Bibliometric Analysis of Studies between 2010-2023 on Leadership in the Field of Educational Sciences

Güler Shaıkh; Semra K Güngör

doi:10.18009/jcer.1461156

TR EN

Bibliometric Analysis of Studies between 2010-2023 on Leadership in the Field of Educational Sciences

Öz

This study analyzed articles on "leadership" published in the Scopus database and the Web of Science between the years 2010-2023. The search term "leadership" was used and the filter section included "education". After excluding non-article entries, a total of 5208 articles were reached. The research methodology -was qualitative, and the data were analyzed using Scopus Analysis Tools and the VOSviewer bibliometric analysis software. The highest density of leadership studies was found to be in the USA, UK, Australia, Canada, South Africa, Spain, Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Netherlands. The year with the most studies on leadership was 2022, and the author Grint K. conducted the most studies on this topic. The University of Toronto had the highest number of leadership articles. 'Transformational Leadership' emerged as the most studied leadership type in education. The frequently used keywords included 'motivation', 'education reform', 'school effectiveness', 'higher education', and 'sustainability.'

Anahtar Kelimeler

Leadership, bibliometric analysis, scopus index, VOSviewer

Kaynakça

Abdullah, K. H., Hashim, M. N., & Aziz, F. S. A. (2020). A 39-year (1980-2019) bibliometric analysis of safety leadership research. TEST Engineering & Management, 83, 4526–4542.
Agbo, F. J., Oyelere, S. S., Suhonen, J., & Tukiainen, M. (2021). Scientific production and thematic breakthroughs in smart learning environments: A bibliometric analysis. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00145-4
Alvesson, M. (1996). Leadership studies: From procedure and abstraction to reflexivity and situation. The Leadership Quarterly 7(4), 455-485.
Antonakis, J., & Day, D. V. (2018). Leadership: past, present, and future. In SAGE Publications, Inc. eBooks (pp. 3–26). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506395029.n1
Bamberg, S., Fujii, S., Friman, M., & Gärling, T. (2011). Behaviour theory and soft transport policy measures. Transport Policy, 18(1), 228–235.
Barnes, D. F. (1978). Charisma and religious leadership: A historical analysis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 17(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/1385423
Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32.
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press eBooks.
Bavik, A. (2020). A systematic review of the servant leadership literature in management and hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(1), 347–382. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-10-2018-0788
Berkovich, I. (2016). School leaders and transformational leadership theory: Time to part ways? Journal of Educational Administration, 54(5), 609-622.

