DETERMINING OF LOGISTICS PROGRAM STUDENTS INTERNSHIP PLACE SELECTION BY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

Yıl 2016, , 235 - 254, 31.10.2016

Polat Yücekaya , Pınar Gürol , Karahan Kara

https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.176

Öz

Internship training is obliged to undergraduate students by schools for practicing the
academic knowledge that learned during education in working conditions, before to get a start in
business. This obligation have revealed the necessity of true internship place selection for get a good
internship training, and complete the internship training in which area they want to work after the
236
education. In this research we tried to determine the right internship place selection for students of
Logistics Program by using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) multi-criteria decision making
technique. In the process of implementation of the problem, firstly the aim of the problem is
determined, and the criterias that affect the problem is selected. After that, alternatives is determined,
and right internship place selection is tried to determine by AHP technique steps implementation

Anahtar Kelimeler

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Internship, Logistics

LOJİSTİK BÖLÜMÜ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN STAJ YERİ SEÇİMİNİN ANALİTİK HİYERARŞİ PROSESİ (AHP) YARDIMIYLA TESPİT EDİLMESİ

Öz

Lisans öğrencilerinin okul öğrenimi süresince almış oldukları akademik bilginin iş hayatına
başlamadan önce iş yeri çalışma koşullarında uygulamalı olarak tecrübe edinebilmesi için okullar
tarafından öğrencilere staj eğitimi alma zorunluluğu getirilmiştir. Bu zorunluluk beraberinde
öğrencinin iyi bir staj eğitimi alması ve çalışmak istediği alanda staj eğitimini tamamlaması için
doğru staj yerinin seçme gerekliliğini ortaya çıkarmıştır. Lojistik bölümü öğrencilerinin doğru alanda
staj eğitimini yapmalarına yardımcı olmak için staj yeri seçim problemi ele alınarak Analitik
Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) çok kriterli karar verme tekniği yardımıyla doğru staj yeri tespit edilmeye
çalışılmıştır. Problemin uygulanmasında öncelikli olarak problemin amacı ortaya koyularak amacı
etkileyen kriterler tespit edilmiştir. Sonraki aşamada alternatifler tespit edilerek AHP tekniği
adımlarının uygulanması ile doğru staj yeri tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi(AHP), Lojistik, Staj

