Pilot Selection in Airline Organizations with the Analytical Hierarchy Process

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 218 - 227, 24.07.2022

Halil Şimşek , İlker Hakan Özaslan , İnan Eryılmaz

https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1111580

Cited By: 4

Öz

In the aviation sector, where intense rules and competition prevail, safe flight operations are possible with the employment of qualified human resources who can adapt to technology. The aim of this research is to investigate how the most suitable candidate can be recruited by evaluating many criteria together in the pilot recruitment processes, which are of critical importance for aviation enterprises. In this context, the opinions of senior pilots working in the world's top 10 airline organizations were consulted in the study carried out with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is one of the multi-criteria decision support methods. As a result of the literature research, the recruitment criteria for pilot candidates, which are actively used in the sector, have been listed in the context of the suggestions of experienced captains who also take part in various management positions in the aviation sector. A total of 17 criteria, 3 of which are upper and 14 are sub-criteria determined were weighted with the AHP method. As a result of the analysis, "technical", "non-technical" and "occupational criteria" were listed as the upper criteria according to the degree of importance in terms of local weights.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Aviation Management, Airline industry, Human Resource Management, Multi Criteria Decision Making, Analytical Hierarchy Process

Kaynakça

• Allianz (2019). Aviation Risk 2020-Safety and the State of the Nation. Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty SE, Munich, Germany.
• Česynienė, R. (2008). Globalization and Human Resource Management. Ekonomika, 82, 41-56.
• T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı. (2018). Hava Taşıtları Üretimi ve Bakım Onarımı Çalışma Grubu Raporu. On Birinci Kalkınma Planı (2019-2023).
• Carretta, T.R. and Ree, M.J. (2000). Pilot Selection Methods. United States Air Force Research Laboratory, AFRL-HE-WP-TR-2000-0116.
• Bates, M.J., Colwell, C.D., King, R.E., Siem, F.M., & Zelensky, W.E. (1997). Pilot Performance Variables. United States Air Force Armstrong Laboratory, AL/CF-TR-1997-0059.
• Howse, W.R. & Damos, D.L. (2011). A Bibliographic Database for the History of Pilot Training Selection. Air Force Personnel Center Strategic Research and Assessment, Technical Report DAS-2011-02.
• Olaganathan, R. & Amihan, R.H. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on Pilot Proficiency - A Risk Analysis. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 6(3), 1-13
• Carretta, T.R. & Ree, M.J. (1994). Pilot-Candidate Selection Method: Sources of Validity. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4(2), 103-117.
• Yazgan, E., Çilingir, F.C., Erol, D., & Anagün, A.S. (2017). An Analysis of the Factors Influencing Score Achieved during Pilot Training. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 60(4), 202-211.
• Yazgan, E. & Üstün, A.K. (2011). Application of Analytic Network Process: Weighting of Selection Criterıa for Civil Pilots. Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies, 5(2), 1-12.
• Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü (2020). SHGM Faaliyet Raporu 2020.
• Gopal, P. (2000). Analysis of Factors Leading to Pilot Error Accidents in Civil Aviation. Indian Journal of Aerospace Medicine, 44(1), 34-38.
• Shappell, S.A. & Wiegmann, D.A. (2003). Reshaping the Way We Look at General Aviation Accidents Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 12, 1047-1052.
• Li, G., Baker, S.P., Grabowski, J.G., & Rebok, G.W. (2001). Factors Associated with Pilot Error in Aviation Crashes. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 72(1), 52-58.
• Plant, K.L. & Stanton, N.A. (2012). Why did the Pilots Shut Down the Wrong Engine? Explaining Errors in Context Using Schema Theory and the Perceptual Cycle Model. Safety Science, 50(2), 300-315.
• Shappell, S. & Wiegmann, D. (2001). Applying Reason: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 1, 59-86.
• Shappell, S., Detwiler, C., Holcomb, K., Hackworth, C., Boquet, A., & Wiegmann, D.A. (2007). Human Error and Commercial Aviation Accidents: An Analysis Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Human Factors, 49(2), 227-242.
• Helmreich, R.L. (1997). Managing Human Error in Aviation. Scientific American, 276(5), 62-67.
• Helmreich, R.L. (2000). Culture and Error in Space: Implications from Analog Environments. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 71(9-11), 133-139.
• Shappell, S.A. & Wiegmann, D.A. (2000). Human Error and Crew Resource Management Failures in Naval Aviation Mishaps: A Review of US Naval Safety Center Data, 1990-96. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, 70(12), 1147-1151.
• Goeters, K.M., Timmermann, B., & Maschke, P. (1993). The Construction of Personality Questionnaires for Selection of Aviation Personnel. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 123-141.
• Hilton, T.F. & Dolgin, D.L. (1991). Pilot Selection in the Military of the Free World. In R. Gal & A. D. Mangelsdorf (Eds.), Handbook of Military Psychology (81-101). John Wiley & Sons.
• Griffin, G.R. & Koonce, J.M. (1996). Review of Psychomotor Skills in Pilot Selection Research of the U.S. Military Services. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6(2), 125-47.
• Martinussen, M. & Torjussen, T. (1998). Pilot Selection in the Norwegian Air Force: A Validation and Meta-Analysis of the Test Battery. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8(1), 33-45.
