Analysis of Articles Published in 2019 and 2020 within the Scope of Education Policies, Management, and Leadership

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 22, 1 - 14, 25.07.2022

İsmail Kılıç , Mustafa Yavuz

https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.901113

Öz

This research aimed to evaluate the research articles in the journals Educational Administration Quarterly (EAQ), Educational Management Administration & Leadership (EMAL), and Educational Policy (EP) according to the theme, method, quality, and quantity of the articles published in 2019 and 2020. The data used in the research were collected by document analysis, one of the qualitative research techniques. The data was analyzed with the help of frequency and categorical analysis using the descriptive analysis method. In this study, the following themes were predetermined as research design and method, purpose and subject, study group, and analysis of data. As a result of the analysis, it was observed that in recent years qualitative research has dominated in educational research, content and document analysis has gained weight in the analysis of research, different sub-leadership titles have increased in the main theme of leadership in research issues, and new topics have been included in a problem-based broad school perspective. It was concluded that teachers, school administrators, students, and documents related to school processes were treatedas the study group, and, in general, document analysis and accordingly content analysis were used in the analysis of the data. It was observed that the largest number of articles published in the journals came from North America, particularly the USA while a certain proportion of research took place in other parts of the world. The findings can be interpreted as guiding researchers and practitioners in the field of educational policies, management, and leadership. According to these results, it is suggested that publications in the field should be published in journals that guide education policies by using a mixed pattern in the focus of school and school stakeholders, and such publications should be conducted in the local and regional context.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Education research, education management research, article review, document analysis

