Eliciting Pre-Service EFL Teachers’ Views on Coursebooks Through Metaphorical Language

Öz

Unearthing pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards coursebooks might well have important implications both for pre- and in-service teacher education since of all the wide range of materials used in English language teaching (ELT), coursebooks are still the most widely used materials in school settings. In this regard, this study aims to surface pre-service English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers’ beliefs on coursebooks through metaphorical language. Data gathered from 129 Turkish pre-service teachers of English are presented and discussed in the present study. Qualitative content analysis was employed in this study to analyze the metaphors provided by the pre-service EFL teachers. The participants produced 70 different metaphors for coursebooks and data analysis revealed seven conceptual categories: Guidance, Resource, Support, Access to New Opportunities, Worthlessness, Restrictions and Boredom. The participants produced mostly positive metaphors for coursebooks and saw coursebooks as a support and guide for language education.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• coursebooks
• pre-service EFL teachers
• ELT materials
• metaphors

Kaynakça

1. Akınoğlu, O. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ metaphorical perceptions regarding the concept of curriculum. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10217
2. Allen, C. (2015). Marriages of convenience? Teachers and coursebooks in the digital age. ELT Journal, 69(3) 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv005
3. Allwright, D. (1981). What do we need teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/36.1.5
4. Arıkan, A. (2009). Problems with course books in EFL classrooms: Prospective teachers' opinions. EKEV Academic Review 38(1), 309–317. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED506597.pdf
5. Arslan, P. (2020). Okul kavramına ilişkin metaforlar [Metaphors about the concept of school]. International Journal of Leadership Studies: Theory and Practice, 3 (1), 1–14. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1038100
6. Aslan, O. (2019). Velilerin ‘öğretmen’ kavramına ilişkin metaforik algılarının incelenmesi [Metaphoric perceptions of parents for the concept of “teaching”]. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 4(8), 78–95. https://www.ijetsar.com/Makaleler/1418152145_6.%2078-95%20osman%20aslan.pdf
7. Aydın, S. (2012). Pre-service teachers' perceptions of the presentation of language skills in a course book. Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 16(3), 249–264. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541474.pdf Aykaç, N., & Çelik, Ö. (2014). Comparison of methaphoric perception of teachers and pre-service teachers about curriculum. Education and Science, 39(173), 326–339. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/2161/695 British Council (2013). The English effect [online] https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/english-effect-report-v2.pdf Open document
8. Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. MacMillan Heinemann

