Constructive Deviation Behavior in the Context of Dark and Light Triad Personality Traits: A Research on Aviation Employees

Yıl 2022, , 146 - 163, 28.02.2022

Tuğba Erhan

https://doi.org/10.51785/jar.1066310

Cited By: 5

Öz

This study investigates the personality variable as the antecedent of constructive deviance, which defines well-intentioned and voluntary behaviors that can benefit the organization and stakeholders despite going beyond organizational norms. The research, which deals with the newly conceptualized dark and light triad personality traits as personality variables, was carried out with 345 participants working in different units of the aviation industry. The hypotheses were tested by performing correlation and regression analyzes on the model whose scales were validated by means of confirmatory factor analysis. According to the results of the research, when the factor structures are considered as a whole, it has been seen that there is a negative relationship between dark triad personality traits (narcissism, machiavellianism, psychopathy) and constructive deviance, and a positive relationship between light triad personality traits (humanism, faith in humanity, Kantianism) and constructive deviant behavior. Although the light and dark triad explain the change in constructive deviance behavior at a relatively low level, the study is important in terms of seeing the assumed effect of the new typology of personality traits. In addition, the research draws attention to the fact that constructive deviation behavior can have positive effects on the reporting culture in organizational structures where strict control and supervision mechanisms operate under the shadow of regulatory authorities such as the aviation sector.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Constructive Deviant, Light Triad, Dark Triad, Aviation Sector

Karanlık ve Aydınlık Üçlü Kişilik Özellikleri Bağlamında Yapıcı Sapma Davranışı: Havacılık Çalışanları Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Öz

Bu çalışma örgüt normlarının dışına çıkılmasına rağmen örgüte ve paydaşlara fayda sağlayabilecek iyi niyetli ve gönüllü davranışları tanımlayan yapıcı sapma davranışının öncülü olarak kişilik değişkenini araştırmaktadır. Kişilik değişkeni olarak yeni kavramsallaştırılan karanlık ve aydınlık üçlü kişilik özelliklerinin ele alındığı çalışma havacılık sektörünün farklı birimlerinde çalışan 345 katılımcı ile yürütülmüştür. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi aracılığıyla ölçeklerinin doğrulandığı modele korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri yapılarak hipotezler sınanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre faktör yapıları bir bütün olarak ele alındığında karanlık üçlü kişilik özellikleri (narsisizm, makyavelizm, psikopati) ile yapıcı sapma davranışı arasında negatif, aydınlık üçlü kişilik özellikleri (hümanizm, insanlığa inanç, Kantçılık) ve yapıcı sapma davranışı arasında pozitif ilişki olduğu görülmüştür. Aydınlık ve karanlık üçlü, yapıcı sapma davranışındaki değişimi görece düşük düzeyde açıklasa da çalışma kişilik özelliklerinin yeni tipolojisinin varsayılan etkisini görme açısından önem taşımaktadır. Ayrıca araştırma, havacılık sektörü gibi düzenleyici otoritelerinin gölgesinde sıkı kontrol ve denetim mekanizmalarının işlediği örgütsel yapılarda yapıcı sapma davranışının raporlama kültürüne olumlu etkilerinin olabileceğine dikkat çekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yapıcı Sapma, Aydınlık Üçlü, Karanlık Üçlü, Havacılık Sektörü

