BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

-

Yıl 2013, Sayı: 4, 51 - 64, 01.12.2013

Öz

This paper examines the implementation of technology enhanced learning which is based on digital resources and its benefits specifically in a reading course at an English prep school. The paper describes the findings that contribute to the impact of technology tailored teaching on students’ learning. Positive impacts are evident if the lesson is carefully planned, structured and integrated. In particular, it provides that there is a direct relationship between the way lessons are presented with the use of digital resources, and the progress students showed during a limited period of time. By no means, technology guarantees significant change in the students’ progress in learning English. This study employed a structured questionnaire, classroom observations, and student interviews to examine the impact of technology tailored teaching. The results indicated that as the level and length of time digital teaching increases, students’ attitudes towards the lessons show more positive results. The data collected in this study support the idea that technology combined with effective instruction can show positive results for students and teachers. However, although the data are promising, they are preliminary

Kaynakça

  • AECT (1977). The Definition of Educational Technology, Task Force on Definition and Terminology, Washington, D.C. pp 1,2.
  • Barad, D. P.(2009),Pedagogical Issues Related to Speaking and Listening Skills & Sound Editing Software, AudacityLT Weekly, Online Journal, Vol.1(27).
  • Barad, D.P.(2010), Experimenting ICT In English Language and Literature, Asia CALL Online Journal. Issue Vol.4 No:1.
  • Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer-assisted language learning. In R. Kaplan, (Ed.). Handbook of applied linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dexter, S.L., Anderson, R.E., & Becker, H. J., (1999). Teachers’ views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 221-239.
  • Fraley, L.E., & Vargas E.A. (1975). Academic tradition and instructional technology. The Journal of Higher Education, 46, 1-15.
  • Gass, S., (1997). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition edited by Catherine J. Doughty, Michael H. Long, Douhgty 1998.
  • Graddol, D. (1997). The Future of English, The British Council, 1st ed., p 2. Hanson-Smith, E., (2006), http://webpages.csus.edu/~hansonsm/CoP_Resources.html. Community of Practice Resources,
  • Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Chapter 1: Definition. In Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Jonassen, D. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: engaging critical thinking, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Long, M.H., (1981). INPUT, INTERACTION, ACQUISITION, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Volume 379, Native Language and Foreign Language Acquisition pages 259–278, December 1981.
  • Long, M.H., (1991). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research, Diane Larsen- Freeman and Micheal H. Long , New York, NY: Longman Inc., p.398.
  • Long, M.H., Kanagy,R. & Falodun,J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. in G.Crookes & S.M.Gass (Eds.) Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory & Practice. (pp.9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Owsten, R.D., (1997). the World Wide Web: A Technology to Enhance Teaching and Learning, Research New and Comment March issue, p.27.
  • Pica,T., (1994). Research on Negotiation: What Does It Reveal About Second-Language Learning Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes? Language Learning Volume 44, Issue 3, pages 493–527, September 1994.
  • Robert J. Blake, Brave new digital classroom technology and foreign language learning, Georgetown University Press, Washington D.C., 2008, p15.
  • Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Integrating educational technology into teaching (3rd edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.Roblyer, M.D. (2003), Integrating Educational Technology in to Teaching, Prentice Hall.
  • Roschelle J., (2003), Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices, in: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19:3(260--272).
  • Saettler, P. (1990) The Evolution of American Educational Technology: Englewood, CO. Libraries Unlimited.
  • Selber, S. (2004), Multiliteracies for Digital Age (Studies inWriting and Rhetoric), USA, p36.
  • Smith, M.K., (2002), ‘Howard Gardner and multiple intelligences’, the encyclopedia of informal education, http://www.infed.org/thinkers/gardner.htm, May 2013.
  • Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Teknoloji Bizim Arkadaşımız: Teknoloji Kullanarak İngilizce Öğrenme Stratejilerini Öğretmek

