Understanding of the relation between ethnic diversity and public space

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 113 - 141, 25.09.2022

Çevirmen: Tülay Zıvalı

Öz

In its most obvious form, the mechanism of the “public” – the individuals in a society and their engagement with each other – can be seen in the core of the cities; the public space. Over the years, many scholars from various disciplines have contributed extensive research on this notion. This article provides a constructive analysis of research approaches and methodologies applied to ethnic diversity as a social phenomenon in relation to public space. It examines 1,079 articles published between 1995 and 2020 and included in Web of Science. The bibliometric dataset was manually filtered, and query-based scientometric visualization was produced using CiteSpace software. The article explores how theory is applied, and it outlines current trends, gaps, and common methodological approaches in the literature, which may lead to new insights for further interdisciplinary research. The results show two fundamental clusters in the theoretical conceptualization regarding the subject: a human–place relational approach, which is based on examining urban and social policy, and a human–human relational approach, which focuses on interpersonal interactions and considers public space a facilitator for this social encounter.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bibliometric review, CiteSpace, ethnic diversity, public space, Web of Science

Teşekkür

Special thanks to Prof. Dr. Salah HAJISMAIL for providing Arabic language support for this article.

فهم العلاقة بين التنوع العرقي والفراغات العامة: تحليل مرجعي

Öz

يمكن رؤية علاقة "الجمهور" - الأفراد في المجتمع وانخراطهم مع بعضهم البعض - في أوضح صورها في قلب المدن ؛ في الفراغات العامة. ساهم العديد من العلماء من مختلف التخصصات على مر السنين بأبحاث مكثفة حول هذه الفكرة. تقدم هذه المقالة تحليلاً بناءً لمقاربات البحث والمنهجيات المطبقة على التنوع العرقي كظاهرة اجتماعية فيما يتعلق بالفراغات العامة. يفحص البحث 1079 مقالة منشورة بين 1995 و 2020 وتم تضمينها في قاعدة بيانات Web of Science. تمت تصفية مجموعة البيانات المرجعية يدويًا ، وتم إنتاج التصور العلمي القائم على الاستعلام باستخدام برنامج CiteSpace. يستكشف المقال كيفية تطبيق النظرية ، ويحدد الاتجاهات الحالية ، والفجوات ، والأساليب المنهجية الشائعة في الدراسات ، والتي قد تؤدي إلى رؤى جديدة لمزيد من البحث متعدد التخصصات. تُظهر النتائج مجموعتين أساسيتين في التصور النظري للموضوع: نهج العلاقات بين الإنسان والمكان ، والذي يعتمد على فحص السياسة الحضرية والاجتماعية ، ونهج العلاقات بين الإنسان والإنسان ، والذي يركز على التفاعلات بين الأشخاص ويعتبر الفراغ العام بمثابة الوسيط من أجل هذا اللقاء الاجتماعي.

