Dealing with in-class challenges: Pre-service teacher cognitions and influences

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3, 754 - 772, 01.10.2019

Şeyda Selen Çimen Ayşegül Daloğlu

https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.631499

Öz

Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.
Dealing with in-class challenges: Pre-service teacher cognitions and influences
This study explores cognitions of pre-service English language teachers in relation to dealing with most commonly experienced in-class challenges in foreign language teaching and the influences that shape their cognitions. Adopting qualitative research design, a case study was conducted to provide an account of pre-service English language teachers’ cognitions. Data for this study were collected in two main stages. The first stage involved collection of the base-line data through an open-ended questionnaire with a view to identifying in-class challenges experienced by in-service English language teachers. The second stage included scenario-based interviews with pre-service teachers that took place before and after the practicum.  Results of the study reveal that (1) pre-service teachers generated various strategies in their pre- and post-practicum cognitions; (2) there were traces of change in cognitions due to practicum; (3) courses in teacher education program, pre-service teachers’ own learning experiences, and practicum experiences emerged as influences that shape their cognitions.
Information about Author(s)*
Author 1
Author (Last name, First name)	Çimen, Şeyda Selen
Affiliated institution (University)	Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No) Write only one corresponding author.
Author 2
Author (Last name, First name)	Daloğlu, Ayşegül
Affiliated institution (University)	METU
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 3
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 4
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)

Anahtar Kelimeler

Pre-service English language teacher; Teacher cognition; Influences; In-class challenges; Practicum

Kaynakça

• Bailey, K. M., Berghthold, B., Braunstein B., Fleichman N. J.,. Holbrook, M., Tuman, P J., Waissbluth X., & Zambo, L.J. (1996). The language learners’ autobiography: Examining the “apprenticeship of observation”. In D. Freeman and J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching. (pp. 11-29). Cambridge University Press.
• Bartels, N. (2009). Knowledge about language. In A. Burns and J. C. Richards (Eds.) The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. (pp. 125-134). Cambridge University Press.
• Basturkmen, H. (2012). Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics. 40(2). 282-295.
• Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching. 36, 81-109.
• Borg, M., (2005). A case study of development in pedagogic thinking of a pre-service teacher. TESL-EJ, 9, 1-30.
• Borg, S. (2005). Experience, knowledge about language, and classroom experience in teaching grammar. In N. Bartels (Ed.). Applied linguistics and language teacher education. (pp. 325-340). New York: Springer.
• Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.
• Borg, S. (2011). The impact of in-service education on language teachers’beliefs. System, 39, 370-380.
• Borg, S. (2012). Current approaches to language teacher cognition research: A methodological analysis. In R. Bernard and A. Burns (eds.). Researching language teacher cognition and practice: International case studies. (pp. 11-29). Multilingual Matters.
• Breen, M. P., Hird, B., Milton, M., Oliver R. & Thwaite, A. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: teachers’ principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 22 (4), 470−501.
• Burns, A. (1996). Starting all over again: From teaching adults to teaching beginners. In D. Freeman and J. C. Richards (Eds.). Teacher learning in language teaching. (pp. 154-177. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Cabaroglu, N. & Roberts, J. (2000). Development in student teachers’ pre-existing beliefs during a 1-year old PGCE programme. System, 28, 387-402.
• Clandinin, D.J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge: A study of teachers' classroom images. Curriculum Inquiry. 15(4). 361-385.
• Clark, C. M. And P. L. Peterson (1984). Teachers’ thought processes. Occational Paper No 72. Downloaded from: ERIC, Number: ED251449 Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Farrel, T. S. C. (2008). Learning to teach language in the first year: A Singapore case study. In Farrel T. (Ed.) Novice language teachers: Insights and perspectives for the first year (pp. 43-56S). C. Equinox.
• Flores, B. B. (2001). Bilingual education teachers’ beliefs and their relation to self-reported practices. Bilingual Research Journal. 25, 251-275.
• Gholami, K. and J. Husu (2010). How do teachers reason about their practice? Representing the epistemic nature of teachers’ practical knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1520-1529.
• Golombek, P. R. (1998). A study of language teachers’ personal practical knowledge. TESOL Quarterly. 32, 447-464.
• Golombek, P. R. (2009). Personal practical knowledge in language teacher education. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. (pp. 155-162). Cambridge University Press.
• Gomez, M.L. (1990). Reflections on research for teaching: Collaborative inquiry with a novice teacher. Journal of Education for Teaching. 16(19). 45-56.
• Grisham, D., L.. (2000). Connecting theoretical conceptions of reading to practice: A longitudinal study of elementary school teachers. Reading Psychology. 21. 145-170.
• Han, I., Shin, W. S. & Ko, Y. (2017). The effect of student teaching experience and teacher beliefs on pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy and intention to use technology in teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 23(7), 829-842.
• Liu, Y. & Fisher, L. (2006). The development patterns of modern foreign language student teachers’ conceptions of self and their explanations about change: Three cases. Teacher Development, 10, 343-360. Lortie, D., C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. The University of Chicago Press.
• Meijer, P.C., Verloop, N., & Beijaard D. (1999). Exploring language teachers’ practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension. Teaching and Teacher Education. 15, 59-84.
• Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage Publications.
• Numrich, C. (1996). On becoming a language teacher: Insights from diary studies. TESOL Quarterly. 30(1). 131-153.
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62. 307-332.
• Pennington, M. C. And A. Urmston. (1998). The teaching orientation of graduating students on a BATESL course in Hong Kong: A comparison with first year students. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics. 3(2). 17-45.
• Phipps, S., (2007). What difference does DELTA make? Cambridge ESOL: Research Notes, 29, 12-16.
• Polat, N. (2010). Pedagogical treatment and change in preservice teacher beliefs: An experimental study. International Journal of Educational Research. 49, 195-209.
• Richards, J. C., Ho, B., & Giblin, K. (1996). Learning how to teach in the RSA cert. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 242-259). Cambridge: CUP.
• Richards, J. C. (1996). Teachers’ maxims in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly. 30, 281-296.
• Richards, J. C. & Pennington, M. (1998). The first year of teaching. In J.C. Richards (ed.). Beyond Training. (pp. 173-190). Cambridge University Press.
• Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications.
• Santoro, N. and A. Allard. (2008). Scenarios as springboards for reflection on practice: Stimulating discussion. Reflective Practice, 9(2), 167-176.
• Sykes, G. and T. Bird. (1992). Teacher education and the case idea. Review of Research in Education. 18, 457-519.
• Tsui, A. B. M. (2011). Teacher education and teacher development. In E. Hinkel (ed). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II. pp. 21-39). New York: Routledge.
• Tüzel, A. E. B. and S. Akcan. (2009). Raising the language awareness of pre-service English teachers in an EFL context. European Journal of Teacher Education. 32(3). 271-287.
• Urmston, A. (2003). Learning to teach English in Hong Kong: The opinions of teachers in training. Language and Education. 17(2). 112-137.
• Williams, M. and Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Warford, M.,K. and J. Reeves. (2003). Falling into it: Novice TESOL teacher thinking. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. 9(1). 47-65.
• Woods, D. & Cakır, H. (2011). Two dimensions of teacher knowledge: The case of communicative language teaching. System, 39(3), 381-390.
• Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making and classroom practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Wright, T. (2005). Classroom management in language education. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
• Zheng, H. (2009). A review of research on EFL pre-service teachers’ beliefs and practices. Journal of Cambridge Studies. 4(1), 73-81.