Bakteriyel Meyve Lekesi Etmeni Acidovorax citrulli’ye Karşı Dayanıklılık Kaynaklarının Belirlenmesi

Öz

Acidovorax citrulli’nin neden olduğu bakteriyel meyve lekesi, kabakgil bitkilerinin üretimini tehdit eden son derece tahripkâr bir hastalıktır. Hastalığın mücadelesinde en etkili yöntemlerden birisi patojene karşı dayanıklı bitki kullanımıdır. Ancak şimdiye kadar, bakteriyel meyve lekesi hastalığına karşı dayanıklı hiçbir kabakgil çeşidi geliştirilememiştir. Bu çalışmada, 10 ticari kavun çeşidi ve 28 kabakgil genotipi A. citrulli’ye karşı dayanıklılık kaynaklarının belirlenmesi amacıyla hem tohum hem de fide döneminde test edilmiştir. Çalışma tesadüf parselleri deneme desenine göre planlanmış ve her saksıda 1 bitki olacak şekilde üç tekerrürlü olarak kurulmuştur. Dayanıklılık reaksiyonu test edilen bitkiler arasında ticari Altınbaş kavun çeşidi ve Gönen kavun genotipi tohum inokulasyon testi sonucunda hastalığa karşı dayanıklı bulunurken, fide inokulasyon testinde yüksek derece hassas olarak belirlenmiştir. Çorum 10 Dilim kavun genotipinin ise fide döneminde yapılan inokulasyonda en düşük hastalık şiddeti (%22.22) değerine sahip kabakgil bitkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmada değerlendirilen bitkilerin, farklı büyüme dönemlerinde hastalığa karşı dayanıklılık reaksiyonlarının değiştiği belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen veriler test edilen kabakgil genotipleri arasında hem tohum hem de fide inokulasyonu sonucunda hastalığa karşı dayanıklılık potansiyeline sahip bitkiler olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kabakgiller
• kavun
• dayanıklılık

Identification of Sources of Resistance to Bacterial Fruit Stain Agent Acidovorax citrulli

Öz

Bacterial fruit spot caused by Acidovorax citrulli is an extremely destructive disease that threatens the production of cucurbit plants. One of the most effective methods in the control of the disease is the use of plants resistant to pathogens. However, no cucurbit cultivars resistant to bacterial fruit spot disease have been developed so far. In this study, 10 commercial melon cultivars and 28 cucurbit genotypes were tested in both seed and seedling stages to determine the sources of resistance to A. citrulli. The study was planned according to completely randomized design (CRD) and was established as three replications with 1 plant in each pot. Among the plants tested for resistance reaction, commercial Altınbaş melon cultivar and Gönen melon genotype were found to be resistant to disease as a result of seed inoculation test, while they were determined as highly sensitive in seedling inoculation test.was determined that the Çorum 10 Dilim melon genotype was the cucurbit plant with the lowest disease severity (22.22%) in the seedling period inoculation. It was determined that the plants evaluated in the study changed their resistance reactions against the disease in different growth periods. The data obtained show that among the tested cucurbit genotypes, there are plants with the potential for disease resistance as a result of both seed and seedling inoculation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cucurbitaceae
• Acidovorax citrulli
• melon
• resistance

Kaynakça

1. Alves AO, Xavier AS, Viana IO, Mariano RLR, Silveira EB, 2010. Colonization dynamics of Acidovorax citrulli in melon. Tropical Plant Pathology, Brasília, DF, 35(6): 368-372.
2. Araújo DV, Mariano RLR, Michereff SJ, 2005. Métodos de inoculação de Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli em melão. Summa Phytopathologica, 31(1): 69-73.
3. Azevedo LAS, 1997. Quantificação de doenças. Manual de quantificação de doenças de plantas. São Paulo: Novartis Biociências/Setor Agro, 101-101.
4. Bahar O, Kritzman G, Burdman S, 2009. Bacterial fruit blotch of melon: screens for disease tolerance and role of seed transmission in pathogenicity. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 123(1): 71-83.
5. Bahar O, Burdman S, 2010. Bacterial fruit blotch: a threat to the cucurbit industry. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences, 58(1): 19-31.
6. Block C, Shepherd L, 2009. Long-term survival and seed transmission of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli in melon and watermelon seed. Phytopathology, 99(6).
7. Branham SE, Levi A, Katawczik ML, Wechter WP, 2019. QTL mapping of resistance to bacterial fruit blotch in Citrullus amarus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 132(5):1463-1471.
8. Burdman S, Kots N, Kritzman G, Kopelowitz J, 2005. Molecular, physiological, and host-range characterization of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli isolates from watermelon and melon in Israel. Plant disease, 89(12):1339-1347.

