Yemlik Börülce (Vigna Unguiculata L. Walp)’ de Tuzluluk Stresinin Çimlenme ve Fide Gelişimine Etkisi

Öz

Tarımsal üretimde verimi etkileyen en önemli hususlardan biri stres faktörleridir. Bu
faktörlerden özellikle tuz stresi; yağışsız ve yarı yağışlı yerlerde verimi oldukça sınırlamaktadır. Baklagil
bitkisi olan börülce, insan beslenmesi yanında hayvan yemi olarak da kullanıldığı için önemlidir. Bu
çalışmada yemlik olarak kullanılan Ülkem yem börülcesi çeşidine farklı NaCl konsantrasyonları
uygulanmış ve deneme Tesadüf Parselleri Deneme planına göre 10 tekerrürlü olarak yürütülmüştür.
Sonuçta farklı parametreler bakımından değerlendirilerek tuzluluğa toleransı belirlenmeye çalışılmış ve
tuz stresinin çimlenme ve fide gelişimini azalttığı ve 90 mM’ın üzerindeki tuzun bitki üzerinde olumsuz
etki gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tuz stresi,Yem börülcesi,Çimlenme,Fide gelişimi

Impact of Salinity Stress on Germination and Seedling Development in Feeding Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata L. Walp)

Öz

One of the most important issues affecting the efficiency of agricultural production are
stress factors.Among these factors, especially salt stress; rainfall and semi-rainy places are quite limited.
Cowpea, which is a legume plant, is important because it is used as animal feed as well as human
nutrition. In this study, different NaCl concentrations were applied to Ulkem forage cowpea cultivar
which was used as a feeder and the experiment was carried out with 10 replications according to the
randomized plot design. After that, it was evaluated for different parameters and salinity tolerance was
determined and salt stress decreased germination and seedling growth and over 90 mM salt had negative
effect on plant.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Salt Stress,Forage cowpea,Germination,Seedling Development

Kaynakça

1. Abdi N, Wasti S, Slama A, Ben Salem M, El Faleh M, Mallek-Maalej E, 2016. Comparative study of salinity effect on some Tunisian barley cultivars at germination and early seedling growth stages. J Plant Physiol Pathol. 4:1–9.
2. Akçay E, Tan M.,2019. Farklı Tuzluluk Seviyelerinin Bazı Kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Çeşitlerinde Kök ve Sürgün Gelişmesine Etkileri. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 50 (3): 292-298.
3. Anonim 2005. Çölleşme ile mücadele Türkiye Ulusal Eylem Programı. T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı yayınları No: 250, Ankara, ISBN 975-7347-51-5.
4. Ashraf M.Y, Sarwar G, Ashraf M, Afaf R, Satar A, 2002. Salinity Induced Changes in α‐Amylase Activity during Germination and Early Cotton Seedling Growth. Biologia Plantarum, 45, 589‐591.
5. Askari-Khorasgani O, Emadi S, Mortazaienezhad F, Pessarakli M, 2017. Differential responses of three chamomile genotypes to salinity stress with respect to physiological, morphological, and phytochemical characteristics. J Plant Nutr. 40:2619–2630.
6. Arslan M, Aydınoğlu B, 2018. Tuzluluk (NaCl) stresinin mürdümükde (Lathyrus sativus L.) çimlenme ve erken fide gelişme özelliklerine etkisi. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi 7(1):49-54
7. Aydın, İ., Atıcı, Ö., 2015. Tuz Stresinin Bazı Kültür Bitkilerinde Çimlenme ve Fide Gelişimi Üzerine Etkileri. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi,3 (2):1-15.
8. Bartels D, Sunkar R, 2005. Drought and Salt Tolerance in Plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 24: 23-58.

