Araştırma Makalesi

Evaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools

Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3 1 Ekim 2020
  • Mehdi Solhi
  • Meryem Sak
  • Şeyda Şahin
  • Selin Yılmaz
PDF İndir
EN

Evaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools

Abstract

This study sought to evaluate the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools. In so doing, a series of coursebooks used in English courses of the curriculum prepared by the Turkish Ministry of National Education were evaluated, using Tomlinson and Masuhara's (2013) set of coursebook evaluation universal criteria. Results indicated that the layout, listening skill, illustrations in use, and affective engagement are the positive traits of the coursebooks, while the negative features outnumber the positive traits. The evaluation indicated that the Turkish public elementary English coursebooks are void of a number of important aspects of language acquisition, including communication-based activities, continuation of using English outside of the classroom, discovery enhancing input and most importantly extensive exposure to English. The central focus of the coursebooks is on the accuracy and repetition rather than effective outcomes, meaningful communication and long term language acquisition. Most activities in all coursebooks contain practice activities, with no place for productivity and autonomy on the part of the students. Additionally, there is no sufficient personalization and the coursebooks fail to make use of what students bring to classroom. Nor are the learners required to think critically, creatively or analytically in most of the activities. The coursebooks do not encourage learners to continue learning English by themselves, thus lacks encouragement for autonomy as well. The activities are designed to practice language items within the classroom environments. Hence, learning does not go beyond the classroom environment with the help of the coursebooks. Nor do the coursebooks guide or encourage learners to make discoveries by themselves. The bombardment of repetitive practice activities that only assess accuracy does not seem to be able to lead to long-term acquisition of English.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Abdelwahab, M. M. (2013). Developing an English language textbook evaluative checklist. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1(3), 55-70.
  2. Akkaya, S. (2019). An evaluation of 2nd graders’ English course book “English 2” from teachers’ perspective (Unpublished master dissertation). Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul: Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University.
  3. Allwright, D. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 1, 5-18.
  4. Arıkan, G. (2008). Textbook evaluation in foreign language teaching: Time for English, grade 4: Teachers’ and students’ views (Unpublished master dissertation). Institute of Social Sciences, Adana: Cukurova University.
  5. Aytuğ, S. (2007). An EFL textbook evaluation study in aAnatolian high schools: New bridge to success for 9th grade new beginners (Unpublished master dissertation). The Graduate School of Education, Ankara: Bilkent University.
  6. Bahman, M., & Rahimi, A. (2010). Gender representation in EFL materials: An analysis of English textbooks of Iranian high schools. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 273–277.
  7. Brown, J. B. (1997). Textbook evaluation form, The Language Teacher, 21(10), 15-21.
  8. Byrd, P. (2001). Textbooks: Evaluation for selection and analysis for implementation. In Celce-Murcia, M. (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 415-427). Heinle & Heinle.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Mehdi Solhi Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Meryem Sak Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Şeyda Şahin Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Selin Yılmaz Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Ekim 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

9 Nisan 2020

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Solhi, M., Sak, M., Şahin, Ş., & Yılmaz, S. (2020). Evaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(3), 1282-1308. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803714
AMA
1.Solhi M, Sak M, Şahin Ş, Yılmaz S. Evaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2020;16(3):1282-1308. doi:10.17263/jlls.803714
Chicago
Solhi, Mehdi, Meryem Sak, Şeyda Şahin, ve Selin Yılmaz. 2020. “Evaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 16 (3): 1282-1308. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803714.
EndNote
Solhi M, Sak M, Şahin Ş, Yılmaz S (01 Ekim 2020) Evaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 16 3 1282–1308.
IEEE
[1]M. Solhi, M. Sak, Ş. Şahin, ve S. Yılmaz, “Evaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools”, Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, c. 16, sy 3, ss. 1282–1308, Eki. 2020, doi: 10.17263/jlls.803714.
ISNAD
Solhi, Mehdi - Sak, Meryem - Şahin, Şeyda - Yılmaz, Selin. “Evaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 16/3 (01 Ekim 2020): 1282-1308. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803714.
JAMA
1.Solhi M, Sak M, Şahin Ş, Yılmaz S. Evaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 2020;16:1282–1308.
MLA
Solhi, Mehdi, vd. “Evaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools”. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, c. 16, sy 3, Ekim 2020, ss. 1282-08, doi:10.17263/jlls.803714.
Vancouver
1.Mehdi Solhi, Meryem Sak, Şeyda Şahin, Selin Yılmaz. Evaluation of the English language coursebooks used at the Turkish public elementary schools. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 01 Ekim 2020;16(3):1282-308. doi:10.17263/jlls.803714