Boyle, F., & Sherman, D. (2006). ScopusTM: The product and its development. The Serials Librarian, 49(3), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1300/j123v49n03_12
Bush, T., & Crawford, M. (2012). Mapping the field over 40 years. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(5), 537–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143212451827
Bush, T., & Ng Yoon Mooi, A. (2019). Distributed leadership and the Malaysia education blueprint: From prescription to partial school-based enactment in a highly centralised context. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(3), 279-295.
Caingcoy, M. E. (2020). Weaving teaching and leading: a systematic literature review on pedagogical leadership contributions. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 5(4), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt20apr727
Chamorro-Padial, J., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, R. (2023). The relevance of title, abstract, and keywords for scientific paper quality and potential impact. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(15), 23075–23090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-14451-9
Chapman, A., Simperl, E., Koesten, L., Konstantinidis, G., Ibáñez, L. D., Kacprzak, E., & Groth, P. (2020). Dataset search: A survey. The VLDB Journal, 29(1), 251-272.
Colbert, B. A., Nicholson, J., & Kurucz, E. C. (2018). Humanistic leadership for sustainable transformation. In Building Leadership Bridges (pp. 33–47).
Contreras, F., Baykal, E., & Abid, G. (2020). E-Leadership and teleworking in times of COVID-19 and Beyond: What we know and where do we go. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.590271
Copeland, L., Littlecott, H., Couturiaux, D., Hoddinott, P., Segrott, J., Murphy, S., . . . Evans, R. (2021). The what, why and when of adapting interventions for new contexts: A qualitative study of researchers, funders, journal editors and practitioners’ understandings. PloS One, 16(7), e0254020.
Cote, R. (2017). Vision of effective leadership. International Journal of Business Administration, 8(6), 1. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v8n6p1
Cowan, D. A. (2007). Artistic undertones of humanistic leadership education. Journal of Management Education, 31(2), 156–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562905285099
Croft, W., & Coleman, N. (2015). The monarch as a politician: The leadership qualities of Queen Elizabeth I (Doctoral dissertation). University of the Cumberlands, Kentucky, USA
Davies, B. (2003). Rethinking strategy and strategic leadership in schools. Educational Management & Administration, 31(3), 295-312.
De Bortoli Cassiani, S. H., De Fatima Fernandes, M. N., Lecorps, K., & Da Silva, F. a. M. (2019). Leadership in nursing: Why should we discuss it? Revista Panamericana De Salud Pública, 43, 1. https://doi.org/10.26633/rpsp.2019.46
De Meyer, A. (2011). Collaborative leadership: New perspectives in leadership development. In Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (pp. 44–63).
Dempster, N., & Lizzio, A. (2007). Student leadership: Necessary research. Australian Journal of Education, 51(3), 276-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494410705100305
Devi, A. D., & Subiyantoro, S. (2021). Implementation of democratic leadership style and transformational head of madrasah in improving the quality. Nidhomul Haq, 6(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v6i1.1162
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2007). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf
Fischer, T., & Sitkin, S. B. (2023). Leadership Styles: A comprehensive assessment and way forward. the Academy of Management Annals, 17(1), 331–372.
Frank, M. R., Wang, D., Cebrian, M., & Rahwan, I. (2019). The evolution of citation graphs in artificial intelligence research. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(2), 79–85.
Ghasabeh, M. S., Soosay, C., & Reaiche, C. (2015). The emerging role of transformational leadership. The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(6), 459-467.
Grimm, J. W. (2010). Effective leadership: Making the difference. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 36(1), 74-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2008.07.012
Hallinger, P., & Chen, J. (2014). Review of research on educational leadership and management in Asia. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535744
Hashem, R. (2020). ‘Al Faza’a’ leadership: An implicit cultural barrier to distributed leadership in Jordanian public schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(1), 26-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220932580
Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2005). The study of educational leadership and management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(2), 229-244.
Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2010). Collaborative leadership effects on school ımprovement: ıntegrating unidirectional- and reciprocal-effects models. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 226-252. https://doi.org/10.1086/656299
Heikka, J., & Waniganayake, M. (2011). Pedagogical leadership from a distributed perspective within the context of early childhood education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(4), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2011.577909
Hitt, M. A., Haynes, K. T., & Serpa, R. (2010). Strategic leadership for the 21st century. Business Horizons, 53(5), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.05.004
Jeong, D., & Koo, Y. (2016). Analysis of trend and convergence for science and technology using the VOSviewer. International Journal of Contents/Journal of Contents, 12(3), 54-58.
Johnston, B. J. (1996). Types of educational leadership in a postindustrial society. Urban Review the Urban Review, 28(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02355338
Lumby, J. (2013). Distributed leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 581–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213489288
Lumby, J., & Foskett, N. (2015). Internationalization and culture in higher education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 95–111.
Nielsen, M. W., & Andersen, J. P. (2021). Global citation inequality is on the rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(7).
Oplatka, I., & Hemsley-Brown, J. (2012). The management and leadership of educational marketing. Emerald Group Publishing eBooks (Vol. 15). Retrieved from https://books.emeraldinsight.com/page/detail/?k=9781781902424
Ripki, A., Murni, S., & Wahyudi, M. (2020). Creative thinking of vocational high school teachers: effects of transformational leadership and job satisfaction. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 4 (7), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.608021
Roig-Tierno, N., Gonzalez-Cruz, T. F., & Llopis-Martinez, J. (2017). An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 15–23.
Sims, M., Waniganayake, M., & Hadley, F. (2017). Educational leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), 960–979.
Skaalvik, C. (2020). School principal self-efficacy for instructional leadership: Relations with engagement, emotional exhaustion and motivation to quit. Social Psychology of Education, 23(2), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09544-4
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A Distributed Perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28.
Szeto, E., Lee, T. T. H., & Hallinger, P. (2015). A systematic review of research on educational leadership in Hong Kong, 1995-2014. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(4), 534–553. https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-03-2015-0027
Tigre, F. B., Curado, C., & Henriques, P. L. (2022). Digital leadership: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 30(1), 40–70.
Thompson, G., & Glasø, L. (2015). Situational leadership theory: a test from three perspectives. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(5), 527–544.
Van Seters, D. A., & Field, R. H. (1990). The evolution of leadership theory. Journal of Organizational Change Management/Journal of Organisational Change Management, 3(3), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819010142139
Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. The American Psychologist, 62(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.62.1.17
Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2016). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Eğitimde Liderlik

