Araştırma Makalesi

Analysis of Genotoxic Damage in Different Diseases

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 25 Ağustos 2021
PDF İndir
EN TR

Analysis of Genotoxic Damage in Different Diseases

Öz

Aim: Research has revealed that diseases changed the repair mechanism of DNA chain breaks. Recent studies indicate that genomic instability results in cancer. The present study aimed to assess the association between diseases and DNA damage measured with the comet assay in humans. Method: In a cross-sectional study the level of genotoxic damage was evaluated in peripheral blood samples by simple random sampling method in Turkish adults using Single Cell Gel Electrophoresis assay. The results of possible DNA damage levels of disease groups were compared with the results of healthy people. A p-value of less than 0.01 was considered as statistically significant. Results: 128 (52 women and 76 men) participated in the study. The tail moment was 1.39±1.21 in healthy groups and 1.41±0.91 in patient groups. Our result showed that participants with hepatitis, thyroid dysfunctions, and psychiatric diseases had statistically significant differences in DNA damage compared to healthy ones. Conclusion and Suggestions: Our findings suggest that patients with hepatitis, thyroid dysfunctions, and psychiatric diseases are at risk of genotoxic damage. Genotoxicity tests have gained importance in early biomonitoring of cancer. Therefore, the relationship between diseases and cancer development should be investigated with different genotoxic experiments.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Comet Assay, DNA Damage, Genotoxicity, Disease, Single Cell Gel Electrophoresis.

Kaynakça

  1. Møller, P., Stopper, H., & Collins, A. R. (2020). Measurement of DNA damage with the comet assay in high-prevalence diseases: current status and future directions. Mutagenesis, 35(1), 5-18.
  2. Blasiak, J., Arabski, M., Krupa, R., Wozniak, K., Zadrozny, M., Kasznicki, J., ... & Drzewoski, J. (2004). DNA damage and repair in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 554(1-2), 297-304.
  3. Ibarra-Costilla, E., Cerda-Flores, R. M., Dávila-Rodríguez, M. I., Samayo-Reyes, A., Calzado-Flores, C., & Cortés-Gutiérrez, E. I. (2010). DNA damage evaluated by comet assay in Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta diabetologica, 47(1), 111-116.
  4. Botto, N., Masetti, S., Petrozzi, L., Vassalle, C., Manfredi, S., Biagini, A., & Andreassi, M. G. (2002). Elevated levels of oxidative DNA damage in patients with coronary artery disease. Coronary artery disease, 13(5), 269-274.
  5. Demirbag, R., Yilmaz, R., & Kocyigit, A. (2005). Relationship between DNA damage, total antioxidant capacity and coronary artery disease. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 570(2), 197-203.
  6. Gerić, M., Domijan, A. M., Gluščić, V., Janušić, R., Šarčević, B., & Garaj-Vrhovac, V. (2016). Cytogenetic status and oxidative stress parameters in patients with thyroid diseases. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 810, 22-29.
  7. Poplawski, T., Chojnacki, C., Czubatka, A., Klupinska, G., Chojnacki, J., & Blasiak, J. (2013). Helicobacter pylori infection and antioxidants can modulate the genotoxic effects of heterocyclic amines in gastric mucosa cells. Molecular biology reports, 40(8), 5205-5212.
  8. Ladeira, M. S., Rodrigues, M. A., Freire-Maia, D. V., & Salvadori, D. M. (2005). Use of Comet assay to assess DNA damage in patients infected by Helicobacter pylori: comparisons between visual and image analyses. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 586(1), 76-86.
  9. Zeyrek, D., Cakmak, A., Atas, A., Kocyigit, A., & Erel, O. (2009). DNA damage in children with asthma bronchiale and its association with oxidative and antioxidative measurements. Pediatric allergy and immunology, 20(4), 370-376.
  10. Hasbal, C., Aksu, B. Y., Himmetoglu, S., Dincer, Y., Koc, E. E., Hatipoglu, S., & Akcay, T. (2010). DNA damage and glutathione level in children with asthma bronchiale: effect of antiasthmatic therapy. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 21(4p2), e674-e678.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Göney, G., & Halisdemir, N. (2021). Analysis of Genotoxic Damage in Different Diseases. Genel Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 124-132. https://izlik.org/JA46TC76ND
AMA
1.Göney G, Halisdemir N. Analysis of Genotoxic Damage in Different Diseases. JGEHES. 2021;3(2):124-132. https://izlik.org/JA46TC76ND
Chicago
Göney, Gülşen, ve Nurhan Halisdemir. 2021. “Analysis of Genotoxic Damage in Different Diseases”. Genel Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 3 (2): 124-32. https://izlik.org/JA46TC76ND.
EndNote
Göney G, Halisdemir N (01 Ağustos 2021) Analysis of Genotoxic Damage in Different Diseases. Genel Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 3 2 124–132.
IEEE
[1]G. Göney ve N. Halisdemir, “Analysis of Genotoxic Damage in Different Diseases”, JGEHES, c. 3, sy 2, ss. 124–132, Ağu. 2021, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA46TC76ND
ISNAD
Göney, Gülşen - Halisdemir, Nurhan. “Analysis of Genotoxic Damage in Different Diseases”. Genel Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 3/2 (01 Ağustos 2021): 124-132. https://izlik.org/JA46TC76ND.
JAMA
1.Göney G, Halisdemir N. Analysis of Genotoxic Damage in Different Diseases. JGEHES. 2021;3:124–132.
MLA
Göney, Gülşen, ve Nurhan Halisdemir. “Analysis of Genotoxic Damage in Different Diseases”. Genel Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 3, sy 2, Ağustos 2021, ss. 124-32, https://izlik.org/JA46TC76ND.
Vancouver
1.Gülşen Göney, Nurhan Halisdemir. Analysis of Genotoxic Damage in Different Diseases. JGEHES [Internet]. 01 Ağustos 2021;3(2):124-32. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA46TC76ND