Kaynakça

• Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (2009). Constructions of deviance: Social power, context, and interaction. Southbank, Victoria, Australia: Thomson/Wadsworth.
• Aiken, L. & Groth-Marnat, G. (2006). Psychological testing and assessment (12th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Alias, M., Mohd Rasdi, R., Ismail, M., & Abu Samah, B. (2013). Predictors of workplace deviant behaviour: HRD agenda for Malaysian support personnel. European Journal of Training and Development, 37 (2), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591311301671
• Bennett, R.J., & Robinson, S.L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.3.349
• Berry, C.M., Ones, D.S., & Sackett, P.R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 410-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.410
• Bodankin, M., & Tziner, A. (2009). Constructive Deviance, Destructive Deviance and Personality: How Do They Interrelate? Amphitheatre Economic Journal, 11 (26), 549-564.
• Caruana, A., Ramaseshan, B., & Ewing, M. T. (2001). Anomia and deviant behaviour in marketing: some preliminary evidence. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(5), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005526
• Carter, G. L., Campbell, A. C., Muncer, S., & Carter, K. A. (2015). A Mokken analysis of the Dark Triad ‘Dirty Dozen’: Sex and age differences in scale structures, and issues with individual items. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.012
• Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
• Cleckley, H. M. (1976). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
• Cohen, A. (2016). Are they among us? A conceptual framework of the relationship between the dark triad personality and counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs). Human Resource Management Review, 26 (1), 69-85.
• Dahling JJ, Kuyumcu D, Librizzi EH (2012) Machiavellianism, unethical behavior, and well-being in organizational life. In: Giacalone RA, Promislo MD (ed) Handbook of unethical work behavior: implications for individual well-being, 1st edn. Taylor & Francis, pp. 183–194. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315703848
• Dahling, J. J., & Gutworth, M. B. (2017). Loyal rebels? A test of the normative conflict model of constructive deviance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38 (8), 1167-1182. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2194
• Donaldson, S. I., Dollwet, M., & Rao, M. A. (2015). Happiness, excellence, and optimal human functioning revisited: Examining the peer-reviewed literature linked to positive psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10 (3), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.943801
• Eryılmaz, İ. Dirik, D. & Odabaşoğlu, Ş. (2019). Güvenlik İklimi Algısı ve İş Performansı İlişkisinde Genel Öz Yeterliliğin Düzenleyici Rolü: Helikopter Teknisyenleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8 (2) , 1854-1870 . DOI: 10.33206/mjss.517936
• Fernie, B. A., Fung, A., & Nikčević, A. V. (2016). Different coping strategies amongst individuals with grandiose and vulnerable narcissistic traits. Journal of Affective Disorders, 205, 301-305.
• Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10-year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7 (3), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018
• Galperin, B.L. (2003). Can workplace deviance be constructive? In Sagie, A., Stashevsky, S. and Koslowsky, M. (Eds.) Misbehavior and Dysfunctional Attitudes in Organizations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 154-170.
• Galperin, B.L. (2012). Exploring the nomological network of workplace deviance: developing and validating a measure of constructive deviance. Journal Apply Social Psychology, 42 (12), 2988–3025.
• Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/259263
• Hornung, S., & Rousseau, D. M. (2007). Active on the job proactive in change: How autonomy at work contributes to employee support for organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43 (4), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886307307555
• Ivtzan, I., Lomas, T., Hefferon, K., & Worth, P. (2016). Second wave positive psychology: Embracing the dark side of life. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
• Jetten, J., & Hornsey, M. J. (2014). Deviance and dissent in groups. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 461–485. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115151
• Johnson, V. A., Beehr, T. A., & O'Brien, K. E. (2015). Determining the relationship between employee psychopathy and strain: Does the type of psychopathy matter? International Journal of Stress Management, 22 (2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038817
• Jonason, P. K., Icho, A., & Ireland, K. (2016). Resources, harshness, and unpredictability: The socioeconomic conditions associated with the Dark Triad traits. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704915623699
• Kaufman, S. B., Yaden, D. B., Hyde, E., & Tsukayama, E. (2019). The light vs. Dark Triad of personality: Contrasting two very different profiles of human nature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00467
• Kozako, I. N. A. M. F., Safin, S. Z., & Rahim, A. R. A. (2013). The Relationship of Big Five Personality Traits on Counterproductive Work Behaviour among Hotel Employees: An Exploratory Study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 7: 181-187.
• Mainemelis, C. (2010). Stealing fire: Creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. The Academy of Management Review, 35 (4), 558-578. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.53502801
• Marcus, D. K., Preszler, J., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2018). A network of dark personality traits: what lies at the heart of darkness? Jouranl of Resarch in Personality. 73, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.003
• Milam, A. C., Spitzmueller, C., & Penney, L. M. (2009). Investigating individual differences among targets of workplace incivility. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012683
• Morrison, E. W. (2006). Doing the Job Well: An Investigation of Pro-Social Rule Breaking. Journal of Management, 32 (1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277790
• Mount, M.K., Ilies, R. & Johnson, E., (2006), Relationship of Personality Traits and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: the Mediating Effects of Job Satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 59, pp.591–622.
• Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Otgaar, H., & Meijer, E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12 (2), 183–204.
• Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
• Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.
• Phipps, S. T., Prieto, L. C., and Deis, M. H. (2015). The role of personality in organizational citizenship behavior: introducing counterproductive work behavior and integrating impression management as a moderating factor. J. Organ. Cult. Commun. Conflict. 19:176.
• Pletzer, J. L., Oostrom, J. K., Bentvelzen, M., and de Vries, R. E. (2020). Comparing domain-and facet-level relations of the HEXACO personality model with workplace deviance: a meta-analysis. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 152:109539. doi: 10. 1016/j.paid.2019.109539
• Rauthmann, J. F., & Kolar, G. P. (2012). How “dark” are the dark triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 884-889.
• Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.2307/256693
• Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
• Sims, R. L., & Kenan, J. P. (1999). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Managers’ Whistleblowing Tendencies. International Journal of Value- Based Management, 12 (2), 137-151.
• Smith, S. F., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2013). Psychopathy in the workplace: The knowns and unknowns. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18 (2), 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.007
• Speier, C., & Frese, M. (1997). Generalized self-efficacy as a mediator and moderator between control and complexity at work and personal initiative: A longitudinal field study in East Germany. Human Performance, 10(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_7
• Spreitzer, G.M., & Sonenshein, S. (2004). Toward the construct definition of positive deviance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 828-847. http://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203260212
• Stewart, S.M., Bing, M.N., Davison, H.K., Woehr, D.J., & McIntyre, M.D. (2009). In the eye of the beholder: A non-self-report measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 207-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012605
• Strohminger, N., Knobe, J., & Newman, G. (2017). The true self: A psychological concept distinct from the self. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(4), 551 560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616689495
• Tekeş, B., & Bıçaksız, P. (2021). Aydınlık üçlü (light triad) ölçeğinin psikometrik özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. AYNA Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, 8(3), 535-556.
• Vadera, A.K., Pratt, M.G., Mishra, P., 2013. Constructive deviance in organizations: integrating and moving forward. J. Manag. 39 (5), 1221–1276.
• Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., Tischner, E. C., & Putka, D. J. (2002). Two studies examining the negative effect of self-efficacy on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.506
• Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E. (2004). Misbehavior in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Management. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609052
• Warren, D.E. (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 28 (4), 622–632. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10899440.
• Xu, W., & Zhao, S. (2020). The Influence of Entrepreneurs’ Psychological Capital on Their Deviant Innovation Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.
• Yalap, O. & Polatcı, S. (2019). Yapıcı Sapma Davranışlarının Öncülleri Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma. Anadolu Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1 (1), 78-92.
• Yıldız, B., Alpkan, L., Ates¸ H., & Sezen, B., 2015. Determinants of constructive deviance: the mediator role of psychological ownership. Int. Bus. Res. 8 (4), 107–121.
• Zeigler-Hill, V., & Vonk, J. (2015). Dark personality features and emotion dysregulation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34 (8), 692-704.