, S., Shpritz, L., Fitton, L., Saffouri, R., and Blair, R. (1995). Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science, 267(5201), 1117–1123. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.267.5201.1117
Priestley, C. H. B., and Taylor, R. J. (1972). On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters. Monthly Weather Review, 100(2), 81–92. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:otaosh>2.3.co;2
Ritter, J. (2012). Wind Erosion - Causes and Effects. ProEnvironment/ProMediu, 12(38), 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/12-053.htm
Rocha-Santos, L., Pessoa, M. S., Cassano, C. R., Talora, D. C., Orihuela, R. L. L., Mariano-Neto, E., Morante-Filho, J. C., Faria, D., & Cazetta, E. (2016). The shrinkage of a forest: Landscape-scale deforestation leading to overall changes in local forest structure. Biological Conservation, 196, 1–9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.01.028
Schüler, G. (2006). Identification of flood-generating forest areas and forestry measures for water retention. Forest Snow and Landscape Research, 80(1), 99–114. Retrieved from https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/wsl/islandora/object/wsl%3A15461
Symes, W. S., Edwards, D. P., Miettinen, J., Rheindt, F. E., and Carrasco, L. R. (2018). Combined impacts of deforestation and wildlife trade on tropical biodiversity are severely underestimated. Nature Communications, 9(1). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06579-2
USDA. (1972). USDA Soil Conservation Service. National Engineering Handbook Section 4 Hydrology, August, Chapters 4-10. Retrieved from https://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/OpenNonWebContent.aspx?content=18389.wba
Verheijen, F. G. A., Jones, R. J. A., Rickson, R. J., and Smith, C. J. (2009). Tolerable versus actual soil erosion rates in Europe. Earth-Science Reviews, 94(1–4), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.02.003
Wardle, D. A., Bardgett, R. D., Klironomos, J. N., Setälä, H., Van Der Putten, W. H., and Wall, D. H. (2004). Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science, 304(5677), 1629–1633. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094875
Watson, R., Noble, R., Bolin, B., Ravindranath, N., Verardo, D., and Dokken, D. (2000). Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (p. 20pp). Retrieved from https://archive.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/land_use/index.php?idp=0
Wenger, A. S., Atkinson, S., Santini, T., Falinski, K., Hutley, N., Albert, S., Horning, N., Watson, J. E. M., Mumby, P. J., and Jupiter, S. D. (2018). Predicting the impact of logging activities on soil erosion and water quality in steep, forested tropical islands. Environmental Research Letters, 13(4). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab9eb
Wilk, J., Andersson, L., and Plermkamon, V. (2001). Hydrological impacts of forest conversion to agriculture in a large river basin in Northeast Thailand. Hydrological Processes, 15(14), 2729–2748. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.229
Williams, J., Karl G., and Bruce P. V. H. (1975). Use of the Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation for average annual sediment yield estimates on small rangeland drainage basins. Present and Prospective Technology for Predicting Sediment Yield and Sources. U.S. Dept. Agrie., pp 244-252. Retrieved from https://iahs.info/uploads/dms/6694.413-422-159-Jackson.pdf
WWF. (2017). Causes and effects of global forest fires. Retrieved from https://www.wwf.de/fileadmin/fm-wwf/Publikationen-PDF/WWF-Study-Forests-Ablaze.pdf
Yen, H., Ahmadi, M., White, M. J., Wang, X., and Arnold, J. G. (2014). C-SWAT: The Soil and Water Assessment Tool with consolidated input files in alleviating computational burden of recursive simulations. Computers and Geosciences, 72, 221–232. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.07.017

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Water Resources and Water Structures

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Rouhollah Nasirzadehdizaji
0000-0003-1913-890X
Türkiye

Dilek Eren Akyüz ^*
0000-0003-4509-6897
Türkiye

Publication Date

March 15, 2022

Submission Date

January 2, 2022

Acceptance Date

March 6, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 6 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2022.1.15

