Kara ve Havacılık Haberleşmeleri İle İlişkili İyonosferik HF Tahminleri Üzerine Jeomanyetik Etkiler

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, 23. Güneş döngüsünün maksimumu boyunca orta enlemlerde IRI-2016’nın foF2 tahminleri üzerine jeomanyetik fırtınaların etkisi araştırılmıştır. Bunun için, 2000 yılı boyunca Roma ve Juliusruh iyonsonda istasyonlarından alınan ve aynı konumlar için IRI-2016'dan hesaplanan saatlik foF2 verileri kullanılmıştır. 3 saatlik gezegensel jeomanyetik aktivite indisi (3h-K_p) jeomanyetik aktivite göstergesi olarak kullanılmıştır. Jeomanyetik fırtınalı dönemler boyunca IRI-2016’nın performansını test etmek için iyonsonda istasyonlarından ölçülen gerçek foF2 verileri ve IRI-2016’dan hesaplanan tahmini foF2 değerleri kullanılarak yüzdelik sapma değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Bu analizler, ekinokslar (21 Mart, 23 Eylül) ve gündönümleri (21 Haziran, 21 Aralık) civarında jeomanyetik fırtınalı günler temel alınarak dört mevsim için yapılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarından, jeomanyetik fırtınalı dönemler boyunca IRI-2016 foF2 tahminlerinin, iyonsonda istasyonlarından ölçülen gerçek foF2 değerlerinden büyük ölçüde saptığı ve bu sapmaların mevsimlere ve enlem değerine bağlı olarak değiştiği tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

• İyonosfer,Kritik frekans,IRI-2016,Jeomanyetik fırtınalar

Geomagnetic Effects on the Ionospheric HF Predictions Related to Ground and Aviation Communications

Abstract

In this study, the effect of geomagnetic storms on the IRI-2016 foF2 predictions is investigated at middle latitudes during the maximum of the solar cycle 23. For this purpose, hourly foF2 data measured from the ionosonde stations Rome and Juliusruh for the year 2000 and hourly foF2 data calculated from IRI-2016 for the same locations and year are used. Planetary geomagnetic activity "3h-Kp" indices are used as a geomagnetic activity indicator. In order to test performance of the IRI-2016 for disturbed geomagnetic conditions, the percentile deviations is calculated using the estimated foF2 data from IRI-2016 and the real foF2 data from the ionosonde stations during the geomagnetic storms. This analysis is done for four seasons based on geomagnetic stormy days around equinoxes (March 21, September 23) and solstices (June 21, December 21). From these results, it is found that IRI-2016 foF2 predictions deviate considerably from the real foF2 data the ionosonde stations during geomagnetic disturbed periods and this deviations differ according to the seasons and latitude value.

Keywords

• Ionosphere,Critical frequency,IRI-2016,Geomagnetic storms,Percentile deviationIonosphere

References

1. R. W. Schunk, and A. F. Nagy, Ionospheres. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
2. G. W. Prölss, Physics of the Earth's Space Environment. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag Press, 2004.
3. A. J. Mannucci, B. T. Tsurutani, B. A. Iijima, A. Komjathy, A. Saito, W. D. Gonzalez, F. L. Guarnieri, J. U. Kozyra, and R. Skoug, “Dayside global ionospheric response to the major interplanetary events of October 29-30, 2003 Halloween Storms”, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L12S02-L12S06, 2005.
4. B. Zhao, W. Wan, L. Liu, K. Igarashi, K. Yumoto, and B. Ning, “Ionospheric response to the geomagnetic storm on 13-17 April 2006 in the West Pacific region”, J. Atmosp. and Solar-Terr. Phys., 71, 88-100, 2009.
5. D. Bilitza, “International Reference Ionosphere-Status 1995/96”, Adv. Space. Res., 20(9), 1751-1754, 1997.
6. M. L. Zhang, J. K. Shi, X .Wang, S. Z. Wu, and S. R. Zhang, “Comparative study of ionospheric characteristic parameters obtained by DPS-4 digisonde with IRI-2000 for low latitude station in China”, Adv. Space Res., 33, 869-873, 2004.
7. D. Bilitza, and B. W. Reinisch, “International Reference Ionosphere 2007: Improvements and new parameters”, Adv. Space Res., 42, 599-609, 2008.
8. X. Wang, J. K. Shi, G. J. Wang, and Y. Gong, “Comparison of ionospheric F2 peak parameters foF2 and hmF2 with IRI2001 at Hainan”, Adv. Space Res., 43, 1812-1820, 2009.

9. D, Bilitza, and B. Reinisch, “Representation of the auroral and polar ionosphere in the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI)”, Adv. Space Res., 51, 535, 2013.
10. I. E. Zakharenkova, A. Krankowski, D. Bilitza, I. V. Cherniak, I. I. Shagimuratov, and R. Sieradzki, “Comparative study of foF2 measurements with IRI-2007 model predictions during extended solar minimum”, Adv. Space Res., 51, 620-629, 2013.
11. D. Bilitza, “The International Reference Ionosphere: Rawer's IRI and its status today”, Adv. Radio Sci., 12, 231-236, 2014,
12. S. Kumar, A. K. Singh, and J. Lee, “Equatorial Ionospheric Anomaly (EIA) and comparison with IRI model during descending phase of solar activity (2005-2009)”, Adv. Space Res., 53(5), 724-733, 2014.
13. P. P. Chaitanya, A. K. Patra, N. Balan, and S. V. B. Rao, “Ionospheric variations over Indian low latitudes close to the equator and comparison with IRI-2012”, Ann. Geophys., 33, 997-1006, 2015.
14. Y. J. Chuo, “Variations of ionospheric profile parameters during solar maximum and comparison with IRI-2007 over Chung-Li, Taiwan”, Ann. Geophys., 30, 1249-1257, 2012.
15. D. Bilitza, “International Reference Ionosphere 2000”, Radio Sci., 36(2), 261-275, 2001.
16. T. J. Fuller-Rowell, M. V. Codrescu, and E. A. Araujo-Pradere, “Capturing the storm-time ionospheric response in an empirical model in Space Weather”, AGU, 321 Washington, D. C., 393-401, 2001.
17. E. A. Araujo-Pradere, T. J. Fuller-Rowell, and M. V. Codrescu, “STORM: An empirical storm-time ionospheric correction model: 1. Model description”, Radio Sci., 37(5), 269 1070-1082, 2002.
18. E. A. Araujo-Pradere, T. J. Fuller-Rowell, M. V. Codrescu, and D. Bilitza, “Characteristics of the ionospheric variability as a function of season, latitude, local time, and geomagnetic activity”, Radio Sci., 40, RS5009, 1-15, 2005.
19. A. O. Adewale, E. O. Oyeyemi, A. B. Adeloye, and M. B. Adedokun, “Ionospheric effects of geomagnetic storms at Hobart and comparisons with IRI model predictions”, J. Sci. Res. Dev., 14, 98-105, 2013.
20. S. Kumar, E. L. Tan, and D. S. Murti, “Impacts of solar activity on performance of the IRI-2012 model predictions from low to mid latitudes”, Earth, Planets and Space, 67, 42-59, 2015.
21. P. P. Chaitanya, A. K. Patra, N. Balan, and S. V. B. Rao, “Ionospheric variations over Indian low latitudes close to the equator and comparison with IRI-2012”, Ann. Geophys., 33, 997-1006, 2015.
22. Space Physics Interactive Data Resource, “SPIDR”, http://spidr.ngdc.noaa.gov/spidr.
23. Space Physics Data Facility, “SPDF”, https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/vitmo/iri2016_vitmo.html.