Hesitation and Inconsistency in International Intervention: The Normative Erosion of the Responsibility to Protect - A Comparative Assessment in the Contexts of Darfur and Gaza

Öz

The ineffectiveness of the United Nations in the crises in Somalia, Rwanda, Bosnia, East Timor and Kosovo in the 1990s undermined the legitimacy of the humanitarian intervention norm, and many academics argued that this norm had come to an end. However, these crises paved the way for the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) principle developed in 2005. The NATO intervention in Libya in 2011, carried out under the R2P principle, began with the aim of protecting civilians but resulted in regime change, leading to serious normative criticism. Subsequently, Russia’s interventions in Crimea (2014) and Syria (2015) and France’s intervention in Mali (2013) have reinforced debates about the instrumentalisation of R2P. On the other hand, the international community’s silence in crises involving serious human rights violations, such as in Darfur and Gaza, has brought the selective application of R2P and the issue of double standards back to the forefront. In both cases, questions are being raised about how, when, and why the international community intervened (or failed to intervene), and the effects of these interventionist or passive attitudes on the normative legitimacy of R2P are being analysed. This study aims to evaluate the extent to which R2P’s normative power remains functional from political, legal, and ethical perspectives by comparing the cases of Darfur and Gaza.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Responsibility to Protect (R2P)
• Humanitarian Intervention
• Darfur
• Gaza
• Ethics of Intervention.

ULUSLARARASI MÜDAHALEDE TEREDDÜT VE TUTARSIZLIK: KORUMA SORUMLULUĞUNUN NORMATİF EROZYONU: DARFUR VE GAZZE VAKALARI BAĞLAMINDA KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Öz

1990’lı yıllarda yaşanan Somali, Ruanda, Bosna, Doğu Timor ve Kosova krizlerinde Birleşmiş Milletler (BM)’in etkisizliği, insani müdahale normunun meşruiyetini zedelemiş ve birçok akademisyen bu normun sona erdiğini ileri sürmüştür. Ancak bu krizler, 2005’te geliştirilen Koruma Sorumluluğu (Responsibility to Protect-R2P) ilkesine zemin hazırlamıştır. 2011’de Libya’da R2P ilkesi çerçevesinde gerçekleşen Kuzey Atlantik Antlaşması Örgütü’nün (NATO) müdahalesi ise sivil koruma amacıyla başlasa da rejim değişikliğiyle sonuçlanarak ciddi normatif eleştirilere neden olmuştur. Ardından Rusya’nın Kırım (2014) ve Suriye (2015) müdahaleleri ile Fransa’nın Mali (2013) müdahalesi, R2P’nin araçsallaştırıldığına dair tartışmaları güçlendirmiştir. Buna karşın, Darfur ve Gazze gibi ağır insan hakları ihlallerinin yaşandığı krizlerde uluslararası toplumun sessiz kalması, R2P’nin seçici uygulanışı ve çifte standart sorunlarını yeniden gündeme getirmiştir. Her iki vakada da uluslararası toplumun nasıl, ne zaman ve neden müdahale ettiği (veya etmediği) sorgulanmakta; bu müdahaleci veya pasif tutumların R2P’nin normatif meşruiyeti üzerindeki etkileri analiz edilmektedir. Bu çalışma, Darfur ve Gazze vakalarını karşılaştırmalı olarak inceleyerek, R2P’nin normatif gücünün siyasi, hukuki ve etik açılardan ne ölçüde işlevsel kaldığını değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Koruma Sorumluluğu (Responsibility to Protect-R2P)
• İnsani Müdahale
• Darfur
• Gazze
• Müdahale Etiği

