Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of practicum through reciprocal peer mentoring and traditional mentoring

Abstract

Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.
Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of practicum through reciprocal peer mentoring and traditional mentoring
Practicum in pre-service teacher education offers ample opportunities for developing a practical conception of teaching and learning. Yet it may also promote further worry for pre-service teachers if not sufficiently resourced and carefully structured. The present study intended to delve into pre-service teachers’ perceptions of practicum undertaken through reciprocal peer mentoring and traditional mentoring trajectories. Designed as a quasi-experimental study, this longitudinal study collected mainly qualitative data through reflective journals, individual interviews and audio-records of peer conferences. The present study revealed a dire need for restructuring the traditional mentoring model currently used in pre-service teacher education programs. The study also unraveled that integration of reciprocal peer mentoring with systematic opportunities for peer conference and peer observation might be a viable suggestion to resolve the perceived shortcomings in practicum. Moreover, the study proposed that apart from an earlier onset of teaching practices, periodic rotations in teaching practices and mentor-mentee pairings might help to maximize contributions of engagement in practicum experiences.
Information about Author(s)*
Author 1
Author (Last name, First name)	Çapan, Seyit Ahmet
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address	[e-mail]
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No) Write only one corresponding author.
Author 2
Author (Last name, First name)	Bedir, Hasan
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address	[e-mail]
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 3
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 4
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)

Keywords

• Practicum; mentoring; traditional; peer; reciprocal

Kaynakça

1. Anderson, N. A., Barksdale, M. A. & Hite, C. E. (2005). Preservice teachers’ observations of cooperating teachers and peers while participating in an early field experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(4), 97-117.
2. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (1999). Mentoring to improve schools. Alexandria, VA: ASDC.
3. Beck, C. & Kosnick, C. (2000). Associate teachers in pre-service education: Clarifying and enhancing their role. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 26(3), 207-224.
4. Boreen, J., Johnson, M. K., Niday, D. & Potts, J. (2009). Mentoring beginning teachers: Guiding, Reflecting, Coaching. Portland: Stenhouse Publishers. Borko, H. & Mayfield, V. (1995). The roles of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor in learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(5), 501-518.
5. Britton, L. R. & Anderson, K. A. (2010). Peer coaching and pre-service teachers: Examining an underutilised concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 306-314.
6. Campbell-Evans, G. & Maloney, C. (1997). An alternative practicum curriculum: Exploring roles and relationships. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 25(1), 35-52.
7. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
8. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314.

