Public Service Motivation’s Mediating Role in the Effect Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Justice Have on Organizational Commitment in Higher Education Institutions

Öz

This research aims to determine the mediating effect that public service motivation (PSM) has on the effects from the factors of organizational justice and corporate social responsibility (CSR) from the perspectives of social identity theory, social exchange theory, and organizational justice theory. The sample of the study was selected from the academic staff of Atatürk University, which ranks first in terms of the number of university social responsibility projects in the category of community service and social responsibility according to the university monitoring and evaluation reports published in 2019 by Türkiye’s Council of Higher Education. The data were collected from 341 samples using the questionnaire method based on a five-point Likert-type scale. The results from analyzing the data obtained from the questionnaire have determined faculty members’ perceptions of organizational justice and CSR to have both direct and indirect effects on their emotional and normative commitment levels. Meanwhile, the findings from this study have also determined PSM to have a mediating effect, and this is an important contribution to the literature that accepts the premise of organizational justice and CSR as significant variables of organizational commitment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Public Services Motivation
• Corporate Social Responsibility
• Organizational Justice
• Organizational Commitment

Yükseköğretim Kurumlarında Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk ve Örgütsel Adalet Algısının Örgütsel Bağlılığa Etkisinde Kamu Hizmetleri Motivasyonunun Aracı Rolü Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Öz

Bu araştırma sosyal kimlik kuramı, sosyal mübadele kuramı ve örgütsel adalet kuramı perspektiflerinden kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk (KSS) ve örgütsel adalet faktörlerinin örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkisinde, kamu hizmetleri motivasyonunun (KHM) aracılık etkisinin tespit edilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemi Yükseköğretim Kurulu’nun 2019 yılında yayınladığı üniversite izleme ve değerlendirme raporlarına göre topluma hizmet ve sosyal sorumluluk kategorisinde, üniversite sosyal sorumluluk proje sayısı alanında birinci sırada yer alan Atatürk Üniversitesinde çalışan öğretim elemanlarından seçilmiştir. Çalışmanın evreninden çok aşamalı örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak evreni temsil gücü yüksek bir örneklem grubu belirlenmiştir. Veriler beşli Likert ölçeğine dayalı anket yöntemi ile 341 katılımcıdan toplanmıştır. Bu verilerden yola çıkarak kullanılan ölçeklerin istatistiksel olarak geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik analizleri yapılmıştır. Daha sonrasında yapısal eşitlik modeli kullanılarak değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler, doğrudan etkiler, dolaylı etkiler, tam aracılık rolleri ve kısmi aracılık rolleri analiz edilmiştir. Anketten elde edilen verilerin analizi neticesinde öğretim elemanlarının örgütsel adalet ve KSS algılarının duygusal ve normatif bağlılıkları üzerinde hem doğrudan hem de dolaylı etkilerinin olduğu belirlenmiştir. Diğer taraftan bu çalışmanın bulguları ile örgütsel adalet ve KSS’yi örgütsel bağlılığın önemli öncül değişkeni olarak kabul eden literatüre önemli bir katkı olarak KHM’nin aracılık etkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kamu hizmetleri motivasyonu
• Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk
• Örgütsel adalet
• Örgütsel bağlılık

Kaynakça

1. Abdelmotaleb, M. ve Saha, S.K. (2019). Corporate social responsibility, public service motivation and organizational citizenship behavior in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(11), 929-939. google scholar
2. Aguinis, H. ve Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968. google scholar
3. Ahmad, R., Ahmad, S., Islam, T. ve Kaleem, A. (2020). The nexus of corporate social responsibility (CSR), affective commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in academia A model of trust. Employee Relations, 42(1), 232-247. google scholar
4. Allen, N.J. ve Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18. google scholar
5. Ashforth, B.E. ve Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39. google scholar
6. Bergman, M.E. (2006). The relationship between affective and normative commitment: review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 645-663. google scholar
7. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. google scholar
8. Boylu, Y., Pelit, E. ve Güçer, E. (2007). Akademisyenlerin örgütsel bağlılık düzeyleri üzerine bir araştırma. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 44(511), 55-74. google scholar