9. Burdman S, Walcott R, 2012. Acidovorax citrulli: Generating basic and applied knowledge to tackle a global threat to the cucurbit industry. Molecular Plant Pathology, 13:805–815.
10. Carvalho FC, Santos LA, Dias RC, Mariano RL, Elineide BS, 2013. Selection of watermelon genotypes for resistance to bacterial fruit blotch. Euphytica, 190:169–180.
11. Conceicao CS, Felix KCS, Mariano RLR, Medeiros EV, Souza EB, 2014. Combined effect of yeast and silicon on the control of bacterial furit blotch in melon. Scientia Horticulturae, 174: 164-170.
12. Daley J, Wehner TC, 2021. Screening for bacterial fruit blotch resistance in watermelon fruit. Crop Science, 61(2):1228-1240.
13. Davis AR, Levi A, Tetteh A, Wehner T, Russo V, Pitrat M, 2007. Evaluation of watermelon and related species for resistance to race 1W powdery mildew. J. Amer. HortScience. 132:790–795.
14. de Assunção EF, da Conceição CS, Alexandre ER, da Gama MAS. de Souza Nunes GH, de Souza EB, 2021. New sources of melon accessions with resistance to bacterial fruit blotch at different phenological stages of melon growth and to multiple strains of Acidovorax citrulli. Euphytica, 217(5):1-15.
15. Demir G, 1996. A new bacterial disease of watermelon in Türkiye: bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon (Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli (Schaad et al., Willems et al.). Journal of Turkish phytopathology, 25(1/2):43-49.
16. de Melo EA, Rosa de Lima RM, Laranjeira D, dos Santos LA, de Omena Gusmão L, de Souza EB, 2015. Efficacy of yeast in the biocontrol of bacterial fruit blotch in melon plants. Tropical Plant Pathology, 40:56–64.
17. Eckshtain-Levi N, Shkedy D, Gershovits M, Da Silva GM, Tamir-Ariel D, Walcott R, Burdman S, 2016. Insights from the genome sequence of Acidovorax citrulli M6, a group I strain of the causal agent of bacterial fruit blotch of cucurbits. Frontiers in microbiology, 7:430.
18. European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, 2021. Eradication of Acidovorax citrulli from Emilia Romagna. https://gd.eppo.int/reporting/article-1929. Erişim tarihi: 17.01.2021.
19. Feng J, Schuenzel EL, Li J, Schaad NW, 2009. Multilocus sequence typing reveals two evolutionary lineages of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. Phytopathology, 99(8):913-920.
20. Fessehaie A, Walcott RR, 2005. Biological control to protect watermelon blossoms and seed from infection by Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. Phytopathology, 95:413-419.
21. Ha Y, Fessehaie A, Ling KS, Wechter WP, Keinath AP, Walcott RR, 2009. Simultaneous detection of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli and Didymella bryoniae in cucurbit seedlots using magnetic capture hybridization and real-time polymerase chain reaction. Phytopathology, 99(6):666-678.
22. Hopkins DL, 1989. Bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon: a new disease in the eastern USA. In Proceedings Cucurbitaceae, 89: 74-75.
23. Hopkins DL, Thompson CM, Elmstrom GM, 1993. Resistance of watermelon seedlings and fruit to the fruit blotch bacterium. HortScience, 28:122–123.
24. Hopkins DL, 1995. Copper-containing fungicides reduce the spread of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon in the greenhouse. Phytopathology, 85:510.
25. Hopkins DL, Cucuzza JD, Watterson J, 1996. Wet seed treatments for the control of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon. Plant Disease, 80:529-532.
26. Hopkins DL, Thompson CM, 2002. Evaluation of Citrullus sp. germ plasm for resistance to Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. Plant Disease, 86:61–64.