Anahtar Kelimeler

مراجعة الببليومترية, CiteSpace, التنوع العرقي, الفضاء العام, Web of Science

Kaynakça

• AHARON-GUTMAN Meirav, 2014. The iron cage of ethnicity: Ethnic urban enclaves and the challenge of urban design, in “Urban Design International”, n. 19(1), pp. 144–158. DOI:10.1057/udi.2013.20.
• AMIN Ash, 2002. Ethnicity and the multicultural city: Living with diversity, in “Environment and Planning”, n. 34(6), pp. 959–980. DOI:10.1068/a3537.
• AMIN Ash, 2012. Land of strangers. Polity Press, Cambridge.
• ANDRADE, L. F. S., DE PAVIA, A. L., DE BRITO, M. J., GARCIA, A. S. & DO PRADO, J. W., 2016. The right to shape different cities and public realm? A systematic review on “right to the city” scientific production in public administration (1995–2015). Paper presented at XL Encontro do ANPAD, 25–28 September, Costa do Sauípe, Brazil. Typescript.
• AYATA Sencer, 2008. Migrants and changing urban periphery: Social relations, cultural diversity and the public space in Istanbul’s new neighbourhoods, in “International Migration”, n. 46(3), pp. 27–64. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2008.00461.x
• BACK Les, 2015. Why everyday life matters: Class, community and making life liveable, in “Sociology”, n. 49(5), pp. 820–836. DOI:10.1177/0038038515589292.
• BADARIN Emile, 2015. Settler-colonialist management of entrances to the native urban space in Palestine, in “Settler Colonial Studies”, n. 5(3), pp. 226– 235. DOI:10.1080/2201473X.2014.955946.
• BHAVNANI Ravi, DONNAY Karsten, MIODOWNIK Dan, MOR Mayaan & HELBING Dirk, 2013. Group segregation and urban violence, in “American Journal of Political Science”, n. 58(1), pp. 226–245. DOI:10.1111/ajps.12045.
• BLUMER Martin & SOLOMOS John, 2015. Multiculturalism, social cohesion and immigration. London, Routledge.
• BROWN Judtih M., 2006. Global South Asians: Introducing the modern diaspora. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511807657.
• BRYNE Jason, 2012. When green is white: The cultural politics of race, nature and social exclusion in a Los Angeles urban national park, in “Geoforum”, n. 43(3), pp. 595–611. DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.10.002.
• BURGERS Jack & ZUIDERWIJK Linda, 2016. At home at the neighborhood square, in “Home Cultures”, n. 13(2), pp. 101–121. DOI:10.1080/17406315.2016.1190582.
• CALIENDO Guillermo G., 2011. MLK Boulevard: Material forms of memory and the social contestation of racial signification, in “Journal of Black Studies”, n. 42(7), pp. 1148–1170. DOI:10.1177/0021934711404415.
• CARMONA Matthew, HEATH Tim, OC Taner & TIESDELL Steve, 2003. Public Spaces – Urban Spaces. Oxford, The Architectural Press.
• CATTELL Vicky, DINES Nick, GESLER Will & CURTIS Sarah, 2008. Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations, in “Health & Place”, n. 14(3), pp. 544–561. DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.007.
• CHARAMBOUS ANTONIADOU Nadia & PERISTIANIS Nicos, 2001. Ethnic groups, space, and identity, in Peponis, J., Wineman, J. & Bafna, S. (eds.) “Space syntax: 3rd international symposium Proceedings”, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, May 7–11 2001. Ann Arbor, MI, A. Alfred Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, pp. s3.1-s3.7.
• CHEN Chaomei, 2016. CiteSpace: A Practical Guide for Mapping Scientific Literature. New York, Nova Science Publishers.
• CHEN Chaomei, 2020. How to use CiteSpace. Victoria, BC, Lean Publishing.
• CHEN Chaomei & SONG Min, 2019. Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews, in “PLoS ONE”, n. 14(10), e0223994. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0223994.
• CHUANG Ru-Jye, SHARMA Shreela, SKALA Katie & EVANS Alexandra, 2013. Ethnic differences in the home environment and physical activity behaviors among low-income, minority preschoolers in Texas, in “American Journal of Health Promotion”, n. 27(4), pp. 270–278. DOI:10.4278/ajhp.110427-QUAN-171.
• Creswell John W., 1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
