YEŞİL SATIN ALMA VE YEŞİL TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ: BEYAZ EŞYA SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Öz

Teknolojinin artan bir hızla gelişmesi, günümüzde işletmelerin daha fazla çeşit ve miktarda ürünü, daha kısa sürelerde pazara sunabilmelerine imkân sağlamaktadır. Bu durum rekabet avantajı elde etmek isteyen işletmeler için bir fırsat yaratmakla beraber, arz miktarlarındaki yüksek artış oranlarına karşılık taleplerin aynı oranda artmaması ve tüketicilerin daha bilinçli ve duyarlı hale gelmeleri, bu işletmeleri yoğun bir rekabet ortamı içerisine sokmaktadır. Doğal kaynakların hızla tükenmesi, iklim değişikliği, çevre kirliliğinin artması, vb. durumların yarattığı olumsuz etkiler sebebiyle toplumdaki farkındalığın artması ve tüketicilerin daha çevreci ürünleri tercih etmeleri, medyanın ve sivil toplum kuruluşlarının çevresel konulara gösterdiği hassasiyet, genel ve yerel otoriteler tarafından yapılan düzenlemeler, vb. koşullar, işletmeleri ürün yaşam döngüsü boyunca tüm aşamalarda çevreye duyarlı olmaya zorlamaktadır. Bu duyarlılık, üretimde kullanılan her türlü kaynağın azaltılmasını, üretim süreçlerinin çevreyle dost olacak şekilde yapılandırılmasını, kullanılan ambalaj malzemelerinin ve taşıma yöntemlerinin çevreyle dost olması ve yeniden kullanım konusunda gerekli adımların atılmasını gerekmektedir. Bu noktada ürün yaşam döngüsünün ilk aşaması olan satın alma konusunda önemli iyileştirme potansiyeli bulunmakta ve üretimde kullanılacak her türlü girdinin temini için en uygun tedarikçinin seçimi en önemli aşamalardan biri haline gelmektedir. Bu değerlendirmeler ışığında yapılan bu çalışma ile amaçlanan, satın alma süreçlerinde geleneksel tedarikçi seçimi yerine, yeşil tedarikçi seçim süreçlerinin araştırılması ve yeşil tedarikçi seçiminde kullanabilecek kriterlerin belirlenmesidir. Yapılan araştırmalardan hareketle yeşil tedarikçi seçimi için yeni bir karar verme modeli geliştirilmiş ve Türkiye ve Avrupa pazarında önemli bir paya sahip beyaz eşya üreticilerinden biri için tedarikçi seçimi süreci bir vaka analizi ile somutlaştırılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yeşil satın alma
• Yeşil tedarikçi seçimi
• Analitik ağ süreci
• Karar verme

GREEN PURCHASING AND GREEN SUPPLIER SELECTION: AN APPLICATION IN THE WHITE GOODS SECTOR

Öz

The increasing speed of technological advancement in recent years, allows companies to offer more varieties and quantities of products to the market in shorter periods. While this creates an opportunity for the companies that want to gain competitive advantage, the fact that the demands do not increase at the same rate with supply and the consumers become more conscious and sensitive, puts these companies in an intense competitive environment. Due to the negative effects of climate change, the rapid depletion of natural resources, increased environmental pollution, etc., environmental awareness in the society increases. As a result, majority of the consumers tend to prefer more environmentally friendly products, the media and non-governmental organizations become more sensitive to environmental issues, and governments put more regulations on environmental protection. All these conditions force companies to be environmentally conscious at all stages throughout the product life cycle, which, in turn, means taking the necessary steps to reduce all kinds of resources used in production, reconfiguring the production processes, using environmentally friendly packaging materials and transportation methods and considering reuse issues. At this point, there is a significant improvement potential in purchasing process, which is the first stage of the product life cycle, and the selection of the most suitable supplier becomes one of the most important issues. For this reason, this study aims to propose a decision making model for green supplier selection to apply this model in one of the biggest white goods manufacturers in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Green Purchasing
• Green Supplier Selection
• Analytic Network Process
• Decision Making

Kaynakça

1. Asan, U., & Soyer, A. (2009). Identifying strategic management concepts: An analytic network process approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(2), 600–615.
2. Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2011). A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Computers In Industry, 62(2), 164–174.
3. Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000–3011.
4. Büyüközkan, G., & Vardaloğlu, Z. (y.y.). Yeşil Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi. 1–15.
5. ÇEVKO. (y.y.). Ambalaj Nedir? https://www.cevko.org.tr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=25&Itemid=138&lang=tr
6. Chiou, T.-Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822–836.
7. Copacino, W. C. (1996). Seven supply-chain principles. Traffic Management, 35(1), 60.
8. Gavronski, I., Klassen, R. D., Vachon, S., & do Nascimento, L. F. M. (2011). A resource-based view of green supply management. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 872–885.

