The effects of learning a second language on the first: The case of increased metalinguistic awareness

Öz

Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.
The effects of learning a second language on the first: The case of increased metalinguistic awareness
The present study aims to test if Turkish L2 users of English judge the grammaticality of generic/habitual real conditionals in Turkish differently compared to Turkish monolinguals. Bassetti and Cook (2011) and Bialystok (2001) claim that one of the outcomes of being a bilingual is an increase in metalinguistic awareness. Accordingly, this study investigates if Turkish L2 users have an increased metalinguistic awareness. 20 grammaticality judgment tasks are analysed in data analysis. The participants are university-graduate 15 Turkish monolinguals and 15 Turkish L2 users of English. The responses are evaluated via both descriptive statistics and also SPSS. The analysis indicates that the difference between the monolinguals and L2 users in the judgement of Turkish conditionals is a statistically significant one. This result suggests that learning an L2 has an effect on the L1 of L2 users. This implies that L2 users are a distinctive group of people with regard to their language knowledge.
Information about Author(s)*
Author 1
Author (Last name, First name)	Atar, Cihat
Affiliated institution (University)	İstanbul Medeniyet University
Country	Turkey
Email address	[e-mail]
Department & Rank	Newcastle University
Corresponding author (Yes/No) Write only one corresponding author.	Yes
Author 2
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 3
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 4
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Metalinguistic awareness; bilingualism; multi-competence theory; grammaticality judgement tasks; habitual conditionals

Kaynakça

1. Aarts, B. (2011) Oxford Modern English Grammar. Oxford University Press.
2. Bassetti, B. and Cook, V. J. (2011) Relating language and cognition: The second language user. In V.J. Cook and B. Bassetti (ed.) Language and Bilingual Cognition (pp. 143-191). East Sussex: Psychology Press.
3. Bialystok, E. (2001) Bilingualism in Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Li, W., Hao, M., Wu, X., & Shu, H. (2004). Phonological awareness of bilingual and monolingual Chinese children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 142-151.
5. Cook, V. J. (1991) The poverty-of-the-stimulus argument and multi-competence. Second Language Research 7 (2), 103-117.
6. Cook, V. J. (2002) Background to the L2 user. In V.J. Cook (ed.) Portraits of the L2 user (pp. 1-28). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
7. Cook, V. J. (2003) ‘Introduction: The Changing L1 in the L2 User’s Mind.’ In Cook, V.J. (ed.) Effects of Second Language on the First (pp. 1-19). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
8. Cook, V. J. (2011) Linguistic relativity and language learning. In V.J. Cook and B. Bassetti (ed.) Language and Bilingual Cognition (143-191). East Sussex: Psychology Press.

9. Cook, V.J., Iarossi, E., Stellakis, N., and Tokumaru, Y. (2003) Effects of the L2 on the syntactic processing of the L1. In Cook, V.J. (ed.) (2003) Effects of Second Language on the First (p. 193-214). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
10. Cromdal, J. (2001). Overlap in Bilingual Play: Some Implications of Code-Switching for Overlap Resolution. Research on Language and Social Interaction 34 (4): 421–51.
11. Dornyei, Z. (2007) Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Golato, A. (2003) Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics 24(1): 90-121.
13. Guasti, M. T. (2004) Language Acquisition: The growth of grammar. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
14. Han, Y. (2000). Grammaticality judgment tests: How reliable are they? Applied Language Learning, 11(1), 177–204.
15. Hartsuiker R. J., Pickeringm M.J., and Veltkamp, E. (2004) Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science 16(6): 409-14.
16. Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G.K. (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Jessner, U. (2002) The Dynamic Model of Multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
18. Kecskes, I. and Papp, T. (2000) Foreign Language and Mother Tongue. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Kecskes, I. and Papp, T. (2003) How to demonstrate the conceptual effect of L2 on L1? Methods and techniques. In Cook, V.J. (ed.) Effects of Second Language on the First (pp. 247-266). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
20. Kerslake, C. and Goksel, A. (2005) Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routlage.
21. Laufer, B. (2003) The Influence of L2 on L1 Collocational Knowledge and on L1 Lexical Diversity in Free Written Expression. In Cook, V.J. (ed.) Effects of Second Language on the First (pp. 19-32). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
22. Lewis, G. (2000) Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Macaro, E. (2005) Codeswitching in the L2 classroom: A communication and learning strategy. In E. Llurda (ed.) Non-Native Language Teachers: Perceptions, Challenges and Contributions to the Profession (pp. 63-84) Boston, MA: Springer.
24. Magiste, E. (1986) Selected issues in second and third language learning. In J. Vaid (ed.) Language Processing in Bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and Neurolinguistic Perspectives (pp. 97-122). Hillsdale: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Makarec, K. and Persinger, M. (1993) Bilingual men, but not women display verbal memory weakness but not figural memory differences compared to monolinguals. Personality and Individual Differences 15 (5), 531-536.
26. McGuinness, D. (2005). Language development and learning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Paltridge, B. and Phakiti, A. (2010) Continuum Companion to Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
28. Porte, G. (2003) English from a Distance: Code-mixing and Blending in the L1 Output of Long-Term Resident Overseas EFL Teachers. In Cook, V.J. (ed.) Effects of Second Language on the First (pp. 103-120). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
29. Randsdell, S.E. and Fischler, I. (1987) Memory in a monolingual mode: when are bilinguals at a disadvantage.Journal of Memory and Language 26, 392-405.
30. Ross, S., Seedhouse, P. and Richards, K. (2012) Research Methods for Applied Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
31. Schütze, C. T. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistics methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
32. Selinker, L. (1972) Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics (3), 209-231.
33. Sorace, A. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 375–409). San Diego, CA: Academic.
34. Sorace, A., & Keller, F. (2005) Gradience in linguistic data. Lingua, 115(11), 1497–1524.
35. Tremblay, A. (2005) Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the use of grammaticality judgment tasks in linguistic theory. Second Language Studies, 24(1), pp. 129-167.
36. Van Hell. J.G. and Djikstra, T. (2002) Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,9, pp. 780-789.
37. White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. New York: Cambridge University.