• Bailey, J. & Woodhead, R. (1996). Current Status and Future Developments of Raf Aircrew Selection. Selection and Training Advances in Aviation, AGARD Conference Proceedings 588 (8-1-8-9), Prague, Czech Republic: Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development.
• Burke, E., Hubson, C., & Linsky, C. (1997). Large Sample Validations of Three General Predictors of Pilot Training Success. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7, 225-234.
• Yazgan, E. & Erol, D. (2016). Sivil Pilot Adayları İçin Seçim Kriterlerinin Belirlenmesi. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 97-104.
• Oktal, H. & Onrat, A. (2020). Analytic Hierarchy Process–Based Selection Method for Airline Pilot Candidates, The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology, 30(3-4), 268-281.
• Bedir, N. & Eren, T. (2015). AHP-PROMETHEE Yöntemleri Entegrasyonu ile Personel Seçim Problemi: Perakende Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(4), 46-58.
• Liang, G.S. & Wang, M.J.J. (1994). Personnel Selection Using Fuzzy MCDM Algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research, 78(1), 22-33.
• Bali, Ö., Gümüş, S., & Dağdeviren, M. (2013). A Group MADM Method for Personnel Selection Problem Using Delphi Technique Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Journal of Military and Information Science, 1(1), 1-13.
• Özgörmüş, E., Mutlu, Ö., & Güner, H. (2005). Bulanık AHP ile Personel Seçimi. V. Ulusal Üretim Araştırmaları Sempozyumu.
• Güdük, Ö. & Önder, E. (2017). Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Veri Giriş Personeli İşe Alım Sürecinde Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi Tekniğinin Kullanılması. Sosyal Güvenlik Uzmanları Derneği, Sosyal Güvence Dergisi, 7(13), 31-56.
• Temiz, N. & Cingöz, K. (2015). İşgören Seçim Sürecindeki Kritik Faaliyetlerin Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ile Değerlendirilmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(4), 531-553.
• Doğan, A. & Önder, E. (2014). İnsan Kaynakları Temin ve Seçiminde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Tekniklerinin Kullanılması ve Bir Uygulama. Journal of Yasar University. 9(34), 5796-5819.
• Koyuncu, O. & Özcan, M. (2014). Personel Seçim Sürecinde Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ve TOPSIS Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması: Otomotiv Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(2), 195-218.
• Turan, H. & Turan, G. (2016). Hemşire Seçiminde Analitik Hiyerarşi Metodunun Uygulanması. Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi, 3(1), 26-30.
• Türeli, N. & Davraz, G. (2016). Hizmet Sektöründeki Personelin Seçiminde AHP ve VIKOR Yönteminin Kullanımı: Özel Hastaneler Açısından Bir İnceleme. International Journal of Social Science, 44, 249-262.
• Weingarten, M.S., Erlich, F., Nydick, R.L., & Liberatore, M.J. (1997). A pilot Study of the Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for the Selection of Surgery Residents, Acad Med., 72(5), 400-2.
• Wang, C., Jia, H., & Zhang, Q. (2017). Physiological and Psychological Selection for High-Performance Fighter Pilot Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process, International Conference on Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on MMESE.
• Sackett, P.R., Borneman, M.J., & Connelly, B.S. (2008). High Stakes Testing in Higher Education and Employment: Appraising the Evidence for Validity and Fairness. American Psychologist, 63(4), 215-227.
• Ryan, A.M. & Ployhart, R.E. (2000). Applicants' Perceptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A Critical Review and Agenda for the Future. Journal of Management, 26(3), 565-606.
• Truxillo, D.M., Bodner, T.E., Bertolino, M., Bauer, T.N., & Yonce, C.E. (2009). Effects of Explanations on Applicant Reactions: A Meta-Analytic Review. International Journal of Selection and Assesment, 17(4), 346-361.
• Aktaş, H. & Tekarslan, E. (2013). Uçuş Ekibi Kaynak Yönetimi: Pilotların Uçuş Ekibi Kaynak Yönetimi Tutumları ile Kişilik Yapıları Arasındaki İlişki. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 42(2), 276-301.
• Todd, M.A. & Thomas, M.J.W. (2012). Flight Hours and Flight Crew Performance in Commercial Aviation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine (ASEM), 83, 776-782.
• Bolstad, C.A., Endsley, M.R., Howell, C.D., & Costello, A.M. (2002). General Aviation Pilot Training for Situation Awareness: An Evaluation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 46, 21-25.
• Civil Aviation Authority (2014). Flight-Crew Human Factors Handbook, CAP 737.
• Carretta, T.R. & Ree, M.J. (1996) Central Role of g in Military Pilot Selection. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6(2), 111-123.
• Endsley, M.R. (1999). Situation Awareness and Human Error: Designing to Support Human Performance. Proceedings of the High Consequence Systems Surety Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
• Zietsman, D. & Vanderschuren, M. (2014). Analytic Hierarchy Process Assessment for Potential Multi-Airport Systems: The Case of Cape Town. Journal of Air Transport Management, 36, 41-49.
• Saaty, T.L. (1977). A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research,15, 234-281.
• Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process.NewYork: Mc-Graw Hill.
• Saaty, T.L. (1990). An Exposition of the AHP in Reply to the Paper Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Physical Distribution Logistics Management, 22, 3-13.
• Saaty, T.L. (2004). Decision making The Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13, 1-35.
• Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Science, 1, 83-98.
• Saaty, R.W. (1987). The Analytic Hierarchy Process-What it is and How it is Used. Mathematical Modelling, 9, (3-5), 161-176.