Current Situation of Field Crops Production in Mazıdağı District of Mardin Province

Öz

The aim of this study was to reveal the current status of field crop production in Mazıdağı district of Mardin province, to determine the socio-economic and demographic structure of farmers and to determine the general situation of farmers in terms of agricultural practices. The main material of the research consists of primary data obtained by face-to-face survey method with enterprises engaged in the production of field crops (barley, wheat, corn, sugar beet and cotton) in Mazıdağı district of Mardin province. Farmer interviews were held in the production period of 2023. As secondary data, statistical data of various institutions and organizations were used. The average age of the surveyed farmers was calculated as 51.09 years and the average duration of farming was 32.32 years. It was determined that the average value of the cultivated land was 228.67 da. The wheat planted area is determined as 82.52 da, the barley planted area is 79.51 da, the corn planted area is 86.07 da, the sugar beet planted area is 67.33 da, and the cotton planted area is 95 da. When we look at the yield values, it is calculated as 562.50 kg da- 1 for wheat, 436.51 kg/da for barley, 1476.76 kg/da for corn, 7166.67 kg/da for sugar beet and 390 kg/da for cotton. It was concluded that the average wheat yield and barley yield increased with the increase in parcel width. It was determined that top fertilization was carried out in almost all of the examined enterprises. The rate of sales of the products grown in the examined enterprises to the private sector was determined as 60.4% and to state institutions was 39.6%. Although 99.3% of the enterprises implement crop rotation, only 44.6% set aside seeds for planting. As a general result, it can be said that farmers growing wheat and barley have higher rates of seed separation. Increasing the education level of farmers can support rural development as well as as increasing agricultural productivity. Educated farmers can more easily adopt new technologies and methods, which can increase sustainability and competitiveness in the agricultural sector. Following the developments in the agricultural sector is of great importance in terms of increasing productivity, ensuring sustainability and gaining competitive advantage.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mardin
• field crops
• socio-economic structure
• yield
• agricultural practice

Kaynakça

1. Acibuca V. (2010). Economics of durum wheat production in Mardin province. Master's thesis, Çukurova University, Institute of Science and Technology, Adana. p.65.
2. Anonymous, (2023). Agricultural products markets. Directorate of Agricultural Economics and Policy Development Institute. https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/ tepge/Menu/27/Tarim-Urunleri-Piyasalari.
3. Arısoy, H. (2004). The Level of Utilization of Newly Developed Wheat Varieties by Agricultural Research Institutes in Agricultural Enterprises and Comparative Economic Analysis with Traditional Varieties, The Case of Konya Province. Master's Thesis, Selçuk University, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Agricultural Economics. 189, Konya.
4. Ayçiçek, M., Karakaya, E. (2022). Current Status and Economic Analysis of Silage Corn Production Activity in Bingöl Province. ÇOMÜ Zir. Fak. Derg. (COMU J. Agric. Fac.) 2022:10(2): 254-266.
5. Aydın, B., Öztürk, O., Çobanoğlu, F., Çebi, U., Özkan, E., Özer, S. (2020). The effect of drip irrigation subsidies on silage corn production: The case of Edirne province. International Journal of Agriculture and Wildlife Sciences. 6 (3): 496-505.
6. Baydar, H. (2023). Field Crops Agriculture and Industry. (https://ziraat.isparta.edu.tr).
7. Candemir, S., Kızılaslan, N., Kızılaslan, H., Uysal, O. (2017). Comparative Analysis of Input Requirements and Profitability of Grain Maize and Cotton Production in Kahramanmaraş Province. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, 4(1), 1-8.
8. Çiçek, A., Erkan, O. (1996). Research and sampling methods in agricultural economics, Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Agriculture, Publication No: 12, Lecture Notes Series No: 6, Tokat.