9. Green, K., Morton, B., & New, S. (1996). Purchasing and environmental management: interactions, policies and opportunities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(3), 188–197.
10. Gungor, A., & Gupta, S. M. (1999). Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: a survey. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 36(4), 811–853.
11. Handfield, R., Walton, S. V, Sroufe, R., & Melnyk, S. A. (2002). Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 141(1), 70–87.
12. Hashemi, S. H., Karimi, A., & Tavana, M. (2015). An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 178–191.
13. Hsu, C.-W., & Hu, A. H. (2009). Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(2), 255–264.
14. Igarashi, M., de Boer, L., & Fet, A. M. (2013). What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(4), 247–263.
15. Ijomah, W. L., Childe, S., & McMahon, C. (2004). Remanufacturing: A key strategy for sustainable development. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Design and Manufacture for Sustainable Development.
16. İstanbul Sanayi Odası. (2002). KOBİ’ler için çevre yönetim sistemi rehberi.
17. Jorge, R., Martin, R., & Athena, S. (2006). Green Purchasing: A Guide for Local Governments and Communities.
18. Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H.-Y., Hsu, C.-F., & Hung, H.-C. (2009). A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7917–7927.
19. Lin, C.-T., Chen, C.-B., & Ting, Y.-C. (2012). A green purchasing model by using ANP and LP methods. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 40(2), 203–210.
20. Little, A. D. (2003). The Business Case for Corporate ResponsibilityNo Title.
21. Lu, L. Y. Y., Wu, C. H., & Kuo, T.-C. (2007). Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4317–4331.
22. Mason, T. (1996). Getting your suppliers on the team. Logistics Focus, 4, 10–12.
23. Min, H., & Galle, W. P. (1997). Green purchasing strategies: trends and implications. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 33(2), 10–17.
24. Min, H., & Galle, W. P. (2001). Green purchasing practices of US firms. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(9), 1222–1238.
25. Myers, J. H., & Alpert, M. I. (1968). Determinant buying attitudes: meaning and measurement. Journal of Marketing, 32(4), 13–20.
26. Noci, G. (1997). Designing ‘green’vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier’s environmental performance. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 3(2), 103–114.
27. Olugu, E. U., Wong, K. Y., & Shaharoun, A. M. (2011). Development of key performance measures for the automobile green supply chain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(6), 567–579.
28. Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., & Scannell, T. V. (1997). Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(3), 190–202.
29. Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
30. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill.
31. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26.
32. Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision-making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications.
33. Saaty, T. L. (2002). Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Scientia Iranica, 9(3), 215–229.
34. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
35. Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2013). Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks (2nd baskı). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7
36. Sarkis, J. (2001). Manufacturing’s role in corporate environmental sustainability ‐ Concerns for the new millennium. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(5/6), 666–686. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110390390
37. Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4), 397–409.
38. Sarkis, J., & Rasheed, A. (1995). Greening the manufacturing function. Business Horizons, 38(5), 17.
39. Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 1–15.
40. Shaik, M., & Abdul-Kader, W. (2011). Green supplier selection generic framework: a multi-attribute utility theory approach. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 4(01), 37–56.
41. Sofres, T. N. (2001). The European survey on socially responsible investment and the financial community.
42. SPN. (2007). Guide to the Businesss Case & Benefits of Sustainability Purchasing.
43. T.C. Bilim Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı. (2013). Beyaz Eşya Sektörü Raporu (2013/1).
44. T.C. Gümrük ve Ticaret Bakanlığı. (2015). Beyaz Eşya Sektörü Raporu.
45. Testa, F., Iraldo, F., Frey, M., & Daddi, T. (2012). What factors influence the uptake of GPP (green public procurement) practices? New evidence from an Italian survey. Ecological Economics, 82, 88–96.
46. Topçu, Y. İ. (2019). Analitik hiyerarşi ve ağ süreci. www.ilkertopcu.net
47. Tsui, C.-W., & Wen, U.-P. (2012). Developing the green supplier selection procedure based on analytical hierarchy process and outranking methods. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 299–307.
48. Uttam, K., Faith-Ell, C., & Balfors, B. (2012). EIA and green procurement: Opportunities for strengthening their coordination. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 33(1), 73–79.
49. Walker, H., & Brammer, S. (2012). The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 256–268.
50. Warner, K. E., & Ryall, C. (2001). Greener purchasing activities within UK local authorities. Eco‐Management and Auditing: The Journal of Corporate Environmental Management, 8(1), 36–45.
51. Yen, Y.-X., & Yen, S.-Y. (2012). Top-management’s role in adopting green purchasing standards in high-tech industrial firms. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 951–959.
52. Zhou, R., Ma, X., Li, S., & Li, J. (2012). The green supplier selection method for chemical industry with analytic network process and radial basis function neural network. Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences, 4(4), 147–158.
53. Zhu, Q., Dou, Y., & Sarkis, J. (2010). A portfolio‐based analysis for green supplier management using the analytical network process. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(4), 306–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541011054670
54. Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265–289.
55. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Geng, Y. (2005). Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(5), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510593148
56. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2007). Green supply chain management: pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11–12), 1041–1052.