Effect Of Intrauterine Device And Chronic Disease On Cervical Cytology

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 110 - 113, 01.05.2015

Emel Kiyak Çağlayan Levent Seçkin Nagihan Sarı Özlem Şimşek Tanın Mustafa Kara Ebru Altindal Susem Selda Seçkin Yaprak Engin-üstün

Öz

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the association between PAP smear results and the parameters such as IUD use, chronic disease, educational status, parity and age among the woman who applied to Bozok University Medical School obstetrics and gynecology department.Material and Methods: PAP smear results of 432 patients between 2011-2013 years were evaluated. Age, parity, and educational status of the patients and the precence of chronic diseasees hypertension, diabetes, asthma, congestive heart failure, hypercholesterolemia, goiter of patients were recorded. IUD use was also noted. Smear results were evaluated according to the 2001 Bethesda system.Results: Smears were obtained from 432 patients. Median age, gravity and parity of patients were 43.1 years 18-84 , 4.1 0-15 and 3.05 0-13 respectively. 415 of 432 smears were evaluated as a ILM - negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy . Among these ILM - smears them 67% were ILM - inflammatory, 30 of them were 7.6% ILM - atrophic and 91 of them were only ILM - . 17 smears were evaluated as ILM + ; 1 0.2% ASCUS, 8 ‘i 1.7% ASC-H, 5 1.2% LGSIL and 3 0.7% HGSIL. IUD use was found as an effective parameters on abnormal smear results. p = 0.03 .Conclusion: There was a correlation between abnormal smear results and IUD use, no association was found with chronic disease.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cervical smear, IUD, risk factors

Rahim İçi Araç ve Kronik Hastalıkların Servikal Sitolojiye Etkisi

Öz

Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı Bozok Üniversitesi Hastanesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum polikliniğine başvuran hastalardan alınan PAP smear sonuçlarının, yaş, parite, eğitim durumu, kronik hastalıklar ve rahim içi araç RİA ile olan ilişkisini araştırmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: 2011 – 2013 tarihleri arasında polikliniğimize başvuran 432 hastanın PAP smear sonuçları incelendi. Hastaların yaşı, paritesi, eğitim durumu ile kronik hastalık hipertansiyon, diabet, astım, konjestif kalp yetmezliği, hiperkolesterolemi, guatr kronik hastalık olup olmadığı ve RİA kullanıp kullanmadığı not edildi. Smear sonuçları 2001 Bethesda sistemine göre değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Toplam 432 hastadan smear alındı. Hastaların ortanca yaşı 43.1 yıl 18-84 , gravidası 4.1 0-15 , parite 3.05 0-13 olarak saptandı. Alınan smearlerden 415’i ILM - intraepitelyal lezyon veya malignite yönünden negatif saptandı. Bunların içerisinden 294’ü % 67 ILM - inflamasyonlu, 30’u %7.6 ILM - atrofik geri kalan 91’ i yalnızca ILM - idi. Geriye kalan ILM + 17 smearden 1’i %0.2 ASCUS, 8 ‘i %1.7 ASC-H, 5 %1.2 LGSIL, 3’ü %0.7 HGSIL olarak değerlendirildi. RIA kullanımının smear sonuçlarını etkilediği saptandı p=0.03 .Sonuç: Çalışma sonucunda smear sonuçları ile RİA kullanımı arasında anlamlı ilişki saptanırken kronik hastalıklar ile arasında anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Servikal smear, RİA, risk faktörleri

Kaynakça

• Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ. Cancersta- tistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53: 5-26.
• Michael A. Bidus, John C. Elkas. Bölüm:34 Berek&Novak Jinekoloji, Lip- pincottt Williams and Wilkins, 2007: 1403-1404.
• Kadın Genital Kanserleri &HPL Editör: Prof. Dr. Ali Ayhan Akademi Yayı- nevi 2010.
• John O. Schorge, Joseph I. Schaffer, Lisa M. Halvorson, Barbara L. Hof- fman, Karen D. Bradshaw, F. Gray Cunningham. Bölüm 29. Williams Ji- nekoloji 2010: 623- 629.
• Waxman AG. Guidelines for cervical cancer screening, history and scien- tificrationale. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2005; 48: 77-97.
• Karateke A, Gurbuz A, Kabaca C, Zati A, Mengulluoglu M, Kir G. Atypical squamous cells: improvement in cytohistological correlation by the 2001 Bethesda System. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2004; 25: 615-8.
• Walboosmers CB, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Peto J, Meijer CJ, Munoz N. Human papilloma virus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer world wide. J Pathol1999; 189: 12-9.
• Lourenço AV, Fregnani CM, Silva PC, Latorre MR, Fregnani JH. Why are women with cervical cancer not being diagnosed in preinvasive phase? An analysis of risk factors using a hierarchical model. Int J Gynecol Can- cer 2012; 22:645-53.
• Sigurdsson K, Sigvaldason H. Longitudinal trends in cervical cytological lesions and the effect of risk factors. A 30-year overview. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85:350-8.
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Cervical Cytology screening. Number 45, August 2003. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003; 83: 237-247.
• Kır G, Karateke A, Aker F. Thecyto-hystologic correlation of ASCUS, LSIL and HSIL diagnosis. Bethesda 2001 evaluation of the ASCUS subgroups. Turkish J Pathol 2003; 19: 14-6.
• Brown ADG, Tara KC. Gynecological disorders. In: Tallis R, Fillit HM, Brocklehurst JC, eds. Brocklehurst’s Textbook of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Churchill Livingstone 2003: 1135-44.
• Creasman WT, Weed JC Jr. Carcinoma of endometrium (FIGO Stages I and II): clinical features and management. In: Coppleson M, ed. Gyneco- logic Oncology. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livinstone 1992: 775-89.
• Kazerooni T, Mosalaee A: Does contraceptive method change the Pap smear finding? Contraception 2002; 66:243-246
• PetrovIu A, Kovaleva EA. Proliferative mucosal changes of the corpus and cervix uteri in woman using intrauterin contraceptives. Vopr Oncol 1986; 32: 49-52.
• Dısaıa J. Phılıp, Creasman T. Wıllıam.; Klinik Jinekolojik Onkoloji: 2003:3- 11.
• Nşñez JT, Delgado M, Pino G, Girón H, Bolet B. Smoking as a risk for pre- invasive and invasive cervical lesion in female sex workers in Venezuela. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 79:57-60.
• Kurman RD, Kaminski PF, Norris HJ. The behavior endometrial hyperp- lasia. Along term study of‘untreated’ hyperplasia in 170 patients.Cancer 1985; 56:403-12.
• White LN. An over view of screening and early detection of gynecologic malignancies. Cancer 1993; 71:1400-5.