Türkçe Unutulan Eklem Skoru-12’nin geçerlik ve güvenirliği

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, total kalça artroplastisi (TKA) ve total diz artroplastisi (TDA) geçiren hastalarda Unutulan Eklem Skoru-12’nin (UES-12) geçerlik ve güvenirliğini araştırmaktı.

Yöntem: Primer osteoartrit nedeniyle sementli kalça ve diz artroplastisi olan toplam 132 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Geçerlik analizi, Türkçe UES-12 anketi sonuçlarının, Western Ontario McMaster Üniversiteleri Osteoartrit Skoru (WOMAC); Diz İncinme ve Osteoartrit Sonuç Skoru Fiziksel Fonksiyon Kısa Formu (KOOS-PS); Kalça İncinme ve Osteoartrit Sonuç Skoru Fiziksel Fonksiyon Kısa Formu (HOOS-PS); Tampa Kinezyofobi Ölçeği (TKS) ve Kısa Form-12 (SF-12) anket sonuçlarının korelasyonu ile yapıldı. İç tutarlık analizi Cronbach alfa ile test edildi. Test-tekrar test güvenirliğine Pearson korelasyon katsayısı ile bakıldı.

Bulgular: Türkçe UES-12’nin iç tutarlılığı yüksekti (Cronbach alfa=0.919). Test-tekrar test güvenilirliği mükemmel bulundu (r=0,96, p<0,001). UES-12 ile WOMAC, KOOS-PS, HOOS-PS, TKS ve SF-12 arasında orta seviyeden yüksek seviyede korelasyon vardı (0,380-0,716 arası). Türkçe UES-12 ile SF-12 fiziksel bölüm skoru arasında iyi derecede korelasyon vardı (r=0,379, p<0,001). Türkçe UES-12 ile SF-12 mental bölüm skoru arasında korelasyon yoktu (r=0,165, p=0,058). Taban tavan etkileri sırasıyla % 1.5 ve % 4.5’ti.

Tartışma: Kalça ve diz artroplastili Türk popülasyonunda Türkçe UES-12 mükemmel güvenilirlik ve geçerlik ile yeterli psikometrik özellikler göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Diz,Kalça,Artroplasti,Geçerlik,Güvenirlik

Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Forgotten Joint Score-12

Öz

Purpose:The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) in patients undergoing with total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods: A total of 132 patients with cemented THA and TKA due to primary osteoarthritis were included in the study. The validity analysis was evaluated by correlating the results of the Turkish version of FJS-12 questionnaire with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (HOOS-PS), Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TKS) and Short Form 12 (SF-12). Internal consistency analysis was tested with Cronbach’s α. Test-retest reliability analysis was tested with Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results: The internal consistency of the Turkish FJS-12 was high (Cronbach’s alpha=0.919). Test-retest reliability was found to be excellent (r=0.960, p<0.001). There were moderate to high correlations between FJS-12 and WOMAC, KOOS-PS, HOOSPS, TKS and SF-12 (from 0.380 to 0.716, p<0.001) There was good correlation between the Turkish version of the FJS-12 and SF-12 physical component scores (r=0.379, p<0.001). There was no correlation between the FJS-12 and the SF-12 mental component score (r=0.165, p=0.058). The ceiling and floor effects were 1.5% and 4.5%, respectively.

Conclusion: The Turkish FJS-12 exhibits satisfactory psychometric properties with excellent reliability and validity in Turkish population with total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Knee,Hip,Arthroplasty,Validity,Reliability

Kaynakça

1. 1. Azboy İ, Yalvaç ES, Azboy N, et al. Türkiye’de total diz ve kalça artroplastisinde cerrahların tercihleri ve ameliyathane olanakları: Bir anket. Eklem Hastalık Cerrahisi. 2016;27(1):34-40.
2. 2. Arnold J, Joern B, Rudi G, et al. Are patients’ expectations of hip and knee arthroplasty fulfilled? A prospective study of 130 patients. Orthopedics. 2010;33(2):76-80.
3. 3. Bellamy N. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol. 1988;1:95-108.
4. 4. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248(248):13-14.
5. 5. Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger JM, et al. The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(3):430-436.
6. 6. Thienpont E, Opsomer G, Koninckx A, et al. Joint awareness in different types of knee arthroplasty evaluated with the forgotten joint score. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(1):48-51.
7. 7. Matsumoto M, Baba T, Homma Y, et al. Validation study of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 as a universal patient-reported outcome measure. Eur J Orthop Surg & Traumatol. 2015;25(7):1141-1145.
8. 8. Giesinger JM, Kesterke N, Hamilton DF, et al. Development of an item list to assess the forgotten joint concept in shoulder patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16(1):67.

9. 9. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-3191.
10. 10. Tüzün E, Eker L, Aytar A, et al. Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13(1):28-33.
11. 11. Davis A, Perruccio A, Canizares M, et al. The development of a short measure of physical function for hip OA HOOS-Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16(5):551-559.
12. 12. Yilmaz O, Gul ED, Bodur H. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS). Rheumatol Int. 2014;34(1):43-49.
13. 13. Perruccio AV, Lohmander LS, Canizares M, et al. The development of a short measure of physical function for knee OA KOOS Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS)-an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16(5):542-550.
14. 14. Gul ED, Yilmaz O, Bodur H. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score-physical function short-form (KOOS-PS). J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2012;26(4):461-466.
15. 15. Swinkels-Meewisse E, Swinkels R, Verbeek A, et al. Psychometric properties of the Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia and the fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire in acute low back pain. Man Ther. 2003;8(1):29-36.
16. 16. Yılmaz ÖT, Yakut Y, Uygur F, Uluğ N. Tampa Kinezyofobi Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonu ve testtekrar test güvenirliği. Fizyoter Rehabil. 2011;22(1):44-49.
17. 17. Ware Jr JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220-233.
18. 18. Kocyigit H, Aydemir O, Fisek G, et al. Kısa Form-36 (KF-36)’nın Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği. Romatizmal hastalığı olan bir grup hasta ile çalışma. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi. 1999;12:102-106.
19. 19. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42.
20. 20. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977:33(1):159-174.
21. 21. Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, et al. A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(8):730-735.
22. 22. Thompson SM, Salmon LJ, Webb JM, et al. Construct validity and test re-test reliability of the Forgotten Joint Score. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(11):1902-1905.
23. 23. Giesinger JM, Kuster MS, Holzner B, et al. Development of a computer-adaptive version of the forgotten joint score. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(3):418-422.