From students’ viewpoint: Integrating contextual micro-grammar revision with contextual vocabulary teaching consistent with constructivism

Abstract

Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.
From students’ viewpoint: Integrating contextual micro-grammar revision with contextual vocabulary teaching consistent with constructivism
The present study is a quantitative research that attempts to scrutinize the place of students’ views on integrating contextual micro-grammar revision with contextual vocabulary teaching consistent with Constructivism. Therefore, the study investigates the first and the second-year students’ attitudes towards a new technique that attempts to consolidate these two techniques into one while taking their individual differences and age factor into account. In compliance with the purpose of the study, a case-specific scale was developed to provide a better projection. It was applied to the first and second year university students at the English Language and Literature Department of a state University in Grammar II and Oral Communication II courses simultaneously. As the results of the data were analyzed through both descriptive and inferential statistics, also in light of the previous studies in the literature, the technique turned out to be sound and promising for the interests of the field of foreign language teaching.
Information about Author(s)*
Author 1
Author (Last name, First name)	Tosun, Bahadır
Affiliated institution (University)	Selçuk University
Country	Turkey
Email address	[e-mail]
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No) Write only one corresponding author.	Yes
Author 2
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 3
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 4
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)

Keywords

• Contextual Micro-Grammar Revision,Contextual Vocabulary Teaching,Constructivism,Foreign Language Teaching

Kaynakça

1. Bach, K. (2004). Minding the gap. In C. Bianchi (Ed.), The semantics/pragmatics distinction (pp. 27-43). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
2. Barcroft, J. (2009). Effects of synonym generation on incidental and intentional L2 vocabulary learning during reading. TESOL Quaterly, 43(1), 79-103. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00228.x/abstract.
3. Blachowicz, C.L.Z., Fisher, P., Ogle, D., & Watts-Taffe, S.M. (2006). Vocabulary: Questions from the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(4), 524-539. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/237972988_Vocabulary_Questions_From_the_Classroom.
4. Canastrary, A. S.& Marlowe, B. A. (Eds.). (2010). Educational Foundations: An Anthology of Critical Readings. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
5. Carlo, M. S., August, D., Mclaughlin, B., Snow, C. E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D. N., … White, C.E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and main stream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39 (2), 188-215. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ684719.
6. Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. Modern Language Journal, 89, 19-36. Retrieved from : http://www.jstor.org/stable/3588549.
7. Cotterall, S. (1999). Key variables in language learning: what do learners believe. System, 53, 490-530. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X99000470.
8. Davis, K. A., & Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2004). Gender and language education [Special issue]. TESOL Quarterly, 38(3). Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tesq.2004.38.issue-3/issuetoc#group3.

9. Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10. Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Form-focused instruction and second language learning (pp. 1-46). Maiden, MA.
11. Ellis, R. (2006). Current Issues in the Teaching of Grammar: An SLA Perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107. Retrieved from
12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40264512.
13. Erlam, R. (2003). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the acquisition of direct object pronouns in French as a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 242-26.
14. Flood, C. P. (2003). Where the boys are: What’s the difference? Paper presented at the Kentucky Teaching and Learning Conference, Louisville. Retrieved from http://qap2.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/
15. Fotos, S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 323.
16. Frantzen, D. (2003). Factors Affecting How Second Language Spanish Students Derive Meaning from Context. The Modern Language Journal, 87 (2), 168-199. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1540-4781.00185/abstract.
17. Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K., Saunders, W., & Christian, D. (2006). Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
18. Georghe, P. (1994). Marcus Contextual Grammars. NJ, USA: Word Scientific Publishers.
19. Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (2005). Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
20. Jäger, G. (2005). Anaphora and type logical grammar. Dordrecht: Springer.
21. Kobayashi, Y. (2010). The Role of Gender in Foreign Language Learning Attitudes: Japanese female students' attitudes towards English learning. Gender&Education, 14:2, 181-197, DOI: 10.1080/09540250220133021.
22. Krashen, S. (1993). The effect of grammar teaching: Still peripheral. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 717-725.
23. McMahill, C. (2001). Self-expression, gender, and community: A Japanese feminist English class. In A. Pavlenko, A. Blackledge, I. Piller, & M. Teutsch-Dwyer (Eds.), Multilingualism, second language learning, and gender (pp. 307-344). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
24. Montero, M., Peters, E., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P. (2014). Effects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary. Language, Learning & Technology, 18(1), 118-141. Retreived from http://www.crossref.org/iPage?doi=10.15446%2Fprofile.v17n1.43957
25. My, N. X., & Paun, G. (1982). On the Generative Capacity of N-Contextual Grammars.
26. Bulletin mathématique de la Société des Sciences Mathématiques de la RépubliqueSocialiste de Roumanie, Nouvelle Série, 26 (74), 345-354.
27. Nassaji, H. (2003). L2 Vocabulary Learning from Context: Strategies, Knowledge Sources, and Their Relationshipwith Success in L2 Lexical Inferencing, 37 (4), 645-670). Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3588216.
28. Nassaji, H. (2006). The Relationship between Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge and L2 Learners' LexicalInferencing Strategy Use and Success. The Modern Language Journal, 90 (3), 387-401. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/canadian_modern_language_review/v061/61.1nassaji.htm
29. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Nilsen, A. P., & Nilsen, D. L. F. (2003). Vocabulary Developmet: Teaching vs. Testing. The English Journal, 92 (3), 31-37. Retrieved from
31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/822257?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
32. Norton, B., & Pavlenko, A. (2004). Gender and English language learners. (Ed.) Alexandria, VA: TESOL. Retrieved from http://tesl-ej.org/ej31/r10.html.
33. Oxford R. L., & Ehrman, M. (1992). Second language research on individual differences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 188-205. Retrieved from
34. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=2685344#
35. Pulido, D. (2007). The relationship between text comprehension and second language incidental vocabulary acquisition: A matter of topic familiarity? Language Learning, 57(1), 155–199. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/227538211_The_Relationship_Between_Text_Comprehension_and_Second_Language_Incidental_Vocabulary_Acquisition_A_Matter_of_Topic_Familiarity.
36. Restrepo Ramos, F. D. (2015). Incidental vocabulary learning in second language acquisition: A literature review. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 17(1), 157-166. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n1.43957.
37. Richards, J. C., & Rogers, T. S. (2003). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Samuda, V. (2001). Getting relationship between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Task-based learning: Language teaching, learning and assessment (pp. 119-140). Harlow, England: Pearson
39. Scott, J. A., Nagy, W. E., & Flinspah, S. L. (2008). More than Nearly Words: Redefining Vocabulary Learning in a Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Society. In Farstrup, A. E. & Samuels, S. J. (Ed.), What Research Has To Say About Vocabulary Instruction (pp. 182-204). Newark, USA: International Literacy Association.
40. Smith, T. B. (2008). Teaching Vocabulary Expeditiously: Three Keys to Improving Vocabulary Instruction. The English Journal, 97 (4), 20-25. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30047242
41. Stanley, J. (2002). Nominal restriction (Chapter 12). In G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.), Logical form and language (pp. 365-388). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Steedman, M. (2000). The syntactic process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Sunderland, J. (1992). Gender in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 46, 81–91. Retrieved from http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/content/46/1/81.abstract.
44. Sunderland, J. (1994). Exploring gender: Implications for English language education. New
45. York: Prentice Hall.
46. Sunderland, J. (2000). Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language Teaching, 33, 203–223. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=5186676.
47. VanPatten, B., Williams, J., & Rott, S. (2004). Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. Wenden, A. L. (2014). Metacognitive Knowledge in SLA: The Neglected Variable. In Michael, B. (Ed.), Learner Contributions to Language Learning: New Directions in Research (pp. 44-64). NewYork, USA: Routlege.
49. Zimmerman, B. J. & Dale, H. S. (2001). Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.