9. Demirtaş, G. (2019). Determination of corn production cost and marketing problems in the villages of the central district of Amasya province. Master's Thesis Department of Agricultural Economics. 108 s.
10. Güldal, H. T. and Özçelik, A. (2017). Determination of the Cost Effects of Fertilizer Used According to the Results of Soil Analysis in Wheat Cultivation: The Case of Konya Province Cihanbeyli District, Journal of Adnan Menderes University, Agricultural Faculty, 14 (1).
11. Kadakoğlu, B., Karlı, B., Taşci, N., & Özyürek, H. (2023). Sugar Beet Production Cost and Profitability Analysis: The Case of Burdur Province. KSÜ Agriculture and Nature Journal 26(2), 385-392. https://doi.org/10.18016/ ksutarimdoga.v26i75874.1146948.
12. Karakuş, S. (2017). The effect of Soil Products Office on producer decisions; The case of Konya province Çumra district, Selçuk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences.
13. Küçükçongar, M., Kan, M. and Özdemir, F. (2014). The use of direct sowing method in wheat farming and determination of farmers' opinions: The case of Konya province, Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research, 1 (2), 26-35.
14. Newbold, P. (1995). Statistics for business and economics (p. 1016). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Inc.
15. Öztekin, M. (2017). Socio-Economic Structure of Farmers in the Villages of Karataş District of Adana Province and Determination of the Problems They Face in Wheat Cultivation.T.C. Mustafa Kemal University Institute of Science and Technology. Department of Field Crops Master's Thesis, p. 69
16. Paksoy, M., Ortasöz, N. (2018). Economic analysis of corn production activity in Pazarcık district of Kahramanmaraş province. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Agriculture and Nature. 21(3): 95-101.
17. Sahinli, M.A. (2011). Economic Analysis of Agricultural Enterprises in Konya Province and Determination of the Factors that are Effective in Sheep Husbandry Activities. PhD Thesis, Ankara University, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Agricultural Economics, 218, Ankara.
18. Taşcı, R., Bayramoğlu, Z. (2020). Evaluation of Barley Production Processing and Marketing Structure. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 10(4), 2988-2998. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.745370
19. The Banks Association of Türkiye, (2023). The Banks Association of Türkiye Agriculture Sector Report. (https://www.tbb.org.tr/Content/Upload/Dokuman/8960/Tarim_Sektor_Raporu_13072 3.pdf)(Access date: 07.07.2024)
20. TUIK, (2020). https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Isgucu-Istatistikleri-Mart-2020-33787
21. Üçpınar, F. (2016). Economic analysis of agricultural enterprises producing fresh beans in Konya province Derbent district, Selçuk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. Uğurlu, M. (2020). Economic Analysis of Cotton Production: Manisa Example. Journal of Faculty of Agriculture Türkiye 13th National, I. International Field Crops Congress Special Issue: 206-217, 2020 Ünalan, A., Serbester, U., Çınar, M., Ceyhan, A., Akyol, E., Şekeroğlu, A., Erdem, T. and Yılmaz, S., (2013). Current Status, Major Problems and Solution Suggestions of Dairy Cattle Breeding Enterprises in Niğde Province, Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 1 (2), 67-72.
22. Yakupoğlu, M. (2023). Adaptations of sugar beet producers to methods of combating climate change: the case of Konya province Cihanbeyli district. T.C. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Institute of Postgraduate Education Department of Agricultural Economics. Master's thesis. S. 109.
23. Yalmancı, B. (2008). Determination of Agricultural Mechanization Level of Agricultural Enterprises in Kadinhani District of Konya Province. Master's Thesis, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Agricultural Machinery, 71, Tokat.
24. Yamane, T. (2010). Basic Sampling Methods, Literatür Publishing, Istanbul
25. Yaşar, M. and Şahin, K. (2023). Grower Practices in Sugar Beet Production: The Case of Muş Province. Journal of Iğdır University Institute of Science and Technology, 13(3), 2195- 2204.
26. Yılmaz, Ş.G., Gül, M. (2015). Cotton Production Cost in Enterprises, Evaluation of Profitability Level: The Case of Antalya Province. Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Agriculture Journal. 20(2):27-41 (2015.