Examining the Mediating Role of Social Worth in the Effect of Employees' Person Environment-Fit on Entrepreneurial Intention

Öz

This study examines the impact of person-environment fit and social acceptance on entrepreneurial intent in the workplace. Based on survey data collected from 289 individuals with at least five years of work experience, the analysis was conducted on 251 valid responses. Results indicate a significant effect of person-environment fit on entrepreneurial intent, particularly within the dimension of person-job fit. Additionally, the study confirms that the perception of social value plays an indirect role in this relationship. Findings suggest that feeling valued by one’s social environment strengthens individuals’ entrepreneurial intentions, and that alignment within the work environment further supports this process. These results contribute to the literature by highlighting the positive effects of person-environment fit and social worth perception on entrepreneurial propensity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Person Environment Fit
• Social Worth
• Entrepreneurial Intention

Çalışanların Çevre Uyumlarının Girişimcilik Niyetleri Üzerindeki Etkisinde Algıladıkları Sosyal Değerin Aracı Rolünün İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırma, iş hayatında uyum ve sosyal kabulün girişimcilik niyeti üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. En az 5 yıl iş tecrübesi olan 289 kişiden anket yöntemiyle toplanan verilere dayanarak, 251 geçerli cevap üzerinden analiz yapılmıştır. Sonuçlara göre, kişi-çevre uyumunun girişimcilik niyeti üzerinde belirgin bir etkisi olduğu ve bu etkinin özellikle kişi-iş uyumu boyutunda öne çıktığı gözlenmiştir. Ayrıca, sosyal değer algısının bu etkileşimde dolaylı bir rol oynadığı doğrulanmıştır. Çalışma, sosyal çevre tarafından değerli hissetmenin, bireylerin girişimcilik niyetlerini güçlendirdiğini ve iş ortamında uyum sağlamanın bu süreci desteklediğini göstermektedir. Elde edilen bulgular, kişi-çevre uyumu ve sosyal değer algısının girişimcilik eğilimi üzerindeki olumlu etkilerine dair literatüre katkı sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kişi-Çevre Uyumu
• Sosyal Değer
• Girişimcilik Niyeti

Kaynakça

1. Aloulou, W. J., Algarni, E. A., Ramadani, V., & Hughes, M. (2023). Passionate to be a social entrepreneur in Saudi Arabia: A moderated mediation analysis of social entrepreneurial intention. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(2), 698–712.
2. Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 295–298.
3. Arshad, M., Afzal, S., Ashraf, N., Atif, M., & Farooq, O. (2024). Career Transition of Employees toward Entrepreneurship: A Person-Environment Perspective. Revue de l’Entrepreneuriat/Review of Entrepreneurship, 23(1), 111–129.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
5. Begley, T. M., & Tan, W. L. (2001). The socio-cultural environment for entrepreneurship: A comparison between East-Asia and Anglo-Saxon countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 537–553.
6. Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research , 8, 137–164.
7. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875–884.

