Ideology in the news through active, passive and nominalization: A study on the terrorist attack in Ankara reported in British and American newspapers

Öz

Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.
Ideology in the news through active, passive and nominalization: A study on the terrorist attack in Ankara reported in British and American newspapers
The present study focuses on the investigation of frequency and distribution of the active, passive voice and nominalized structures presented in new reports about ‘the terrorist attack in Ankara on October 10th’ across British and American newspapers. In the light of this purpose, the following research questions are addressed: How is the news about the terrorist attack in Ankara reported in British and American newspapers as far as active, passive voice and nominalized structures are concerned? What are the frequencies and distributions of active, passive voice and nominalized structures in news reports across British and American newspapers? The data of the study are analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively by finding out the frequencies and distributions of the structures, and by explaining examples from the document analysis process respectively. American newspapers were found to present the agent more frequently compared to British newspapers. The results of the study show that there are instances of passivization in mitigating a claim about the agent, or attenuating to present the details of the events. Compared to the active forms of verbs, the journalists use active voice in describing the actions and events whereas they prefer passive voice in presenting the actions in which the agent is unknown or irrelevant. As the newspapers examined within the domain of this study are the most circulating and leading newspapers, the choice of these structures and their potential role in conveying ideology have crucial role in presentation of the image of Turkey in external media.
Information about Author(s)*
Author 1
Author (Last name, First name)	Söğüt, Sibel
Affiliated institution (University)	Anadolu University
Country	Turkey
Email address	[e-mail]
Department & Rank	English Language Teaching Department
Corresponding author (Yes/No) Write only one corresponding author.	Yes
Author 2
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 3
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 4
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)

Anahtar Kelimeler

• active; passive; nominalization; ideology; news reports

Kaynakça

1. Ahangar, A.A., Sultani, A.A., Khoshkhoonejad, A. (2014). A critical study of news discourse: Iran‟s tenth presidential election of 2009 (1388) In Keyhan and Etemad newspapers. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World. 6 (1), 151-169
2. Anthony, L. (2011). AntConc (Version 3.2.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/
3. Baudrillard, J. (1982). Sessiz yığınların gölgesinde. Doğu Batı [A l‟ombre des majorities silencieuses suivi de l‟extase du socialsme].
4. Billig, M. (2008). The language of critical discourse analysis: The case of nominalization. Discourse & Society, 19(6), 783-800.
5. Bonyadi, A., Samuel, M. (2011). Linguistic nature of presupposition in American and Persian newspaper editorials. International Journal of Linguistics. 3(1), 1-16
6. Busa, G.M. (2014). Introducing the language of the news: A student’s guide. Routledge. Corpus of Contemporary American English. http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
7. Cotter, C. (2010). News talk: Investigating the language of journalism. Cambridge University Press.
8. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman Group Limited.

9. Fang, Y.J. (2001). Reporting the same events? A critical analysis of Chinese printed news media texts. Discourse & Society. 12(5). 585-613.
10. Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G. and Trew, T. (1979). Language and social control. London: Routledge
11. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In Graddol, D., & Boyd-Barrett, O. (Eds.) Media texts: Authors and readers: A reader. Multilingual matters.
12. He, X., Zhou, H. (2015). Contrastive analysis of lexical choice and ideologies in news reporting the same accidents between Chinese and American newspapers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 5(11), 2356-2365.
13. Koosha, M., & Shams, M. R. (2005). A critical study of news discourse: Iran‟s nuclear issue in the British newspapers. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 107-142.
14. Kuo, S.H., Nakamura, M. (2005). Translation or transformation? A case study of language and ideology in the Taiwanese press. Discourse and Society. 16(3), 393-417.
15. Oktar, L. & Değer, A.C. (2015). Gazete söyleminde kiplik ve işlevleri. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 45-54.
16. Oktar, L. (2001). The ideological organization of representational processes in the presentation of us and them. Discourse and Society. 12 (3), 313 - 46.
17. Shojaei, A., Youssefi, K., Hosseini, H.S. (2013). A CDA approach to the biased interpretation and representation of ideologically conflicting ideas in Western printed media. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 858-868.
18. Thetela, P. (2001). Critique discourses and ideology in newspaper reports: A Discourse analysis of the South African press reports on the 1998 SADC‟s Military Intervention in Lesotho. Discourse and Society. (12) 3, 347-370.
19. Teo, P. (2000). Racism in the news: A Critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse and Society.11(1), 7-49.
20. Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News analysis. Case studies of international and national news in the press. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
21. Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & Society, 6(2), 243-289.
22. Van Dijk, T. A. (1996). Discourse, power and access. In Caldas-Coulthard, C. R., & Coulthard, M. (Eds.). Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis. Psychology Press.
23. Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.
24. Van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Critical discourse analysis and nominalization: Problem or pseudo-problem? Discourse & Society. 19(6), 821–828.
25. Vo, D.D. (2013). Language and ideology in English and Vietnamese business hard news reporting: A comparative study. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 19 (2),1-12.
26. Xie, X. (2013). Words must mean something: A critical discourse analysis of some aspects of ideational meaning in a Japanese newspaper editorial. Studies in Media and Society.
27. Zhang, X. (2011). Critical discourse analysis of news reports of China-Japan ship collision incident on New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. MA Thesis. Ocean University of China.
28. Zucchi, A. (1993). The language of propositions and events: Issues in the syntax and the semantics of nominalization. Springer Science & Business Media.