Ergonomic Analysis of Working Conditions in Cable Assembly Plants: A Study Based on REBA and CMDQ

Öz

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) represent one of the most prevalent and critical ergonomic health issues encountered globally in the field of occupational health and safety. Today, excessive workload and prolonged exposure to non-ergonomic working postures contribute significantly to the development of MSDs, particularly in the back, waist, neck, and upper extremities. The manifestation of these disorders varies depending on the nature and repetition of work tasks. In this context, the present study evaluates ergonomic risk levels affecting various body regions of employees engaged in cable manufacturing, assembly, and production activities. To assess the impact of musculoskeletal discomfort, the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) was employed, while posture-based ergonomic risk levels at workstations were analyzed using the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) method. Based on the findings, practical recommendations were developed to reduce ergonomic risks and improve working conditions. This study demonstrates that the combined use of CMDQ and REBA provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating workplace ergonomics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ergonomics
• REBA
• CMDQ
• Occupational health and safety

Kablo Montaj Tesislerinde Çalışma Koşullarının Ergonomik Analizi: REBA ve CMDQ Dayalı Bir Çalışma

Öz

Çalışma kaynaklı kas-iskelet sistemi bozuklukları (KİSB), küresel ölçekte iş sağlığı ve güvenliği alanında karşılaşılan en yaygın ve önemli ergonomik sorunlardan biri olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Günümüzde çalışanların aşırı iş yüküne maruz kalmaları ve ergonomik olmayan çalışma pozisyonlarında uzun süre görev yapmaları, başta sırt, bel, boyun ve üst ekstremiteler olmak üzere çeşitli vücut bölgelerinde kas-iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıklarının gelişmesine neden olmaktadır. Söz konusu rahatsızlıkların ortaya çıkışı, yapılan işin niteliğine ve tekrarlayan duruşlara bağlı olarak değişkenlik göstermektedir. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışmada bir kablo üretim tesisinde yürütülen imalat, montaj ve üretim faaliyetlerinde görev alan çalışanların farklı vücut bölgelerine yönelik ergonomik risk düzeyleri değerlendirilmiştir. Analiz sürecinde, kas-iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıklarının çalışanlar üzerindeki etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla Cornell Kas-İskelet Sistemi Bozuklukları Anketi (CMDQ), iş istasyonlarındaki duruş temelli ergonomik risk düzeylerini belirlemek üzere ise REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda, ergonomik risk düzeylerinin azaltılmasına ve çalışma koşullarının iyileştirilmesine yönelik uygulanabilir çözüm önerileri sunulmuştur. Bu çalışma, REBA ve CMDQ yöntemlerinin birlikte kullanımının işyeri ergonomisine yönelik bütüncül bir değerlendirme sağladığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ergonomi
• REBA
• CMDQ
• İş sağlığı ve güvenliği

Kaynakça

1. Tarakçı, E., Can, E., Sakallı, A. E., & Tak, G. (2020). The Ergonomıc Rısk Analysıs Wıth Reba Method In Productıon Lıne. Ergonomi, 3(3), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.33439/ergonomi.743276.
2. Ispășoiu, A., Milosan, I., & Gabor, C. (2024). Improving Workplace Safety and Health Through a Rapid Ergonomic Risk Assessment Methodology Enhanced by an Artificial Intelligence System. Applied System Innovation, 7(6), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi7060103.
3. Kulaç, S., & Kiraz, A. (2024). An integrated ergonomic risk assessment framework based on fuzzy logic and IVSF-AHP for optimising ergonomic risks in a mixed-model assembly line. Ergonomics, 67(12), 2009–2029. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2368270.
4. Okuyucu, K., Hignett, S., Gyi, D., & Doshani, A. (2021). Midwives’ thoughts about musculoskeletal disorders with an evaluation of working tasks. Applied Ergonomics, 90, 103263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103263.
5. Enez, K., & Nalbantoğlu, S. S. (2019). Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment outputs from OWAS and REBA in forestry timber harvesting. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 70, 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.01.009.
6. Sabino, L., Melo, R. B., & Carvalho, F. (2019). Ergonomic Work Analysis at Plant Nurseries of a Portuguese Municipality. Occupatıonal and Envıronmental Safety and Health, 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94484-5_29.
7. Tarakçi, E., & Can, E. (2024). A Novel Approach to Ergonomic Risk Analyses. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1004385.
8. Chakravarthya, S. P. (2015). Ergonomıc Assessment And Rısk Reductıon Of Automobıle Assembly Tasks Usıng Postural Assessment Tools. Internatıonal Journal Of Research Scıence & Management, 2.