9. Cable, D. M., & Edwards, J. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 822–834.
10. Cahyadi, H., Maupa, H., Handoyo, S. E., Dewi, D. A., & Jatiningrum, C. (n.d.). The Interplay of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Personality Traits and Person-Environment Fit in Predicting Work Engagement: Evidence from an Indonesia Startup.
11. Chhabra, M., Singh, L. B., & Mehdi, S. A. (2023). Women entrepreneurs’ success factors of Northern Indian community: a person–environment fit theory perspective. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 17(6), 1293–1314.
12. Chuang, A., Shen, C.-T., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Development of a multidimensional instrument of person–environment fit: The perceived person–environment fit scale (PPEFS). Applied Psychology: An International Review, 65(1), 66–98.
13. Chuang, C. H., Chen, S. jer, & Chuang, C. W. (2013). Human resource management practices and organizational social capital: The role of industrial characteristics. Journal of Business Research, 66(5), 678–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.04.002
14. Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96(4), 608–630.
15. Davis, J. R., & Reyna, C. (2015). Seeing red: How perceptions of social status and worth influence hostile attributions and endorsement of aggression. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(4), 728–747.
16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
17. Gabarrell-Pascuet, A., García-Mieres, H., Giné-Vázquez, I., Moneta, M. V., Koyanagi, A., Haro, J. M., & Domènech-Abella, J. (2023). The association of social support and loneliness with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 2765.
18. Gaffar, M. A., Amang, B., & Dewi, R. (2024). Effect of Person-Organization and Person-Job Fit on Career Development: The Role of Proactive Behavior. 8th International Conference on Accounting, Management, and Economics (ICAME 2023), 367–379.
19. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th (ed.)). Prentice-Hall.
20. Hayes, A. F. (2019). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis (3rd ed., Vol. 2507, Issue February). Guilford publications.
21. Henry, P. J. (2009). Low-status compensation: A theory for understanding the role of status in cultures of honor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 451–466.
22. Jusri, R., & Lechner, C. (2024). The level and development of university students’ social integration: Personality traits and person-environment fit predict integration with fellow students and teaching staff. Higher Education, 1–20.
23. Kimakwa, S., Gonzalez, J. A., & Kaynak, H. (2023). Social entrepreneur servant leadership and social venture performance: how are they related? Journal of Business Ethics, 182(1), 95–118.
24. Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Guay, R. P. (2011). Person–environment fit: APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (S. Zedeck (ed.); Vol. 3, pp. 3–50). American Psychological Association.
25. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342.
26. Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49.
27. Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593–617.
28. Matthews, C. H., & Moser, S. B. (1995). Family background and gender: Implications for interest in small firm ownership. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7(4), 365–377.
29. Piasentin, K. A., & Chapman, D. S. (2006). Subjective person-organization fit: Bridging the gap between conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 202–221.
30. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.
31. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271–320.
32. Riedo, V., Kraiczy, N. D., & Hack, A. (2019). Applying person‐environment fit theory to identify personality differences between prospective social and commercial entrepreneurs: An explorative study. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(3), 989–1007.
33. Rothers, A., & Cohrs, J. C. (2024). Social Worth. In Subjective Well-Being and Life Satisfaction (pp. 365–381). Routledge.
34. Segaf, S. (2023). Exploring perceptions and elements of entrepreneurial behavior in pesantren: understanding fundamental concepts of Entrepreneurial Behavior. Al-Tanzim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7(3), 962–972.
35. Şeşen, H., & Basım, H. N. (2012). Demografik faktörler ve kişiliğin girişimcilik niyetine etkisi: Spor bilimleri alanında öğrenim gören üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma. Ege Akademik Bakış, 12, 21–28.
36. Stephan, U., Zbierowski, P., & Hanard, P.-J. (2020). Entrepreneurship and Covid-19: Challenges and opportunities. KBS Covid-19 Research Impact Papers, 2, 1–30.
37. Tatlı, M., & Çakmak, A. F. (2019). Kişi-Çevre Uyumunun Farkli Kavramsal Yaklaşimlar Açisindan Çok Düzeyli Ölçümü; Hemşirelerin Uyum Algilari İle Çalişma Tutum Ve Davranişlari Arasindaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(5), 2464–2488.
38. Tesi, A., Aiello, A., & Pratto, F. (2023). How people higher on social dominance orientation deal with hierarchy-attenuating institutions: the person-environment (mis) fit perspective in the grammar of hierarchies. Current Psychology, 42(30), 26721–26734.
39. Udin, U. (2024). Transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of person-job fit and person-organization fit in social exchange perspective. Human Systems Management, 43(3), 325–339.
40. Yonuari, C., Septiawan, D., & Marcheline, A. (2024). The The Effect Of Person-Job Fit And Person-Organization Fit On Employee Performance With Individual Capacity As Moderation. Primanomics: Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis, 22(3), 64–77.