Kaynakça

1. Abrahamsen, R. (2000). Disciplining democracy: Development discourse and good governance in Africa. London: Zed Books.
2. Allison, R. (2014). Russian ‘deniable’ intervention in Ukraine: How and why Russia broke the rules. International Affairs, 90(6), 1255–1297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12170
3. Amnesty International. (2025, March). Gaza: “Starvation or gunfire—this is not a humanitarian response.” Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/03/gaza-starvation-or-gunfire-this-is-not-a-humanitarian-response/
4. Annan, K. (2000). We the peoples: The role of the United Nations in the 21st century. New York, NY: United Nations Department of Public Information.
5. Asi, Y., Mills, D., Greenough, P. G., Abu Sittah, G., AlKahlout, M., & White, K. (2024). ‘Nowhere and no one is safe’: Spatial analysis of damage to critical civilian infrastructure in the Gaza Strip during the first phase of the Israeli military campaign, 7 October to 22 November 2023. Conflict and Health, 18(24), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00580-x
6. Awan, H. S., & Malik, H. (2024). Humanitarian crisis and crumbling pillars of R2P in Gaza. Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, X(1), 87–104.
7. Ayoob, M. (2002). Humanitarian intervention and international society. Global Governance, 7(3), 225–248.
8. Badescu, C. G., & Bergholm, L. (2009). The responsibility to protect and the conflict in Darfur: The big let down. Security Dialogue, 40(3), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010609336198