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Güler Shaıkh ^*
0000-0002-1094-6110
Türkiye

Semra K Güngör
0000-0001-5785-8137
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

17 Eylül 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

21 Ekim 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

29 Mart 2024

Kabul Tarihi

3 Ağustos 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 24

DOI

https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1461156

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA28LM23EP

APA

Shaıkh, G., & K Güngör, S. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis of Studies between 2010-2023 on Leadership in the Field of Educational Sciences. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 12(24), 422-445. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1461156

AMA

1.Shaıkh G, K Güngör S. Bibliometric Analysis of Studies between 2010-2023 on Leadership in the Field of Educational Sciences. JCER. 2024;12(24):422-445. doi:10.18009/jcer.1461156

Chicago

Shaıkh, Güler, ve Semra K Güngör. 2024. “Bibliometric Analysis of Studies between 2010-2023 on Leadership in the Field of Educational Sciences”. Journal of Computer and Education Research 12 (24): 422-45. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1461156.

EndNote

Shaıkh G, K Güngör S (01 Ekim 2024) Bibliometric Analysis of Studies between 2010-2023 on Leadership in the Field of Educational Sciences. Journal of Computer and Education Research 12 24 422–445.

IEEE

[1]G. Shaıkh ve S. K Güngör, “Bibliometric Analysis of Studies between 2010-2023 on Leadership in the Field of Educational Sciences”, JCER, c. 12, sy 24, ss. 422–445, Eki. 2024, doi: 10.18009/jcer.1461156.

ISNAD

Shaıkh, Güler - K Güngör, Semra. “Bibliometric Analysis of Studies between 2010-2023 on Leadership in the Field of Educational Sciences”. Journal of Computer and Education Research 12/24 (01 Ekim 2024): 422-445. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1461156.

JAMA

1.Shaıkh G, K Güngör S. Bibliometric Analysis of Studies between 2010-2023 on Leadership in the Field of Educational Sciences. JCER. 2024;12:422–445.

MLA

Shaıkh, Güler, ve Semra K Güngör. “Bibliometric Analysis of Studies between 2010-2023 on Leadership in the Field of Educational Sciences”. Journal of Computer and Education Research, c. 12, sy 24, Ekim 2024, ss. 422-45, doi:10.18009/jcer.1461156.

Vancouver

1.Güler Shaıkh, Semra K Güngör. Bibliometric Analysis of Studies between 2010-2023 on Leadership in the Field of Educational Sciences. JCER. 01 Ekim 2024;12(24):422-45. doi:10.18009/jcer.1461156

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

Değerli Yazarlar,

JCER dergisi 2018 yılından itibaren yayımlanacak sayılarda yazarlarından ORCID bilgilerini isteyecektir. Bu konuda hassasiyet göstermeniz önemle rica olunur.

Önemli: "Yazar adından yapılan yayın/atıf taramalarında isim benzerlikleri, soyadı değişikliği, Türkçe harf içeren isimler, farklı yazımlar, kurum değişiklikleri gibi durumlar sorun oluşturabilmektedir. Bu nedenle araştırmacıların tanımlayıcı kimlik/numara (ID) edinmeleri önem taşımaktadır. ULAKBİM TR Dizin sistemlerinde tanımlayıcı ID bilgilerine yer verilecektir.

Standardizasyonun sağlanabilmesi ve YÖK ile birlikte yürütülecek ortak çalışmalarda ORCID kullanılacağı için, TR Dizin’de yer alan veya yer almak üzere başvuran dergilerin, yazarlardan ORCID bilgilerini talep etmeleri ve dergide/makalelerde bu bilgiye yer vermeleri tavsiye edilmektedir. ORCID, Open Researcher ve Contributor ID'nin kısaltmasıdır. ORCID, Uluslararası Standart Ad Tanımlayıcı (ISNI) olarak da bilinen ISO Standardı (ISO 27729) ile uyumlu 16 haneli bir numaralı bir URI'dir. http://orcid.org adresinden bireysel ORCID için ücretsiz kayıt oluşturabilirsiniz. "

Bibliometric Analysis of Studies between 2010-2023 on Leadership in the Field of Educational Sciences

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bibliometric Analysis of Studies between 2010-2023 on Leadership in the Field of Educational Sciences

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster