Ankilozan spondilitli bireylerde servikal bölge eklem pozisyon hissi ve servikal bölge kaslarının mekanik özellikleri: kesitsel tanımlayıcı araştırma

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, ankilozan spondilitli bireylerde servikal eklem pozisyon hissi ve servikal kasların mekanik özelliklerini sağlıklı bireylerle karşılaştırmaktır. Yöntem: Çalışmaya 30 ankilozan spondilitli ve 32 sağlıklı birey dahil edildi. Servikal eklem pozisyon hissi Cervical Range Of Motion (C-ROM) cihazı ile, kasların mekanik özellikleri Myoton Pro cihazı ile ve boyun ağrısı Northwick Park Boyun Ağrısı Anketi (NPBAA) ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Sol üst trapez kasının tonusu ve sertliği ankilozan spondilit grubunda sağlıklı bireylere göre anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksekti (p=0,027; p=0,032). Servikal ekstansiyon, lateral fleksiyon ve rotasyon hareket açıklıkları ankilozan spondilit grubunda anlamlı şekilde daha düşük bulundu (p<0,001; p=0,002). Boyun ağrısı skoru da ankilozan spondilit grubunda sağlıklı gruba göre anlamlı düzeyde yüksekti (p=0,001). Sonuç: Ankilozan spondilitli bireylerde üst trapez kasında tonus ve sertlik artışı ile birlikte servikal ekstansiyon, lateral fleksiyon ve rotasyon hareket açıklıklarında kısıtlılıklar gözlendi. Fleksiyon hareketinin görece korunmuş olması, postüral adaptasyon ve günlük kullanım alışkanlıklarıyla ilişkilendirilebilir. Kas mekanik özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi, ankilozan spondilitin fonksiyonel etkilerini anlamada ve uygun rehabilitasyon planlamasında önemli bir parametre olarak öne çıkmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ankilozan spondilit
• Boyun ağrısı
• Boyun kasları
• Propriosepsiyon.

Proje Numarası

2024/11-3

Teşekkür

çalışmaya katılan tüm katılımcılara teşekkürlerimizi sunarız.

Cervical joint position sensation and mechanical properties of cervical muscles in individuals with ankylosing spondylitis: A cross-sectional descriptive study

Öz

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare cervical joint position sense and the mechanical characteristics of cervical muscles in individuals with ankylosing spondylitis and healthy individuals. Methods: A total of 30 individuals with ankylosing spondylitis and 32 healthy individuals were included. Cervical joint position sense was evaluated using the Cervical Range Of Motion (C-ROM) device, mechanical properties of the muscles were measured with the Myoton Pro device, and neck pain was assessed using the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPBAA). Results: Tonus and stiffness of the left upper trapezius muscle were significantly higher in the ankylosing spondylitis group compared to healthy controls (p=0.027; p=0.032). Cervical extension, lateral flexion, and rotation ranges of motion were significantly lower in the ankylosing spondylitis group (p<0.001; p=0.002). Neck pain scores were also significantly higher in the ankylosing spondylitis group (p=0.001). Conclusion: Increased tone and stiffness in the upper trapezius muscle, along with limitations in cervical range of motion cervical extension, lateral flexion, and rotation, were observed in individuals with ankylosing spondylitis. Preservation of cervical flexion may be related to postural adaptation and habitual daily use. Evaluating muscle mechanical properties is important for understanding functional effects of ankylosing spondylitis and planning appropriate rehabilitation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ankylosing spondylitis
• Neck pain
• Neck muscle
• Proprioception.

Proje Numarası

2024/11-3

Etik Beyan

Sanko University Non-Interventional Research Ethics Committee

Teşekkür

We would like to express our gratitude to all participants who took part in the study.

Kaynakça

1. 1. Smith JA. Update on ankylosing spondylitis: current concepts in pathogenesis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015;15:489.
2. 2. Sharan D, Rajkumar JS. Physiotherapy for ankylosing spondylitis: Systematic review and a proposed rehabilitation protocol. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2017;13:121-125.
3. 3. van der Heijde D, Braun J, Deodhar A, et al. Modified stoke ankylosing spondylitis spinal score as an outcome measure to assess the impact of treatment on structural progression in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019;58:388-400.
4. 4. Martins NA, Furtado GE, Campos MJ, et al. Exercise and ankylosing spondylitis with New York modified criteria: A systematic review of controlled trials with meta-analysis. Acta Reumatol Port. 2014;39:298-308.
5. 5.Millner JR, Barron JS, Beinke KM, et al. Exercise for ankylosing spondylitis: An evidence-based consensus statement. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;45:411-427.
6. 6. Jull G, Moore A, Falla D, et al. Grieve’s Modern Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2015.
7. 7. Zhang W, Yin W, Cui X, et al. Operative strategies for ankylosing spondylitis-related thoracolumbar kyphosis: Focus on the cervical stiffness, coronal imbalance and hip involvement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24:723.
8. 8. Gran JT, Skomsvoll JF. The outcome of ankylosing spondylitis: A study of 100 patients. Rheumatology. 1997;36:766-771.

