Araştırma Makalesi

Does indirect writing assessment have any relevance to direct writing assessment? Focus on validity and reliability

Cilt: 14 Sayı: 4 15 Aralık 2018
PDF İndir
EN

Does indirect writing assessment have any relevance to direct writing assessment? Focus on validity and reliability

Abstract

Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.

Does indirect writing assessment have any relevance to direct writing assessment? Focus on validity and reliability

The present paper, which is a study based on midterm exam results of 53 University English prep-school students, examines correlation between a direct writing test, measured holistically by multiple-trait scoring, and two indirect writing tests used in a competence exam, one of which is a multiple-choice cloze test and the other a rewrite test measured on the sentence grammar scale.  The purpose of the study is to compare and analyse the results obtained from the use of these distinct strategies in writing assessment and to see to what extent they are of value to account for the students’ writing skills and in what areas they can offer validity and reliability in diagnostic terms as well as investigating whether any quantitative correlations exist between the choice of topics and the level of achievement in essay-writing, in which the choice of topic also implied the choice of a particular rhetoric to be used as part of the essay writing task

Information about Author(s)*

Author 1

Author (Last name, First name)

 Kural, Faruk

Affiliated institution (University)

 Hasan Kalyoncu University

Country

 Turkey

Email address

 farukkural@gmail.com

Department & Rank

 Department of English Language Teaching

Corresponding author (Yes/No)

Write only one corresponding author.

Yes 

Author 2

Author (Last name, First name)

 

Affiliated institution (University)

 

Country

 

Email address

 

Department & Rank

 

Corresponding author (Yes/No)

 

Author 3

Author (Last name, First name)

 

Affiliated institution (University)

 

Country

 

Email address

 

Department & Rank

 

Corresponding author (Yes/No)

 

Author 4

Author (Last name, First name)

 

Affiliated institution (University)

 

Country

 

Email address

 

Department & Rank

 

Corresponding author (Yes/No)

 

 

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Alderson, J. C., C. M. Clapham & D. Wall (1995). Language Test Construction and Evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Breland, H.M., Conlon, G.C., and Rogosa, D. (1976). A preliminary study of the test of standard written English. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1976.
  3. Breland, H.M. and Gaynor, J.L. (1979) A comparison of direct and indirect assessments of writing skill. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1979, 16, 119-128.
  4. Davidson, F. & B. K. Lynch (2002). Testcraft: A Teacher's Guide to Writing and Using Language Test Specifications. London: Yale University Press.
  5. Godshalk, F.I., Swineford, F., and Coffman, W.E. (1966). The measurement of writing ability. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board, 1966.
  6. Grabe, W. and Kaplan, R.B. (1988). Theory and Practice of Writing. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
  7. Hogan, T.P. and Mishler, C. (1980). Relationships between essay tests and objective tests of language skills for elementary school students. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1980, 17, 219-227.
  8. Huntley, R.M., Schmeiser, C.B., and Stiggins, R.J. (1979). The assessment of rhetorical proficiency: The role of objective tests and writing samples. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA, 1979.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

15 Aralık 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

18 Şubat 2018

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kural, F. (2018). Does indirect writing assessment have any relevance to direct writing assessment? Focus on validity and reliability. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(4), 342-351. https://izlik.org/JA55LW32MN
AMA
1.Kural F. Does indirect writing assessment have any relevance to direct writing assessment? Focus on validity and reliability. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2018;14(4):342-351. https://izlik.org/JA55LW32MN
Chicago
Kural, Faruk. 2018. “Does indirect writing assessment have any relevance to direct writing assessment? Focus on validity and reliability”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 14 (4): 342-51. https://izlik.org/JA55LW32MN.
EndNote
Kural F (01 Aralık 2018) Does indirect writing assessment have any relevance to direct writing assessment? Focus on validity and reliability. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 14 4 342–351.
IEEE
[1]F. Kural, “Does indirect writing assessment have any relevance to direct writing assessment? Focus on validity and reliability”, Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, c. 14, sy 4, ss. 342–351, Ara. 2018, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA55LW32MN
ISNAD
Kural, Faruk. “Does indirect writing assessment have any relevance to direct writing assessment? Focus on validity and reliability”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 14/4 (01 Aralık 2018): 342-351. https://izlik.org/JA55LW32MN.
JAMA
1.Kural F. Does indirect writing assessment have any relevance to direct writing assessment? Focus on validity and reliability. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2018;14:342–351.
MLA
Kural, Faruk. “Does indirect writing assessment have any relevance to direct writing assessment? Focus on validity and reliability”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, c. 14, sy 4, Aralık 2018, ss. 342-51, https://izlik.org/JA55LW32MN.
Vancouver
1.Faruk Kural. Does indirect writing assessment have any relevance to direct writing assessment? Focus on validity and reliability. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2018;14(4):342-51. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA55LW32MN