9. Yazdanirad, S., Pourtaghi, G., Raei, M., & Ghasemi, M. (2022). Development of modified rapid entire body assessment (MOREBA) method for predicting the risk of musculoskeletal disorders in the workplaces. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23, 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05011-7.
10. Ayvaz, Ö., Özyıldırım, B. A., İşsever, H., Öztan, G., Atak, M., & Özel, S. (2023). Ergonomic risk assessment of working postures of nurses working in a medical faculty hospital with REBA and RULA methods. Scientific Progress, 106. https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504231216540.
11. Widyanti, A. (2018). The Agreedness between Observation and Self-report Method in Work Posture Analysis. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 17(2), 186. https://doi.org/10.23917/jiti.v17i2.6800.
12. Ogedengbe, T. S., Markus, S., Dabo, A. L., Afolalu, S. A., Ikumapayi, O. M., & Musa, A. I., et al. (2023). Comparative Study of the REBA and RULA Assessment Tools Efficiency for Workers Tasks. 2nd International Conference on Multidisciplinary Engineering and Applied Science (ICMEAS), IEEE, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMEAS58693.2023.10379279.
13. Gönen, D., Karaoglan, A. D., Ocaktan, M. A. B., Oral, A., Atıcı, H., & Kaya, B. (2018). Kas iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıklarının analizinde yeni bir risk değerlendirme yaklaşımı. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(2), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.416351.
14. Liyanage, E., Chellapillai, D., Liyanage, I., Samarakoon, C., Samarasekara, H., & Rikas, M. (2024). Sinhala version of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Work, 77(2), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-220295.
15. Carrasquero Carrasquero, E. E. (2015). Spanısh Adaptatıon And Valıdatıon Of Cornell Skeletalmuscle Instrument Of Dıscomfort Perceptıon Questıonnaıres (CDMQ). Desarrollo Gerencial, 7(2), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.17081/dege.7.2.1179.
16. Kreuzfeld, S., Seibt, R., Kumar, M., Rieger, A., & Stoll, R. (2016). German version of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ): translation and validation. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 11, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-016-0100-2.
17. Eyvazlou, M., Asghari, A., Mokarami, H., Bagheri Hosseinabadi, M., Derakhshan Jazari, M., & Gharibi, V. (2021). Musculoskeletal disorders and selecting an appropriate tool for ergonomic risk assessment in the dental profession. Work, 68(4), 1239–1248. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-213453.
18. Nisa, K. S., Topandi, A., Wulansari, I., Fauziah, A., & Bismo, Z. M. (2024). Comparison of Ergonomic Assessment Results in the Automotive Polymer Industry: Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) and Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) Methods. Jurnal Inotera, 9(1), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.31572/inotera.Vol9.Iss1.2024.ID309.
19. Aziz, F. A., & Hafidz, N. A. A. (2024). The Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders Symptoms and Ergonomics Risk Amongst Engineering, Science, and Technology Students. Progress in Engineering Technology VI, 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8819-8_30.
20. Chowdhury, N. (n.d.). A Comparative Assessment of Ergonomic Risk Factors in University Personnel Using RULA and REBA Aiming to Study the Cause and Effect Relationship. Research Paper.
21. Grooten, W. J. A., & Johansson, E. (2018). Observational Methods for Assessing Ergonomic Risks for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. A Scoping Review. Revista Ciencias de La Salud, 16(1), 8–38. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.6840.
22. Abdol Rahman, M. N., Lay Zhan Yek, Ho Fu Haw, Masood, I., Abdullah, H., & Hassan, M. F., et al. (2024). Relationship between Improper Working Posture among Maintenance Workers using Different Assessment Methods. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 49(2), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.49.2.1525.
23. Engür, M., & Chaush-Ogly, K. (2019). Türkiye İş Sağlığı Ve Güvenliği Mevzuatında Ergonominin Yeri Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Ergonomi, 2(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.33439/ergonomi.480559.
24. Serpil, A., Özok, A. F., Yamankaradeniz, N., Gökçe, A., Akalp, G., & Çankaya, O., et al. (2018). Metal Sanayiinde Çalışan Kadınların Ergonomik Risk Algısı: Bir Araştırma. Ergonomi, 1(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.33439/ergonomi.473023.
25. Alkan, E., & Ilgın, M. A. (2018). Bi̇r elektroni̇k fi̇rmasinin montaj hatlarinin ergonomi̇k anali̇zi̇. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.386385.
26. Aksüt, G., Eren, T., & Tüfekçi, M. (2020). Ergonomi̇k ri̇sk faktörleri̇ni̇n siniflandirilmasi: bi̇r li̇teratür taramasi. Ergonomi, 3(3), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.33439/ergonomi.773896.
27. Chiasson, M. E. (2012). Assessment of risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders: Comparison of observation methods and workers’ perceptions. Polytechnic School of Montreal.