Kaynakça

• Al, U. (2008). Scientific Publications Policy in Turkey: An Approach Based on Bibliometric Citation Index, unpublished doctoral thesis, Ankara.
• Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., Yıldırım, E. (2012). Research Methods in Social Sciences, 7th Edition, Sakarya: Sakarya Publishing.
• Arık, R. S. and Türkmen, M. (2009). Examination of articles in scientific journals published in the field of educational sciences. February 2, 2021 Retrieved from www.eab.og.tr/eab/2009/pdf/488.pdf.
• Aykan, A., and Kıncal, R.Y. (2016). Content analysis of scientific studies published in different countries within the scope of course research. Atatürk University Journal of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, 32, 19-31.
• Aypay, A., Çoruk, A., Yazgan, A. D., Kartal, O. Y., Tunçer, B., Attila, S. M., and Erman, B. (2010). Status of educational management research: Analysis of educational management journals 1999-2007. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 39, 59-77.
• Balcı, A. (1988). Education management research status: studies published in EAQ between 1970-1985. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal, 21 (1), 421-434.
• Balcı, A., Aydın, İ., Yılmaz, K., Memduhoğlu, H. B. and Apaydın Ç. (2007). Management and control of primary education in the Turkish education system: Current situation and new perspectives. S. Özdemir, H. Bacanlı, and M. Sözer (ed.), 126-185. Ankara: Turkish Education Association Publications.
• Balcı, A. (2008). Being Science level of educational management in Turkey. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 54, 181-209.
• Busch, T. and Crawford, M. (2012). Mapping the field over 40 years: A Historical Review. Educational Management Administrational & Leadership, 40 (5), 537-543.
• Cresswell, J.W. (2017). Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches. 3. Translation from Print; Translation Ed.: Selçuk Beşir Demir. Ankara: Educational book.
• Çiçek, D. and Kozak, N. (2012). Anatolia: Bibliometric profile of peer-reviewed articles published in the journal of tourism research. Turkish Librarianship, 26, (4), 734-756.
• Doğan, H. and Tok, T. N. (2018). Examination of the articles published in the field of science education in Turkey: The Example of Education and Science. Curr Res Educ, 4 (2), 94-109. Eren, B., Çelik, M., Oğuz, A. (2014). Examination of studies related to attitudes towards the teaching profession in Turkey. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences. 42, 359-370.
• Gül, H. and Maksüdünov, A. (2019). Manas sosyal araştırmalar dergisinde 2012-2018 yılları arasında yayınlanan makalelerin içerik analizi. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8 (2), 1459-1478.
• Gülmez, D. and Yavuz, M. (2016). Evaluation of articles published in 2012 within the scope of educational leadership and management in terms of purpose and method. Elementary Education Online, 15 (2), 318-329.
• Gümüş, S., Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, E., Hallinger, P. (2019). Science mapping research on educational leadership and management in Turkey: A bibliometric review of international publications. School Leadership and Management, 40 (1), 23-44.
• Güven, E. (2014). Analysis of Turkish Published Qualitative Articles in Science Education. Journal of European Education, 4 (1), 1-10.
• Günbayi İ. (2019). Developing A Qualitative Research Manuscript Based On Systematic Curriculum And Instructional Development. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 3 (3), 124-153.
• Hoy, W.K (1982). Recent advances in theory and research in education. Quarterly Educational Administration, 18 (3), 1-11.
• Karadağ, E. (2009). Examination of doctoral dissertations in educational sciences. Ahi Evran University Journal of Education Faculty, 10 (3), 75-87.
• Karadağ, E. (2010). Research models used in educational sciences doctoral dissertations: Quality levels and analytical error types. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 49-71.
• Karasar, N. (2007). Scientific research methods (17th Edition). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Kılıç, Ç. and Arslan S. (2016). Meta-evaluation of published articles on adult education in Turkey. Ercincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 18 (2), 865-899.
• Kirk, J. and Miller, M.L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly hills, CA: Sage.
• Kurtoğlu, M. and Seferoğlu, S. (2013). Turkey originated in the use of technology related magazines published articles examining the teachers. Journal of Instructional Technologies and Teacher Education. 2 (3). 1-10.
• Mortimore, P. (2000). Does educational research matter?. British Educational Research Journal, 26 (1),5-24.
• Miskel, C. and Sandlin, T. (1981). Survey Research in Educational Administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17 (4), 1-20.
• Özdemir, A. N. and Alpaydın, Y. (2018). Academic publishing in higher education institutions: Examining university journals in terms of some variables. Journal of Higher Education, 8 (1), 9-22.
• Neuman, L. W. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (S. Özge, Trans.). 7th Edition, Istanbul: Publishing Room.
• Selçuk, Z., Palancı, M., Kandemir, M. and Dündar, H. (2014). Trends of research published in education and science journal: Content analysis. Education and Science, 39 (173), 430-453.
• Skene, L. (2007). Research in Other Countries: National Ethnic-Legal Barometers and International Ethical Consensus Statements. Plos Mecidine E Peer-Rewieved, Open Access Journal, 4 (2), 10.
• STM. (2018). An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Publishing, The STM Report: Fifth edition, 8 February 2021 accessed, https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf.
• Swafford, G.L (1990). Window or mirror?. A content analysis of the first 25 years of the journal of educational administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 28 (1), 5-23.
• Taşkın, G. and Aksoy, G. (2019). Examination of postgraduate theses and articles on transition to secondary education system studied between 2000-2018. Journal of İnönü University Education Faculty, 20 (2), 633-649.
• Turan, S., Karadağ, E., Bektaş, F., Yalçın, M. (2014). Turkey production information management in education: Theory and Practice Journal of Educational Administration investigation of 2003-2013 publications. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 20 (1), 93-119.
• Turan, S. and Şişman, M. (2013). Introduction to the critique of scientific knowledge and western cognition produced in the field of educational administration. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 19 (4), 505-514.
• Yıldırım, A. (2018). Examination of research on education management in Turkey: National educational training and social science journals example. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26 (6), 1887-1896.
• Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek, H. (2006). Qualitative research methods in social sciences, (5th Edition), Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
• Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek, H. (2016). Qualitative research methods in social sciences, (11th Edition). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
• Yılmaz, K. (2019). Trends in the education article in organizational behavior management in Turkey. Turkey Education Journal, 4 (2), 81-103.