Kaynakça

• Abalı, Y.A., Kutlu, B.S., Eren, T. (2012) "Çok ölçütlü karar verme yöntemleri ile bursiyer seçimi: Bir öğretim kurumunda uygulama", Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 26 (3-4), 259-272.
• Adıgüzel, O., Çetintürk, İ., Er, O. (2009) "Konaklama işletmelerine olan müşteri tercihinin analitik hiyerarşi prosesi yöntemi ile belirlenmesi", Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 1(1), 17-35.
• Ahire, S.L., Rana, D.S. (1995) "Selection of TQM pilot projects using an MCDM approach", İnternational Journal of Quality &Reliability Management, 12(1), 61-81.
• Al Harbi, K.M. (2001) "Application of AHP in project management", International Journal of Project Management, 19(4), 19-27
• Al Khalil, M.I. (2002) "Selecting the appropriate delivery method using AHP", International Journal of Project Management, 20, 469-474.
• Bahurmoz, A.M.A. (2003) "The analytic hierarchy process at Dar El-Hekma Saudi Arabia", Interfaces, 33 (4), 70-78.
• Bard, J.F. (1986) "A multiobjective methodology for selecting subsystem automation option", Management Science, 32(12), 1628-1641.
• Beebe, A., Blaylock, A., Sweetser, K.D. (2009) "Job satisfaction in public relations internship", Public Relations Rewiev, 35, 156-158.
• Büyüközkan, G., Feyzioğlu, O., Nebol, E. (2008) "Selection of strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain", International Journal of Production Economics, 113 (1), 148- 158.
• Byun, D.H. (2001) "The AHP approach for selecting an automobile puurchase model", Information and Management, 38(5), 289-297.
• Chen, T.L., Shen, C.C. (2012) "Today's intern tomorrow's practitioner? The influence of intership programme's on students' career development in the hospitally industry", Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education, 11, 29-40.
• Cheng, C.H. (1997) "Evaulating naval tactical missile system by Fuzzy AHP based on grade value of membership function", International Journal of Operation Research, 96 (2), 343-350.
• Dyer, J. (2005) "Multiattribute Utility Theory(MAUT)", in Figuera, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (Eds.), Multiple Crirteria Decision Analysis: State of The Art Surveys, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 265-295.
• Ferrari, P. (2002) "A method for choosing from among alternative transportation projects", International Journal of Operation Research, 150, 194-203.
• Garcia-Cascales, M.S., Lamata, M.T. (2009) "Selection of a cleaning system for engine maintanance based on the analytic hierarchy process", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56, 1442-1451.
• Garfi, M., Tondelli, S., Bonoli, A. (2009) "Multi-criteria decision analysis for waste management İSaharawi refugee camps", Waste Management, 29 (10), 2615-2796. 251
• Gates, S.M., Paul, C. (2004) "Intern Programs As A Human Resources Management Tool For The Depertman Of The Defense", Rand Cooperation, Pittsburg, ABD, 11-24.
• Ghoudsypour, S.H., O'Brien, C. (1996) "A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming", International Journal Production Economics, 56-57, 199-212.
• Gordon, G.R., McBride, R.B. (2012) "Criminal Justice Internship", Seventh Edition, 3-10.
• Hedge, G.G., Tadikamalla, P.R. (1990) "Site selection for a sure terminal", International Journal of Operation Research, 48 (1), 77-80.
• Ishizaka, A., Labib, A. (2011) "Selection of new production facilities with the group analytic hierarcy process ordering method", Expert System With Application, 38, 7317-7325.
• Jung, H.W., Choi, B. (1999) "Optimization models for quality and cost of modular software systems", European Journal of Operational Research, 112, 613-619.
• Keçek,G., Yıldırım, E. (2010) "Kurumsal kaynak planlama (ERP) sisteminin analitik hiyerarşi süreci ile seçimi: Otomotiv sektöründe bir uygulama", Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15 (1), 193-211.
• Kengpol, A., O'Brien, C. (2000) "The development of a decision support tool for the selection of advanced technology to achive rapid product development", International Journal of Production Economics, 69, 177-191.
• Kengpol, A., Meethom, W., Tuominen, M. (2012) "The development of decision support system in multimodel transportation routing within Greater Mekong sub-region countries", International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (2), 691-701.
• Kim, C.S., Yoon, Y. (1992) "Selection of good expert system shell for instructional purposes in business", Information and Management, 23 (5), 249-262.
• Koçak, A. (2003) "Yazılım seçiminde analitik hiyerarşi yöntemi yaklaşımı ve bir uygulama", Ege Akademik Bakış, 3(12), 67-77.
• Korpela, J., Tuominen, M. (1996) "A decision aid warehouse site selection", International Journal of Production Economics, 45, 169-180.
• Korpela, J., Lehmusvaara, A., Nisonen, J. (2007) "Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologies", International Journal of Production Economics, 108(1-2), 135-142.
• Kuo, R.J., Chı, S.C., Kao, S.S. (1999) "A decision support system for locating convenience store through fuzzy AHP", Computers & Industrial Engineering, 37, 323-326.
• Lai, V.S., Wong, B.K., Cheung, W. (2002) "Group decision making in multiple criteria enviroment: A case using th AHP in software selecttion", European Journal of Operational Research, 137, 134-144.
• Lee, G.K.L., Chan, E.H.W. (2007) "The analytic hierarcy process (AHP) approach for assesment of urban renawel proposals", Social Indicators Research, 89 (1), 155-168.
• Liberatore, M.J., Nydick, R.L. (2008) "The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decission making: A literature rewiev", European Journal of Operational Research, 189, 194-207.
• Mafakheri, F., Breton, M., Ghoniem, A. (2011) "Supply selection-order allocation: A two stage multiple criteria dynamic programming approach", International Journal of Production Economics, 132 (1), 52-57.
• Moffet, A., Dyer, J.S., Sarkar, S. (2006) "Integration biodiversity represantation with multiple criteria in North Central Namibia usin non-dominated alternatives and a modified anlytic hierarchy process", Biological Conversation, 129, 181-191.
• Mohanty, R.P., Deshmukh, S.G. (1998) "Advanced manufacturing teknology selection: A strategic model for learning and evaulation", International Journal of Production Economics, 55, 295-307.
• Murlidhar, K., Shantharaman, R. (1990) "Using the analytic hierarcy process for information system project selection", Information & Management, 18 (2), 87-95.
• Ngai, E.W.T. (2003) "Selection of web sites for online advertising using the AHP", Information & Management, 40, 233-242.
• Noci, G., Toletti, G. (2000) "Selecting quality based programmes in small firms: A comparison between the fuzzy linguistic approach and the analytic hierarchy process", International Journal of Production Economics, 67, 113-133.
• Oddershede, A., Arnoldo, A., Cancino, H. (2007) "Rural development decision support using the analytic hierarchy process", Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46 (7-8), 1107-1114.
• Omasa, T., Kishimoto, M., Kawase, M., Yagi, K. (2004) "An attempt at decision making in tissue engineering: reactor evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)", Biochemical Engineering Journal, 20, 173-179.
• Özden, Ü.H. (2008) "Analitik hiyerarşi yöntemi ile ilkokul seçimi", Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25 (1), 299-320.
• Partovi, F.Y. (2007) "An analytic model of process choice in the chemical industry", International Journal of Production Economics, 105 (1), 213-227.
• Raju, K.S., Pillai, C.R.S. (1999) "Multicriterion decision making in river basin planning and development", European Journal of Operational Research, 112, 249-257.
• Saaty, T.L. (1977) "A Scalling methods for priorities in hierarchical structures", Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234-281.
• Saaty, T.L. (1980) "The Analytic Hierarchy Process", McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Saaty, T.L. (1989) "Group Decision Making and The AHP", Springer-Verlag, New York.
• Saaty, T.L. (1990) "An exposition of the AHP in repply to the paper remarks on the analytic hiyerarchy process", Management Science, 36 (3), 259-268.
• Saaty, T.L. (1994) "Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the analytic hierarchy process", Europen Journal of Operational Research, 74, 426-447.
• Saaty, T.L. (1996) "The Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications", Pittsburgh.
• Saaty, T.L. (2000) "The analytic hierarchy and analytic network process", MCDM 15th International Conference, Ankara, Turkey, 1-5.
• Schniederjans, M.J., Wilson, R.L. (1991) "Using the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for information system project selection", Information & Management, 20 (5), 333-342.
• Schniederjans, M.J., Garvin, T. (1997) "Using the analytic hierarchy process and multi objective programming for selection of cost drivers in activity-based costig", Europen Journal of Operational Research, 100, 72-80.
• Srdjevic, B. (2007) "Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methodsto support group decision-making in water management", Decision Support Systems, 42 (4), 2261-2273.
• Tadisna, S.K., Troutt, M.D., Bhasin, V. (1991) "Selecting a doctoral programme using AHP: The importance of perspective", Journal of operational research Society, 42 (8), 631- 638.
• Vaidya, O.S., Kumar, S. (2006) "Analytic hierarchy process: An overwiev of application", European Journal of Operation Research, 169, 1-29.
• Yaralıoğlu, K. (2001) "Performans değerlendirmede analitik hiyerarşi proses", Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (1), 129-142.