9. Brammer, S., Millington, A. ve Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. International Journal ofHuman Resource Management, 18(10), 1701-1719. google scholar
10. Bright, L. (2008). Does public service motivation really make a difference on the job satisfaction and turnover intentions of public employees? The American Review ofPublic Administration, 38(2), 149-166. google scholar
11. Brislin, R.W., Lonner, W.J. ve Thorndike, R.M. (1973). Cross Cultural Research Methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons Publication. google scholar
12. Buchanan, B. (1975). Red-tape and the service ethic: Some unexpected differences between public and private managers. Administration & Society, 6(4), 423-444. google scholar
13. Büyükyılmaz, O., Tunçbiz, B. (2016). “Örgütsel adaletin örgütsel bağlılığa etkisi: Akademik personel üzerinde bir araştırma”. Bartın Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(14), 90-114. google scholar
14. Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55-86. google scholar
15. Çalışkan, O. (2010). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk algılama boyutunun personelinin iş tatminine ve işte kalma niyetine etkisi: Antalya bölgesinde yer alan beş yıldızlı konaklama işletmelerinde çalışanlar üzerinde bir araştırma. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
16. Camilleri, E. (2007). Antecedents affecting public service motivation. Personnel Review, 36(3), 356-377. google scholar
17. Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505. google scholar
18. Chang, E. (1999). “Career commitment as a complex moderator of organizational commitment and turnover intention”. Human Relations, 52(10), 1257-1278. google scholar
19. Christensen, R.K. ve Wright, B.E. (2011). The effects of public service motivation on job choice decisions: Disentangling the contributions of person-organization fit and person-job fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 723-743. google scholar
20. Cihangiroğlu, N. (2009). Örgütsel bağlılığın belirleyicileri olarak örgütsel adalet ve kararlara katılım. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
21. Clerkin, R.M., Paynter, S.R. ve Taylor, J.K. (2009). Public service motivation in undergraduate giving and: volunteering decisions. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(6), 675-698. google scholar
22. Çolak, M. ve Erdost, H.E. (2004). Organizational justice: A review of the literature and some suggestions for future research. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), 51-84. google scholar
23. Colquitt, J.A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400. google scholar
24. Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O. ve Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445. google scholar
25. Costin, H. ve Tregua, M. (2018). Implementing CSR in higher education: A taxonomy of approaches. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing-Iap. google scholar
26. Crewson, P.E. (1997). Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(4), 499-518. google scholar
27. Cropanzano, R. ve Mitchell, M.S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. google scholar
28. Crow, M.S., Lee, C.B. ve Joo, J.J. (2012). Organizational justice and organizational commitment among South Korean police officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 35(2), 402-423. google scholar
29. Dağlı, M. (2016). Psikolojik sözleşme ihlalleri, örgütsel vatandaşlık ve örgütsel adalet algısı ilişkisine yönelik bir araştırma. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Haliç Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı. google scholar
30. De Roeck, K. ve Maon, F. (2018). Building the theoretical puzzle of employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(3), 609-625. google scholar
31. Du, S.L., Bhattacharya, C.B. ve Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19. google scholar
32. Edwards, M.R. ve Kudret, S. Multi-foci CSR perceptions, procedural justice and in-role employee performance: the mediating role of commitment and pride. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 169-188. google scholar
33. Ellemers, N., Kingma, L., van de Burgt, J. ve Barreto, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as a source of organizational morality, employee commitment and satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Moral Psychology, 1(2), 97-124. google scholar
34. Esfijani, A., Hussain, F.K. and Chang, E. (2013). University social responsibility ontology. Engineering Intelligent Systems, 21(4), 291-306. google scholar
35. Farooq, O., Payaud, M., Merunka, D. ve Valette-Florence, P. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment: Exploring Multiple Mediation Mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 563-580. google scholar
36. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. google scholar
37. Giauque, D., Ritz, A., Varone, F. ve Anderfuhren-Bıget, S. (2012). Resigned but satisfied: The negative impact of public service motivation and red tape on work satisfaction. Public Administration, 90(1), 175-193. google scholar
38. Gilliland, S. (2008). The tails of justice: A critical examination of the dimensionality of organizational justice constructs. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 271-281. google scholar
39. Glavas, A. ve Kelley, K. (2014). The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(2), 165-202. google scholar
40. Gond, J.P., El-Akremi, A., Igalens, J. ve Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate social responsibility influence on employees. International Center for Corporate Social Responsibility, 54, 1-47. google scholar
41. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178. google scholar
42. Gould-Williams, J.S., Bottomley, P., Redman, T.O.M., Snape, E.D., Bishop, D.J., Limpanitgul, T. ve Mostafa, A.M.S. (2014). Civic Duty and Employee Outcomes: Do High Commitment Human Resource Practices and Work Overload Matter? PublicAdministration, 92(4), 937-953. google scholar