27. Hopkins DL, Thompson CM, Hilgren J, Lovic B, 2003. Wet seed treatment with peroxyacetic asid fort he control of bacterial fruit blotch and other seedborne diseases of watermelon. Plant Disease, 87:1495-1499.
28. Hopkins DL, Thompson CM, Lovic B, 2009. Management of transplant house spread of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli on cucurbits with bactericidal chemicals in irrigation water. Plant Health Progress, 10(1): 29.
29. Horuz S, Aysan Y, 2012. Outbreak of bacterial fruit blotch disease on melon and watermelon in Çukuroba region, Turkey. Proceedings of the Xth EUCARPIA Meeting on Genetics and Breeding of Cucurbitaceae. 15-18 Ekim 2012, Antalya, p 763-766.
30. Isakeit T, Black MC, Barnes LW, Jones JB, 1997. First report of infection of honeydew with Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. Plant Disease, 81(6):694-694.
31. Islam MR, Hossain MR, Kim H-T, Nath UK, Abuyusuf M, Jung H-J, Park J-I, Nou I-S, 2020. Molecular characterization of Acidovorax citrulli strain NIHHS15-280 causing bacterial fruit blotch disease in Korea and screening of resistance sources in melon. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 61:115–126.
32. İnik F, 2018. Iğdır İlinde Kavun Bitkisinde Hastalığa Neden Olan Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli’nin İzolasyonu ve Tanısı. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi (Basılmış).
33. Kubota M, Hagiwara N, Shirakawa T, 2012. Disinfection of seeds of cucurbit crops infested with Acidovorax citrulli with dry heat treatment. Journal of Phytopathology, 160(7‐8):364-368.
34. Langston Jr DB, Walcott RD, Gitaitis RD, Sanders Jr F, 1999. First report of a fruit rot of pumpkin caused by Acidivorax avenae subsp. citrulli in Georgia. Plant Disease, 83(2):199-199Latin RX, Rane KK, 1990. Bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon in Indiana. Plant Disease, 74(4).
35. Latin RX, Hopkins DL, 1995. Bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon. The hypothetical exam question becomes reality. Plant Disease, 79(8):761-765.
36. Ma S, Wehner TC, 2015. Flowering stage resistance to bacterial fruit blotch in the watermelon germplasm collection. Crop Science, 55(2):727-736.
37. Martin HL, O'Brien RG, Abbott DV, 1999. First report of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli as a pathogen of cucumber. Plant Disease, 83(10):965-965.
38. Martin HL, Horlock CM, 2002. First report of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli as a pathogen of Gramma in Australia. Plant Disease, 86(12):1406-1406.
39. McCreight JD, 2003. Genes for resistance to powdery mildew races 1 and 2 US in melon PI 313970. HortScience, 38:591–594.
40. Mirik M, Aysan Y, Şahin F, 2006. Occurrence of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon caused by Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli in the Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Plant Disease, 90(6):829.
41. O’Brien RG, Martin HL, 1999. Bacterial blotch of melons caused by strains of Acidovorax avenae subsp citrulli. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 39: 479–485.
42. Rane KK, Latin RX, 1992. Bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon: Association of the pathogen with seed. Plant Disease, 76: 509-512.
43. Ren YZ, Li H, Li GY, Wang QY, Li JQ, 2006. First report of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli infecting edible seed watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus) in China. Plant disease, 90(8):1112-1112.
44. Sales Júnior R, Menezes J, 2001. Mapeamento das doenças fúngicas, bacterianas e viróticas do cultivo do melão no Estado do RN. Mossoró Escola Superior de Agricultura de Mossoró.
