An investigation into university EFL students’ and instructors’ perceptions of using a learning management system

Öz

Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.
An investigation into university EFL students’ and instructors’ perceptions of using a learning management system
The aim of this study is to investigate Turkish EFL students’ and their instructors’ perceptions of using a learning management system (MyELT) in a blended learning context. The study was conducted at a state university with 129 preparatory class students, and 4 instructors of English. In order to collect data, a close – ended questionnaire was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the instructors. While the quantitative data was analysed by means of SPSS, the qualitative data was analysed through content analysis. The results indicated that the students generally have positive perceptions about the practicality of MyELT though they were not as sure about its usefulness. The findings showed no significant difference between male and female students’ perceptions and between students who had easy and limited access to the internet. Similarly, no significant correlation was found between students’ perceptions and their average grade scores. Although the instructors believed in the pedagogical value of the MyELT, they regarded it unsuccessful in their own context due to a number of reasons such as students’ lack of required ICT skills and some technical failures.
Information about Author(s)*
Author 1
Author (Last name, First name)	Tayşı, Eda
Affiliated institution (University)	Fırat University
Country	Turkey
Email address	[e-mail]
Department & Rank	School of Foreign Languages
Corresponding author (Yes/No) Write only one corresponding author.	Yes
Author 2
Author (Last name, First name)	Başaran, Süleyman
Affiliated institution (University)	Dicle University
Country	Turkey
Email address	[e-mail]
Department & Rank	Department of Foreign Languages
Corresponding author (Yes/No)	No
Author 3
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 4
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Computer-assisted language learning; web-based language learning; learning management systems; Web 2.0 tools

Kaynakça

1. Baskaran, L., & Shafeeq, C.P. (2015). ESL Teachers’ Perception of CALL Integration in ELT. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 3(5), 63-74.
2. Bilgin, H. (2010). The effects of a learning management system on the achievement of university EFL students. MA Thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.
3. Dawson, C. (2002). Practical Research Methods. Oxford: How to books.
4. Dudeney, G. & Hockly, N. (2007). How to teach English with technology. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.
5. Golonka E.M., Bowles A.R., Frank V.M., Richardson D.L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 70–105.
6. Grgurovic, M. (2012). Blended Learning in an ESL Class: A Case Study. CALICO Journal, 29(1), 100-117.
7. Hall, B. (2003). New Technology definitions. Retrieved April 22, 2015 from http://www.brandonhall.com/public/glossary/index.htm
8. Hamat, A., Azman, H., Noor, N. M., Bakar, K. A., & Nor, N. F. M. (2014). Evaluation of an LMS for productive language skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 134-139.

9. İçli, G. (2001). Eğitim, İstihdam ve Teknoloji. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9, 65-71.
10. Kern, N. (2013).Technology Integrated English For Specific Purposes Lessons: Real Life Language, Tasks and Tools For Professionals. G.Motteram (eds.), Innovations in Learning Technologies for English Language Teaching (pp.87-115. London: British Council.
11. Kobayashi, K., & Little, A. (2011). Learner perceptions on the usefulness of a blended learning EFL program. The JALT CALL Journal, 7(1), 103-117.
12. Kritikou,Y., Stavroulaki,V., Paradia, M., & Demestichas, P. (2010). User-oriented web based learning management system for enhanced vocabulary teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 473-479.
13. Larson-Hall, J. (2015). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R. Routledge.
14. Marczyk, G., DeMatteo, D., & Festinger, D. (2005). Essentials of research design and methodology. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
15. Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129-132.
16. Oneto, L., Abel, F., Herder, E., Smits, D. (2009). Making today's Learning Management Systems adaptive. Retrieved April 10, from http:// http://wwwis.win.tue.nl/lms-ale-09/Oneto_paper.pdf.
17. Öztürk, K. (2012). Students’ Perceptions of CALL at Dokuz Eylül University School of Foreign Languages. ELT Research Journal, 1(4), 216-229.
18. Raaij, E.M., & Schepers, J. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838–852.
19. Tavakol, M. & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s Alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.
20. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100.