43. Grant, A.M. (2007). Relational Job Design and the Motivation to Make a Prosocial Difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393-417. google scholar
44. Grant, A.M. ve Sumanth, J.J. (2009). Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 927-944. google scholar
45. Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business ethics, 74(4), 315-327. google scholar
46. Gumport, P.J. (1997). Public universities as academic workplaces. Daedalus, 126(4), 113-136. google scholar
47. Hayes, A.F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford publications. google scholar
48. Hofman, P.S. ve Newman, A. (2014). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment and the moderating role of collectivism and masculinity: evidence from China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(5), 631-652. google scholar
49. Hou, T.C.T. (2019). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and sustainable financial performance: firm-level evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 19-28. google scholar
50. Işık, O., Uğurluoğlu, Ö., Akbolat, M. (2012). Sağlık kuruluşlarında örgütsel adalet algılarının örgütsel bağlılığa etkisi. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 13(2), 254-265. google scholar
51. Jaros, S. J., Jermier, J. M., Koehler, J. W., Sincich, T. (1993). Effects of continuance, affective, and moral commitment on the withdrawal process: An evaluation of eight structural equation models. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (5), 951-995. google scholar
52. Kim, S., Vandenabeele, W., Andersen, L.B., Cerase, F.P., Christensen, R.K., Koumenta, M., . . . Pedersen, L.H. (2010). Measuring public service motivation: developing an instrument for international use. Paper at the Annual conference of the European Group for Public Administration, Toulouse, France, September, 8-10. google scholar
53. Kucukusta, D., Denizci Guillet, B. ve Chan, H.L. (2016). The effect of CSR practices on employee affective commitment in the airline industry. Journal of China Tourism Research, 12(3-4), 451-469. google scholar
54. Laplume, A.O., Sonpar, K. ve Litz, R.A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves US. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152-1189. google scholar
55. Lee, E.M., Park, S.-Y. ve Lee, H.J. (2013). Employee perception of CSR activities: Its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1716-1724. google scholar
56. Maignan, I. ve Ferrell, O. (2001). Antecedents and benefits of corporate citizenship: An investigation of French businesses. Journal of Business Research, 51(1), 37-51. google scholar
57. Mascarenhas, C., Mendes, L, Marques, C. ve Galvâo, A. (2020). Exploring CSR’s influence on employees’ attitudes and behaviours in higher education. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(4), 653678. google scholar
58. McGee, G. W., Ford, R. C. (1987). “Two (or more?) dimensions of organizational commitment: Reexamination of the affective and continuance commitment scales”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 638-641. google scholar
59. Mellor, S., Mathieu, J. E., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., Rogelberg, S. G. (2001). Employees’ nonwork obligations and organizational commitments: A new way to look at the relationships. Human Resource Management, 40 (2), 171-184. google scholar
60. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1 (1), 61-89. google scholar
61. Meyer, J.P., Allen, N.J. ve Gellatly, I.R. (1990). Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 710-720. google scholar
62. Miles, J. (2016). Yönetim ve organizasyon kuramları. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. google scholar
63. Morrow, P.C. (1983). Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 486-500. google scholar
64. Morrow, P.C. (1993). The theory and measurement of work commitment (15. bs.). Greenwich: Jai Press. google scholar
65. Mostafa, A.M.S., Gould-Williams, J.S. ve Bottomley, P. (2015). High-Performance Human Resource Practices and Employee Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 747-757. google scholar
66. Musa, U.A. ve Rahman, A.A. (2015). Employee Perception of CSR Activities, Job Attachment and Organizational Commitment. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 23, 1-16. google scholar
67. Mutlu, H. M., Çeviker, A., Murat, E. (2009). Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk, Örgütsel Bağlılık Ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışının İşletme Performansına Etkileri. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Dergisi, 1(3), 109150. google scholar
68. Ng, T.W.H., Yam, K.C. ve Aguinis, H. (2019). Employee perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Effects on pride, embeddedness, and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 72(1), 107-137. google scholar
69. Niehoff, B.P. ve Moorman, R.H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556. google scholar
70. Norris, P. (2003). Still a Public Service Ethos? Work values, experience, and job satisfaction among government workers For the People: Public Service for the 21st Century içinde (1. bs.). Harvard University Cambridge: Endicott Hall. google scholar
71. Önder, Ç. ve Erdil, S.E. (2015). Ayni kurumsal beklentilere tabi aktörlerin farklılaşan davranışları: Ögretim üyelerinin bilimsel yayın üretkenliklerinin üniversite, bölüm ve birey düzeyindeki yordayıcıları. METU Studies in Development, 42(3), 481-519. google scholar
72. Özdemir, H.Ö. (2007). Çalışanların kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk algılamalarının örgütsel özdeşleşme, örgütsel bağlılık ve iş tatminine etkisi: OPET çalışanlarına yönelik uygulama. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmış Doktora Tezi. google scholar
73. Pandey, S.K. ve Stazyk, E.C. (2008). Antecedents and Correlates of Public Service Motivation. J.L. Perry ve A. Hondeghem (Ed.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service içinde. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
74. Park, T. (2018). The effect of CSR on organizational commitment with moderating role of emotional ıntelligence; evidence form pharmaceutical companies. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 5(12), 1453514543. google scholar
75. Perry, J.L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of public administration research and theory, 6(1), 5-22. google scholar
76. Perry, J.L. ve Hondeghem, A. (2008). Building theory and empirical evidence about public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 3-12. google scholar
77. Perry, J.L. ve Wise, L.R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public administration review, 50(3), 367-373. google scholar
78. Pirsch, J., Gupta, S., Grau, S. L. (2007). “A framework for understanding corporate social responsibility programs as a continuum: An exploratory study”. Journal of business ethics, 70(2), 125-140 google scholar
79. Rahman, A.A., Castka, P. ve Love, T. (2019). Corporate social responsibility in higher education. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 916-928. google scholar
80. Rodrigo, P., Aqueveque, C. ve Duran, I.J. (2019). Do employees value strategic CSR? A tale of affective organizational commitment and its underlying mechanisms. Business Ethics-a European Review, 28(4), 459-475. google scholar
81. Rosso, B.D., Dekas, K.H. ve Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91-127. google scholar
82. Rupp, D.E. (2011). An employee-centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility. Organizational Psychology Review, 1(1), 72-94. google scholar
83. Rupp, D.E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R.V. ve Williams, C.A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: an organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537-543. google scholar
84. Rupp, D.E., Shao, R., Thornton, M.A. ve Skarlicki, D.P. (2013). Applicants’ and Employees’ Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Effects of First-Party Justice Perceptions and Moral Identity. Personnel Psychology, 66(4), 895-933. google scholar
85. Sample Size Calculator. (2017). Erişim tarihi: 12.01.2017, Erişim adresi: https://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm google scholar
86. Schmiesing, R.J., Safrit, R.D. ve Gliem, J.A. (2003). Factors affecting OSU extension agents’ perceptions of organizational justice and job satisfaction. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 10(2), 25-35. google scholar
87. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. google scholar
88. Suliman, A., Iles, P. (2000). Is continuance commitment beneficial to organizations? Commitment-performance relationship: A new look. Journal ofManagerial Psychology, 15 (5), 407-422. google scholar
89. Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J.C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. S. Worchel ve W.G. Austin (Ed.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations içinde (7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall. google scholar
90. Tanrıverdi, H., Koçaslan, G., Eğriboz, N. (2019). Örgütsel adalet, örgütsel bağlılık ve çalışan memnuniyeti arasında ilişki. Journal ofInternational Social Research, 12(62), 1604-1614. google scholar
91. Turker, D. (2009a). How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal ofBusiness Ethics, 89(2), 189-204. google scholar
92. Turker, D. (2009b). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 411-427. google scholar
93. Vandenabeele, W. (2007). Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545-556. google scholar
94. Vandenabeele, W. (2008). Development of a public service motivation measurement scale: Corroborating and extending Perry’s measurement instrument. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 143-167. google scholar
95. Vandenabeele, W. ve Van de Walle, S. (2008). International differences in public service motivation: Comparing regions across the world. J.L. Perry ve A. Hondeghem (Ed.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service içinde (1. bs., 223-244). New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
96. Voegtlin, C. ve Greenwood, M. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: A systematic review and conceptual analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 26(3), 181-197. google scholar
97. Wang, H.L., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R. ve George, G. (2016). Thematic ıssue on corporate social responsibility corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 534544. google scholar
98. Wasti, S. A. (2001). Örgütsel adalet kavramı ve tercüme bir ölçeğin Türkçe’de güvenirlik ve geçerlik analizi. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 33-50. google scholar
99. Wong, I.A. ve Gao, J.H. (2014). Exploring the direct and indirect effects of CSR on organizational commitment the mediating role of corporate culture. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26(4), 500-525. google scholar
100. Wright, B.E. ve Pandey, S.K. (2008). Public service motivation and the assumption of person—Organization fit: Testing the mediating effect of value congruence. Administration & Society, 40(5), 502-521. google scholar
101. Wright, T.S.A. ve Wilton, H. (2012). Facilities management directors’ conceptualizations of sustainability in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 31, 118-125. google scholar
102. Yeung, S.M.C. (2018). Linking ISO 9000 (QMS), ISO 26000 (CSR) with accreditation requirements for quality indicators in higher education. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(13-14), 1594-1611. google scholar
103. Yıldırım, F. (2002). Çalışma yaşamında örgüte bağlılık ve örgütsel adalet ilişkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
104. YÖK. (2020). Yükseköğretim Kurulu Üniversite İzleme ve Değerlendirme Genel Raporu. Erişim 01.01.2020, Erişim adresi: https://atauni.edu.tr/yok-degerlendirme-raporu-aciklandi-ataturk-universitesi-sosyal-sorumluluk-projeleri-kategorisinde-turkiye-birincisi-oldu google scholar