• Creswell John W., 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
• DEMINTSEVA Ekaterina, 2017. Labour migrants in post-Soviet Moscow: Patterns of settlement, in “Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies”, 43(15), pp. 2556– 2572. DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1294053.
• DINES Nick, CATTELL Vicky, GESLER Wil & CURTIS Sarah, 2006. Public spaces, social relations and well-being in East London. Bristol, Policy Press.
• Ehrkamp Patricia, 2013. “I’ve had it with them!” Younger migrant women’s spatial practices of conformity and resistance, in “Gender, Place & Culture”, n. 20(1), pp. 19–36. DOI:10.1080/0966369X.2011.649356.
• FERATI Armir, 2009. Spatial and ethnic patterns: The interface between “majority” and “minority” in Macedonia, in Koch, D., Marcus, L. & Steen, J. (eds.), “Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium”, KTH, Stockholm, pp. 030:1-030:6.
• FESTIĆ Fatima, 2015. Coming to terms with horror: The “ghosts” of the ‘ex-Yugoslav’ wars and psycho-politics after communism, in “Chinese Semiotic Studies”, n. 11(2), pp. 181–203. DOI:10.1515/css-2015-0010.
• FINCHER Ruth & IVESON Kurt, 2008. Planning and diversity in the city. London, Palgrave Macmillan. DOI:10.1007/978-1-137-06960-3.
• FREDMAN Avigail, 2018. Perfectionist public space: A political philosophy approach, in “Space and Polity”, n. 22(1), pp. 30–49. DOI:10.1080/13562576.2018.1485216.
• GEHL Jan, 2011. Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. Washington, DC, Island Press.
• GEHL Jan & GEMZOE Lars, 1996. Public spaces – Public life. Copenhagen, Danish Architectural Press.
• GIBSON Danjuma, 2018. When empathy is not enough: A reflection on the self-experience of black boys in public spaces, in “Pastoral Psychology”, n. 67(1), pp. 611–626. DOI:10.1007/s11089-018-0837-x.
• HALL Suzanne M., 2015. Super-diverse street: A “trans-ethnography” across migrant localities, in “Ethnic and Racial Studies”, n. 38(1), pp. 22–37. DOI:10.1080/01419870.2013.858175.
• HARWOOD Stacy A., MENDENHALL Ruby, LEE Sang S., RIOPELLE Cameron & HUNTT Margaret B., 2018. Everyday racism in integrated spaces: Mapping the experiences of students of color at a diversifying predominantly white institution, in “Annals of the American Association of Geographers”, n. 108(5), pp. 1245– 1259. DOI:10.1080/24694452.2017.1419122.
• HILLIER Bill, 1996. Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• HILLIER Bill, PENN Alan, HANSON, J., GRAJEVSKI, T. & XU, J., 1993. Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement in “Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design”, n. 20(1), pp. 29–66. DOI:10.1068/b200029.
• HA Hyun J., 2017. Emotions of the weak: Violence and ethnic boundaries among Coptic Christians in Egypt, in “Ethnic and Racial Studies”, n. 40(1), pp. 133–151. DOI:10.1080/01419870.2016.1201586.
• HO Ching-Hua, SASIDHARAN Vinod, ELMENDORF William, WILLITS Fern K., GRAEFE Alan & GODBEY Geoffrey, 2005. Gender and ethnic variations in urban park preferences, visitation, and perceived benefits, in “Journal of Leisure Research”, n. 37(3), pp. 281–306. DOI:10.1080/00222216.2005.11950054.
• HOPKINS Peter, BOTTERILL Katherine, SANGHERA Gurchathen & ARSHAD Rowena, 2017. Encountering misrecognition: Being mistaken for being Muslim, in “Annals of the American Association of Geographers”, n. 107(4), pp. 934–948. DOI:10.1080/24694452.2016.1270192.
• HUTCHINSON John & SMITH Anthony D., 1996. Ethnicity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• JACOBS Jane, 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House, New York.
• JACKSON Emma, 2019. Valuing the bowling alley: Contestations over the preservation of spaces of everyday urban multiculture in London, in “The Sociological Review”, n. 67(1), pp. 79–94. DOI:10.1177/0038026118772784.
• JADALLAH Dina, 2014. Colonialist construction in the urban space of Jerusalem, in “Middle East Journal”, n. 68(1), pp. 77–98. DOI:10.3751/68.1.14.
• JOHNSON Asal M. & MILES Rebecca, 2014. Toward more inclusive public spaces: Learning from the everyday experiences of Muslim Arab women in New York City, in “Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space”, n. 46(8), pp. 1892–1907. DOI:10.1068/a46292.
• JOLY Danièle, 2017. Women from Muslim communities: Autonomy and capacity of action, in “Sociology”, n. 51(4), pp. 816–832. DOI:10.1177/0038038515621677.
• KACZYNSKI Andrew T., STANIS Sonja A., BESENYI Gina M. & CHILD Stephanie, 2013. Differences in youth and adult physical activity in park settings by sex and race/ ethnicity, in “Preventing Chronic Disease”, n. 10, E42. DOI:10.5888/pcd10.120276.
• KAZMIERCZAK Aleksandra, 2013. The contribution of local parks to neighbourhood social ties, in “Landscape and Urban Planning”, n. 109(1), pp. 31–44. DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.007.
• KHOO Christopher S. G., NA Jin-Cheon & JAIDKA Kokil, 2010. Analysis of the macro-level discourse structure of literature reviews, in “Online Information Review”, n. 35(2), pp. 255–271. DOI:10.1108/14684521111128032.
• KLOEK Marjolein E., PETERS Karin & SIJTSMA Mette, 2013. How Muslim women in the Netherlands negotiate discrimination during leisure activities, in “Leisure Sciences”, n. 35(5), pp. 405–421. DOI:10.1080/01490400.2013.831285.
• KUTMANALIEV Joldon, 2015. Public and communal spaces and their relation to the spatial dynamics of ethnic riots: Violence and non-violence in the city of Osh, in “International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy”, n. 35(7/8), pp. 449–477. DOI:10.1108/IJSSP-02-2015-0027.
• LAURENCE James, 2014. Reconciling the contact and threat hypotheses: Does ethnic diversity strengthen or weaken community inter-ethnic relations?, in “Ethnic and Racial Studies”, n. 37(8), pp. 1328–1349. DOI:10.1080/01419870.2013.788727.
• LE GENTIL Eric & MONGRUEL Rémi, 2014. A systematic review of socio- economic assessments in support of coastal zone management (1992–2011), in “Journal of Environmental Management”, n. 149(1), pp. 85–96. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.018.
• LEES Loretta, 2003. The ambivalence of diversity and the politics of urban renaissance: The case of youth in downtown Portland, Maine, in “International Journal of Urban and Regional Research”, n. 27(3), pp. 613–634. DOI:10.1111/1468-2427.00469.
• LOBO Michele, 2010. Interethnic understanding and belonging in suburban Melbourne in “Urban Policy and Research”, n. 28(1), pp. 85–99. DOI:10.1080/08111140903325424.
• LOBO Michele, 2014. Everyday multiculturalism: Catching the bus in Darwin, Australia, in “Social & Cultural Geography”, n. 15(7), pp. 714–729. DOI:10.1080/14649365.2014.916743.
• LOBO Michele, 2015. Gestures of judgement and welcome in public spaces: Hypervisible migrant newcomers in Darwin, Australia in “Journal of Cultural Geography”, n. 32(1), pp. 54–67. DOI:10.1080/08873631.2015.1005881.
• LOUKAITOU-SIDERIS Anastasia, 1995. Urban form and social context: Cultural differentiation in the uses of urban parks, in “Journal of Planning Education and Research”, n. 14(2), pp. 89–102. DOI:10.1177/0739456X9501400202.
• MASSEY Doreen, 1994. Space, Place and Gender. Polity Press, Cambridge.
• MITCHELL Don, 1995. The end of public space? People’s park, definitions of the public, and democracy, in “Annals of the Association of American Geographers”, n. 85(1), pp. 108–133. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1995.tb01797.x.
• MITCHELL Don, 2003. The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. Guilford Press, New York.
• MOHAMMAD Robina, 2013. Making gender ma(r)king place: Youthful British Pakistani Muslim women’s narratives of urban space, in “Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space”, n. 45(8), pp. 1802–1822. DOI:10.1068/a45253.
• MONTERESCU Daniel, 2011. Estranged natives and indigenized immigrants: A relational anthropology of ethnically mixed towns in Israel, in “World Development”, n. 39(2), pp. 270–281. DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.11.027.
