Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing

Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1 31 Mart 2020
PDF İndir
EN TR

Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing

Öz

Polyamide, commonly used in engineering plastics, has wear resistance and high strength. Hybrid manufacturing, using a combination of more than one production technique to benefit from the superiority of the manufacturing. In this study, polyamide, which is produced with casting and three-dimensional printer, has been drilled and reamed in numerical controlled machine. Thus, the effect of production technique, machining allowance and tool feed rate on hole surface and size quality was investigated. In general, the surface quality of the holes in the polyamide material produced by the two production techniques was directly affected by the machining allowance and the increased feed rate. In addition, the size of the holes created with the three-dimensional printer has reached the desired level after reaming process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. ASTM F2792-12. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing Technologies, ASTM International, 2012.
  2. Guo N, Leu MC. Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, ; 8(3): 215-243.
  3. Wohlers T. Wohler’s Report 2016, Wohlers Associates, Inc., 2016.
  4. Petrick IJ, Simpson TW, 3D printing disrupts manufacturing: how economies of one create new rules of competition. Research-Technology Management, 2013, 56(6): 12-16.
  5. Amanullah ANM, Murshiduzzamana, Saleha T, Khana R. Design and Development of a Hybrid Machine combining Rapid Prototyping and CNC Milling Operation. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 184: 163 – 170.
  6. Sealy MP, Madireddy G, Williams RE, RAO P, Toursangsaraki M. Hybrid processes in additive manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 2018, 140, 6.
  7. Deopura BL, Lagirusamy R, Joshi M, Gupta B. Polyesters and polyamides. Cambridge, England, 2008.
  8. Kuram E. Micro-machinability of injection molded polyamide 6 polymer and glass-fiber reinforced polyamide 6 composite. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2016, 88 : 85-100.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Mühendislik

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Mart 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

18 Nisan 2019

Kabul Tarihi

10 Aralık 2019

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Tezel, T. (2020). Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, 32(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.555453
AMA
1.Tezel T. Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. JEPS. 2020;32(1):1-7. doi:10.7240/jeps.555453
Chicago
Tezel, Tuğçe. 2020. “Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32 (1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.555453.
EndNote
Tezel T (01 Mart 2020) Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32 1 1–7.
IEEE
[1]T. Tezel, “Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing”, JEPS, c. 32, sy 1, ss. 1–7, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.7240/jeps.555453.
ISNAD
Tezel, Tuğçe. “Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32/1 (01 Mart 2020): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.555453.
JAMA
1.Tezel T. Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. JEPS. 2020;32:1–7.
MLA
Tezel, Tuğçe. “Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, c. 32, sy 1, Mart 2020, ss. 1-7, doi:10.7240/jeps.555453.
Vancouver
1.Tuğçe Tezel. Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. JEPS. 01 Mart 2020;32(1):1-7. doi:10.7240/jeps.555453

Cited By