Feedback for writing or writing for feedback?

Abstract

Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.
Feedback for writing or writing for feedback?
Writing has been seen as a problem to many of students and learning to write fluently has been the most difficult of the macro-skills for all languages. From academic writing point of view, drawing attention to the constant needs to draft and revise can be considered one of the important ways to encourage students to be responsible for making improvements themselves.  The best way to learn how to write is to be evaluated continuously across writing. Here feedback plays an important role in writing process. Considering the problems in writing classes, the aim of this study was to investigate a training procedure through which Language learners can develop self-confidence, be motivated, improve the quality of essays, acquire communicative competence through writing and following feedbacks. This study is triple phased study and the first phase comprised students’ attitude about giving and receiving feedback. The study was conducted for 22 3rd grade female ELT students of UFUK University in Turkey. An attitude questionnaire was administered to elicit students` thoughts about the effectiveness of   using feedback in writing classes. The ideas expressed through the questionnaire revealed that ELT students has mostly positive attitude toward using teacher-feedback and peer-feedback. The results show that although writing is the most difficult skill for them to learn, but giving feedback motivates them to write more.
Information about Author(s)*
Author 1
Author (Last name, First name)	Tehrani, Faranak Abbaszad
Affiliated institution (University)	Ufuk University
Country	Turkey
Email address	[e-mail]
Department & Rank	Department of Foreign Language Teaching
Corresponding author (Yes/No) Write only one corresponding author.	Yes
Author 2
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 3
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 4
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)

Keywords

• academic writing,continuous assessment,feedback

Kaynakça

1. Abbaszad Tehrani,F.(2010). Using Net-Folio to improve Writing Skills. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Institute of educational sciences. Gazi University, Ankara-Turkey.
2. Cho,K.,&MacArthur,C.(2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewin. Learning and Instruction, 20, pp.328-338
3. Gielen,S.,Tops,L., Dochy,F., Onghena,P., & Smeets,S. (2010).A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum. British Educational Research Journali Vol.36, Issue 1, pp.1-17
4. Kluger, A.N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, pp.254–284.
5. Kulhavy,R.Wç,& StockW.A.(1989). Feedback in writteninstruction:Historical context and implications for practice. In J.V Dempsey & G.C. Sales(Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback, pp.3-20. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology
6. Lee,I., Mark,P., & Burns,A. (2015). Bringing innovation to conventional feedback approaches in EFL secondary writing classrooms. English Teaching Practice & Critique. Vol 14 No.2,2015.pp.140-163
7. Liu,J.,& Hansen,J.G.(2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
8. Narciss,S.(2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M.D.Merrill, J.J. G. Van Merrienboer, & M.P.Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communication and technology, 3rd ed, pp.125-143

9. Nichol,D., Thomson,A., & Breslin,C.(2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment & Education in Higher Education, 2014. Vol.39,No.1, pp.102-122
10. Peter, E. (1998). Writing with power: Techniques for Mastering the Writing Process.OUP
11. Rollinson, P.(2005). Using Peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal 59(1):January,23-30.
12. Sadler, D.R.(1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in education, 5, 77-84.
13. Seliger.H.W.(1983).Learner interactions in the classroom and its effects on language acquisition.In Seliger,H.W.,& Long,M.H.,(Eds)Clssroom oriented research in second language acquisition(pp.246-267). Rowley, Massachusetts:Newbury House Publishers,Inc.
14. Smalzer,W.R.(2005). Write to be read. CUP:54
15. Tuzi, F. (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and composition. 21, 217-235
16. Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2005). A surprising effect of feedback on learning. Learning and Instruction, 15, 589–602.
17. Yang, M., Badger, R. & Yu, Z. (2006) A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class, Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179–200.