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA43NN78WL

APA

Nasirzadehdizaji, R., & Akyüz, D. E. (2022). Application of swat hydrological model to assess the impacts of land use change on sediment loads. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 6(1), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2022.1.15

AMA

1.Nasirzadehdizaji R, Akyüz DE. Application of swat hydrological model to assess the impacts of land use change on sediment loads. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2022;6(1):108-120. doi:10.31015/jaefs.2022.1.15

Chicago

Nasirzadehdizaji, Rouhollah, and Dilek Eren Akyüz. 2022. “Application of Swat Hydrological Model to Assess the Impacts of Land Use Change on Sediment Loads”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 6 (1): 108-20. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2022.1.15.

EndNote

Nasirzadehdizaji R, Akyüz DE (March 1, 2022) Application of swat hydrological model to assess the impacts of land use change on sediment loads. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 6 1 108–120.

IEEE

[1]R. Nasirzadehdizaji and D. E. Akyüz, “Application of swat hydrological model to assess the impacts of land use change on sediment loads”, int. j. agric. environ. food sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 108–120, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.31015/jaefs.2022.1.15.

ISNAD

Nasirzadehdizaji, Rouhollah - Akyüz, Dilek Eren. “Application of Swat Hydrological Model to Assess the Impacts of Land Use Change on Sediment Loads”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences 6/1 (March 1, 2022): 108-120. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2022.1.15.

JAMA

1.Nasirzadehdizaji R, Akyüz DE. Application of swat hydrological model to assess the impacts of land use change on sediment loads. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2022;6:108–120.

MLA

Nasirzadehdizaji, Rouhollah, and Dilek Eren Akyüz. “Application of Swat Hydrological Model to Assess the Impacts of Land Use Change on Sediment Loads”. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, Mar. 2022, pp. 108-20, doi:10.31015/jaefs.2022.1.15.

Vancouver

1.Rouhollah Nasirzadehdizaji, Dilek Eren Akyüz. Application of swat hydrological model to assess the impacts of land use change on sediment loads. int. j. agric. environ. food sci. 2022 Mar. 1;6(1):108-20. doi:10.31015/jaefs.2022.1.15

Cited By

In-Stream Modeling of Inorganic Nutrients and Total Suspended Sediments Concentrations at a Watershed-Scale in the West-Carpathians with Swat+ Procedure

SSRN Electronic Journal

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4105289

Future eco-hydrological dynamics: Urbanization and climate change effects in a changing landscape: A case study of Birmingham's river basin

Journal of Cleaner Production

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141320

Enhancing Flood Management Through Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis of the CatBoost Application

International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)

https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1770

Ecological and human health risks arising from heavy metals and metalloid in river surface sediments for sustainable watershed management

Acta Geophysica

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-025-01681-8

Sediment-Loading Processes in a Forested Catchment: Modeling and Observations

Open Journal of Modern Hydrology

https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmh.2023.132005

Abstracting & Indexing Services

Google Scholar | Crossref DOI Registry

All content published in this journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal a non-exclusive right to publish, reproduce, and distribute the articles within an open-access framework.

Web: dergipark.org.tr/jaefs E-mail: editorialoffice@jaefs.com Phone / WhatsApp: +90 850 309 59 27

Abstract

Project Number

Application of swat hydrological model to assess the impacts of land use change on sediment loads

Abstract

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Project Number

Thanks

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

In-Stream Modeling of Inorganic Nutrients and Total Suspended Sediments Concentrations at a Watershed-Scale in the West-Carpathians with Swat+ Procedure

Future eco-hydrological dynamics: Urbanization and climate change effects in a changing landscape: A case study of Birmingham's river basin

Enhancing Flood Management Through Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis of the CatBoost Application

Ecological and human health risks arising from heavy metals and metalloid in river surface sediments for sustainable watershed management

Sediment-Loading Processes in a Forested Catchment: Modeling and Observations

Abstracting & Indexing Services

© International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences