Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Kinestetik ve Görsel İmgeleme Anketi- 20’nin Türkçe versiyonunun geçerlik ve güvenirliği

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 201 - 210, 10.01.2020

Öz

Amaç: Bildiğimiz kadarıyla Türkçe diline çevrilen ve yayınlanan bir imgeleme anketi yoktur. Bu çalışmanın amacı Kinestetik ve
Görsel İmgeleme Anketi- 20’nin (KGIA-20) Türkçe diline çevirmek, geçerlik ve güvenirliğini araştırmak idi.

Yöntem: Çalışmaya kırk dört kadın ve on beş erkek olmak üzere elli dokuz sağlıklı gönüllü dahil edildi. Anketin Türkçe’ye
çevrilmesinin ardından KGIA-20’nin güvenirliği ile iç tutarlılığı test edildi. Test-tekrar test güvenirliğini değerlendirmek ve sınıf
içi korelasyon katsayısını (ICC) hesaplamak amacıyla anket tüm katılımcılara iki kez uygulandı. Cronbach alfa değeri, anketin
iç tutarlılığını belirlemek için hesaplandı. Anketin yapısal geçerliliğini değerlendirmek için açıklayıcı faktör analizi yapıldı.

Bulgular: Cronbach alfa katsayıları tüm anket için kabul edilebilir seviyedeydi (test ve tekrar test için: 0.98 ve 0.98). Anketin bu
değeri görsel maddeler için test ve tekrar test değerleri olarak sırasıyla 0.95 ve 0.95; kinestetik maddeler için 0.97 ve 0.96
olarak bulundu. Anketin görsel başlıklar için ICC katsayı değerleri (%95 güven aralığında (GA)) 0.61– 0.90; kinestetik maddeler
için ise 0.59– 0.89 olarak bulundu. Faktör analiz sonuçları anketin iki faktörlü yapısının total varyansın %64.21’ini açıkladığını
gösterdi.

Sonuç: Bu çalışma, KGIA-20’nin Türkçe versiyonunun Türk toplumunda imgelemeyi değerlendiren geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç
olduğunu gösterdi. 

Kaynakça

  • 1. Jeannerod M. The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Cambridge University Press. 1994;187-202.
  • 2. Decety J, Ingvar DH. Brain structures participating in mental simulation of motor behavior: A neuropsychological interpretation. Acta psychol. 1990;73:13-34.
  • 3. Dickstein R, Deutsch JE. Motor imagery in physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2007;87:942-953.
  • 4. Jeannerod M. The timing of natural prehension movements. J. Mot. Behav. 1984;16:235-254.
  • 5. Fansler CL, Poff CL, Shepard KF. Effects of mental practice on balance in elderly women. Phys Ther. 1985;65:1332-1338.
  • 6. Frenkel MO, Herzig DS, Gebhard F, et al. Mental practice maintains range of motion despite forearm immobilization: a pilot study in healthy persons. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46:225-232.
  • 7. La Touche R, Grande-Alonso M, CuencaMartínez F, et al. Diminished kinesthetic and visual motor imagery ability in adults with chronic low back pain. PM R 2019;11:227-235.
  • 8. Malouin F, Richards CL, Jackson PL, et al. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: a reliability and construct validity study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:20-29.
  • 9. Tabrizi YM, Zangiabadi N, Mazhari S, et al. The reliability and validity study of the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17:588-592.
  • 10. Schuster C, Lussi A, Wirth B, et al. Two assessments to evaluate imagery ability: translation, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the German KVIQ and Imaprax. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:127.
  • 11. Nakano H, Kodama T, Ukai K, et al. Reliability and validity of the Japanese Version of the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ). Brain Sci. 2018;8:79.
  • 12. Randhawa B, Harris S, Boyd LA. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire is a reliable tool for individuals with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2010;34:161-167.
  • 13. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186-3191.
  • 14. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliabilty. Psycol Bull. 1979;86:420.
  • 15. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297-334.
  • 16. Malouin F, Richards CL, Jackson PL, et al. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: a reliability and construct validity study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:20-29.

