The Experiences of the Prospective Information Technology Teachers Taking the Multimedia Design and Production Course with Project-Based Learning Method: A Case Study

Yıl 2020, , 720 - 737, 20.10.2020

Murat Çoban

https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.758956

Cited By: 3

Öz

This study aims to determine the opinions and experiences of the prospective information technologies teachers who are taught in multimedia design and production with project-based learning (PBL). In the study, 45 prospective teachers were divided into eight different study groups. These study groups developed projects with a 14-week syllabus based on the ADDIE design model. At the end of the study, qualitative data were obtained from the participants through the interview form. The collected data were analyzed by the content analysis method. According to the results, the vast majority of the participants emphasized that they are satisfied with the way that the PBL is applied and that the PBL should be taken as a basis in the learning process. They also stated that the PBL allows for collaboration, leads to research, supports skill development, and is a fun learning method. However, the participants complained about not finding sufficient resources, especially in the PBL process, lack of cooperation in the group, and the limited time allocated for the PBL process. The results of the study can be useful to educators and education politicians who want to use the PBL in the learning process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Project-based learning, information technologies, multimedia applications, constructivist teaching methods

Kaynakça

• Ahmad, C. N. C., Ching, W. C., Yahaya, A., & Abdullah, M. F. N. L. (2015). Relationship between constructivist learning environments and educational facility in science classrooms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1952-1957.
• Apaydın, Z., & Kandemir, M. (2017). The effect of active learning approach jigsaw ii technique on student attitudes relating to science 4th grade science course. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 5(10), 317-334. 10.18009/jcer.336175
• Arkun, S. (2007). A study on development process of a multimedia learning environment, according to ADDIE model and students’ opinion on the environment (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
• Assaf, D. (2018). Motivating language learners during times of crisis through project-based learning: Filming activities at the arab international university (AIU). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(12), 1649-1657. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0812.10.
• Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43.
• Bender, W. N. (2012). Project-based learning: Differentiating instruction for the 21st century (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
• Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Gil-Doménech, D., & Alegre, I. (2017). Where to locate? A project-based learning activity for a graduate-level course on operations management. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(5), 1586-1597.
• Celik, H. C., Ertas, H., & İlhan, A. (2018). The impact of project-based learning on achievement and student views: The case of AutoCAD programming course. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n6p67.
• Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
• Chisanu, J., Sumalee, C., Issara, K., & Charuni, S. (2012). Design and develop of constructivist learning environment on learning management system. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3426-3430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.078
• Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), 213-220.
• Danks, S. (2011). The ADDIE model: Designing, evaluating instructional coach effectiveness. ASQ Primary and Secondary Education Brief, 4(5), 1-6.
• Dauletova, V. (2014). Expanding omani learners’ horizons through project-based learning: A case study. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77(2), 183-203.
• Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 255-272.
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education (4th Edt.). London: McGraw Hill.
• Frank, M., & Barzilai, A. (2004). Integrating alternative assessment in a project-based learning course for preservice science and technology teachers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000160401
• Gulbahar, Y., & Tinmaz, H. (2006). Implementing project-based learning and e-portfolio assessment in an undergraduate course. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 309-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782462
• Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
• Hannan, A. (2007). Interviews in education research. Retrieved June 18, 2020, from https://eclass.aspete.gr/modules/document/file.php/EPPAIK269/UsingInterviewsinEducationResearch.pdf.
• Holm, M. (2011). Project-based instruction: A review of the literature on effectiveness in prekindergarten through 12th grade classrooms. Insight: Rivier Academic Journal, 7(2), 1-13.
• Holmes, L. M. (2012). The effects of project based learning on 21st century skills and no child left behind accountability standards (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (3569441).
• Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. M. (2014). Teaching science in elementary and middle school: A project-based approach (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 275–297). (2nd ed.).
• Lenz, B., Wells, J., & Kingston, S. (2015). Transforming schools using project-based learning, performance assessment, and common core standards (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2003). Project based learning handbook: A guide to standards-focused project based learning for middle and high school teachers (2nd ed.). Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.
• Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Polat, M., & Kose, Y. (2013). Perceptions of primary education teachers towards the use of e-portfolio as a tool of performance evaluation in schools. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 1(1), 57-82.
• Rabiee, F. (2004). Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63(4), 655-660. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2004399
• Raycheva, R. P., Angelova, D. I., & Vodenova, P. M. (2017). Project-based learning in engineering design in bulgaria: expectations, experiments and results. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 944–961.
• Sadeghi, H., Biniaz, M., & Soleimani, H. (2016). The impact of project-based language learning on Iranian EFL learners comparison/contrast paragraph writing skills. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 6(9), 510-524.
• Saraçoglu, M., & Kahyaoğlu, M. (2018). Examination of secondary school students’ scientific inquiry skills perceptions in term of curiosity, motivation and attitude. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 6(12), 358-376. 10.18009/jcer.472673
• Tierney, G., Goodell, A., Nolen, S. B., Lee, N., Whitfield, L., & Abbott, R. D. (2020). (Re) Designing for engagement in a project-based AP environmental science course. The Journal of Experimental Education, 88(1), 72-102.
• Tseng, K.-H., Chang, C.-C., Lou, S.-J., & Chen, W.-P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87-102.
• Vogler, J. S., Thompson, P., Davis, D. W., Mayfield, B. E., Finley, P. M., & Yasseri, D. (2018). The hard work of soft skills: Augmenting the project-based learning experience with interdisciplinary teamwork. Instructional Science, 46(3), 457-488.
• Whatley, J. (2012). Evaluation of a team project based learning module for developing employability skills. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9, 75-92.
• Wu, T. T., Huang, Y.M., Su, C. Y., Chang, L., & Lu, Y. C. (2018). Application and analysis of a mobile e-book system based on project-based learning in community health nursing practice courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 143-156. Retrieved September 22, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/190831/
• Yam, L. H. S., & Rossini, P. (2010). Effectiveness of project-based learning as a strategy for property education. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 16(3), 291-313.
• Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara Seckin Publications.