Yıl 2013, Sayı: 4, 51 - 64, 01.12.2013

Öz

Kaynakça

  • AECT (1977). The Definition of Educational Technology, Task Force on Definition and Terminology, Washington, D.C. pp 1,2.
  • Barad, D. P.(2009),Pedagogical Issues Related to Speaking and Listening Skills & Sound Editing Software, AudacityLT Weekly, Online Journal, Vol.1(27).
  • Barad, D.P.(2010), Experimenting ICT In English Language and Literature, Asia CALL Online Journal. Issue Vol.4 No:1.
  • Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer-assisted language learning. In R. Kaplan, (Ed.). Handbook of applied linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dexter, S.L., Anderson, R.E., & Becker, H. J., (1999). Teachers’ views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 221-239.
  • Fraley, L.E., & Vargas E.A. (1975). Academic tradition and instructional technology. The Journal of Higher Education, 46, 1-15.
  • Gass, S., (1997). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition edited by Catherine J. Doughty, Michael H. Long, Douhgty 1998.
  • Graddol, D. (1997). The Future of English, The British Council, 1st ed., p 2. Hanson-Smith, E., (2006), http://webpages.csus.edu/~hansonsm/CoP_Resources.html. Community of Practice Resources,
  • Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Chapter 1: Definition. In Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Jonassen, D. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: engaging critical thinking, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Long, M.H., (1981). INPUT, INTERACTION, ACQUISITION, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Volume 379, Native Language and Foreign Language Acquisition pages 259–278, December 1981.
  • Long, M.H., (1991). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research, Diane Larsen- Freeman and Micheal H. Long , New York, NY: Longman Inc., p.398.
  • Long, M.H., Kanagy,R. & Falodun,J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. in G.Crookes & S.M.Gass (Eds.) Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory & Practice. (pp.9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Owsten, R.D., (1997). the World Wide Web: A Technology to Enhance Teaching and Learning, Research New and Comment March issue, p.27.
  • Pica,T., (1994). Research on Negotiation: What Does It Reveal About Second-Language Learning Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes? Language Learning Volume 44, Issue 3, pages 493–527, September 1994.
  • Robert J. Blake, Brave new digital classroom technology and foreign language learning, Georgetown University Press, Washington D.C., 2008, p15.
  • Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Integrating educational technology into teaching (3rd edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.Roblyer, M.D. (2003), Integrating Educational Technology in to Teaching, Prentice Hall.
  • Roschelle J., (2003), Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices, in: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19:3(260--272).
  • Saettler, P. (1990) The Evolution of American Educational Technology: Englewood, CO. Libraries Unlimited.
  • Selber, S. (2004), Multiliteracies for Digital Age (Studies inWriting and Rhetoric), USA, p36.
  • Smith, M.K., (2002), ‘Howard Gardner and multiple intelligences’, the encyclopedia of informal education, http://www.infed.org/thinkers/gardner.htm, May 2013.
  • Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Zeynep Munzur Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2013
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Munzur, Z. (2013). Teknoloji Bizim Arkadaşımız: Teknoloji Kullanarak İngilizce Öğrenme Stratejilerini Öğretmek. Journal of Education and Future, 1(4), 51-64.
AMA Munzur Z. Teknoloji Bizim Arkadaşımız: Teknoloji Kullanarak İngilizce Öğrenme Stratejilerini Öğretmek. JEF. Aralık 2013;1(4):51-64.
Chicago Munzur, Zeynep. “Teknoloji Bizim Arkadaşımız: Teknoloji Kullanarak İngilizce Öğrenme Stratejilerini Öğretmek”. Journal of Education and Future 1, sy. 4 (Aralık 2013): 51-64.
EndNote Munzur Z (01 Aralık 2013) Teknoloji Bizim Arkadaşımız: Teknoloji Kullanarak İngilizce Öğrenme Stratejilerini Öğretmek. Journal of Education and Future 1 4 51–64.
IEEE Z. Munzur, “Teknoloji Bizim Arkadaşımız: Teknoloji Kullanarak İngilizce Öğrenme Stratejilerini Öğretmek”, JEF, c. 1, sy. 4, ss. 51–64, 2013.
ISNAD Munzur, Zeynep. “Teknoloji Bizim Arkadaşımız: Teknoloji Kullanarak İngilizce Öğrenme Stratejilerini Öğretmek”. Journal of Education and Future 1/4 (Aralık 2013), 51-64.
JAMA Munzur Z. Teknoloji Bizim Arkadaşımız: Teknoloji Kullanarak İngilizce Öğrenme Stratejilerini Öğretmek. JEF. 2013;1:51–64.
MLA Munzur, Zeynep. “Teknoloji Bizim Arkadaşımız: Teknoloji Kullanarak İngilizce Öğrenme Stratejilerini Öğretmek”. Journal of Education and Future, c. 1, sy. 4, 2013, ss. 51-64.
Vancouver Munzur Z. Teknoloji Bizim Arkadaşımız: Teknoloji Kullanarak İngilizce Öğrenme Stratejilerini Öğretmek. JEF. 2013;1(4):51-64.