9. Dreyer, J. (1998). The use of mentors (experienced teachers) as school-based experts to assist student and beginning teachers. South African Journal of Education, 18, 109-112.
10. Forbes, C. T. (2004). Peer mentoring in the development of beginning secondary science teachers: Three case studies. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 12(2), 219-239.
11. Foster, R. (1999). School-based initial teacher training in England and France: Trainee teachers’ perspectives compared. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 7(2), 131-143.
12. Goh, P. S. & Matthews, B. (2011). Listening to the concerns of students teachers in Malaysia during teaching practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 92-102.
13. Goodwyn, A. (1997). Developing English teachers: The role of mentorship in a reflective profession. Buckingham: Open University Press.
14. Haigh, M., Pinder, H. & McDonald, L. (2006). Practicum’s contribution to students’ learning to teach. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Coventry, UK. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/160597.htm on 08.05.2017.
15. Hardy, C. A. (1999). Perceptions of physical education beginning teachers’ first year of teaching: Are we doing enough to prevent early attrition?. Teacher Development, 3(1), 109-127.
16. Harry, B., Sturges, K. M. & Klingner, J. K. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34(2), 3-13.
17. Hasbrouck, J. E. (1997). Mediated peer coaching for training preservice teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 31(2), 251-271.
18. Henning, J. M., Weidner, T. G. & Jones, J. (2006). Peer-assisted learning in athletic training clinical setting. Athletic Training Education Journal, 41(1), 10-108.
19. Hooker, T. (2014). The benefits of peer coaching as a support system for early childhood education students. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 12(1), 109-122.
20. Hornberger, B., Askvig, B. & Arrayan, K. (2002). Follow-up of online instruction: Effectiveness of peer coaching seminar course. Prism project technical report. (Report No. PRISM-3). North Dakota Center for Persons with Disabilities, Minot. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 475859).
21. Hudson, P. & Nguyen, T. M. H. (2008). What do preservice EFL teachers expect from their mentors?. In Proceedings of AARE Conference: Changing Climates: Education for Sustainable Futures. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2008/hud08144.pdf on 09.05.2017. Joyce, B. & Showers, B. (1980). Improving inservice training: The messages of research. Educational Leadership, 37(5), 379-385.
22. Jenkins, J. M., Garn, A. & Jenkins, P. (2005). Preservice teacher observations in peer coaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24, 2-23.
23. Jenkins, J. M. & Veal, M. L. (2002). Preservice teachers’ PCK development during peer coaching. Journal do Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 49-68.
24. Joyce, B. R. & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
25. Kurtts, S. A. & Levin, B. B. (2000). Using peer coaching with preservice teachers to develop reflective practice and collegial support. Teaching Education, 11(3), 297-310.
26. Kuru-Gönen, S. I. (2013). A study on reflective reciprocal peer coaching: An application in pre-service English language teaching context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Anadolu University, Eskişehir.
27. Le Cornu, R. (2005). Peer mentoring: Engaging pre-service teachers in mentoring one another. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 13(3), 355-366.
28. Le Cornu, R. (2008). The changing role of the ‘student teacher’ in professional experience. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Brisbane.
29. Levine, M. (2002). Why invest in professional development schools?. Educational Leadership, 6, 65-68.
30. Lu, H. L. (2010). Research on peer coaching in preservice teacher education: A review of literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 748-753.
31. McCarthy, S. & Youens, B. (2005). Strategies used by science student teachers for subject knowledge development: A focus on peer support. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23(2), 149-162.
32. McDonald, F. J. & Elias, P. (1983). The transition into teaching: The problems of beginning teachers and programs to solve them. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED257777.pdf on 07.28.2016.
33. McNamara, D. (1995). The influence of student teachers’ tutors and mentors upon their classroom practice: An exploratory study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 51-61.
34. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35. Neubert, G. A. & Stover, L. T. (1994). Peer Coaching in Teacher Education (Fastback 371). Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. ERIC Doc No: ED 378140. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED378140.pdf on 05.04.2017.
36. Nguyen, H. T. M. (2013). Peer mentoring: A way forward for supporting preservice EFL teachers psychosocially during the practicum. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(7), 31-44.
37. Örsdemir-Panpallı, E. (2016). Becoming a mentor: An action research on enhancing an EFL teacher’s mentoring skills in Turkey. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Çukurova University, Adana.
38. Richards, J. C. & Ho, B. (1998). Reflective thinking through journal writing. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Beyond Training (pp. 153-170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
40. Smith, K. & Lev-Ari, L. (2005). The place of the practicum in pre-service teacher education: The voice of the students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 289-302.
41. Ulvik, M. & Smith, K. (2011). What characterises a good practicum in teacher education?. Education Inquiry, 2(3), 517-536.
42. Vidmar, D. J. (2006). Reflective peer coaching: Crafting collaborative self-assessment in teaching. Research Strategies, 20, 135-148.
43. Wynn, M. & Kromrey, J. (2000). Paired peer placement with peer coaching to enhance prospective teachers’ professional growth in early field experience. Action in Teacher Education, 22(2A), 73-83.
44. Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-99.
45. Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, T., Bergen, T., & Bolhuis, S. (2009). Which characteristics of a reciprocal peer coaching context affect teacher learning as perceived by teachers and their students?. Journal of Teacher Education,60(3), 243-257.
46. Zwart, R.C., Wubbels, T., Bulhois, S. & Bergen, T. (2008). Teacher learning through reciprocal peer coaching: An analysis of activity sequences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 982-1002.