45. Schaad NW, Postnikova E, Sechler A, Claflin LE, Vidaver AK, Jones JB, Ramundo BA, 2008. Reclassification of subspecies of Acidovorax avenae as A. avenae (Manns 1905) emend., A. cattleyae (Pavarino, 1911) comb. nov., A. citrulli Schaad et al., 1978) comb. nov., and proposal of A. oryzae sp. nov. Systematic and applied microbiology, 31(6-8): 434-446.
46. Schaad NW, Postnikova E, Randhawa P, 2003. Emergence of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli as a crop threatening disease of watermelon and melon. In Pseudomonas syringae and related pathogens (pp. 573-581). Springer, Dordrecht.
47. Shen MA, Wehner TC (2015) Flowering stage resistance to bacterial fruit blotch in the watermelon germplasm collection crop science. Crop Sci 55:727–736.
48. Silva GM, Souza RM, Yan L, Júnior RS, Medeiros FH, Walcott RR, 2016. Strains of the group I lineage of Acidovorax citrulli, the causal agent of bacterial fruit blotch of cucurbitaceous crops, are predominant in Brazil. Phytopathology 106:1486–1494.
49. Somodi GC, Jones JB, Hopkins DL, Stall RE, Kucharek TA, Hodge NC, Watterson JC, 1991. Occurrence of a bacterial watermelon fruit blotch in Florida. Plant Disease, 75:1053-1056.
50. Sowell GJR, Schaad NW, 1979. Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes subsp. citrulli on watermelon: seed transmission and resistance of plant introductions. Plant Disease, 63:437-441.
51. Thibault B, Lecomte P, Hermann L, Belouin A, 1986. Assessment of the susceptibility to Erwinia amylovora of 90 varieties or selections of pear. In IV International Workshop on Fire Blight 217:305-310.
52. Tomita Y, Ogawara T, Shirakawa T, Sato M, Kashima T, Nakanishi H, 2006. Occurrence of bacterial fruit blotch of melon caused by Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli in Ibaraki prefecture. Jpn Journal of Phytopathology 72: 312.
53. Townsend GK, Heuberger JW, 1943. Methods for estimating losses caused by diseases in fungicide experiments. Plant Disease Reporter, 27:340-343.
54. Ustun N, Arslan N, 2016. Screening of some cucurbits cultivars for tolerance to bacterial fruit blotch pathogen Acidovorax citrulli in Turkey. In VII International Scientific Agriculture Symposium," Agrosym 2016", Jahorina,6-9 October 2016, pp. 1658-1661.
55. Ünlü M, Kurum R, Sülü SM, Kırışık M, 2018. Determination of resistance status of melon landraces against Acidovorax citrulli and Aphis gossypii (Glover) in Turkey. In XXX International Horticultural Congress IHC2018: International Symposium on Tropical and Subtropical Vegetable Production: 1257:pp. 51-56.
56. Walcott RR, Fessehaie A, Castro AC, 2004. Differences in pathogenicity between two genetically distinct groups of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli on cucurbit hosts. Journal of Phytopathology, 152:277–285.
57. Wall GC, Santos VM, Cruz FJ, Nelson DA, Cabrera I, 1990. Outbreak of watermelon fruit blotch in the Mariana islands. Plant Disease, 74:(1).
58. Wang, X., L. Zhang, F.-S. Xu, L.-H. Zhao, and G.-L. Xie. 2007. Immuno-capture PCR method for detecting Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli from watermelon. Chin. J. Agr. Biotechnol. 4:173–179.
59. Wechter WP, Levi A, Ling KS, Kousik C, Block CC, 2011. Identification of resistance to Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli among melon (Cucumis spp.) plant introductions. HortScience, 46:207–212.
60. Yılmaz M, Ünlü A, Gözen V, Ünlü M, Aras V, Kurum R, İçöz SM, 2012. Evaluation of some native cucurbits (watermelon, melon and cucumber) for resistance to Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli in Turkey. Proceedings of the Xth EUCARPIA Meeting on Genetics and Breeding of Cucurbitaceae October 15-18, Antalya-Turkey.
61. Zitter TA, Hopkins, DL, Thomas, CE, 1996. Compendium of cucurbit diseases. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.