EFL students’ vocabulary learning strategies and their affixes knowledge

Abstract

Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.
EFL students’ vocabulary learning strategies and their affixes knowledge
Vocabulary Learning Strategies and knowledge of affixes have long been considered to have influence on learners’ vocabulary learning. However, how they relate to each other seems to have drawn little attention. This current study was intended to explore the frequency of vocabulary learning strategies used by Indonesian high school students, to find out their  knowledge of affixes as well as to figure out how their reported vocabulary learning strategies use relate to their knowledge of affixes. This correlational study involved 116 participants of the first grade of senior high school consisting of 27 males and 89 females aged between fourteen and seventeen years old.  A questionnaire of Vocabulary Learning Strategies adapted from Schmitt (1997) and a Word Part Level Test proposed by Sasao & Webb (2015) were employed to answer the research questions. Using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS version 24), it was discovered that the participants used a medium level of frequency of Vocabulary Learning Strategies with Determination strategy most preferred by them. In addition, it was found that their affixes knowledge was low with multi, re-, inter- , dis-, -ful, and –er respectively considered as the order of their affixes acquisition. With respect to their interrelatedness, the overall participants’ Vocabulary Learning Strategies significantly contribute to their knowledge of affixes.  However, unlike Memory strategy, Determination strategy proved to have no significant contributions to their affixes knowledge.
Information about Author(s)*
Author 1
Author (Last name, First name)	Noprianto, Eko
Affiliated institution (University)	Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Country	Indonesia
Email address	[e-mail]
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No) Write only one corresponding author.	Yes
Author 2
Author (Last name, First name)	Purnawarman, Pupung
Affiliated institution (University)	Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Country	Indonesia
Email address	[e-mail]
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)	No
Author 3
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 4
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)

Keywords

• Affixes,Affixes Knowledge

Kaynakça

1. Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 202–232. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/alseghayer/.
2. Ali, S., & Kalajahi, R. (2012). Vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size of ELT students at EMU in Northern Cyprus. English Language Teaching, 5(4), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n4p138.
3. Asgari, A., & Bin Mustapha, G. (2010). The type of vocabulary learning strategies used by ESL students in University Putra Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p84.
4. Aziez, F. (2011). Examining the vocabulary levels of Indonesia’s English national examination texts. Asian EFL Journal, 51(April), 16–29. Retrieved from http://70.40.196.162/PTA/April-2011-Aziez.pdf.
5. Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Çelik, S., & Toptaş, V. (2010). Vocabulary learning strategy use of Turkish EFL learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.013.
7. Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (1997). Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam034/96003115.pdf.
8. Danilovic, J., Savic, J. D., & Dimitrijevic, M. (2013). Affixes acquisition order in Serbian EFL learners. Versita, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/rjes-2013-0006.

9. Griffiths, C. (2003). Language learning strategy use and proficiency: The relationship between patterns of reported language learning strategy (LLS) use by speakers of other languages (SOL) and proficiency with implications for the teaching/learning situation (Doctoral thesis, University of Auckland). Retrieved from http://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz.
10. Hamzah, M. S. G., Kafipour, R., & Abdullah, S. K. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies of Iranian undergraduate EFL students and its relation to their vocabulary size. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 39–50. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228801062_Vocabulary_Learning_Strategies_of_Iranian_Undergraduate_EFL_Students_and_its_Relation_to_their_Vocabulary_Size.
11. Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.
12. Kırmızı, O. (2014). Measuring vocabulary learning strategy use of Turkish EFL learners in relation to academic success and vocabulary size. World Journal of Education, 4(6), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v4n6p16.
13. Kudo, Y. (1999). L2 vocabulary learning strategies. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i. Retrieved from http://www.lll.hawaii.edu/nflrc/networks/nw14.
14. Mochizuki, M., & Aizawa, K. (2000). An affixes acquisition order for EFL learners : An exploratory study. System, 28(2), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00013-0.
15. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/cml.2006.0049.
17. Nation, P., & Newton, J. (1997). Teaching vocabulary. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Ed.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 238-254). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Nosidlak, K. M. (2013). Vocabulary learning strategies of the advanced students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 655–661. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.4.655-661.
19. Nurweni, A., & Read, J. (1999). The English vocabulary knowledge of Indonesian university students. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00005-2.
20. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
21. Ranalli, J. M. (2003). The treatment of key vocabulary learning strategies in current ELT coursebooks (Doctoral thesis, University of Bimingham, UK). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237796163_THE_TREATMENT_OF_KEY_VOCABULARY_LEARNING_STRATEGIES_IN_CURRENT_ELT_COURSEBOOKS_REPETITION_RESOURCE_USE_RECORDING.
22. Riankamol, N. (2008). A survey study of vocabulary learning strategies of gifted English students at Triam Udomsuksa School in the first semester of academic year 2008 (Master thesis, Thammasat University, Bangkok). Retrieved from http://litu.tu.ac.th/2012/images/litu/Research/student/2551/4921032217.pdf.
23. Sasao, Y. (2013). Diagnostic tests of English vocabulary learning proficiency: Guessing from context and knowledge of word parts (Doctoral thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington). Retrieved from http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10063/4475/thesis.pdf?sequence=2.
24. Sasao, Y., & Webb, S. (2015). The word part levels test. Language Teaching Research, 21(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815586083.
25. Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Ed.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199-277). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Schmitt, N., & Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework: Word associations and verbal suffixes. Studies in SLA, 19(1), 17–36. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition/article/researching-vocabulary-through-a-word-knowledge-framework/B66BDCC37C142B6C4AE1E5F134A67FA6.
28. Tılfarlıoğlu, F. F. Y., & Bozgeyik, Y. (2012). The relationship between vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary proficiency of English language learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.2p.91.