9. Çırak Kurt, S. (2017). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin “öğretim programı” kavramına ilişkin metaforik algıları [Secondary school teachers’ metaphoric perceptions of the concept of curriculum]. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 31, 631–641. http://dx.doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.654
10. Duru, S. (2017). Öğretmen olmak: ilkokul öğretmenlerinin öğretimle ilgili (yanliş) kavramsallaştırmaları ve inançları [Being a teacher: elementary teachers’ (mis)conceptions and (illstructured) beliefs about teaching]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 42, 135–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.9779/PUJE843
11. Gao, Y., & Cui, Y. (2021). To arrive where you are: A metaphorical analysis of teacher identity change in EAP reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 104, 103374 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103374.
12. Garton, S., & Graves, K. (2014). Materials in ELT: current issues. In S. Garton, & K. Graves (Eds.), International perspectives on materials in ELT (pp. 1–15). Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Gencer, M. (2020). Öğrenci ve velilerin öğretmen kavramına ilişkin metaforik algıları [Metaphoric perceptions of students and parents regarding the concept of teacher]. Balıkesir University The Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 23(44), 805–825. https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.742089
14. Global English Education Policy (n.d.). Countries in which English language is a mandatory or an optional subject (interactive). https://www.uwinnipeg.ca/global-english-education/countries-in-which-english-is-mandatory-or-optional-subject.html
15. Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2008). Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education 24(8), 2014–2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.05.002
16. Gültekin, M. (2013). İlköğretim öğretmen adaylarının eğitim programı kavramına yükledikleri metaforlar [The metaphors that primary education teacher candidates use regarding curriculum]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(169), 126–141. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/1825/501
17. Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal, 48(4), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/48.4.315
18. Israelsson, J. (2007). Teachers' attitudes to teaching aids and authentic materials. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
19. Kayapınar, U. (2009). Coursebook evaluation by English teachers. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(1), 69–78. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/92310
20. Kesen, A. (2010). Turkish EFL learners’ metaphors with respect to English language coursebooks. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 4(1), 108–118. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/111867
21. Kimsesiz, F. (2023). The EFL teachers’ self-perceptions of professional teacher identity in Turkey. Kastamonu Education Journal, 31(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1271468
22. Koca, İ., Kaya, M., & Gökçimen, S. (2021). Türkiye’de okul kavramına ilişkin metafor araştırmalarının değerlendirilmesi: bir meta sentez çalışması [Evaluation of metaphor research about school concept in Turkey: a meta synthesis study]. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 15–26. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1733740
23. Kütük, S. İ., & Su-Bergil, A. (2021). The effectiveness of English textbooks at MoNE from teachers’ aspects. Kastamonu Education Journal, 29(5), 965–973. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.764273 Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press
24. Leavy, A. M., McSorley, F. A., & Bote, L. A. (2007). An examination of what metaphor construction reveals about the evolution of pre-service teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1217–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.016
25. Levine, P. M. (2005). Metaphors and images of classrooms. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 41(4), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2005.10532066
26. Littlejohn, A. P. (1998). The analysis of language teaching materials: inside the Trojan Horse. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.) Materials development in language teaching (pp. 179-211). Cambridge University Press. McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’s guide (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
27. McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh University Press. McGrath, I. (2006a). Teachers’ and learners’ images for coursebooks. ELT Journal, 60(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci104
28. McGrath, I. (2006b). Using insights from teachers' metaphors. Journal of Education for Teaching, 32(3), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470600782443
29. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks.
30. Neyişçi, N., & Özdiyar, Ö. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının okul, öğretmen ve öğrenci kavramlarına ilişkin metaforik algıları [Metaphorical perceptions of prospective teachers about concepts of school, teacher and student]. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.464080
31. Nguyen, C. D. (2016). Metaphors as a window into identity: A study of teachers of English to young learners in Vietnam, System 60, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.06.004.
32. O’Neill, R. (1982). Why use textbooks? ELT Journal, 36(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/36.2.104
33. Oxford, R. L., Tomlinson, S., Barcelos, A., Harrington, C., Lavine, R. Z., Saleh, A., & Longhini, A. (1998). Clashing metaphors about classroom teachers: towards a systematic typology for the language teaching field. System, 26(1), 3–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00071-7
34. Özdemir, S. M. (2012). Eğitim programı kavramına ilişkin öğretmen adaylarının metaforik algıları [Metaphoric perceptions of prospective teachers regarding the concept of curriculum]. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 5(3), 369–393. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/akukeg/issue/29346/314041
35. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks.
36. Saban, A. (2006). Functions of metaphor in teaching and teacher education: A review essay. Teaching Education, 17(4), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210601017386
37. Saban, A. (2008). Okula ilişkin metaforlar [Metaphors about school]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 55, 459–496. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kuey/issue/10342/126702
38. Sarıkaya, B. (2018). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının öğretmen kavramına ilişkin metaforik algıları [prospective Turkish teachers’ metaphorical perceptions of the concept “teacher”]. Türkiye Eğitim Dergisi, 3(2), 1–16. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/turkegitimdergisi/issue/41487/478058
39. Seferoğlu, G., Korkmazgil, S., & Ölçü, Z. (2009). Gaining insights into teachers’ ways of thinking via metaphors. Educational Studies, 35(3), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690802648135
40. Semerci, N., & Özçelik, C. (2018). Okul yöneticilerinin eğitim programı kavramına ilişkin algıları [Perceptions of school managers on the concept of curriculum]. Bartın University Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 1–12. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/bujer/issue/41557/420193
41. Shaw, D. M., & Mahlios, M. (2011). Literacy metaphors of pre-service teachers: do they change after instruction? Which metaphors are stable? How do they connect to theories? Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2011.538274
42. Şahin, H. İ. (2022). An evaluation of EFL coursebooks used in state schools in Turkey based on teachers' opinions. Futuristic Implementations of Research in Education (FIRE), 3(1), 40–56. http://www.firejournal.org/index.php/fire/article/view/49/39
43. Şener, S., & Mulcar, V. (2018). An investigation of teachers’ perceptions on English textbooks: A case study of teachers teaching 10th graders in Mugla. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(1), 15–37. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/baebd/issue/35175/358650
44. Şimşek, M. R. (2017). Confronting culture in local and global English coursebooks: student teachers’ preferences in materials adaptation. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 13(2), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.310224
45. Tham, J. C. K., Burnham, K. D., Hocutt, D. L., Ranade, N., Misak, J., Duin, A. H., Pedersen, I., & Campbell, J. L. (2021). Metaphors, mental models, and multiplicity: understanding student perception of digital literacy. Computers and Composition, 59, 102628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102628
46. Thomas, L., & Beauchamp, C. (2011). Understanding new teachers’ professional identities through metaphor. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 76–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.007.
47. Thornbury, S. (1991). Metaphors we work by: EFL and its metaphors. ELT Journal, 45(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/45.3.193
48. Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528
49. Tsui, A. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
50. Ungar, O. A. (2016). Understanding teachers’ attitude toward educational reforms through metaphors International Journal of Educational Research 77, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.03.008
51. Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge University Press. Yeşilbursa, A. (2012). Using metaphor to explore the professional role identities of higher education English language instructors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 468–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.143
52. Yıldız, H., & Korkmazgil, S. (2021). İngilizce öğretmenlerinin İngilizce dersi eğitim programına ilişkin algılarının metaforlar yoluyla incelenmesi [Exploring English language teachers’ perceptions about English language curriculum through metaphors] Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 60, 302–330. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.916712
53. Yılmaz, H., & Aydın, S. (2015). A brief review of literature on EFL teachers’ perceptions of coursebooks. International Journal of Technical Research and Applications, Special Issue 30, 110–114. https://www.ijtra.com/special-issue-view.php?paper=a-brief-review-of-literature-on-efl-teachersrsquo-perceptions-of-course-books.pdf
54. Yüksel, P., & Yıldırım, S. (2015). Theoretical frameworks, methods, and procedures for conducting phenomenological studies in educational settings. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.59813