9. Bandyopadhyay, S., & Green, E. (2013). Nation-building and conflict in modern Africa. World Development, 45, 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.10.028
10. Bantekas, I., & Jaber, S. S. (2025). The human rights obligations of belligerent occupiers: Israel and the Gazan population. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 30(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krae018
11. Barber, R. (2023). Reflections on the three pillars of the responsibility to protect. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 77(4), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2023.2241835
12. Bellamy, A. J. (2015). The responsibility to protect: A defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Bellamy, A. J. (2022). World peace and how we can achieve it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Boukari, Y., Ali, A., Khan, A., & Mcheka, M. (2024). Gaza, armed conflict and child health. Conflict and Health, 18, Article 57, 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00598-z
15. Brown, C. (2002). Sovereignty, rights and responsibilities. In M. Welsh (Ed.), Humanitarian intervention and international relations (pp. 63–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Buchanan, A. (2010). Justice, legitimacy, and self-determination: Moral foundations for international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Buzan, B., & Lawson, G. (2013). The global transformation: The nineteenth century and the making of modern international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 57(3), 620–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12011 Cassese, A. (2005). International law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Chomsky, N. (2011). Making the future: Occupations, interventions, empire and resistance. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.
19. Crowley-Vigneau, A., Baykov, A., Zhang, T., & Morozov, V. (2024). The responsibility to protect the civilians of Gaza: Building on international perceptions. International Peacekeeping, 32(1), 98–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2024.2427208
20. Darnela, L., Subekti, Y. T., & Rachmawati, M. (2024). War crimes and legal accountability in the 2023 Israel–Gaza conflict. Lentera Hukum, 11(3), 356–395. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v11i3.44732
21. De Waal, A. (2007). Darfur and the failure of the responsibility to protect. International Affairs, 83(6), 1039–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2007.00674.x
22. Englebert, P. (2000). State legitimacy and development in Africa. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
23. Evans, G. (2008). The responsibility to protect: Ending mass atrocity crimes once and for all. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
24. Evans, G., & Sahnoun, M. (2001). The responsibility to protect. Foreign Affairs, 81(6), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.2307/20050339
25. Falk, R. (2014). Palestine: The legitimacy of hope. Washington, DC: Just World Books.
26. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York, NY: Free Press.
27. Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. (2020). Unwilling and unable: The failed response to the atrocities in Darfur (pp. 3–5). Retrieved from https://www.globalr2p.org/publications/unwilling-and-unable-the-failed-response-to-the-atrocities-in-darfur/
28. Gordon, N. (2024). Between human rights and civil society: The case of Israel’s apartheid enablers. Law and Social Inquiry, 49(3), 1426–1452. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2024.21
29. Heinze, E. A. (2024). International law, self-defense, and the Israel–Hamas conflict. Parameters, 54(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.3273
30. Holzgrefe, J. L. (2003). The humanitarian intervention debate. In J. L. Holzgrefe & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Humanitarian intervention: Ethical, legal and political dilemmas (pp. 15–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Human Rights Watch. (2024). “Hopeless, starving, and besieged”: Israel’s forced displacement of Palestinians in Gaza. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/06/03/hopeless-starving-and-besieged-israels-forced-displacement-palestinians-gaza
32. Huysmans, J. (2006). The politics of insecurity: Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.
33. Ignatieff, M. (2003). State failure and nation-building. In J. L. Holzgrefe & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Humanitarian intervention: Ethical, legal and political dilemmas (pp. 299–321). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Illingworth, R. (2022). An R2P commission: A proposal for holding states accountable to their responsibility to protect. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksac012
35. International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. (2001). The responsibility to protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre. https://responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICISS%20Report.pdf
36. International Criminal Court. (2024). Prosecutor applications and jurisdiction: Warrants and jurisdiction in Palestine [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/prosecutor-applications-and-jurisdiction-warrants-and-jurisdiction-in-palestine
37. International IDEA. (2023). Post-conflict governance and power-sharing in Darfur: Challenges and prospects. https://www.idea.int
38. Jarvis, S. D. (2022). R2P and atrocity prevention: Contesting human rights as a threat to international peace and security. European Journal of International Security, 7(3), 354–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2022.15
39. Kaldor, M. (2013). New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
40. Keohane, R. O. (2003). Political authority after intervention: Gradations in sovereignty. In J. L. Holzgrefe & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Humanitarian intervention: Ethical, legal and political dilemmas (pp. 275–298). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Kohtala, J. (2021). Responsibility to protect and French intervention in Mali. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 15(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2020.1836126
42. Kwaja, C. M. A. (2017). The challenges of regional peacebuilding: The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) experience. In N. Udombana (Ed.), Peacebuilding in Africa (pp. 59–76). Abingdon: Routledge.
43. Mamdani, M. (2009). Saviors and survivors: Darfur, politics, and the war on terror. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
44. McLoughlin, S. (2023). The UN Secretariat and the development of early warning systems for mass atrocities. International Peacekeeping, 30(1), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2023.2236929
45. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
46. Murithi, T. (2009). The African Union’s transition from non-intervention to non-indifference: An ad hoc approach to the responsibility to protect? Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, 1(2009), 90–106.
47. Nkrumah, K. (1965). Neo-colonialism: The last stage of imperialism. London: Thomas Nelson & Sons. Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/ebooks/nkrumah/nkrumah-neocolonialism.pdf
48. Orford, A. (2011). International authority and the responsibility to protect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Pattison, J. (2010). Humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect: Who should intervene? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Pogge, T. (2002). World poverty and human rights: Cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms. Cambridge: Polity Press.
51. Posner, D. N. (2005). Institutions and ethnic politics in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Rynhold, J. (2008). Liberalism and the Oslo Process: Theory and practice. In G. Ben Porat (Ed.), The failure of the Middle East peace process? Inherently flawed or flawed implementation? (pp. 111–132). Ramat Gan: BESA Center, Bar Ilan University.
53. Saxon, D. (2015). A role for the ICC in R2P enforcement. University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review, 17(1), 57–75. Retrieved from https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/undalr/vol17/iss1/4
54. Straus, S. (2006). The order of genocide: Race, power, and war in Rwanda. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
55. Teson, F. R. (2005). Humanitarian intervention: An inquiry into law and morality (3rd ed.). Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.
56. Thakur, R. (2016). The United Nations, peace and security: From collective security to the responsibility to protect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. UNAMID. (2020). Final report of the African Union–United Nations Hybrid Operation in Darfur. African Union–United Nations.
58. United Nations General Assembly. (2005, September 16). 2005 World Summit Outcome Document (A/RES/60/1, paras. 138–139). United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_60_1.pdf United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry. (2025). Report to the UN Human Rights Council: Israeli attacks on schools and religious sites in Gaza constitute extermination. United Nations. Weiss, T. G. (2016). Humanitarian intervention (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press. Williams, P. D. (2011). Drafting in Doha: An assessment of the Darfur Peace Process and ceasefire agreements. In M. Weller (Ed.), Peace settlements and political transformation in divided societies (pp. 185–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_bk_contributions/95