The Epistemic Crisis of Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Nafs al-Amr

Öz

Unlike previous general-purpose technological transformations, AI is rapidly transforming all aspects of life within a very short period, creating an ecosystem with fundamentally different dynamics. Within this ecosystem, the problems arising from the inherent nature of AI have become more visible, triggering intense debates and efforts to develop solutions. Among these challenges, the reproduction of social inequalities through biased outputs, the phenomenon of hallucination leading to the generation of incorrect information, and biases or deficiencies embedded in algorithmic assumptions stand out prominently. Consequently, the accuracy of the knowledge produced by AI has emerged as a critical issue that demands close attention. In this study, we examine the epistemic dimension of the knowledge generated by artificial intelligence within the framework of nafs al-amr, which holds a significant place in Islamic thought regarding the relationship between knowledge and truth. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first of its kind in this context. Unlike the knowledge produced by AI systems that operate solely on statistical correlations, nafs al-amr grounds the validity of knowledge in a stable and independent domain of truth, allowing meaning to extend beyond mere probabilistic resemblance. This study underscores the necessity of rethinking how truth is represented and validated in contexts shaped by AI. By adopting the perspective of nafs al-amr, it not only exposes the structural deficiencies of current AI systems but also provides a conceptual foundation for building a more reliable and ethically grounded epistemic architecture, thereby laying the groundwork for future discussions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Nafs al-amr
• artificial intelligence
• Islamic thought
• epistemology
• bias
• hallucination

Kaynakça

1. Ahmad, S. F., Han, H., Alam, M. M., Rehmat, M. K., Irshad, M., Arrano-Munoz, M. and Ariza-Montes, A. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness and safety in education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(311), doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01787-8. google scholar
2. Berberette, E., Hutchins, J., & Sadovnik A. (2024). Redefining “Hallucination“in LLMs:Toward a psychology-informed framework for mitigating misinformation arXiv .2402-01769v1. google scholar
3. Bozkurt, V., & Gursoy, D. (2025). The artificial intelligence paradox: Opportunity or threat to humanity? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(1), 174-187.doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2297114. google scholar
4. Fazlıoğlu, İ. (2015). Derin Yapı: İslam-Türk Felsefe-Bilim Tarihinin Kavram Çerçevesi, Papersense Yayınları. google scholar
5. Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking, Societies, 15(1), 6. doi: 10.3390/ soc15010006 google scholar
6. Ghosh, S., Venkit, P. N., Gautam, S., Wilson, S., & Caliskan, A. (2024). Do generative AI models output harm while representing non-Western cultures: Evidence from a community-centered approach In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (Vol. 7, pp. 476-489). google scholar
7. İlikhan, S., Özer, M., Tanberkan, H., & Bozkurt, V. (2024). How to mitigate the risks of deployment of artificial intelligence in medicine? Turkish Journal of Medical Science, 54(3), 483-492. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5814 google scholar
8. İlikhan, S., Özer, M., Perc, M., Tanberkan, H., & Ayhan, Y. (2025). Complementary use of artificial intelligence in healthcare Medical Journal of Western Black Sea, 9(1), 7-17. doi:.29058/ mjwbs.1620035 google scholar

9. Kosmyna, N., Hauptmann, E., Yuan, Y. T., Situ, J., Liao, X. H., Beresnitzky, A. V.,... & Maes, P. (2025). Your brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for an essay writing task. arXiv:2506.08872. doi: 10.48550/ arXiv.2506.08872 google scholar
10. Köbis, N., Rahwan, Z., Rilla, R., Supriyatno, B. I., Bersch, C., Ajaj, T., Bonnefon, J. F. and Rahwan, I. (2025). Delegation to artificial intelligence can increase dishonest behavior. Nature, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09505-x. google scholar
11. Mohammadkarimi, E., & Omar, J. A. (2025). Does artificial intelligence impede critical thinking? A case study of Iranian university students Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 8(2), 1-9. doi:10.37074/jalt.2025.8.2.3 google scholar
12. O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increase inequality and threatens democracy Crown Books. google scholar
13. Özer, M. (2024a). Potential benefits and risks of artificial intelligence in education Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 13(2), 232-244. doi: 10.14686/1416087 google scholar
14. Özer, M. (2024b). Impact of ChatCPT on Scientific Writing. İnsan ve Toplum Dergisi, 14(3), 210-217. doi: 10.12658/E000 google scholar
15. Özer, M. (2024c). Is artificial intelligence hallucinating? Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 35(4), 333-335. doi: 10.5080/u27587. google scholar
16. Özer, M. (2024d). Dynamics of the meritocracy trap and artificial intelligence International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 20(3), 845-869. doi: 10.17130/ijmeb.1524229 google scholar
17. Özer, M., & Perc, M. (2024). Human complementation must aid automation to mitigate the unemployment effects due to AI technologies in the labor market. Reflektif Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 503-514. doi: 10.47613/reflektif.2024.176 google scholar
18. Özer, M., Perc, M., & Suna, H. E. (2024a). Artificial intelligence bias and the amplification of inequalities in the labor market Journal of Economy, Culture and Society, 69, 159-168. doi: 10.26650/ JECS2023-1415085 google scholar
19. Özer, M., Perc, M., & Suna, H. E. (2024b). Participatory management can help AI ethics adhere to the social consensus. Istanbul University Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 221-238. doi: 10.26650/ SJ.2024.44.1.0001 google scholar
20. Özer, M. (2025). Can mathematical models be weapons of mass destruction? Reflektif Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 259-268. doi: 10.47613/reflektif.2025.212 google scholar
21. Özer M., Tanberkan H., & Perc M., (2025). Artificial intelligence threatens critical thinking in education systems. Journal of Higher Education and Science/Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 15(2), 157-164. doi:10.5961/higheredusci.1747885 google scholar
22. Perc, M., Özer, M., & Hojnik, J. (2019). Social and juristic challenges of artificial intelligence Palgrave Communications, 5(61). doi: 10.1057/ s41599-019-027 google scholar
23. Perc, M., & Özer, M., (2025). Disappearing Minds in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. İnsan ve Toplum Dergisi. 15(3), 1-9. google scholar
24. Qadri, R., Shelby R., Bennett, C. L., & Denton, R. (2023). AI’s Regimes of Representation: A Community-centered Study of Text-to-Image Models in South Asia İn Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 506-517. doi: 10.1145/3593013.3594016 google scholar
25. Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York:Vintage Books google scholar
26. Stadler, M., Bannert, M., & Sailer, M. (2024). Cognitive ease at a cost: LLMs reduce mental effort but compromise depth in student scientific inquiry. Computers in Human Behavior, 160. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108386 google scholar
27. Suleyman, M. (2023). The Coming Wave: Technology, Power, and the Twenty-First Century’s Greatest Dilemma New York: Crown. google scholar
28. Suna, H. E., & Özer, M. (2025). The human complimentary usage of AI and ML for fair and unbiased educational assessments. Chinese/English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 6(1), 1-21. doi: 10.59863/YPKL4338 google scholar
29. Tanberkan, H., Özer, M., & Gelbal, S. (2024). Impact of artificial intelligence on assessment and evaluation approaches in education International Journal of Educational Studies and Policy, 5(2), 139-152. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14016103 google scholar
30. Ulnicane, I., & Aden, A. (2023). Power and politics in framing bias in artificial intelligence policy Review of Policy Research, 40 (5), 665687. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12567 google scholar