A Field Study on Social Innovation

Öz

Today, social innovation is an important proposition for responding social needs. However, there are a few studies on social innovation and there isn’t common theoretical framework when looking the relevant literature. In this study, a survey is prepared based on literature review and applied to the experts. With this approach, defining the related components and the factors affecting social innovation is the main objective of this study. According to the survey results, social entrepreneurship has the highest interaction with social innovation and “social expectations” is the most important factor influencing the generation of social innovations. In addition, the most important attribute that social innovations contain is defined as the development potential on social areas such as education, health, environment and economy. The most important role in the process of social innovation is stated to be taken by municipalities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• social innovation,social entrepreneurship,Turkey

Sosyal Yenilik Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması

Öz

Günümüzde sosyal yenilik, toplumsal ihtiyaçların karşılanması için önemli bir konudur. Bununla birlikte ilgili literatüre bakıldığında sosyal yenilik üzerine yapılan çalışmaların kısıtlı olduğu ve bu konuda ortak bir kavramsal yapının oluşturulmadığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışma kapsamında, literatüre dayalı oluşturulan anket aracılığıyla kavrama ilişkin unsurların uzmanlar tarafından değerlendirilmesi yapılmıştır. Bu yaklaşımla sosyal yenilikle ilgili unsurların ve sosyal yeniliği etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi çalışmanın temel amacını oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, sosyal yeniliğin en fazla ilişkili olduğu kavramın sosyal girişimcilik olduğu, sosyal yeniliğin ortaya çıkışında en önemli faktörün ise sosyal beklentiler olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, eğitim, sağlık, çevre, ekonomi gibi sosyal alanlarda gelişme sağlama potansiyelinin sosyal yeniliklerin barındırması gereken en önemli unsur olduğuna işaret edilirken sosyal yenilik süreçlerindeki en önemli rolün ise belediyeler tarafından üstlenilmesi gerektiği tespit edilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• sosyal yenilik, sosyal girişimcilik, Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. Austin, James, Howard Stevenson ve Jane Wei-Skillern (2006), “Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both?”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30 (1), 1-22.
2. Aygören, Huriye, Şefik Şenyürek, Aytül Erçil ve Selçuk Karaata (2009), İnovasyon Yönetimi, 1. Baskı, İstanbul Sanayi Odası, Mürettebat Matbaacılık. Bhatt, Punita ve Levent Altınay (2013), “How social capital is leveraged in social innovations under resource constraints?”, Management Decision, 51(9), 1772-1792.
3. Bouchard, Marie (2011), “Social innovation, an analytical grid for understanding the social economy: the example of the Que´bec housing sector”, Service Business, 6 (1), 47-59.
4. Bulut, Cagri, Hakan Eren ve Duygu S. Halac (2013), “Social innovation and psychometric analysis”, Procedia & Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 122-130.
5. Burgelman, Robert, Clayton Christensen ve Steven Wheelwright (2008), Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, 4. Baskı, McGraw-Hill Education, USA.
6. Cajaiba-Santana, Giovany (2014), “Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42-51.
7. Charalabidis, Yannis, Euripidis L., ve Aggeliki A. (2014), “Fostering Social Innovation through Multiple Social Media Combinations”, Information Systems Management, 31 (3), 225-239.
8. d’Ovidio, Marianna ve Marc Pradel (2013), “Social innovation and institutionalisation in the cognitive–cultural economy: Two contrasting experiences from Southern Europe”, Cities, 33, 69-76.

