Examination of Primary School Teachers' Opinions on Cultural Heritage Education in Life Science Lesson
Öz
The case study was used in this study, which was conducted to examine the opinions of primary school teachers on cultural heritage education in the Life Science lesson. The participants the study consisted of 15 primary school teachers working primary schools in Yozgat. Convenience sampling method was used while determining the participants. A semi-structured interview form improved by the researcher and expert opinions were used to collect the data of the study. Descriptive analysis technique was used analysis of the obtained data. At the end of the data, it was concluded that teachers' opinions on cultural heritage are mostly in the form of cultural heritage elements. The majority of the teachers stated that they did not receive any education on cultural heritage or did not participate in the activity. In addition, a significant part of the teachers expressed that they found the cultural heritage education the Life Science curriculum insufficient.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Avcı, M., & Memişoğlu, H. (2016). Kültürel miras eğitimine ilişkin sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerin görüşleri [Opinions of social studies teachers on cultural heritage education]. Elementary Education Online, 15(1), 104-124.
- Azrak, S., & Yalçınkaya, E. (2020). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin tarihi kültürel miras eğitimine ilişkin görüşleri (Denizli şehri örneği) [Opinions of social studies teachers on historical cultural heritage education (Example of Denizli city)]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(3), 1307-1320. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3866
- Bean, G. E. (1999). Eskiçağda güney kıyılar (Çev. İ. Delemen ve S. Çokay) [Southern coasts in antiquity (Trans. İ. Delemen and S. Çokay)]. İstanbul: Arion Yayınevi.
- Bıyıklı, S. G. (2010). Representation of cultural heritage in textbooks: Examination of the illustration in the 4th and 5th grade social studies textbooks (1974-2009) in Turkey. (Unpublished master's thesis). Koç University, İstanbul.
- Chmiliar, I. (2010). Multiple-case designs. A. J. Mills, G. Eurepas & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research içinde (s. 582-583). USA: SAGE Publications.
- Copeland, T. (2004). Heritage and education: A European perspective. Proceedings of the Europa Nostra Forum 2004, 19-22. Netherlands: Pan European Federation for Heritage.
- Çal, Ü. T., & Demirkaya, H. (2017). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının kültürel mirasın korunmasına yönelik görüşleri [Opinions of social studies teacher candidates on the protection of cultural heritage]. XI. International Turkic Culture, Art and Protection of Cultural Heritage Symposium/Art Activity “Turkey-Belarus Relations”, (s. 61-67). Baranovichi/Belarus.
- Çankaya, E. (2006). Somut olmayan kültürel mirasın müzecilik bağlamında korunması. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi) [Conservation of intangible cultural heritage in the context of museology. (Unpublished master's thesis)]. Yıldız Teknik University, İstanbul.
- Çengelci, T. (2012). Sosyal bilgiler öğretim programında somut olmayan kültürel mirasın yeri [The place of intangible cultural heritage in social studies curriculum]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 185-203.
- Çengelci, T. (2013). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde yararlanılan toplumsal ve kültürel kaynakların belirlenmesi [Determining the social and cultural resources used in the social studies lesson]. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 43(12), 219-236.