• MÜLLER Thaddeus, 2011. Interethnic interactions and perceptions of immigrant men in public space: The experience of community safety by seniors in a multicultural neighbourhood, in Denzin, N. K. & Faust, T. (eds.), “Studies in Symbolic Interaction”, Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley UK, pp. 63–78. DOI:10.1108/S0163-2396(2011)0000037005.
• OMER Itzhak, GOLDBLATT Ran, ROMANN Michael & KHAMAISI Rassem, 2018. Tolerance, intergroup contacts and municipal-spatial organisation: The case of Jews and Arab Palestinians in the Tel-Aviv metropolitan area, in “Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie”, n. 109(1), pp. 57–72. DOI:10.1111/tesg.12259.
• PEOPLES James G. & BAILEY Garrick, 2011. Humanity: An Introduction to Cultural Anthropology. Wadsworth Publishing, Boston.
• PIEKUT Aneta & VALENTINE Gill, 2017. Spaces of encounter and attitudes towards difference: A comparative study of two European cities, in “Social Science Research”, n. 62(1), pp. 175–188. DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.08.005.
• RIGOLON Alessandro & NÉMETH Jeremy, 2018. Privately owned parks in New Urbanist communities: A study of environmental privilege, equity, and inclusion, in “Journal of Urban Affairs”, n. 40(4), pp. 543–559. DOI:10.1080/07352166.2017.1360739.
• RISHBETH Clare, GANJI Farnaz & VODICKA Goran, 2018. Ethnographic understandings of ethnically diverse neighbourhoods to inform urban design practice, in “Local Environment”, n. 23(1), pp. 36–53. DOI:10.1080/13549839.2017.1385000.
• ROKEM Jonathan & VAUGHAN Laura, 2018. Segregation, mobility and encounters in Jerusalem: The role of public transport infrastructure in connecting the “divided city”, in “Urban Studies”, n. 55(15), pp. 3454–3473. DOI:10.1177/0042098017691465.
• ROLLOCK Nicola, GILLBORN David, VINCENT Carol & BALL Stephen, 2011. The public identities of the black middle classes: Managing race in public spaces, in “Sociology”, n. 45(6), pp. 1078–1093. DOI:10.1177/0038038511416167.
• RYAN Louise, 2003. Moving spaces and changing places: Irish women’s memories of emigration to Britain in the 1930s, in “Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies”, n. 29(1), pp. 67–82. DOI:10.1080/1369183032000076722.
• SCHLUETER Elmar & SCHEEPERS Peer, 2010. The relationship between outgroup size and anti-outgroup attitudes: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test of group threat- and intergroup contact theory, in “Social Science Research”, n. 39(2), pp. 285–295. DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.07.006.
• SCHMIDT Garbi, 2012. “Grounded” politics: Manifesting Muslim identity as a political factor and localized identity in Copenhagen, in “Ethnicities”, n. 12(5), pp. 603–622. DOI:10.1177/1468796811432839.
• SCHMIDT Sandra J., 2015. A queer arrangement of school: Using spatiality to understand inequity, in “Journal of Curriculum Studies”, n. 47(2), pp. 253–273. DOI:10.1080/00220272.2014.986764.
• SENNETT Richard, 2003. The Fall of Public Man. Penguin Books Ltd, London.
• SHAFTOE Henry, 2008. Convivial Urban Spaces: Creating Effective Public Spaces. Routledge, Abingdon.
• SHTERN Marik, 2016. Urban neoliberalism vs. ethno-national division: The case of West Jerusalem’s shopping malls, in “Cities”, n. 52(1), pp. 132–139. DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.019.
• SHUANGYUN Yuan & HONGXIA Li, 2020. Knowledge mapping of ethnic identity and acculturation based on the method of bibliometric, in “Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies”, n. 7(3), pp. 17–33. DOI:10.29333/ejecs/370.
• SHUVAL Kerem, WEISSBLUETH Eyal, BREZIS Mayer, ARAIDA Adan & DIPIETRO Loretta, 2009. Individual and socioecological correlates of physical activity among Arab and Jewish college students in Israel, in “Journal of Physical Activity and Health”, n. 6(3), pp. 306–314. DOI:10.1123/jpah.6.3.306.
• STAVRIDES Stavros, 2016. Common Space: The City as Commons. Zed Books: London.
• STOLLE Dietlind, PETERMANN Sören, SCHMID Katharina, SCHÖNWÄLDER Karen, HEWSTONE Miles, VERTOVEC Steven, SCHMITT Thomas & HEYWOOD Joe, 2013. Immigration-related diversity and trust in German cities: The role of intergroup contact, in “Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties”, n. 23(3), pp. 279–298. DOI:10.1080/17457289.2013.809350.
• SU Xinwei, LI Xi & YANXIN Kang, 2019. A bibliometric analysis of research on intangible cultural heritage using CiteSpace, in “SAGE Open”, April 2019, pp. 1–18. DOI:10.1177/2158244019840119.
• SWYNGEDOUW Eva, 2013. The segregation of social interactions in the Red Line L-Train in Chicago, in “Symbolic Interaction”, n. 36(1), pp. 293–313. DOI:10.1002/symb.64.
• TRIANDAFYLLIDOU Anna & KOUKI Hara, 2013. Muslim immigrants and the Greek nation: The emergence of nationalist intolerance, in “Ethnicities”, n. 13(6), pp. 709–728. DOI:10.1177/1468796813483287.
• TROUILLE David, 2014. Fencing a field: Imagined others in the unfolding of a neighborhood park conflict, in “City & Community”, n. 13(1), pp. 69–87. DOI:10.1111/cico.12052.
• Valentine Gill, 2008. Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounters, in “Progress in Human Geography”, n. 32(3), pp. 323–337. DOI:10.1177/0309133308089372.
• VAUGHAN Katherine B., KACZYNSKI Andrew T., WILHELM STANIS Sonja A., BESENYI Gina M., BERGSTROM Ryan & HEINRICH Katie M., 2013. Exploring the distribution of park availability, features, and quality across Kansas City, Missouri by income and race/ethnicity: An environmental justice investigation, in “Annals of Behavioral Medicine”, n. 45(1), pp. S28–S38. DOI:10.1007/s12160-012-9425-y.
• VERTOVEC Steven, 2007. Super-diversity and its implications, in “Ethnic and Racial Studies”, n. 30(6), pp. 1024–1054. DOI:10.1080/01419870701599465.
• WESSEL Terje, 2009. Does diversity in urban space enhance intergroup contact and tolerance?, in “Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography”, n. 91(1), pp. 5–17. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0467.2009.00303.x.
• WHYTE William H., 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Project for Public Spaces , New York.
• WILLIAMSON Rebecca, 2016. Everyday space, mobile subjects and place-based belonging in suburban Sydney, in “Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies”, n. 42(14), pp. 2328–2344. DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2016.1205803.
• WILSON Terri S., 2016. Contesting the public school: Reconsidering charter schools as counterpublics, in “American Educational Research Journal”, n. 53(4), pp. 919–952. DOI:10.3102/0002831216658972.
• WISE Amanda & VELAYUTHAM Selvaraj (eds.), 2009. Everyday Multiculturalism. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• WOLCH Jennifer, WILSON John P. & FEHRENBACH Jed, 2005. Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: An equity-mapping analysis, in “Urban Geography”, n. 26(1), pp. 4–35. DOI:10.2747/0272-3638.26.1.4.
• YIFTACHEL Oren & YACOBI Haim, 2003. Urban ethnocracy: Ethnicization and the production of space in an Israeli “mixed city”, in “Environment and Planning D: Society and Space”, n. 21(6), pp. 673–693. DOI:10.1068/d47j.
• YU Shaolu, BRYANT Madalyn, MESSMER Emily, TSAGRONIS Sophia & LINK Sarah, 2018. “Is there a bubble to burst?” –College students’ spatial perception of campus and the city: A case study of Rhodes College in Memphis, TN, in “Urban Geography”, n. 39(10), pp. 1555–1575. DOI:10.1080/02723638.2018.1481602.
• ZAHNOW Renee, 2018. Mixed land use: Implications for violence and property crime, in “City & Community”, n. 17(4), pp. 1119–1142. DOI:10.1111/cico.12337.
• ZSOLT FARKAS Jenő, LENNERT József, DONÁT KOVÁCS András & KANALAS Imre, 2017. Impacts and consequences of residential segregation of Roma in urban spaces: Case studies from Hungary, in “Urbani Izziv”, n. 28(2), pp. 136–148. DOI:10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2017-28-02-005.