9. 9. Valdes K, Manalang KC, Leach C. Proprioception: An evidence-based review. J Hand Ther. 2023;37:269-272.
10. 10.Armstrong B, McNair P, Taylor D. Head and neck position sense. Sports Med. 2008;38:101-117.
11. 11.Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev. 2012;92:1651-1697.
12. 12. Taş S, Yaşar Ü, Kaynak BA. Interrater and intrarater reliability of a handheld myotonometer in measuring mechanical properties of the neck and orofacial muscles. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021;44:42-48.
13. 13. Park SK, Yang DJ, Kim JH, et al. Effects of cervical stretching and cranio-cervical flexion exercises on cervical muscle characteristics and posture of patients with cervicogenic headache. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29:1836-1840.
14. 14. Erdem EU. Servikal spondilozda eklem pozisyon hissi, kas kuvveti ve fonksiyonel düzey arasındaki ilişki [doktora tezi]. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi; 2007.
15. 15. Tousignant M, Smeesters C, Breton AM, et al. Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36:242-248.
16. 16. Lettner J, Królikowska A, Ramadanov N, et al. Evaluating the reliability of myotonpro in assessing muscle properties: A systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024;60:851.
17. 17. Yılmaz E, Aydın T, Pasin Ö. Cross-cultural translation, validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire. J Phys Med Rehabil Sci. 2023;26:282-289
18. 18. Hopkins GO, McDougall J, Mills KR, et al. Muscle changes in ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Rheumatol. 1983;22:151-157.
19. 19. Faus-Riera S, Martínez-Pardo S, Blanch-Rubió J, et al. Muscle pathology in ankylosing spondylitis: clinical, enzymatic, electromyographic and histologic correlation. J Rheumatol. 1991;18:1368-1371.
20. 20. Ragurajaprakash K. Spine degeneration - Advanced neuromuscular therapy protocol. Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2021;26:101347.
21. 21. Zedka M, Prochazka A, Knight B, et al. Voluntary and reflex control of human back muscles during induced pain. J Physiol. 1999;520:591-604.
22. 22. Zhu W, He X, Cheng K, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis: etiology, pathogenesis, and treatments. Bone Res. 2019;7:22.
23. 23. Kuchta G, Davidson I. Occupational and physical therapy for children with rheumatic diseases: A clinical handbook. Routledge; 2008.
24. 24. Singla D, Veqar Z. Association between forward head, rounded shoulders, and increased thoracic kyphosis: a review of the literature. J Chiropr Med. 2017;16:220-229.
25. 25. Richter JM, Mathiassen SE, Slijper HP, et al. Differences in muscle load between computer and non-computer work among office workers. Ergonomics. 2009;52:1540-1555.
26. 26. Yana M, Bouta D, Gunes M. Comparison of the differences between dominant and non-dominant upper extremity muscle strength, manual dexterity and joint position sense between genders in healthy young adults. Ergoter Rehabil Derg. 2025;13:28-35.
27. 27. Yong MS, Lee HY. Does forward head posture influence muscle tone, stiffness, and elasticity in university students? J Clin Med. 2025;14:1888.
28. 28. Fukashiro S, Noda M, Shibayama A. In vivo determination of muscle viscoelasticity in the human leg. Acta Physiol Scand. 2001;172:241-248.
29. 29. Ostergaard M, Lambert RG. Imaging in ankylosing spondylitis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2012;4:301-311.
30. 30. Wong K, Trudel G, Laneuville O. Noninflammatory joint contractures arising from immobility: animal models to future treatments. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:848290.
31. 31. Hodges PW. Pain and motor control: from the laboratory to rehabilitation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011;21:220-228.
32. 32. Roch M, Morin M, Gaudreault N. The MyotonPRO: A reliable tool for quantifying the viscoelastic properties of a trigger point on the infraspinatus in non-traumatic chronic shoulder pain. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020;24:379-385.
33. 33. Peng B, Yang L, Li Y, et al. Cervical proprioception impairment in neck pain - pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, and management: a narrative review. Pain Ther. 2021;10:143-164.
34. 34. Vishal K, Walkay A, Huixin T, et al. The relationship between cervical spine range of motion and postural sway in mechanical neck pain: A cross-sectional study. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2023;43:129-135.
35. 35. Bekkers EM, Dockx K, Heremans E, et al. The contribution of proprioceptive information to postural control in elderly and patients with Parkinson's disease with a history of falls. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 24;8:939.
36. 36. Goudarzi L, Ghomashchi H, Vahedi M, et al. Investigating the effect of addition of cervical proprioceptive training to conventional physiotherapy on visual, vestibular and proprioceptive dependency of postural control in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12:36-50.