Investigating the concept of individuation and judgment of quantity: Evidence from count-mass distinction

Abstract

Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.
Investigating the concept of individuation and judgment of quantity: Evidence from count-mass distinction
The present study aims to explore English as a Foreign Language (hereafter EFL) instructors’ recognition of count-mass distinction regarding the concept of individuation and judgment of quantity. Accordingly, fifteen EFL instructors recruited from different public universities in Turkey were asked to write the plural forms of a sum of fifty count and mass nouns given in a list. Participants, then, were asked to rate the elements of aggregates (either count or mass) in order to identify their semantic mappings. Following these, the participants were also given a self-rating form to check post-experiment familiarity of those fifty nouns in a random order, and they rated how familiar they were with the items given on a basis of very familiar’, ‘somewhat familiar’ and ‘not familiar’. Descriptive statistics were applied as a part of quantitative data analysis. Demographic information was given on gender and year(s) of teaching experience. As a result, it was reported that EFL instructors conceptualized count nouns as distinct individuals whereas mass nouns were regarded as non-individuals. Familiarity had a probable positive linear effect on success, though. To mention, participants did better at aggregate terms for count nouns than those of mass nouns. Besides, aggregate terms for count nouns were judged to be more familiar than those of mass nouns. The principle of cognitive individuation was confirmed with no external interference of gender and years of teaching experience.
Information about Author(s)*
Author 1
Author (Last name, First name)	Kavaklı, Nurdan
Affiliated institution (University)	Izmir Demokrasi University
Country	Turkey
Email address	[e-mail]
Department & Rank	English Language Teaching
Corresponding author (Yes/No) Write only one corresponding author.	Yes
Author 2
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 3
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 4
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)

Keywords

• Count nouns; mass nouns; count-mass distinction; cognitive individuation; quantity judgment; EFL.

Kaynakça

1. Allan, K. (1980). Nouns and countability. Language, 56, 541-567.
2. Bale, A. C., & Barner, D. (2009). The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to expore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 26(3), 217-252.
3. Barner, D., Inagaki, S., & Li, P. (2009). Language, thought and real nouns: Individiuation in Japanese, English and Mandarin Chinese. Cognition, 111, 329-344.
4. Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2005). Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition, 97, 41-46.
5. Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2005). No nouns, no verbs? Rejoinder to panagiotidis. Lingua, 115, 1169-1179.
6. Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2006). Children's early understanding of mass-count syntax: Individuation, lexical content, and the number asymmetry hypothesis. Language Learning and Development, 2, 163-194.
7. De Belder, M. (2011). A morphosyntactic decomposition of countability in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 14(3), 173-202.
8. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

9. Gillon, B. (1992). Towards a common semantics for English count and mass nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15, 597-639.
10. Pelletier, F. J. (2012). Holism and compositionality. In M. Werning, W. Hinzen, & E. Machery (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality (pp. 149-174). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Sutton, P R., & Filip, H. (2016). Counting in context: Count/mass variation and restrictions on coercion in collective artifact nouns. Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 26(0), 350-370.
13. Wisniewski, E. J., Lamb, C. A., & Middleton, E. L. (2003). On the conceptual basis for the count and mass noun distinction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(5/6), 583-624.
14. Zanini, C., Benavides-Varela, S., Lorusso, R., & Franzon, F. (2017). Mass is more: The conceiving of (un)countability and its encoding into language in 5-year-old-children. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1330-1340