28. Tuncel, S., Genaidy, A., Shell, R., Salem, S., Karwowski, W., & Darwish, M., et al. (2008). Research to practice: Effectiveness of controlled workplace interventions to reduce musculoskeletal disorders in the manufacturing environment—critical appraisal and meta‐analysis. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 18(2), 93–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20104.
29. Gholami, A., Yalameh, J. T., Fouladi-Dehaghi, B., Eskandari, D., & Teimori-Boghsani, G. (2020). Evaluation of the influence of education on the ergonomic risk of concrete form workers. Work, 67(4), 1007–13. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203350.
30. Drinkaus, P., Sesek, R., Bloswick, D., Bernard, T., Walton, B., & Joseph, B., et al. (2003). Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment outputs from Rapid Upper Limb Assessment and the Strain Index for tasks in automotive assembly plants. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 21(2), 165–72. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2003-00317.
31. Teixeira, R. C. M., Guimarães, W. P. S., Ribeiro, J. G., Fernandes, R. A., Nascimento, L. B. F., & Torné, I. G., et al. (2022). Analysis of the Reduction of Ergonomic Risks through the Implementation of an Automatic Tape Packaging Machine. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 15193. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215193.
32. Am-Eam, N., Jankaew, P., Ninthappho, K., & Noosom, T. (2020). An Evaluation of Work Posture by REBA: A Case Study in Maintenance Department. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20142-5_11.
33. Agustina, F., Ansori, N., Novianti, T., Widiaswanti, E., & Anggraeni, R. A. (2023). Risk Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Design of Lifting-carrying Facilities. PROZIMA (Productivity, Optimization and Manufacturing System Engineering), 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21070/prozima.v7i1.1605.
34. Moradi Rad, R., Vosough, S., & Mahdavi, S. (2020). Ergonomic Assessment of Working Postures Using NERPA and REBA Methods (Case Study: Abadan Oil Refinery). Archives of Occupational Health, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.18502/aoh.v4i3.4067.
35. Biradar, V. G., Hebbal, S. S., & Qutubuddin, S. M. (2024). Ergonomic Risk Identification and Postural Analysis in Electrical Transformers Manufacturing Company located in Southern India. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 14(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijosh.v14i2.53692.
36. Avila Bridge, M. E. (2014). Identification and evaluation of ergonomic risk factors in workers at an automotive company and their relationship with musculoskeletal conditions. SEK International University.
37. Neumann, P. (2022). Production Ergonomics: Identifying and Managing Risk in the Design of High Performance Work Systems. Ryerson University. https://doi.org/10.32920/ryerson.14638713.v1.
38. Jin, X., Dong, Y., Yang, L., Huang, W., Cao, L., & Zhang, Z., et al. (2025). Ergonomic interventions to improve musculoskeletal disorders among vehicle assembly workers: a one-year longitudinal study. BMC Public Health, 25, 824. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21798-1.
39. Öztürk, N., & Esin, M. N. (2011). Investigation of musculoskeletal symptoms and ergonomic risk factors among female sewing machine operators in Turkey. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 41(6), 585–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2011.07.001.
40. Sakthi Nagaraj, T., Jeyapaul, R., & Mathiyazhagan, K. (2019). Evaluation of ergonomic working conditions among standing sewing machine operators in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 70, 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.01.006.
41. Yek, L. Z., Nasrull, M., & Rahman, A. (2023). A Case Study of An Ergonomic Risk Assessment for Working Posture among Maintenance Workers. Research Progress In Mechanıcal And Manufacturıng Engıneerıng, 4(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.30880/rpmme.2023.04.01.011.
42. Seife, W., Bizuneh, B., & Minbale, E. (2025). Workplace ergonomics: a comparative analysis of sitting and standing workstations in Ethiopian garment manufacturing industries. International Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 12(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHFE.2025.147908.
43. Piskunova, L., Zubok, T., Klepko, A., Trzh, Z., & Kudryavytska, A. (2024). Scientific and methodological approaches to improving the level of environmental and labour safety as modern trends and prospects of higher education. Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University Series Physics, 2257–2266. https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.225sp7.
44. Kapoor, S., Cantrell, E. M., Peng, K., Pham, T. H., Bail, C. A., & Gundersen, O. E., et al. (2024). REFORMS: Consensus-based Recommendations for Machine-learning-based Science. Science Advances, 10. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk3452.
45. Çırakoğlu Kelleci, S., & Civcivoğlu, S. N. (2024). Yetişkin Öğrenmesinde Andragojik Yaklaşımlar: Otomotiv Sektöründe İş Sağlığı Güvenliği Eğitiminde Oyunlaştırma Uygulamaları. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, 36(3), 396–406. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.1529762.