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire-20

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 201 - 210, 10.01.2020

Öz

Purpose: As far we know, there is no any imagery questionnaire translated into Turkish and published. The aim of this study was
to translate the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire-20 (KVIQ-20) into Turkish to investigate the validity and reliability.

Methods: The study included forty four females and fifteen males, totally fifty nine healthy volunteers. After the questionnaire
was translated into Turkish, the reliability and the internal consistency of KVIQ-20 was computed. The questionnaire was applied
twice to all participants to evaluate the test-retest reliability and to calculate the "Intraclass Correlation Coefficient” (ICC) value.
The Cronbach’s Alpha value was calculated to determine internal consistency. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine
the validity of the questionnaire.

Results: The Cronbach’s Alpha value regarding the questionnaire taken as a whole was satisfactory (test-retest: 0.98-0.98).
This value was found for visual items 0.95 for test and 0.95 for retest; for kinesthetic items 0.97 for test and 0.96 for retest.
Intraclass correlation coefficients for visual items were ranges from 0.61 to 0.90 with 95% confidence interval (CI) and for
kinesthetic items were ranges from 0.59 to 0.89. The factorial analyses indicated that two factors explained 64.21% of total
variance.

Conclusion: This study showed that Turkish version of the KVIQ-20 is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate the imagery in
the Turkish population. 

Kaynakça

  • 1. Jeannerod M. The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Cambridge University Press. 1994;187-202.
  • 2. Decety J, Ingvar DH. Brain structures participating in mental simulation of motor behavior: A neuropsychological interpretation. Acta psychol. 1990;73:13-34.
  • 3. Dickstein R, Deutsch JE. Motor imagery in physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2007;87:942-953.
  • 4. Jeannerod M. The timing of natural prehension movements. J. Mot. Behav. 1984;16:235-254.
  • 5. Fansler CL, Poff CL, Shepard KF. Effects of mental practice on balance in elderly women. Phys Ther. 1985;65:1332-1338.
  • 6. Frenkel MO, Herzig DS, Gebhard F, et al. Mental practice maintains range of motion despite forearm immobilization: a pilot study in healthy persons. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46:225-232.
  • 7. La Touche R, Grande-Alonso M, CuencaMartínez F, et al. Diminished kinesthetic and visual motor imagery ability in adults with chronic low back pain. PM R 2019;11:227-235.
  • 8. Malouin F, Richards CL, Jackson PL, et al. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: a reliability and construct validity study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:20-29.
  • 9. Tabrizi YM, Zangiabadi N, Mazhari S, et al. The reliability and validity study of the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17:588-592.
  • 10. Schuster C, Lussi A, Wirth B, et al. Two assessments to evaluate imagery ability: translation, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the German KVIQ and Imaprax. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:127.
  • 11. Nakano H, Kodama T, Ukai K, et al. Reliability and validity of the Japanese Version of the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ). Brain Sci. 2018;8:79.
  • 12. Randhawa B, Harris S, Boyd LA. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire is a reliable tool for individuals with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2010;34:161-167.
  • 13. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186-3191.
  • 14. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliabilty. Psycol Bull. 1979;86:420.
  • 15. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297-334.
  • 16. Malouin F, Richards CL, Jackson PL, et al. The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: a reliability and construct validity study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:20-29.
Toplam 16 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Burcu Dilek 0000-0002-4169-6302

Çiğdem Ayhan 0000-0002-4555-4563

Yavuz Yakut 0000-0001-9363-0869

Yayımlanma Tarihi 10 Ocak 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 26 Mart 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Dilek B, Ayhan Ç, Yakut Y. Kinestetik ve Görsel İmgeleme Anketi- 20’nin Türkçe versiyonunun geçerlik ve güvenirliği. JETR. 2020;6(3):201-10.