9. Datta, Punita Bhatt (2011), “Exploring the evolution of a social innovation: A case study from India”, International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 10 (1), 55-75.
10. Dawson, Patrick ve Lisa Daniel (2010), “Understanding social innovation: a provisional framework”, International Journal of Technology Management, 51 (1), 9-21.
11. Dees, J. Gregory (1998), “The meaning of social entrepreneurship”, Social Entrepreneurship Funders Working Group, 1-6.
12. Dees, J. Gregory ve Battle B. Anderson (2003), “2. For-Profit Social Ventures”, Marilyn L. Kourilsky ve William B. Walstad (Ed.), Social Entrepreneurship, Birmingham, UK: Senate Hall Academic Publishing.
13. Descubes, Irena, Jean-Philippe Timsit ve Yann Truong (2013), “Social Innovation in emerging economies: A resource‐based view perspective”, Strategic Change, 22 (7), 503-510.
14. Edwards-Schachter, Monica E., Cristian E. Matti ve Enrique Alcantara (2012), “Fostering quality of life through social innovation: A living lab methodology study case”, Review of Policy Research, 29(6), 672-692.
15. El-Haddadeh, Ramzi, Irani, Zahir, Millard, Jeremy ve Schröder, Antonius (2014), “Toward a Coherent Methodological Framework for Examining Social Innovation in the Public Sector”, Information Systems Management, 31(3), 250-258.
16. Eren, Hakan (2010), Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sosyal Yenilikçilik Kapasitelerinin Teknolojik Yenilikçilik Eğilimlerine Etkisini Ölçmeye Yönelik Bir Model Önerisi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Kara Harp Okulu Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü Teknoloji Yönetimi Ana Bilim Dalı.
17. Garcia, Daniel ve Dorothy Macharia (2014), Collaboration Between Sectors for Social Innovation: The Refugee Housing Unit Case, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Linköping University Department of Management and Engineering.
18. Gray, Denis O. ve Barri A. Braddy (1988), “Experimental Social Innovation and Client-Centered Job-Seeking Programs”, American Journal of Community Psychology, 16 (3), 325-343.
19. Green, Ken ve Philip Vergragt (2002), “Towards sustainable households: A methodology for developing sustainable technological and social innovations”, Futures, 34 (5), 381-400.
20. Güler, Burcu (2008), Sosyal Girişimciliği Etkileyen Faktörlerin Analizi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
21. Harrisson, Denis, Reynald Bourque, ve György Széll (2009), “Social innovation, economic development, employment and democracy.” Social Innovation, the Social Economy and World Economic Development. 1. Baskı içinde (7-15). Frankfurt (Main): Peter Lang.
22. Haugh, Helen (2005), “A research agenda for social entrepreneurship”, Social Enterprise Journal, 1 (1), 1-12.
23. Henderson, Hazel (1993), “Social innovation and citizen movements”, The Knowledge Base of Futures Studies, 25(3), 322-338.
24. Howaldt, Jürgen ve Micheal Schwarz (2010), Social innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends, Dortmund: IMA/ZLW.
25. Jing, Yijia ve Ting Gong (2012), “Managed social Innovation: The case of government-sponsored venture philanthropy in Shanghai”, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71 (2), 233-245.
26. Koç, Oktay (2010), “Toplumsal sorunlarla mücadelede bir kaldıraç olarak sosyal inovasyon ve sosyal girişimcilik açısından önemi”, Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 5(2), 205-212.
27. Le Ber, Marlene ve Oana Branzei (2010), “(Re)Forming strategic cross-sector partnerships relational processes of social Innovation”, Business & Society, 49(1), 140-172.
28. Marques, Carla S., Chris Gerry, Francisco Diniz, ve Ana L. Ferreira (2012), “Social innovation: determinants of the demand for high-quality institutional care by the elderly”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 2(2), 187-204.
29. Maruyama, Yasushi., Makoto Nishikido ve Tetsunari Iida (2007), “The rise of community wind power in Japan: Enhanced acceptance through social innovation”, Energy Policy, 35, 2761-2769.
30. Mulgan, Geoff, Simon Tucker, Rushanara Ali, ve Ben Sanders (2007), “Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated”, Oxford SAID Business School, Skoll Center for Social Entrepreneurship, Working Paper.
31. Westley, Frances, Nino Antadze, Darcy J. Riddell, Kirsten Robinson, ve Sean Geobey (2014), “Five Configurations for Scaling Up Social Innovation: Case Examples of Nonprofit Organizations From Canada”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Aug 2014, 1-27.