9. Bybordi A, Tabatabaei S. J, Ahmadev A, 2010. Effects of salinity on fatty acid composition of canola (Brassica napus L.). J. Food Agric. and Environ. 8(1):113-115.
10. Çavuşoğlu K, Kabar, K, 2010. Effects of Hydrogen Peroxide on the Germination and Early Seedling Growth of Barley under NaCl and High Temperature Stresses. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences, 4, 70‐79.
11. Dajic Z, 2006. Salt Stress, Physiology and Molecular Biology of Stress Tolerance in Plants, ISBN-13 978-14020-4224-9, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 345p.
12. Forni C, Duca D, Glick B.R, 2017.Mechanisms of plant response to salt and drought stress and their alteration by rhizobacteria. Plant Soil, 410, 335–356.
13. Hassen A, Maher S, Cherif H, 2014.Effect of salt stress (NaCl) on germination and early seedling parameters of three pepper cultivars (Capsicum annuum L.). Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry.;10(1).
14. Hernandez A.J, 2019.Salinity Tolerance in Plants: Trends and Perspectives. İnternational Journal of Molecular Science. 1-8.
15. Julkowska, M.M,Hoefsloot,H.C.J., Mol, S., Feron, R., Boer, G-J de, Haring, M.A., Testerink, C.,2014. Capturing Arabidopsis Root Architecture Dynamics With ROOT-FIT Reveals Diversity in Responses to Salinity. Plant Physiology,114(1):1-39.
16. Khan M. A, Qayyum A, Noor E, 2007. Assessment of wheat genotypes for salinity tolerance. Proceeding of 8th African Crop Science Conference, El-Minia, Egypt.
17. Matthews S, Khajeh-Hosseini M, 2007. Length of The Lag Period of Germination and Metabolic Repair Explain Vigour Differences In Seed Lots of Maize ( Zea mays ). Seed Science and Technology, 35(1): 200-212.
18. Munns, R., 2002. Salinity, Growth and Phytohormones, Salinity: Environment-Plants-Molecules, Published by Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 1-4020-0492-3, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 522p
19. Okçu,G., Kaya, M.D., Atak, M.,2005. Effect of Salt and Drought Stresses on Germination and Seedling Growth of Pea (Pisum sativum L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 29(4):237-242
20. Önal Aşcı Ö 2011. Salt Tolerance in Red Clover (Trifolium pratense L.) seedlings. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(44): 8774-8781.
21. Özkorkmaz,F., Yılmaz, N.,2017. Farklı Tuz Konsantrasyonlarının Fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) ve Börülcede (Vigna unguiculata L.) Çimlenme Üzerine Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. Ordu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi.7(2):196-200.
22. Parihar P, Singh S, Singh R, Singh VP, Prasad S.M, 2015. Effect of salinity stress on plants and its tolerance strategies: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research.;22(6):4056-4075.
23. Pastori GM, Foyer CH 2002. Common components, networks, and pathways of cross-tolerance to stress. The central role of "redox" and abscisic acid-mediated controls. Plant Physiology, 129: 460-468.
24. Prado F.E, Boero C, Gallardo M, Gonzalez J.A, 2000. Effect of NaCl on germination, growth, and soluble sugar content in Chenopodium quinoa (Willd.) seeds. Bot Bull Acad Sin, 41: 27-34.
25. Shabala S, Munns R, 2012.Salinity stress: Physiological constraints and adaptive mechanisms. In S. Shabala, N. Farrar, G. Spearing, A. Lainsbury, & F. Chippendale (Eds.). Plant Stress Physiology. CAB International.;59–93.
26. Shavrukov Y, 2013. Salt stress or salt shock: which genes are we studying? Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(1): 119-27.
27. Shrivastava P. Kumar, R, 2015. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci., 22, 123–131.
28. Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., 2002. Plant Physiology. 3rd edition, Sinauer Associates İnc. Publishers, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA,690p.
29. Tiryaki İ, 2018. Bazı Tarla Bitkilerinin Tuz Stresine Gösterdikleri Adaptasyon Mekanizmaları. KSÜ Tarım ve Doğa Derg 21(5):800-808.
30. Turhan A, Șeniz V 2010. Salt Tolerance of SomeTomato Genotypes Grown in Turkey. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 8(3-4): 332-33.
31. Yılmaz E, Tuna A.L, Bürün B, 2011. Bitkilerin Tuz Stresi Etkilerine Karşı Geliştirdikleri Tolerans Stratejileri, C.B.U Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1),47-66.